Hi Paul,
it turned out there is a bug in the linux kernel up to and including
2.6.36 concerning
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon
when it comes to all graphics chips like RV350.
Does anybody know about a patch for gentoo-sources-2.6.36 ?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On 10/22/10 17:04:24, Paul Hartman
Hi all,
I have an old RV350 9600 ATI graphic card and the open source radeon
driver works fine with 2.6.36 kernel.
Cheers,
--
Jacques
Le 25/10/2010 09:50, Helmut Jarausch a gentiment tapote:
Hi Paul,
it turned out there is a bug in the linux kernel up to and including
2.6.36 concerning
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:26 on Monday 25 October 2010, Allan
Gottlieb did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you :-)
Or in this case, it doesn't mean it's not justified. I now have
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Then again, Alan knows
Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox out by
accident.
The results were ... awful. Bad
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:36 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
FEATURES= buildpkg sandbox fixpackages parallel-fetch --keep-going
I thought --keep-going goes into EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, no?
--
Fatih
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:44 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Hello,
On most of my kde workstations when I plug in a
usb(memory)stick and popup screen appears
Devices recently plugged in:
On one kde system, this does not occur and I
do not know what app/software to install or
On 10/25/10 10:15:46, Jacques Montier wrote:
Hi all,
I have an old RV350 9600 ATI graphic card and the open source radeon
driver works fine with 2.6.36 kernel.
That depends on the application. e.g. glxgears runs fine while a
PyOpenGL application crashes the whole machine.
See
Am 25.10.2010 04:36, schrieb Dale:
FEATURES= buildpkg sandbox fixpackages parallel-fetch --keep-going
Hi,
parallel-fetch is default and no need to list it in make.conf any more.
I notices when I had to add -parallel-fetch to one of my boxes.
kh
On 10/25/2010 01:24 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Then again, Alan knows
Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox
Apparently, though unproven, at 15:09 on Monday 25 October 2010, Bill Longman
did opine thusly:
On 10/25/2010 01:24 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Then again, Alan knows
Gentoo pretty well and may know
- Original Message
From: Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:29:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Although, perhaps I'm missing something but doesn't alpha
come *before* release candidate? :)
Yes, but:
2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99
It should
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote:
2.2.0_alpha1 comes *after* 2.2_rc99
It should also come after 2.2, but I appear to have missed that
release.
Why? 2.2 == 2.2.0
Not in portage's eyes.
So 2.2.0_alpha1 would make a logical progression.
Since when did an
how to unsubscribe?
I try to send mail for gentoo-user-unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org but nothing
happens
--
Gregory
Am 25.10.2010 16:33, schrieb Gregory Fontenele:
how to unsubscribe?
I try to send mail for gentoo-user-unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org but nothing happens
--
Gregory
Hi Gregory,
this is expected behavior. It is like hotel california. You can never leave.
You
I'm trying to reinstall asterisk-1.4.22.1 but I get:
('Filesize does not match recorded size', 20776689, 11602819)
!!! Fetched file: asterisk-1.4.22.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 20776689
!!! Expected: 11602819
Refetching... File renamed
Le Monday 25 October 2010 17:52:14, Joseph a écrit :
I'm trying to reinstall asterisk-1.4.22.1 but I get:
('Filesize does not match recorded size', 20776689, 11602819)
!!! Fetched file: asterisk-1.4.22.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got:
On 10/25/10 18:04, St?phane Guedon wrote:
Le Monday 25 October 2010 17:52:14, Joseph a ?crit :
I'm trying to reinstall asterisk-1.4.22.1 but I get:
('Filesize does not match recorded size', 20776689, 11602819)
!!! Fetched file: asterisk-1.4.22.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does
On 10/25/2010 08:37 AM, Iain Buchanan wrote:
Hi all, looking for some serious vmware debugging help! I've had
vmware-workstation working for ages, but sometime this year (ok I use it
sporadically!) it's stopped. I don't know if its the old GTK issue or
what. No google searches has found
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:55:53 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Not what you asked for, but my advise is to upgrade to a newer version
of Workstation :P 7.1.2 is the current version (and it's in the
vmware overlay.)
$100+tax is a lot to pay to upgrade something you only use sporadically.
--
On Monday 25 October 2010, Joseph wrote:
I'm trying to reinstall asterisk-1.4.22.1 but I get:
('Filesize does not match recorded size', 20776689, 11602819)
!!! Fetched file: asterisk-1.4.22.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
!!! Got: 20776689
!!!
Hi,
I'm trying to emerge apache withe EXTRA_CFLAGS+=-g to be able to use
the Core Dump behaviour as recommended here:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
How should I do that?
thx
Laurent
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
Apparently, though unproven, at 02:26 on Monday 25 October 2010, Allan
Gottlieb did opine thusly:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes:
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you :-)
Or in this case, it
On Monday 25 October 2010 9:50:30 pm Allan Gottlieb wrote:
Yes?
yes
--
- Yohan Pereira.
