Re: [gentoo-user] unable to find xcb-{aux, event, atom}

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 01 Jun 2011 05:00:08 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > I get the following error several times when trying to emerge > gnome-panel on "oldlap", an ~x86 gentoo. > > CCLD panel-test-applets > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: > cannot find -lxcb-aux >

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 20:55:08 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote: > >> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there > >> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS > >> m

Re: [gentoo-user] What has Sabayon to do with Gentoo?

2011-05-31 Thread Maxim Vorontsov
Hi. Maybe it offtop, but are you know about yet another gentoo-based distro Calculate? http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=calculate On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Paul Hartman < paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:18 PM, skiarxon wrote: > > > > > > O

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread Valmor de Almeida
On 05/31/2011 01:31 PM, James wrote: > Anyone having any problems with VirtualBox and kernel panics? > > I've tried vbox 3 and 4, both with the same behavior. Installing > Windows 7 as a guest and either (a) my system will completely freeze > (I'm assuming the kernel panicked), or (b) I'm thinking

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 03:35, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 21:02:46 Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Apparently, though unproven, at 21:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did >> opine >> >> thusly: >> > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 08:07:24 Pandu Poluan wrote: >> > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKi

[gentoo-user] unable to find xcb-{aux, event, atom}

2011-05-31 Thread Allan Gottlieb
I get the following error several times when trying to emerge gnome-panel on "oldlap", an ~x86 gentoo. CCLD panel-test-applets /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: cannot find -lxcb-aux /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bi

Re: [gentoo-user] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid?

2011-05-31 Thread Adam Carter
> > I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped Gentoo box: For some > sites, Squid just times out. But if I access the sites directly, they > appear in my browser. And doing a direct wget from the Squidbox also > works. > > Now I'm not sure whose 'fault' it is, but just in case it's Squid's,

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: So that's what you look like :-) I had a ... very different ... mental picture (also a complete fiction). There's no public photos on your page though :-( And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile pic? Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on the

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:43:59 +0100, David W Noon wrote: Remember that I am writing purely about *unmerged* packages. In the case of a rebuild or upgrade, customizations would be preserved just as they are now. Sometimes it is necessary to unmerge a package befor

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 00:30:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: > And what's that gigantic gate over the river behind you in the profile > pic? Looks a bit like the sea wall gates on the Thames. A good deal less elegant though :) -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Wednesday 01 June 2011 00:14:04 Neil Bothwick wrote: > It's quite simple logic... If a file is modified, it is no longer the file > portage installed, so portage does not uninstall it. If anything, the > problem is that the logic used by portage is too simple. I don't think it's too simple. It

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:35 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Dale did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did > > opine > > > > thusly: > >>> It appears I was wrong after all. > >>> > >>> Manners dictates that apologies

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 31 May 2011 17:26:43 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > >> You have just touched on an annoyance of unmerge, in that it does not > >> clean up configuration files that have been modified. It removes > >> files that are still in the same state as when the package was > >> emerged, but not those

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:43:59 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > Remember that I am writing purely about *unmerged* packages. In the > case of a rebuild or upgrade, customizations would be preserved just > as they are now. Sometimes it is necessary to unmerge a package before emerging a newer version,

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
David W Noon wrote: On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:40:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:26:43 David W Noon wrote: [snip] To repeat myself: I do not see a customized configuration file as being any more importan

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:40:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: >On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:26:43 David W Noon wrote: [snip] >> To repeat myself: I do not see a customized configuration file as >> being any more important than a vanilla one. If I unde

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine thusly: It appears I was wrong after all. Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order. Sorry Dale. No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be 1

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:55 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine thusly: > > It appears I was wrong after all. > > > > Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order. > > > > Sorry Dale. > > > > > > No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be >

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did opine thusly: tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I f

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did opine thusly: > tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: > > Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in > > the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge > > k

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 22:12 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine thusly: Alan McKinnon wrote: Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them in. Which is

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Nils Larsson wrote: tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system packages bei

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:00 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht > > did > > > > opine thusly: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 21:02:46 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 21:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did > opine > > thusly: > > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 08:07:24 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKinnon > > > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011

Re: [gentoo-user] setting locale

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 16:44:25 William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:19:16AM -0400, David Relson wrote: > > Why not use "echo >> ..." ?? > > > > Since the ">>" does an append, the original file contents are still > > available for reference. > > > > Since the added line is at the end

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:26:43 David W Noon wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:10:01 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: > > [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: > >On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:08:08 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > >> You have just touched on an annoyance of unmerge, in tha

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:12 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Dale did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space > > and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them > > in. Which is what vapier also say

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Nils Larsson
tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: > Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in > the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge > kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system > packages being removed. It may

