Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) -- ,, SUPPORT

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Dale
Philip Webb wrote: 081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) Don't worry, we knew that was a boo boo. OOo

[gentoo-user] read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in gentoo-portage)

2008-10-19 Thread Dale
Hi, I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by: WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded (will try again). rsync: read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in gentoo-portage): Stale NFS file handle (116) Anybody else get that? Portage seems to work

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). It opened my usual spreadsheets word-processing files correctly, but the toolbar needs

Re: [gentoo-user] Is gentoo-portage and gentoo-wiki offline?

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 18 October 2008 23:31:56 kashani wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: On Friday 17 October 2008 23:27:44 RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote: heehee have been wanting to get onboard with gentoo for a while now how ironic that the wiki site i was so looking forward to using is down the same day my

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel crash - howto find out what happened?

2008-10-19 Thread Alexander Puchmayr
Hi there! As my system froze again right now, I've tried to reproduce it, tried to use some of the hints given to me in this thread, and made the following observations: * The system freezes on heavy I/O on my sata-harddisks, especially when copying mpeg-files (2GB) from one disk to another.

Re: [gentoo-user] read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in gentoo-portage)

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 09:06:23 Dale wrote: Hi, I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by: WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded (will try again). rsync: read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in gentoo-portage): Stale NFS file handle

Re: [gentoo-user] read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in gentoo-portage)

2008-10-19 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 09:06:23 Dale wrote: Hi, I did a sync earlier and noticed this little message scroll by: WARNING: profiles/ChangeLog failed verification -- update discarded (will try again). rsync: read errors mapping /profiles/ChangeLog (in

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Arttu V.
On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been attempted with these two lines. Would it work better without overlays, i.e., by commenting these two out? --

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 12:59:35 Arttu V. wrote: On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been attempted with these two lines. Would it work better

Re: [gentoo-user] usb webcam

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 18 October 2008 20:58:07 RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote: Oct 18 18:43:35 huang usb 3-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 7 Oct 18 18:43:35 huang usb 3-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Oct 18 18:43:45 huang hub 1-0:1.0: unable to enumerate USB device on port 1

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread luis jure
on 2008-10-19 at 01:25 Philip Webb wrote: Dillo 2.0 has been announced: well, _that_ is good news. visiting the dillo home page (http://www.dillo.org/) i see that dillo 2.0 has been released, and there's even something about 2.1 in the changelog. would it be too difficult to update the ebuild?

[gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2, but I still have a couple of show-stoppers. After running autounmask, I had 81 new entries in package.keywords, but I had to add another 82 myself

[gentoo-user] AutoFS with LDAP

2008-10-19 Thread Mike
Folks, Has anyone used AutoFS with the automounter information coming from LDAP? I have a LDAP server with the necessary maps setup. I have a number of LDAP clients on Debian successfully using this. However, I cannot get this to work with Gentoo. When I try to start autofs I get a message

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Weifeng Liu
I think I had the similar blocks while upgrading my kde from 3.5.x to 4.1.2, I just unmerged x11-libs/qt-core then everything seemed to be fine. -Weifeng On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:54:24 Peter Humphrey wrote: Having been inspired by messages here extolling the virtues of KDE-4, I tried installing it. I did as Neil B said and autounmasked kde-meta-4.1.2, but I still have a couple of show-stoppers. After running autounmask, I had 81 new

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild: RDEPEND= !=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT} [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than 4.4.0_alpha, it means any version less than that which is SLOT=4. I thought that too,

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has been attempted with these two lines. Would

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Liviu Andronic schrieb am 19.10.2008 16:51: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage I don't really know an answer, but I'm curious about what has

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Peter Humphrey schrieb am 19.10.2008 16:50: On Sunday 19 October 2008 15:24:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: From the qt-core-4.4.2 ebuild: RDEPEND= !=x11-libs/qt-4.4.0_alpha:${SLOT} [The] first blocker you have does NOT refer to any version less than 4.4.0_alpha, it means any version less than

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 16:51:32 Liviu Andronic wrote: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Arttu V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/18/08, Liviu Andronic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage I don't really know an answer, but I'm

[gentoo-user] NVidia + vanillla kernel == versions ?