On 10/26/10 00:18, Robin Atwood wrote:
On Monday 25 October 2010, Joseph wrote:
I'm trying to reinstall asterisk-1.4.22.1 but I get:
('Filesize does not match recorded size', 20776689, 11602819)
!!! Fetched file: asterisk-1.4.22.1.tar.gz VERIFY FAILED!
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Laurent Kappler rwx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to emerge apache withe EXTRA_CFLAGS+=-g to be able to use the
Core Dump behaviour as recommended here:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
How should I do that?
thx
Laurent
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Laurent Kappler rwx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to emerge apache withe EXTRA_CFLAGS+=-g to be able to use the
Core Dump behaviour as recommended here:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 1:20:25 am Kfir Lavi wrote:
Ok,
thinking again, just emerge apache, and make sure it emerges alone.
Then change temporarily your CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf
emerge apache
revert to the old make.conf
Regards,
Kfir
i would normall create the file
Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 26 October 2010 1:20:25 am Kfir Lavi wrote:
Ok,
thinking again, just emerge apache, and make sure it emerges alone.
Then change temporarily your CFLAGS in /etc/make.conf
emerge apache
revert to the old make.conf
Regards,
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:05 on Monday 25 October 2010, Neil Bothwick
did opine thusly:
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:55:53 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Not what you asked for, but my advise is to upgrade to a newer version
of Workstation :P 7.1.2 is the current version (and it's in
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:00:36 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
i would normall create the file /etc/portage/env/www-servers/apache
containing CFLAGS=...
Can I also use this to add EXTRA_ECONF if I need it for a particular
package?
Yes.
--
Neil Bothwick
Q: What's the proper
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Iain Buchanan iai...@netspace.net.au wrote:
Hi all, looking for some serious vmware debugging help! I've had
vmware-workstation working for ages, but sometime this year (ok I use it
sporadically!) it's stopped. I don't know if its the old GTK issue or
what.
My principle for using vmware on Gentoo is; use the latest vmware, do not
use the latest kernel.
I'm using Workstation 7.1.2, which works well with 2.6.34, also works with
2.6.35 (but wants to rebuild one kernel module every time it runs, which I
havent tried to fix).
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I am thinking of upgrading from a FX-5200 with 128Mb video card to a
GeForce 6200 with 512MB. It will be AGP since this is a older rig.
My system is something like this:
Mobo: Abit NF7 2.0
CPU: AMD 2500+ No overclocking
Memory: 2Gbs of 333Mhz.
Monitor: Gateway 19
Dale writes:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I
get only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver
issue?
Is OpenGL working at all? Does glxinfo produce lots of output, with
'direct rendering: Yes' near the top? If not, your're using
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I
get only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver
issue?
Is OpenGL working at all? Does glxinfo produce lots of output, with
'direct rendering: Yes' near the
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 18:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I get
only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver issue?
I'm going to take the side off and blow out the case in a bit and test
again. I'm open to ideas
Adam Carter adamcarter3 at gmail.com writes:
My principle for using vmware on Gentoo is; use the latest vmware, do not use
the latest kernel.I'm using Workstation 7.1.2, which works well with 2.6.34,
also works with 2.6.35 (but wants to rebuild one kernel module every time it
runs, which I
Iain Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 18:42 -0500, Dale wrote:
So, same card as a year or so ago and same everything else but now I get
only about 1/10th the frame rate. What gives? Is this a driver issue?
I'm going to take the side off and blow out the case in a bit and test
again.
Have you tried 2.6.34? FWIW i use gentoo-sources.
I have no useful ideas at this point - beyond my level. Have you tried
running it with strace to establish what its doing just before it dies? Does
ldd show any missing libs? malloc = Memory ALLOCation
Dale wrote:
Well, at least we know there is a problem and it isn't just us. If
you find something, let us know. I would hate to know I had to try
to watch a DVD right now. I doubt it would even start up. o_O
BTW, hal is disabled on xorg here. It's enabled on other things but
not
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
Well, at least we know there is a problem and it isn't just us. If you
find something, let us know. I would hate to know I had to try to watch a
DVD right now. I doubt it would even start up. o_O
BTW, hal
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
I have a update. Check this out:
hey, don't get my hopes up like that. Still no improvement on my box.
But then, I am seeing nearly 6500 FPS :D
--
Iain Buchanan iaindb at netspace dot net dot au
The chief enemy of creativity is good sense
Hi,
over the last week or so I've noticed unusually large swap usage. I
usually hibernate this laptop and have uptimes up to 12 days so apps can
run for a long time. I don't usually use any swap space (except for a
few k).
If I swapoff and swapon, the usage falls back to zero but then creeps
43 matches
Mail list logo
