On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed emerge system ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
Use rpm2targz to turn it into a tarball, then unpack it into your
root filesystem (after first checking the contents).
--
Neil Bothwick
I am neither
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 13:44:03 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved
KDE4 session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
???
2009/4/6 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
Use rpm2targz to turn it into a tarball, then unpack it into your
root filesystem (after first checking the
On Sunday 05 April 2009 21:45:16 Daniel Troeder wrote:
When updates hit the portage tree, that are known to cause problems to
lots of people - why not tell that directly after the --sync?
Unfortunate timing here - within 24 hours the X11 upgrade included exactly
this feature by way of eselect
Steffen Loos schrieb:
Ward Poelmans schrieb:
Hi,
I've got a problem running screen in a gnome-terminal: all the usual
keystroks (for example: ^a c) don't work. When i press ctrl+a d, i
just get a d on the terminal. Screen works perfectly when i start it
in a xterm.
I haven't got a clue
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:20, Steffen Loos fe...@gmx.net wrote:
Steffen Loos schrieb:
I would assume gnome-terminal is eating your ctrl-a ;-)
you can have a look on your settings with:
ssty -a
if ^A is set up to an action.
Using ^Tt as the default works, so ^Aa is getting eating by
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:16:37AM +0600, Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 22:43:21 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
KH gentoo-user at konstantinhansen.de writes:
Q: Why is top-posting evil?
A: .backwards read don't humans because
OK. Everyone that hates top
Wyatt Epp wrote:
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things that
I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so. Things
like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show one mask
at a time. So I was curious...what have people that
Ward Poelmans schrieb:
Hi,
I've got a problem running screen in a gnome-terminal: all the usual
keystroks (for example: ^a c) don't work. When i press ctrl+a d, i
just get a d on the terminal. Screen works perfectly when i start it
in a xterm.
I haven't got a clue where to search for the
On Monday 06 April 2009 13:52:34 Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 13:44:03 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved
KDE4 session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
Mick wrote:
2009/4/6 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:41:53 +0100, Mick wrote:
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
Use rpm2targz to turn it into a tarball, then unpack it into your
root filesystem (after first
On Monday 06 April 2009 13:44:03 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved
KDE4 session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
??? it is a big fat point in the kmenu on the 'leave'
Momesso Andrea wrote:
I'm kinda bored of the please no top posting replies... Couldn't we
ask the infra staff (or whoever runs this mailing list) to periodically
send a guidelines message to all the subscribers, like it happens in
other mailing lists.
This way we could soimply ask
Ward Poelmans wpoel...@gmail.com writes:
I've got a problem running screen in a gnome-terminal: all the usual
keystroks (for example: ^a c) don't work. When i press ctrl+a d, i
just get a d on the terminal. Screen works perfectly when i start it
in a xterm.
I haven't got a clue where to
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved KDE4
session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:41:43 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Thanks Neil, is that the equivalent of running:
yum install /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/packageXXX.el5.i386.rpm
No. It is equivalent to running rpm2targz on RH and them extracting
the tarball to / :P It is equivalent to
Joseph wrote:
On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed emerge system ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:52:05 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I just thought of this one. Sometimes devs love to change ebuilds
without bumping them. That's annoying; a bug gets fixed and you don't
know about it because emerge -u doesn't find any newer version or
revision.
That's a bad
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved KDE4
session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
??? it is a big fat point in the kmenu on the 'leave' page between 'Lock' and
'Switch user'
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:03:43 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 13:44:03 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved
2009/4/6 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:41:43 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
If you're familiar with ebuilds, you can write one that does all this
so you can do emerge packageXXX to install it.
And there's an rpm.eclass to do some of the work for you.
If you also
Mick schrieb:
Hi All,
I have an rpm binary which looks like this on a RH
machine: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/packageXXX.el5.i386.rpm
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
Just emerge yum.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
ABCD wrote:
I'm not sure if you will need sys-fs/cryptsetup for your setup, but I
think you may have gotten confused over the difference between USE and
IUSE. IUSE is a variable set by an ebuild to tell portage (or your PM
of choice) that this package supports certain USE flags. See
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:31:57PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved KDE4
session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
It just needs a relogin to show the option in the logout dialog, last time I
tried it, it worked this
Hi,
gigli wrote:
Hi
I wonder if there is any easy firewall for gentoo. I tried ubuntu for a
while and used their ufw, which was very simple.
