Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system first makes good sense. Then you can update your config
files,
Here's /etc/conf.d/net on my Gentoo netbook system...
config_eth0=192.168.123.249 broadcast 192.168.123.255 netmask 255.255.255.248
mtu 1452
routes_eth0=(
default via 192.168.123.254 metric 2
192.168.123.248/29 via 192.168.123.254 metric 0
)
The multiple routes allow eth0 to remain connected
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Gregory Shearman zek...@gmail.com wrote:
Why are libX11-xcb.so.1, libX11.so.6, libdrm.so.2 in the
/opt/gfx-test/lib directory rather than in /usr/lib as they are on my
machine?
Sorry about that, this /opt/gfx-test/ directory was something I
created to test a
Hi,
I've started to look around on how to speed up the Gentoo boot sequence.
Looking at the bootchart output I discovered that if using parallel boot
feature from the /etc/conf.d/rc (RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP=yes), things get
done about 9 seconds faster that with RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP=no.
Boot time is
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si wrote:
Hi,
I've started to look around on how to speed up the Gentoo boot sequence.
Looking at the bootchart output I discovered that if using parallel boot
feature from the /etc/conf.d/rc (RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP=yes), things
Hi,
I have problems to connect to WPA wireless networks, and it seemed
like those were driver related, so I've tried running ndiswrapper.
After I failed to get better (or any) performance with it, I tried to
revert to the previous settings, but at first the system wouldn't even
boot. I've booted
On 04/12/10 11:31, Ngoc Nguyen Bao wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si
wrote:
Hi,
I've started to look around on how to speed up the Gentoo boot sequence.
Looking at the bootchart output I discovered that if using parallel boot
feature from the
Am 12.04.2010 11:56, schrieb Hinko Kocevar:
[...]
Thank you!
Hmm, I was looking at the
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml. For OpenRC I added
sys-apps/openrc ~x86 to package.keywords, to get baselayout-2 ebuild
I've added ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to /etc/make.conf.
Will it be
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and old
friends like rc-update and df look different, but it worked and didn't
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si wrote:
On 04/12/10 11:31, Ngoc Nguyen Bao wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si
wrote:
Hi,
I've started to look around on how to speed up the Gentoo boot sequence.
Looking at the
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs, output etc.
~amd64 works like a charm for me here.
On Monday 12 April 2010 13:57:39 Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:47:26 +0300, Yoav Luft wrote:
I have problems to connect to WPA wireless networks, and it seemed
like those were driver related, so I've tried running ndiswrapper.
After I failed to get better (or any) performance with it, I tried to
revert to the previous settings, but
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:57:39AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and old
On 12 April 2010 08:11, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
Here's /etc/conf.d/net on my Gentoo netbook system...
config_eth0=192.168.123.249 broadcast 192.168.123.255 netmask
255.255.255.248 mtu 1452
routes_eth0=(
default via 192.168.123.254 metric 2
192.168.123.248/29 via
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs, output etc.
~amd64 works like a charm for me here.
On 2010-04-11 9:20 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org writes:
I'm a bit clueless when it comes to firewalls, and have no idea what
these numbers mean/do:
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [4911:886011]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [4546:2818732]
COMMIT
The numbers are [packets:bytes]
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:57:39AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively
Hi,
On 04/12/10 12:26, KH wrote:
Am 12.04.2010 11:56, schrieb Hinko Kocevar:
[...]
Thank you!
Hmm, I was looking at the
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/openrc-migration.xml. For OpenRC I added
sys-apps/openrc ~x86 to package.keywords, to get baselayout-2 ebuild
I've added
I am however documenting my experiences for others than come after me
to this question of to ~amd64 or not ~amd64. Nothing more. It worked
for Alan who is a __very__ experienced and capable person. It didn't
work for Mark (at this point) who is a 10 year Gentoo user but
__nothing__ more than
On Apr 12, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si
wrote:
On 04/12/10 11:31, Ngoc Nguyen Bao wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Hinko Kocevar hinko.koce...@i-tech.si
wrote:
Hi,
I've started to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I am however documenting my experiences for others than come after me
to this question of to ~amd64 or not ~amd64. Nothing more. It worked
for Alan who is a __very__ experienced and capable person. It didn't
work for
On Monday 12 April 2010 14:29:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs,
On 12/04/2010 12:57, Mark Knecht wrote:
QUESTION: Assume I'm happy with ~amd64 on @system, but want to build
the stable version of gnome or kde. How do I get it? Since gnome-2.26
You could opt to retain the ~amd64 keyword on system packages alone.
Consider the following (which requires
On 04/12/2010 05:35 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Between xfce4 gnome I've seen about a dozen packages fail to build
this morning and haven't yet checked bug reports.
Let's start with xfce4 then because it's much smaller than gnome. What
fails to build, and with what errors?
I actually use gnome,
On 12/04/2010 13:42, William Kenworthy wrote:
Is there a reason why you want to run all @system as ~amd64, and the
rest stable. To me it makes more sense (especially for production
Perhaps he simply doesn't feel like re-installing. By going down this
road, the breakage caused by dowgrading
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:29:00 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
It's certainly not working for me at this point but I'm not upset,
mad, or anything like that. I'm asking a simple question. That's it.
