Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
can mount the volume /dev/vg/data to /mnt/data without any problem.
However, when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed emerge system ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I am afraid I can't really answer
On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/lvm2.xml to create the LVM2 volume named vg
then create the logical volume /dev/vg/data. Everything went fine and I
can mount the volume /dev/vg/data
Hi Alan,
Thanks a lot for a quick reply. It turn out that I need to activate LVM
at the boot time using rc-update.
Hung
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:36:08 Hung Dang wrote:
Hi all
I have a strange problem with LVM2. I follow this guide
On Friday 03 April 2009 22:11:28 Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones
show stopper list of Gentoo defects. Gentoo doesn't *need*
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:14:05 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
I like the idea but does it solve the root-cause issue - whatever that
might really be - for portage maintainers removing ebuilds and code in
the first place? If it was in the sunset overlay then we'd say they
don't have to support it
On Friday 03 April 2009 23:46:44 Mark Knecht wrote:
I think you may be correct, but the problem still exist. The
problem is that you can be running an driver on your system. The
portage maintainers depreciate it. the ebuilds get stripped form my
machine. Sometime later I choose to clean up
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
- Managing USE flags is sometimes quite irritating, having to fidget
around /etc/make.conf, /etc/portage/package.use and such with
everyone's favourite text editors. (Maybe I'm micromanaging them too
much?)
emerge flagedit
- Keeping the
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:45:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
bash
vi
tar
emerge
Note that these are the *exact* *same* *tools* you are going to use
every day after the install is done.
You must be joking, I wouldn't be caught dead using the first two ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
DCE seeks DTE for
On Saturday 04 April 2009 01:24:58 Arttu V. wrote:
- Portage 2.2 stopping dead with you should re-emerge foo with USE=bar
with the new cat/foo[bar]-style dependencies.
Sadly, that one is unavoidable. You have a circumstance where it is not
possible to continue and the missing bit must be fixed
On Saturday 04 April 2009 09:59:15 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:45:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
bash
vi
tar
emerge
Note that these are the *exact* *same* *tools* you are going to use
every day after the install is done.
You must be joking, I wouldn't be caught dead
Dan Cowsill wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Daniel da Veiga danieldave...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would still think its a problema.
People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
answered and
Mike Kazantsev mike_kazant...@fraggod.net writes:
-mtune=native can be dropped if -march=native is there already.
It is still worthwhile keeping it in CFLAGS as some packages remove or
replace the '-march' flag.
* Nikos Chantziaras (rea...@arcor.de) [04.04.09 03:55]:
I thought about it and I would still like an installer. People asked me
I want that too after they see what Gentoo can do and is about. I
could help them learn to keep their Gentoo healthy and running, but I am
not willing to
On 4 Apr 2009, at 08:56, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
...
- Difficulty of predicting how long some new package compilations
(with
dependencies, upgrades and revdep-rebuilds etc) will actually take
(genlop -t only knows about individual packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan McKinnon wrote:
What could work is a way to do these checks during the initial phase so you
get told about it before the actual building starts, just like with blockers.
Which is exactly how it works, now, with the new USE-deps (before you
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
[...]
- Difficulty of predicting how long some new package compilations (with
dependencies, upgrades and revdep-rebuilds etc) will actually take
(genlop -t only knows about individual packages that have been emerged
On Saturday 04 April 2009 10:59:35 ABCD wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
What could work is a way to do these checks during the initial phase so
you get told about it before the actual building starts, just like with
blockers.
Which is exactly how it works, now, with the new USE-deps (before
I am using Gentoo for some years now, and installing Gentoo on a new
box isn't hard at all, but you have to be prepared. You need a running
linux-system, a live-CD (or USB-Stick), and the handbook.
So, i have SLAX and the handbook on my USB-Stick which i use to install
Gentoo. Boot SLAX, look at
On 4/4/09, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:24:58 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
- Managing USE flags is sometimes quite irritating, having to fidget
around /etc/make.conf, /etc/portage/package.use and such with
everyone's favourite text editors. (Maybe I'm micromanaging
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [04.04.09 09:57]:
emerge --lock some-package-some-version
I find this suggestion very good, and would like to ask the more
experienced participants, if such thing was thought of before.
I'm thinking about some options to freeze a system totally,
On Monday 30 March 2009, Mick wrote:
Hi All,
I just noticed today that my kgpg 1.2.2 (using KDE 3.5.9) is not showing
the email addresses of the public keys contained in it - i.e. the names are
blank. User IDs and signature email addresses are shown fine when one
expands the tree.
In case
On 4/4/09, Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
Do you really need to know EXACTLY how many? Or
can you just accept a little patience as the cost of using Gentoo?
I'd be happy for a modest, rough guesstimator. A Gentoo emerge
weather forecast-gauge/meter if you will. :)
I'm currently
Wyatt Epp wrote:
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask
at a time. So I was curious...what have people that
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:55:47 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
Do you really need to know EXACTLY how many? Or
can you just accept a little patience as the cost of using Gentoo?
I'd be happy for a modest, rough guesstimator. A Gentoo emerge
weather forecast-gauge/meter if you will. :)
Before
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
--
Neil Bothwick
I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 09:54:50 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I'd like a way to completely lock a package to the current running
version, and be able to do something like this:
emerge --lock some-package-some-version
emerge could then move the ebuild to a local overlay, mask out higher
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
I looked at mine a while back, month
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 14:06:49 +0300, Arttu V. wrote:
emerge flagedit
Yes, flagedit sure helps on a single box, but when running several
Gentoo boxes, with slightly differing USE settings, arches and whatnot
(firewall, server, old box for light browsing/office work, new-ish
multimedia/gaming
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:28:41 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Neil Bothwick
I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will be
behind me.
