On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
under /usr, e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living
somewhere else, on different partition and different filesystem.
Let's say something mounted
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:41:15 +
Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2012 12:21:17 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:34:27 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
My mother swears blind I watched England win the World Cup but I
don't remember (being only 1
On Tuesday 13 Mar 2012 05:36:38 ro...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
I recently decided to update my AMD64 box from 2.38 to the new 3.2 kernel.
I used genkernel all to compile the upgraded kernel but when I go to boot
I get the following error.
Loading modules
Determining root device
!!Block device
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:54:58 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
The idea of trying to launch udevd and initialize devices without
the software, installed in /usr, which is required by those devices
is a configuration that causes problems in many real-world,
practical situations.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:24:32AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Help would be appreciated.
Sorry, mdev is not for you, it looks like udev is a mandatory
dependancy for lvm2. I tried emerge -pv lvm2 and it came back with...
waltdnes@d530 ~ $ emerge -pv lvm2
These are the packages that would
On Mar 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:54:58 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
The idea of trying to launch udevd and initialize devices without
the software, installed in /usr, which is required by those devices
is a
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:24:32AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Once you're back to your old setup, can you do me a favour? Please do
the following...
1) Add the line...
sys-fs/udev
to /etc/portage/package.mask.
2) Run the 2 commands
emerge -pv system system.txt
emerge -pv world
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:54:58 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
The idea of trying to launch udevd and initialize devices without
the
On Mar 13, 2012 2:41 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:54:58 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012 2:00 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
under /usr, e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living
somewhere else, on
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:39PM -0500, Dale wrote
I think mdev has shown it can be fixed. Given time, it just may replace
udev then the udev dev can screw up his own stuff on not bother other
distros. I'm giving mdev some thought here. I want /usr on LVM which
means it has to be
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012 2:00 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
under
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 09:50:02PM +0100, pk wrote
So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr
then? Thanks for the info!
I believe that 180 or 181 is the first version that requires /usr on /
(or an initramfs or whatever). And that's why it's currently masked.
--
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:39PM -0500, Dale wrote
I think mdev has shown it can be fixed. Given time, it just may replace
udev then the udev dev can screw up his own stuff on not bother other
distros. I'm giving
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:35:33PM -0400, Bruce Hill, Jr. wrote
Unless I misunderstand you, after you issue lilo to write to the MBR,
then issue:
lilo -R experimental
where experimental is the name of the kernel image you want to boot. The R
creates a one time command which it will use the
On 13.03.2012 09:15, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
If I'm understanding you, you want:
fstab:
/dev/XX /mnt/p1 ...
/dev/YY /mnt/p2 ...
and then
/usr/portage - /mnt/p1
/usr/src - /mnt/p2
(or using bindmounting, whatever).
This makes no sense at all (at least not to me), when you can
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:15, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
You are; but in an incredible complicated and convulted way.
If I'm understanding you, you want:
fstab:
/dev/XX /mnt/p1 ...
/dev/YY /mnt/p2 ...
and then
/usr/portage - /mnt/p1
/usr/src - /mnt/p2
(or
Hi,
I have an annoying problem with the current version update of
cryptsetup-1.4.1. Already in the configure step emerge stops with the
error message:
...
checking for gcry_check_version in -lgcrypt... no
configure: error: Cannot find static gcrypt library
...
Actually, libgcrypt-1.4.6 is
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:15, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
You are; but in an incredible complicated and convulted way.
If I'm understanding you, you want:
fstab:
/dev/XX /mnt/p1 ...
/dev/YY
On Mar 13, 2012 2:42 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:15, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are; but in an incredible complicated and convulted way.
If I'm
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:05:59 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Mar 13, 2012 2:00 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:04:00 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:41:15 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I can't remember it at all, even though I was 23 or so. (Aside: my
father used to say that football is a game, and games are what children
play.)
Yes, but that doesn't mean no one else plays them. That's the sort of
argument that
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:38:26 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Of course, for a normal desktop user, a separate /usr is basically
useless.
If you need to encrypt /etc but don't want the overhead of encrypting
everything is /usr, which is basically publicly available files anyway,
separating /
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:00:08 +0700
Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:15, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are; but in an incredible complicated and convulted way.
If I'm understanding you, you want:
fstab:
/dev/XX /mnt/p1 ...
