071002 Jed R. Mallen wrote:
Do you guys have a trick that will update a new kernel quickly?
Copy .config from the previous /usr/src/linux/ to the new one,
run 'make xconfig' tell it to load the .config you copied.
That will keep all your previous settings,
but allow you to react to new
Hi all!
I have a problem with getting my dual-screen setup to work. With the
under-mentioned setup, only the
Radeon 9250 shows X.
My hardware:
* Radeon 9250 (on AGP)
* Radeon 7000 (on PCI)
My xorg.conf:
***
Section ServerLayout
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:22:07 +0800, Jed R. Mallen wrote:
I don't really need the config files. As I've said I've been doing the
make oldconfig way before and I'm just wondering with the change of
kernel versions if this is still safe in any way. Thanks.
Yes it is. I've recycled my config files
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:04:10 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
after recompiling another bunch of libraries just to unstrip them, I'm
wondering if I can specify FEATURES and CXXOPTS (for example) on a
per-ebuild basis.
eg. I would always want to build glib and glibc with nostrip in the
FEATURES,
2 outputs? I'm not sure what you mean by this.
Both cards have a VGA-connector and a DVI-connector. On both cards I use the
VGA-connector to
connect them to their respective screens.
And I think both cards are too 'old' for the binary driver, right? I currently
use the open source
drivers, as
Section Device
Identifier ATI0
Driver radeon
BusID PCI:1:0:0
Screen 0
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier ATI1
Driver radeon
BusID PCI:2:10:0
Screen 1
EndSection
(II) Primary
Done that:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO]
(rev 01)
02:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY [Radeon
7000/VE]
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Section Device
Identifier ATI0
Driver radeon
Hello.
When X.Org 1.4 first hit the portage tree, I masked it, as I had quite
some problems getting it to work work with my Nvidia graphics card.
I decided to stay with 1.3.0.0 for the time being.
Now x11-base/xorg-server-1.4-r2 is in the tree. And also a new version
of nvidia-drivers
On Monday 01 October 2007 16:35:21 Nicolai Beuermann wrote:
Hello,
I've got a big problem after updating world. My Keyboard - Apple Extended
USB Keyboard - refused to print german umlauts, AT and euro symbol.
[...]
Any known bugs or even solutions?
Fixed in: x11-base/xorg-server-1.4-r2
--
On Tuesday 02 October 2007 11:36:19 Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello.
When X.Org 1.4 first hit the portage tree, I masked it, as I had quite
some problems getting it to work work with my Nvidia graphics card.
I decided to stay with 1.3.0.0 for the time being.
Now x11-base/xorg-server-1.4-r2 is
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello.
When X.Org 1.4 first hit the portage tree, I masked it, as I had quite
some problems getting it to work work with my Nvidia graphics card.
I decided to stay with 1.3.0.0 for the time being.
Now x11-base/xorg-server-1.4-r2 is in the
Emerging xorg set me on the right track.
Xorg-server didn't want to compile. Googling around some posts reminded me
of /etc/portage/packages.mask and how I masked the latest xorg server because
of nvidia issues.
Unmasking it resolved my problem with the keyboard.
After reemerging
2007/10/2, Evert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Done that:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200
PRO] (rev 01)
02:0a.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV100 QY
[Radeon 7000/VE]
Does it work now with changing the BusID's?
--
[EMAIL
On 11:36 Tue 02 Oct, Alexander Skwar wrote
Hello.
When X.Org 1.4 first hit the portage tree, I masked it, as I had quite
some problems getting it to work work with my Nvidia graphics card.
I decided to stay with 1.3.0.0 for the time being.
Yeah, that was due to an ABI change in the new
Change them how?
I already have BusID PCI:1:0:0 BusID PCI:2:10:0 in my config...
Greetings,
Evert
Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2007/10/2, Evert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Done that:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200
PRO] (rev 01)
02:0a.0 VGA
Hello Dan,
Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 12:57:05 -0230
Roger Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I had it working on Friday but over the weeekend I tinkered some
more with pixegrub and broke it again. Now pxelinux won't work
either.