OK, OK, I know this is so completely and totally OT. But I don't care, and
I've been around here long enough to get away with it:
On Saturday 04 April 2009 21:36:00 Dale wrote:
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
Second computer with the same symptoms ... this is not machine
specific. Anyone else come across this problem?
I rarely use kgpg, but I just checked and mine is the same.
I am annoyed by a little more generous thing lately, which i am afraid
isn't fixable by a summer of code. But you wanted to know what annoys
me, so here it is.
There was a lib update, that broke sancho a while ago. A new version of
sancho fixed this. But i had to use this new version from the
Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC version
as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
--
Joseph
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:50:51 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I am sitting on the toilet with your article before me. Soon it will
be behind me.
Brilliant fortune! And I know just the manager who's email is gonna get
the fortune appended to the end of every reply...
I think it is a Winston
On Saturday 04 April 2009 22:42:00 Norman Rieß wrote:
I am annoyed by a little more generous thing lately, which i am afraid
isn't fixable by a summer of code. But you wanted to know what annoys
me, so here it is.
There was a lib update, that broke sancho a while ago. A new version of
sancho
Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
version as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
I don't think it is possible to get the compiler or it's version used
for
On Saturday 04 April 2009 23:42:54 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
version as I'm getting an errors at time to time.
I don't
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This mythical thing - a working installer - probably does not exist and likely
never will.
This may be true, and it certainly is the case right now.
But that's not a good reason to reject one out of hand
before you even see it.
There are just too many decisions the
Alan McKinnon schrieb am 04.04.2009 23:55:
On Saturday 04 April 2009 23:42:54 Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
Joseph schrieb am 04.04.2009 22:48:
Is there a way to verify GCC version program was compiled with?
I just want to check if all the programs were compiled with latest GCC
version as I'm
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield kut...@kutulu.org wrote:
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't belong near the top of anyones show
stopper list of
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 17:11, Mike Edenfield kut...@kutulu.org wrote:
On 4/3/2009 3:38 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
there is no installer anymore. And that is a good thing.
I will agree that an installer doesn't
Hi
I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
My needs:
Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba share, mythtv and
mysql when i use openvpn or
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:11:08 Mike Edenfield wrote:
I would still think its a problema.
People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
answered and handbook questions.
Aside from this being exactly
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:07:12 Mike Edenfield wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This mythical thing - a working installer - probably does not exist and
likely never will.
This may be true, and it certainly is the case right now.
But that's not a good reason to reject one out of hand
before
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 00:38:45 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There is such a thing as a prerequisite level of expertise. Every field
has this and every field SHOULD enforce it. You don't get to drive a
car on a public road till you have proven that you have learned how to
drive a car, and you
On 04/04/09 23:55, Alan McKinnon wrote:
[snip]
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
This is complete nonsense advice. There is absolutely no need to rebuild the
entire system every time you upgrade compilers, and whoever told you that is
flat out wrong. If the gentoo docs told
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
Since you can ssh into the system, could you remove hald from the
default runlevel and reboot? I'm not sure about the keyboard and mouse
after that tho. At least maybe you can get to a console.
As reported in OP, I sshed in and stopped the start of hald..
Harry Putnam wrote:
No I didn't do the update... As reported in OP, I actually wasn't done
with the follup chores to an update, and shutdown from a remote due to
absentminded pea brainedness.
I'm doing that now via ssh. Maybe things will improve...
Well, if you will cross your fingers
On 00:24 Sun 05 Apr, gigli wrote:
Hi
I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
My needs:
Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba
On Sunday 05 April 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
less than 2.
On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
starting hal daemon.
There is
Harry Putnam wrote:
Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
less than 2.
On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
starting hal daemon.
There is sets forever.
Since
gigli wrote:
I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
My needs:
Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba share, mythtv and
mysql when
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
But I can ssh into the box.
What should I supply here to allow someone to help diagnose the
problem?
Recent info on hal from `qlop --list|grep hal'
Sun Feb 15 10:52:16 2009 app-misc/hal-info-20090202
Sun Feb 15 10:54:45 2009
Once again I find myself with a big mess following an update world.
This time I was probably out of date by more than 1 mnth, probably
less than 2.
On first reboot the bootup proceeds well into level 3, right up to
starting hal daemon.
There is sets forever.
Since its past the point where
Mike Edenfield wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Friday 03 April 2009, Daniel da Veiga wrote:
I would still think its a problema.
People would install Gentoo, get a functional system, not read the
handbook, and flood the forums and this mailing list with already
answered and handbook
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:
On next boot, the problem with hal daemon reported above started.
and you did etc-update/cfg-update after the update? Have you read the
messages
with elogv? Same hal versions here - no problems at all.
I've completed the cfg-update
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
No I didn't do the update... As reported in OP, I actually wasn't done
with the follup chores to an update, and shutdown from a remote due to
absentminded pea brainedness.
I'm doing that now via ssh. Maybe things will improve...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:
On next boot, the problem with hal daemon reported above started.
and you did etc-update/cfg-update after the update? Have you read the
messages
with elogv? Same hal
Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
the included the following lines:
* All prepared. Starting rebuild
emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
mail-client/-MERGING-evolution:2.0
media-plugins/gst-plugins-faad:0.8
John P. Burkett wrote:
Doing revdep-rebuild on an amd64 machine, I received a response
the included the following lines:
* All prepared. Starting rebuild
emerge --oneshot app-text/xpdf:0
gnome-base/gnome-panel:0
kde-base/kdegraphics:3.5
mail-client/-MERGING-evolution:2.0
60 matches
Mail list logo