My needs:
Block incoming traffic except for sshd and https (and sometimes
bittorrent) and allow my lan to connect to my samba share, mythtv and
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:11:13 YoYo siska wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 01:31:57PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
I have found it is possible to select a restoring of a manually saved
KDE4 session. But have not found how to save :-) Help!
It just needs a relogin to show the option in the
hello,
When I type 'eselect profile list'
I only see 2008 options. Is there
no 2009 profile yet, or am I remiss
in my admin details?
If it is late, then any ideas on when
the 2009 profiles might appear?
James
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than changes to the default
use flags. Partly due to new features in recent versions of portage and
partly due to changes in the release engineering side of Gentoo
(automated
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than changes to the default
use flags. Partly due to new features in recent versions of portage
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:52:28PM +, James wrote:
hello,
When I type 'eselect profile list'
I only see 2008 options. Is there
no 2009 profile yet, or am I remiss
in my admin details?
If it is late, then any ideas on when
the 2009 profiles might appear?
James
You shouldn't
Xav' schrieb:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than changes to the default
use flags. Partly due to new features in recent
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Xav' x...@linuxant.fr wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than changes to the default
use
Paul Hartman schrieb:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Xav' x...@linuxant.fr wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:16:11 +0200, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Xav' schrieb:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x
profile.
Profile updates are generally little more than changes
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:50:02 Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Actually, when i install Gentoo from a 2008.0 stage 3, there is many
updates to deal with, and many more when going under unstable tree...
A new release
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:10:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
You shouldn't mind about that. A new profile is not what a new release
is for other distros, but just a symlink to a profile.
As long as there is no need for a new one, 2009.0 will not be released.
Perhaps engineering should name the
Andrew Gaydenko schrieb:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:50:02 Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Actually, when i install Gentoo from a 2008.0 stage 3, there is many
updates to deal with, and many more when going under
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 05:55:16PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:10:07 Momesso Andrea wrote:
You shouldn't mind about that. A new profile is not what a new release
is for other distros, but just a symlink to a profile.
As long as there is no need for a new one,
On 04/06/09 11:56, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
[snip]
~adj~
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64
I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems. an
examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my
previous settings:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:55:39PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:50:02 Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Actually, when i install Gentoo from a 2008.0 stage 3, there is many
updates to deal
Is there someone out there in Gentoo-land that is using OFS
(http://offlinefs.sourceforge.net/wiki/doku.php). If yes did find a ebuild
for it in some overlay or did you just download the src and compile?
Regards,
--
Dan Johansson, http://www.dmj.nu
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use native if I know that my CPU is athlon64 :P
Are you sure your cpu is not athlon64-sse3?
Look for pni in cat /proc/cpuinfo :-)
Jarry
--
___
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Momesso Andrea
momesso.and...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:55:39PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:50:02 Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Actually, when i install Gentoo from a 2008.0 stage 3, there is many
updates to deal with, and many more when going under unstable tree...
A new release mean for me that the postinstall
On 04/06/09 18:53, Jarry wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use native if I know that my CPU is athlon64 :P
Are you sure your cpu is not athlon64-sse3?
Look for pni in cat /proc/cpuinfo :-)
Jarry
Here is my cpuinfo;
cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id :
Momesso Andrea a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:55:39PM +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:50:02 Xav' wrote:
What i'm expecting from a new release is a new stage[1,2,3] tarballs with
updated software.
Actually, when i install Gentoo from a 2008.0 stage 3, there is
On Friday 03 April 2009, Wyatt Epp wrote:
Greets,
So while gearing up for the Summer of Code, I noted a lot of things
that I had come to accept as normal that I feel should not be so.
Things like the danger of depclean or the way portage will only show
one mask at a time. So I was
* Xav' (x...@linuxant.fr) [06.04.09 20:28]:
To get back with releases, I'm waiting for releases a full well tested
version of stage releases, as i don't agree with those saying that
weekly stage build are good enough to have updated stage.
A stable stage tarbar is not well tested? How can
Xav' wrote:
To get back with releases, I'm waiting for releases a full well tested
version of stage releases, as i don't agree with those saying that
weekly stage build are good enough to have updated stage.
The autobuild stages are exactly what you would get if you installed a
traditional
On Monday 06 April 2009 19:53:51 Francesco Talamona wrote:
Why in some circumstances emerge is perfectly able to spot user omission
and fill-in it automatically, while with other options it just
complains?