I've attached my
Section Device
Identifier ATI0
Driver radeon
BusID PCI:1:0:0
Screen 0
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier ATI1
Driver radeon
BusID PCI:2:10:0
Screen 1
EndSection
(II) Primary
2007/10/2, Daniel Pielmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Section Device
Identifier ATI0
Driver radeon
BusID PCI:1:0:0
Screen 0
EndSection
Section Device
Identifier ATI1
Driver radeon
BusID
On 2007-10-02, Jed R. Mallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you guys have a trick that will update a new kernel
quickly? I'm using 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 right now, and have
foregone upgrading to 2.6.22-gentoo-r5 and -r8 because I read
somewhere that I can't just use my old .config file for a new
I've just done a diff on the 'x86' 'amd64' versions of the Handbook.
The latter warns against using ReiserFS or Lilo on a 64-bit system,
both of which are my longstanding preferences.
I plan to install the 64-bit version of Gentoo on my new box.
Does anyone have experience or advice to offer in
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:13:19 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
I've just done a diff on the 'x86' 'amd64' versions of the Handbook.
The latter warns against using ReiserFS or Lilo on a 64-bit system,
both of which are my longstanding preferences.
I plan to install the 64-bit version of Gentoo on my
Hello, i am trying to install 2007.0 on a x86 system using the minimal CD.
However, since i have other stuff to do, my idea is to install via a gentoo
station i already have properly set up and working fine.
¿how can i connect to the pc which booted from the livecd to continue the
install without
Rafael Barrera Oro написа:
Hello, i am trying to install 2007.0 on a x86 system using the minimal
CD. However, since i have other stuff to do, my idea is to install via
a gentoo station i already have properly set up and working fine.
¿how can i connect to the pc which booted from the livecd
Hello Rafael,
Rafael Barrera Oro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
¿how can i connect to the pc which booted from the livecd to continue
the install without moving from my main gentoo workstation?
(ssh livecd from my pc does not work even after startin sshd in the
remote machine where i
Hi,
Rafael Barrera Oro написа:
I already did that (started ssh, passwd root, etc), in fact, i can
connect from to the computer that booted from the livecd to the my
gentoo box, but not the other way around.
Have you started sshd (/etc/init.d/sshd start as root).
Could check with: netstat -t |
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Rafael Barrera Oro wrote:
(ssh livecd from my pc does not work even after startin sshd in the
remote machine where i am trying to install gentoo)
I frequently install to remote machines in this way.
Have you tried using its IP address?
Are you sure the livecd machine
I already did that (started ssh, passwd root, etc), in fact, i can connect
from to the computer that booted from the livecd to the my gentoo box, but
not the other way around.
2007/10/2, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rafael Barrera Oro написа:
Hello, i am trying to install 2007.0 on a x86
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
I've just done a diff on the 'x86' 'amd64' versions of the
Handbook. The latter warns against using ReiserFS or Lilo on a 64-bit
system, both of which are my longstanding preferences.
I plan to install the 64-bit version of Gentoo on my new box.
First of all, i'd like to point that i had started the ssh daemon and reset
the root password from the beginning. However, after repeated failures i
solved this by connecting using the ip instead of the hostname.
ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks for all your replies
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Does anyone know, if it's now safe to use xorg 1.4 with nvidia-drivers?
On a related note, I'm one of those guys with one of those old old video
cards for which I need to use version 1.0.7185 of nvidia-drivers. Am I
going to be able to use xorg 1.4, or will doing so
Francesco Talamona wrote:
IIRC you have to use special mount option to use ReiserFS for /boot
partition.
Using reiserfs on a /boot partition is just plain silly. ;) Furthermore,
in this day and age, why would you even want a /boot partition? FWIW,
using reiserfs on my 64bit systems
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:17:46 -0400
Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Does anyone know, if it's now safe to use xorg 1.4 with nvidia-drivers?
On a related note, I'm one of those guys with one of those old old video
cards for which I need to use version 1.0.7185 of
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Neil Walker wrote:
Using reiserfs on a /boot partition is just plain silly. ;)
Furthermore, in this day and age, why would you even want a /boot
partition?
/boot can't be on LVM. And these days you do want LVM.
Not everyone is happy leaving /boot mounted all the
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:00:49PM +, Penguin Lover Grant Edwards squawked:
You probably want to disable generic IDE support and enable the
combined SATA/PATA stuff in the new one. The ATA stuff has
been completely redone between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22.