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Considering that ~250 devices consumes a teeny-weeny bit of disk space and they are hidden from view normally, I say it's worth it leaving them in. Which is what vapier also says. +1 They are tiny plus when devfs mounts, they aren't visible anymore if I recall corre

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 08:07:24 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKinnon > > wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > >> Meh, I clicked 'Send' too fas

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Dale
Alan McKinnon wrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did opine thusly: On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote: Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread kashani
On 5/31/2011 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote: The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on vbox. My un

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote: >> The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there >> have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS >> more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work w

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 08:07:24 Pandu Poluan wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > >> Meh, I clicked 'Send' too fast. > >> > >> *My* suggested solution: > >> > >> Generate an initramfs containing udev. The hands-

[gentoo-user] Re: Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread walt
On 05/30/2011 06:03 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > Are you using a recent stage3 tarball? If so, I suspect your booting > problem has got something to do with this bug: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368597 That was it, thanks! Nothing to do with the kernel after all. I created /dev/conso

Re: [gentoo-user] What has Sabayon to do with Gentoo?

2011-05-31 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:18 PM, skiarxon wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:05:06 Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> > Hi, all. >> > >> > Sabayon Linux is said to be "derived" from Gentoo.  Yet, reading reviews >> > of Sabayon (from

Re: [gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2011-05-31 1:31 PM, James wrote: > The only thing I've read online that may be applicable is that there > have been some issues with kernel panics when you give the guest OS > more than 1 processor. It would suck badly if SMP didn't work well on > vbox. My understanding is it is a general rule

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:27 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Mark Knecht did opine thusly: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman > > wrote: > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN > > > > wrote: > >> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6 > > > > I find that it is e

Re: [gentoo-user] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid?

2011-05-31 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 31.05.2011 19:36, schrieb Pandu Poluan: > Hello! > > I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped Gentoo box: For some > sites, Squid just times out. But if I access the sites directly, they > appear in my browser. And doing a direct wget from the Squidbox also > works. > > Now I'm not sur

Re: [gentoo-user] What has Sabayon to do with Gentoo?

2011-05-31 Thread skiarxon
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann < volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:05:06 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > Hi, all. > > > > Sabayon Linux is said to be "derived" from Gentoo. Yet, reading reviews > > of Sabayon (from www.distrowatch.org), I fail to see

[gentoo-user] What has Sabayon to do with Gentoo?

2011-05-31 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, all. Sabayon Linux is said to be "derived" from Gentoo. Yet, reading reviews of Sabayon (from www.distrowatch.org), I fail to see any similarity between G and S; S is a binary distribution, doesn't have portage, and doesn't look like having much flexibility. Purely out of curiosity, what is

Re: [gentoo-user] What has Sabayon to do with Gentoo?

2011-05-31 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:05:06 Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hi, all. > > Sabayon Linux is said to be "derived" from Gentoo. Yet, reading reviews > of Sabayon (from www.distrowatch.org), I fail to see any similarity > between G and S; S is a binary distribution, doesn't have portage, and > doesn't loo

[gentoo-user] Caching Proxy alternative to Squid?

2011-05-31 Thread Pandu Poluan
Hello! I've been having problems with my Squid-equipped Gentoo box: For some sites, Squid just times out. But if I access the sites directly, they appear in my browser. And doing a direct wget from the Squidbox also works. Now I'm not sure whose 'fault' it is, but just in case it's Squid's, I'll

[gentoo-user] virtualbox + kernel panic 2.6.38-r2

2011-05-31 Thread James
Anyone having any problems with VirtualBox and kernel panics? I've tried vbox 3 and 4, both with the same behavior. Installing Windows 7 as a guest and either (a) my system will completely freeze (I'm assuming the kernel panicked), or (b) I'm thinking the Linux raid module dies because the system

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread David W Noon
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:10:01 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files: >On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:08:08 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > >> You have just touched on an annoyance of unmerge, in that it does not >> clean up configuration files that have been

[gentoo-user] Re: time issue

2011-05-31 Thread András Csányi
On 30 May 2011 10:15, András Csányi wrote: > Hi All, > > I have a little problem regarding time.  After every boot I have to > setup my clock because about my machine the current time is +2 hour > more. To be honest, this is a little bit annoying. > What I did: > > - According to install guide I h

Re: [gentoo-user] setting locale

2011-05-31 Thread William Hubbs
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:19:16AM -0400, David Relson wrote: > Why not use "echo >> ..." ?? > > Since the ">>" does an append, the original file contents are still > available for reference. > > Since the added line is at the end of the file, the new value will be > used instead of the old val

[gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-user] time issue

2011-05-31 Thread aaniao...@gmail.com
Try to modify conf file "/etc/conf.d/hwclock" Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "András Csányi" To: Subject: [gentoo-user] time issue Date: Mon, May 30, 2011 16:15 Hi All, I have a little problem regarding time. After every boot I have to setup my clock because about my machi

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Mark Knecht
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN > wrote: >> Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6 > > I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge > the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like tha

Re: [gentoo-user] kde update

2011-05-31 Thread Paul Hartman
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote: > Trying to update from kde4.5 to kde4.6 I find that it is easier to unmerge old version :4.5 KDE, then emerge the new version :4.6. Upgrade always seems to be a mess like that.

Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo

2011-05-31 Thread Mick
On 31 May 2011 14:38, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Apparently, though unproven, at 14:30 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Alex Schuster > did opine thusly: > >> Alan McKinnon writes: >> > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:28 on Friday 27 May 2011, Kevin >> > >> > O'Gorman did opine thusly: >> > > It looks like

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 31 May 2011 07:34:22 -0500, James Wall wrote: > > It doesn't remove *any* files that have been modified, the reasons > > systems used to get cluttered with orphaned .la files. The logic is > > quite simple, if it is not the file portage installed with the > > package, it should not be unin

Re: [gentoo-user] Install issue

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 19:22 on Monday 30 May 2011, Colleen Beamer did opine thusly: > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:47 AM, James Wall wrote: > > I have had that particular problem if I mounted /dev before extracting > > the stage3 tarball. Just follow those instructions and you sill be fin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: openrc and /etc/modprobe.d/*

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 00:33 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Harry Putnam did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon writes: > >> modules=fuse > >> > >> Which appears to be the proper syntax judging from the comments in > >> the stub file provided (/etc/conf.d/modules). > >> > >> But `fuse' never ge

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I eject an audio CD inside Gnome?

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:46 on Monday 30 May 2011, Mick did opine thusly: > e17 is the best desktop for me, because it is extremely light footed, has > enough eye candy (if you need that) and it is relatively > configurable. Until it becomes stable you'll need to compile it from > sv

Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo

2011-05-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 14:30 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Alex Schuster did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon writes: > > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:28 on Friday 27 May 2011, Kevin > > > > O'Gorman did opine thusly: > > > It looks like it's time to take Gentoo off of my main machine. I

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT - More Router Advice] Cheap Router with decent/reliable VLAN support

2011-05-31 Thread Todd Goodman
* Tanstaafl [110530 16:40]: > On 2011-05-28 8:42 PM, Gregory Shearman wrote: > > In linux.gentoo.user, Todd Goodman wrote: > >> * Tanstaafl [110528 12:43]: > >>> Anyone? Will one of the FLOSS builds for the cheap Cable/DSL routers > >>> support VLANs on the different built-in router ports (ie, To

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread James Wall
On May 31, 2011 3:02 AM, "Neil Bothwick" wrote: > > On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:08:08 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > > > You have just touched on an annoyance of unmerge, in that it does not > > clean up configuration files that have been modified. It removes files > > that are still in the same state a

Re: [gentoo-user] Goodbye, Gentoo

2011-05-31 Thread Alex Schuster
Alan McKinnon writes: > Apparently, though unproven, at 01:28 on Friday 27 May 2011, Kevin > O'Gorman did opine thusly: > > It looks like it's time to take Gentoo off of my main machine. I feel > > a little sad about it, or I'd just quietly go away. > > I know how you feel :-) > > I've tried to

Re: [gentoo-user] setting locale

2011-05-31 Thread David Relson
On Mon, 30 May 2011 22:34:46 +0200 Nils Larsson wrote: > Eh... Right, so ... > > The echo example might have been a bit blunt. I've found myself using > echo examples as a general "you need to add this setting here" > device, like you learn to do when you start using Gentoo, might have > been a b

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:08:08 +0100, David W Noon wrote: > You have just touched on an annoyance of unmerge, in that it does not > clean up configuration files that have been modified. It removes files > that are still in the same state as when the package was emerged, but > not those modified by

Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone running a gentoo guest on virtualbox?

2011-05-31 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 13:56, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Pandu Poluan wrote: >> Meh, I clicked 'Send' too fast. >> >> *My* suggested solution: >> >> Generate an initramfs containing udev. The hands-down easiest way is >> using genkernel's 'only create an initramfs' s

Re: [gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files

2011-05-31 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
Cfg-update has such a logic. It looks for user changes, If there are decisions to make at all and previous decisions. Ihatethespellcheckerofmyphone. Am 31.05.2011 08:49 schrieb "Alan McKinnon" : On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 AM, David W Noon wrote: > On Mon, 30 May 2011 21... The logic appears