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:23:28PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out how my Asus laptop maps function key
events. This is being driven by an emerge message telling me that the
acpi4asus package is being obsoleted and removed in 30 days and
replaced by an in-kernel
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Alex Schuster wrote:
José Romildo Malaquias writes:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 07:36:07PM +0100, YoYo Siska wrote:
mke2fs -f -b1024 -i2048 /usr/img_portage
The -f option from mke2fs is to specify a fragment size and expects an
argument. Do
Hello, Walter.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:14:55AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:24:32AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Sorry, mdev is not for you, it looks like udev is a mandatory
dependancy for lvm2. I tried emerge -pv lvm2 and it came back with...
waltdnes@d530 ~ $
On March 13, 2012 at 3:10 AM Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 13 Mar 2012 05:36:38 ro...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
I recently decided to update my AMD64 box from 2.38 to the new 3.2
kernel.
I used genkernel all to compile the upgraded kernel but when I go to
boot
I get the
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
LVM, everything else is under LVM. I think all
Hi, Walter.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:33:06AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 09:24:32AM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
Once you're back to your old setup, can you do me a favour? Please do
the following...
1) Add the line...
sys-fs/udev
to /etc/portage/package.mask.
On March 13, 2012 at 1:36 AM ro...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
I recently decided to update my AMD64 box from 2.38 to the new 3.2
kernel.
I used genkernel all to compile the upgraded kernel but when I go to boot
I get the following error.
Loading modules
Determining root device
!!Block device
On Tuesday 13 March 2012 11:01:29 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 02:41:15 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
I can't remember it at all, even though I was 23 or so. (Aside: my
father used to say that football is a game, and games are what
children play.)
Yes, but that doesn't mean no
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:53:29 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
As Alan said in other thread, it can be fixed (if you think is not
right) for some very specific cases. Alan mentioned servers, really
simple desktops with simple hotplug devices, and embedded systems. For
mdev to
On Mar 13, 2012 10:39 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:53:29 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
As Alan said in other thread, it can be fixed (if you think is not
right) for some very specific cases. Alan mentioned servers, really
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a situation
that I have to encrypt my hard drive. I keep /, /boot, and swap outside
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked at encryption before and find myself in a
Am 13.03.2012 17:26, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 11.03.2012 16:38, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
Hello,
I have not looked
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:49:40 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Besides, I've already lost a poorly cooled HDD on a benchmark.
Better than losing it on real data.
--
Neil Bothwick
Why do they call it a TV set when you only get one?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 17:26, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 12:55, schrieb Valmor de Almeida:
On 03/11/2012 02:29 PM, Florian Philipp
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:54:30 +0200
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13/03/12 00:34, »Q« wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:29:10 +0200
Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone care to offer an opinion on what it will take to get
PROVIDES support in portage?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
What do you mean with overhead? CPU utilization? In that case the
overhead is minimal, especially when you run a 64-bit
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:04:00PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote
I am seriously thinking of splitting the storage of directories under /usr,
e.g., /usr/portage and /usr/source actually living somewhere else, on
different partition and different filesystem. Let's say something mounted
on
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
What do you mean with overhead? CPU utilization? In that case the
overhead
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM control, what kind
of overhead should I expect?
On 2012-03-13 08:13, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've also thought about this and I also want to ask why?
Hm... me too? :-)
I stopped using a separate /usr on my workstations a long time ago when
I realized it was pointless. The days of 5M hard disks when the entire
Ok, you realized it was
Hello,
i try to install avidemux and so i give emerge avidemux. But at
media-libs/aften-0.0.8 break emerge with the message:
error
cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libnettle.so.3:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
/error
But the libnettle.so.3 is present on
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am planning to encrypt only home/ under LVM
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:57 PM, siefke_lis...@web.de
siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
i try to install avidemux and so i give emerge avidemux. But at
media-libs/aften-0.0.8 break emerge with the message:
error
cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libnettle.so.3:
cannot open
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:05:34PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
I also did 2 {system,world}.err. system.err was empty. I've included
world.err in the enclosed tarball.
From your error listing, it looks like lvm2, kde, and gnome (including
the XFCE subset) require udev. Ouch.
--
Walter
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:57 AM, siefke_lis...@web.de
siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
i try to install avidemux and so i give emerge avidemux. But at
media-libs/aften-0.0.8 break emerge with the message:
error
cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libnettle.so.3:
cannot open
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, siefke_lis...@web.de
siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:
Hello,
i try to install avidemux and so i give emerge avidemux. But at
media-libs/aften-0.0.8 break emerge with the message:
error
cmake: error while loading shared libraries: libnettle.so.3:
cannot open
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586
version is better for you --- unless GCC suddenly got a lot better at
optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at optimization, but
I fully expect current versions to produce better code for
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100,
Am 13.03.2012 19:58, schrieb Florian Philipp:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:11:47PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
Since I am
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I don't know a whole lot about multilib, but I believe /usr/lib is a
32-bit library folder. Perhaps avidemux is looking for a 64-bit
version?