I just installed 2.6.23-rc[some number
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
$ mkfs.xfs /dev/sda9
$ mkdir /xfsrestore
$ mount /dev/sda9 /xfsrestore
$ cd /xfsrestore
$ tar -jxvf xfsdump-2.2.45.tbz2
$ cd usr/bin
$ rm xfsdump xfsrestore
$ ln -s /xfsrestore/sbin/xfsdump xfsdump
$ ln -s /xfsrestore/sbin/xfsrestore
On 2007-10-02, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:00:49PM +, Penguin Lover Grant Edwards
squawked:
You probably want to disable generic IDE support and enable the
combined SATA/PATA stuff in the new one. The ATA stuff has
been completely redone between
So I was an idiot when I set up my system and didn't use LVM. Now that
I'm out of disk space on one of my drives and kicking myself, I want to
do it without doing a reinstall. If I use tar -cvjpf
oldSystemThatShouldStillWorkWhenUnTarred.tar.bz2 /, then setup LVM, then
tar all that junk back
Randy Barlow schrieb:
So I was an idiot when I set up my system and didn't use LVM. Now that
I'm out of disk space on one of my drives and kicking myself, I want to
do it without doing a reinstall. If I use tar -cvjpf
oldSystemThatShouldStillWorkWhenUnTarred.tar.bz2 /, then setup LVM, then
Francesco Talamona wrote:
First of all, thanks for sharing.
I used to think xfs was overkill for /boot, but the procedure described
is quite straightforward.
There are two things I don't understand:
1) why do you delete xfsdump and xfsrestore in /xfsrestore/usr/bin/ just
extracted to
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 16:45 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
So I was an idiot when I set up my system and didn't use LVM. Now that
I'm out of disk space on one of my drives and kicking myself, I want to
do it without doing a reinstall. If I use tar -cvjpf
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:04:10 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
[snip]
eg. I would always want to build glib and glibc with nostrip in the
FEATURES, and -ggdb in the compile options, but all other ebuilds would
be as normal.
mkdir -p
Don't install 64bit linux, there are unresolved issues with 64bit linux
List Members -
I have trying to set up Suspend on my Dell Latitude D620 laptop. The laptop is
currently running a 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 kernel. I emerged the suspend2
sources, copied the .config from the 2.6.19 directory and ran make
oldconfig. I then configured the suspend options in the kernel
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 21:33 -0400, James Colby wrote:
currently running a 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 kernel. I emerged the suspend2
sources, copied the .config from the 2.6.19 directory and ran make
which suspend2 kernel ver?
/etc/fstab. The reason for that is because the suspend kernel is
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, James Colby wrote:
The reason for that is because the suspend kernel is
configuring my hard disk as /dev/hda and my standard kernel is configuring
it as /dev/sda. Does anyone know how I can get the suspend kernel to
assign my hard disk as /dev/sda?
I think
On 10/2/07, Hex Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't install 64bit linux, there are unresolved issues with 64bit linux
I've been using 64 bit linux for almost two years: I don't have any
single problem, and I only use two 32 bit binary programs: Firefox
(for Flash) and MPlayer (for the
James Colby wrote:
I have trying to set up Suspend on my Dell Latitude D620 laptop. The laptop is
currently running a 2.6.19-gentoo-r5 kernel. I emerged the suspend2
sources, copied the .config from the 2.6.19 directory and ran make
oldconfig. I then configured the suspend options in the
Steve Dommett wrote:
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, James Colby wrote:
The reason for that is because the suspend kernel is
configuring my hard disk as /dev/hda and my standard kernel is configuring
it as /dev/sda. Does anyone know how I can get the suspend kernel to
assign my hard disk as
071002 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Neil Walker wrote:
Using reiserfs on a /boot partition is just plain silly. ;)
Yes indeed. You use 'ext2'.
why would you even want a /boot partition?
You keep it unmounted why not keep it separate anyway ?
/boot can't be on
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 21:23 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
I've been using 64 bit linux for almost two years: I don't have any
single problem, and I only use two 32 bit binary programs: Firefox
(for Flash) and MPlayer (for the win32codecs).
Everything else is native 64 bit and works like
P.s: You are quite correct that xfs is overkill for /boot. However I
just found it easier to xfs everything (otherwise I'd have to use
different dump programs depending on what I was backing up etc... ).
To me this is more important than the fact that it wastes disk space
a bit (my /boot uses
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Neil Walker wrote:
Francesco Talamona wrote:
IIRC you have to use special mount option to use ReiserFS for /boot
partition.
Using reiserfs on a /boot partition is just plain silly. ;)
Furthermore, in this day and age, why would you even want a /boot
partition?
52 matches
Mail list logo