2008-10-19 Thread meino . cramer
Hi, I am regulary updateing my system with the newest release of the linux kernel from ftp.kernel.org. My graphics card is an nVidia Corporation GeForce 7600 GT (rev a2) (according to lspci). For kernels of version 2.6.26.* I was using nvidia driver version 173.14.12. This version failed to

[gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). It opened my usual spreadsheets

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ? It's this [details snipped: thanks]: So basically it is dependant on the nsplugin USE flag and will look for xulrunner or seamonkey to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Grant Edwards wrote: On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 GB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). The first

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes: Repost the output of your emerge command using the -t option. Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to determine WHY it's happening. If you are going to post emerge output,

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying KDE-4

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 19:32:42 Alex Schuster wrote: Alan McKinnon writes: Repost the output of your emerge command using the -t option. Tip: tricky blockers often require that you post the output of 'emerge -t'. Otherwise all we know is THAT you have a block and no way to determine

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:52:24 Philip Webb wrote: 081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: Does anyone know why it wants 'xulrunner', which is not a use flag here ? It's this [details snipped: thanks]: So basically it is dependant on the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote: I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed   3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have  2 GB  memory (I didn't check how much it was using). I have 4.5G free in /var and I've already

Re: [gentoo-user] progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread KH
Philip Webb schrieb: 081019 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). Sorry, that's = 5,3 GB ... (red face) Thanks for that info. Than I will have to build

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread KH
Alan McKinnon schrieb: This is getting insane. Sun needs to have a good long hard look at this build process - 5G+ to build a package that totals 380M when installed is just a tad over the top in my book Someone once told me there is a library he needs for math and physics a the

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/19/08, Daniel Pielmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where is your portage tree stored? In /usr/portage I guess, so remove this PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/portage or replace it with PORTDIR=/usr/portage but this is not needed as it is default. Regarding PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/usr/local/portage if you

Re: [gentoo-user] AbiWord 2.6.4 build failure

2008-10-19 Thread Liviu Andronic
On 10/19/08, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant. ^^^ You did not do this. You posted the bottommost error. Well, the error message essentially didn't change from

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !

2008-10-19 Thread Philip Webb
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote: I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed   3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have  2 GB  memory (I didn't check how much it was using). I have 4.5G

[gentoo-user] how to word-wrap using a pipe?

2008-10-19 Thread zhangweiwu
Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g. like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long text lines) by using command pipe? I could use vim, activate some formatting

Re: [gentoo-user] how to word-wrap using a pipe?

2008-10-19 Thread meino . cramer
Hi ...just a shot in the dark: Try 'fmt' (UNIX standard too so no extra install I think). Kind regards, Meino Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08-10-20 03:52]: Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g. like text file created on Microsoft Windows's

Re: [gentoo-user] how to word-wrap using a pipe?

2008-10-19 Thread paulcol
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 09:13:46AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g. like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long text

[gentoo-user] rsh failed

2008-10-19 Thread Chuanwen Wu
Hi, I want to use iozone to test my cluster, and I found that iozone would use rsh. But rsh never worked in my machine. I have followed this guide http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/hpc-howto.xml#doc_chap2, which including the configuration of rsh. # eix netkit-rsh [I] net-misc/netkit-rsh

Re: [gentoo-user] how to word-wrap using a pipe?

2008-10-19 Thread djanderson
Zhang Weiwu wrote: Hello. How can I line-wrap a text file that was not wrapped before (e.g. like text file created on Microsoft Windows's notepad, the software does softwrap by default, thus the file created using it often have very long text lines) by using command pipe? I think you'll