Except you didn't really ask a question, at least not in manner that
could be answered. Posting the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
A couple of packages in this OpenRC upgrade aren't building. I hope
they are less important. So far groff and help2man have failed so I
did --resume
when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or two
I've already seen packages doing that, but they shouldn't happen, right? :-)
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two, it makes it easier to just ignore it.
Hopefully no one will mind a slight OT question, but still
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two, it makes it easier to just
Am 12.04.2010 11:02, schrieb Hinko Kocevar:
Hi,
I've started to look around on how to speed up the Gentoo boot sequence.
Looking at the bootchart output I discovered that if using parallel boot
feature from the /etc/conf.d/rc (RC_PARALLEL_STARTUP=yes), things get
done about 9 seconds faster
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
before damaging delicate electronic equipment I want
to ask, what the best way is to switch from a 1600x1200
pixel analogous Iiyama monitor to an Flat panel HP2475w (LCD)
with 1980x1200 pixel monitor?
Graphics card is a
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-04-12 11:05 AM, Paul Hartman wrote:
I use the --keep-going always, it was a great addition and especially
helpful when there is a bad package that won't compile for a week or
two,
Am 12.04.2010 14:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
[...]
2. when devs commit to ~arch, they tend to run ~arch on their test boxes.
Issues are easy to spot and get fixed quickly. If you have a mixture of the
two, then you have a combination that no-one but you is using, and it will not
have been
No, I haven't. I've also checked all files in /etc/modprobe.d/,
/etc/modules.d/ and /etc/{modules,modprobe}.conf to see if it isn't
blacklisted. I have checked the rc files yet, but I haven't changed
anything. Just to be sure, I grepped for wl, and it's not
blacklisted. ndiswrapper does alias a
On 12. 4. 2010 14:36, Hinko Kocevar wrote:
I've added ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 to /etc/make.conf.
Will it be enough to (re-)build the baselayout and openrc and its
closest dependencies (41 packages)? Or do I need to perform complete
system upgrade (~900 packages) now that ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2010-04-11 9:20 AM, Graham Murray wrote:
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org writes:
I'm a bit clueless when it comes to firewalls, and have no idea what
these numbers mean/do:
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
before damaging delicate electronic equipment I want
to ask, what the best way is to switch from a 1600x1200
pixel analogous Iiyama monitor
Hello,
My menu updating tool for kde4 does not seem to work,
any suggestions of fixes?
James
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:13:26 -0700
schrieb Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:11:53 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Doing system
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a gnome user but I can try this if you want (135 packages to
emerge in my case), or if you have more specific info about which part
doesn't build I can try only the specifics.
I went ahead and emerged
On Thursday 08 April 2010 14:45:49 Joseph wrote:
On 04/08/10 13:40, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 04/08/2010 07:11 AM, Joseph wrote:
I've activated Network adapter in VirtualBox (running Windows XP) but I
it is not working. It works only in NAT mode not in Bridge mode.
The worst part is when I
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:38 PM, stosss sto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:21 AM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
before damaging delicate electronic equipment I want
to ask, what the best
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:07 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/12/2010 05:35 AM, Mark Knecht wrote:
Between xfce4 gnome I've seen about a dozen packages fail to build
this morning and haven't yet checked bug reports.
Let's start with xfce4 then because it's much smaller than gnome.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
MakeMaker FATAL: prerequisites not found.
ExtUtils::Depends not installed
If part of your transition was upgrading from perl 5.8 to 5.10 you
need to run perl-cleaner like
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
MakeMaker FATAL: prerequisites not found.
ExtUtils::Depends not installed
If part of
Mark Knecht writes:
OK, let's start with xfce4-meta because there was only one failure.
eix-update was done this morning and emerge -DuN @system is clean
using ~arch in make.conf. I'll paste make.conf emerge --info at the
end of this message
[...]
Source prepared.
Configuring source in
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
MakeMaker FATAL: prerequisites not found.
ExtUtils::Depends not installed
If part of
On 2010-04-12 12:23 PM, Dale wrote:
+1 I been using the latest portage for a long time too. I don't recall
any problems with it and the new features sure do help.
If you keyword portage, you need to do the same for its friends. Mainly
gentoolkit and eix. They seem to go together better.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
cruncher mark # cat .xsession-errors
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup...
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Cannot find Xclients
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: line 203: exec: xterm: not found
cruncher mark #
cruncher mark #
Florian Philipp writes:
Am 12.04.2010 11:02, schrieb Hinko Kocevar:
Can boot be sped up even more?
The fastest way to boot is not to boot at all. Just use Suspend2Disk or
SuspendToRam.
Take a look at TuxOnIce and hibernate-script. Unless something is
broken, I hardly ever reboot.
I
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:52:19 +0300, Yoav Luft wrote:
No, I haven't. I've also checked all files in /etc/modprobe.d/,
/etc/modules.d/ and /etc/{modules,modprobe}.conf to see if it isn't
blacklisted. I have checked the rc files yet, but I haven't changed
anything. Just to be sure, I grepped for
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
cruncher mark # cat .xsession-errors
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup...
/etc/X11/gdm/Xsession: Cannot find Xclients
54 matches
Mail list logo