The inability to add missing = and the inconsistence annoy me. IMHO
emerge should be
Momesso Andrea momesso.andrea at gmail.com writes:
Here is an intersting article by a gentoo dev (darkside):
http://blog.jolexa.net/2009/02/25/gentoo-yearly-releases-help-or-hurt-gentoo/
OK,
I'll bite on these postings (Although my question
was really about the profile...)
1. Where is the
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 12:24 AM, gigli gi...@swipnet.se wrote:
kmyfirewall and others, didn't really like them. Something like ufw
would be nice.
The other day I filed a bug report for gufw [1], but there's no ebuild sofar.
Liviu
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=264912
--
Do you
On Monday 06 April 2009 14:30:55 Justin wrote:
Mick schrieb:
Hi All,
I have an rpm binary which looks like this on a RH
machine: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/packageXXX.el5.i386.rpm
How can I use this on a gentoo machine (I understand that it won't be
maintained by portage).
Just
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote:
I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that
did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run revdep-rebuild it quits
at 21%
Does anybody know how to fix it?
I tried recompiling gentoolkit; did not help.
Error
On Monday 06 April 2009, Xav' wrote:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:16:11 +0200, Justin jus...@j-schmitz.net wrote:
Xav' schrieb:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:07:19 +0100, AllenJB gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk
wrote:
To my knowledge there are currently no plans to release a 2009.x
profile.
Profile
On Monday 06 April 2009 21:16:08 James wrote:
Momesso Andrea momesso.andrea at gmail.com writes:
Here is an intersting article by a gentoo dev (darkside):
http://blog.jolexa.net/2009/02/25/gentoo-yearly-releases-help-or-hurt-gen
too/
OK,
I'll bite on these postings (Although my question
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 17:55:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Perhaps engineering should name the profile updates sequentially then.
Start with 1 and increment every time something happens that warrants
a new profile. As it is, the date-based numbering scheme leads people
to believe there is some
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
Information on gentoo-wiki.com is not a Gentoo recomendation. Look at
docs.gentoo.org for those.
--
Neil Bothwick
Anything worth fighting for
James wrote:
1. Where is the official discussion/instruction on rolling
my own profile, since 'profile' as a gentoo supported
file is deprecated?
I'll bite this one. Who said it was depreciated? If you want to see
how important that link is, even tho it is a 2008 profile, delete that
On 04/06/09 21:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
Information on gentoo-wiki.com is not a Gentoo recomendation. Look at
docs.gentoo.org for those.
--
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/06/09 21:07, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:35:56 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Well, according to gentoo recommendations it is not so:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags
Information on gentoo-wiki.com is
James schrieb:
3. I have a very smart teenager who is willing
to learn and struggle with Gentoo. I think
he should use the systemRescue path to gentoo.
Where are the instructions related to installing
off of a SystemRescue media (usb/cdrom)?
Where will he read about which weekly release
for
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 14:28:40 -0600, Joseph wrote:
If you have look for it more carefully you would have found similar
recommendation on the official gentoo pages:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/distcc.xml I think the above page qualify
as an official doc. isn't it?
Yes.
...-march=native
On 04/06/09 21:20, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009 04:13:07 Joseph wrote:
I upgraded to gcc-4.3.2-r3 rebuild system, world. The only package that
did not compile was g-wrap. However, when I run revdep-rebuild it quits
at 21%
Does anybody know how to fix it?
I tried recompiling
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600
Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/03/09 10:34, alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
performed emerge system ?
What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
--
On 04/06/09 22:00, Jorge Morais wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 00:02:21 -0600
I just notice that there is a problem with CFLAGS -march=native on AMD64
I recompile my system using this new flag and have a lot of problems.
an examples new xorg-server-1.5... would not compile, I switch back to my
Jarry wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why should I use native if I know that my CPU is athlon64 :P
Are you sure your cpu is not athlon64-sse3?
That was just an example. For my CPU I use -march=core2 :)
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 13:31:35 +0200
Sebastian Günther sam...@guenther-roetgen.de wrote:
* Alan McKinnon (alan.mckin...@gmail.com) [04.04.09 09:57]:
emerge --lock some-package-some-version
I find this suggestion very good, and would like to ask the more
experienced participants, if such
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:28:16PM +0200, Ward Poelmans wrote:
I can see nothing about ^A? Any idea how i can find who is eating ^A?
Maybe a gtk keybinding. You should check the keybindings everywhere in
the menu bar of gnome-terminal.
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
70 matches
Mail list logo