It's a sim link here:
c2stable ~ # ls -l /usr/lib
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
Am 13.03.2012 20:13, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 18:45, schrieb Frank Steinmetzger:
On 03/13/2012 10:00 AM, Uwe Scholz wrote:
Hi,
I have an annoying problem with the current version update of
cryptsetup-1.4.1. Already in the configure step emerge stops with the
error message:
...
checking for gcry_check_version in -lgcrypt... no
configure: error: Cannot find static
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586
version is better for you --- unless GCC suddenly got a lot better at
optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:05:22 -0700 Mark Knecht wrote:
First, was the system up-to-date prior to trying to install your new
program?
I has yesterday make emerge world.
emerge -pvDuN @world
If not get it up-to-date first.
Okay this i use in future.
Once up-to-date, and still before the
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 20:13, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.net
wrote:
Am 13.03.2012 19:18, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Florian Philipp
Hello, Walter,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:00:52PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:05:34PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
I also did 2 {system,world}.err. system.err was empty. I've included
world.err in the enclosed tarball.
From your error listing, it looks like
Am 13.03.2012 20:07, schrieb Stroller:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586 version is better for you --- unless GCC
suddenly got a lot better at optimizing code.
Since when, exactly? GCC isn't the best compiler at optimization,
but I fully expect
Am 13.03.2012 20:38, schrieb Michael Mol:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 13 March 2012, at 18:18, Michael Mol wrote:
...
So I assume the i586 version is better for you --- unless GCC
suddenly got a lot better at optimizing code.
Since
This thread is becoming ridiculously long. Just as a last side-note:
One of the primary reasons that the IA64 architecture failed was that it
relied on the compiler to optimize the code in order to exploit the
massive instruction-level parallelism the CPU offered. Compilers never
became
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hello, Walter,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:00:52PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:05:34PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
I also did 2 {system,world}.err. system.err was empty. I've included
world.err in
This revision includes some checking to see if your system can run
without udev. In general, if you use any of...
* GNOME
* KDE
* XFCE
* lvm2
... you probably need udev, so mdev is not for you. I've also found one
situation where I need to take one extra step to run without udev. I
have a
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Fringe programs will not require udev, or it will be optional; but
the moment a fringe program reaches critical mass to become
maistream, the probability of it needing udev (directly or
indirectly) will increase.
Am 12.03.2012 12:24, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I only recently emerged the gnome tracker and try to index my
thunderbird emails.
tracker-control -l shows that the email-miner is/seems disabled.
I used USE=thunderbird for app-misc/tracker and I see the addon
Trackerbird within
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 07:58:55PM +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:
From what I can see in the kernel sources, there is a generic AES
implementation using nothing but portable C code and then there is
aes-i586 assembler code with aes_glue C code.
So I assume the i586
version is better
Hello, Canek,
I thought you'd be replying to me here. :-)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:27:25PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hello, Walter,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:00:52PM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Fringe programs will not require udev, or it will be optional; but
the moment a fringe program reaches critical mass to
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:07:37 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
But I really meant what functionality udev has that mdev lacks. For
example, mdev this morning recognised my USB stick being inserted, and
created /dev/sdc for it.
udev does a *lot* more than that, for example the persistent naming of
Hi Alan!
you were right. It is masked! I figured out that autounmask is not in
portage, because of that I believe that this might not be the only
package that is masked
tamer@office ~ $ emerge -pv =gnome-3.2.1
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating
On March 13, 2012 at 5:22 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Fringe programs will not require
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 5:22 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:35:05 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Hill, Jr. da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 5:22 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13,
Let's deal with your biggest mistake first. You are running a stable
system (you have ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64 in make,conf) but you want to
install gnome-3.
Now that is highly unlikely to work for a very long time yet as gnome-3
is considered nowhere near stable enough yet to be unmasked. Portage
Anyone else seeing this?
No bugreport yet, and I rebuilt and revdeped
Stefan
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:13:33 +0100
Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Anyone else seeing this?
No bugreport yet, and I rebuilt and revdeped
Stefan
I'm thinking you hit send before typing up the bit where you say what
the issue is you are having.
--
Alan McKinnnon
Hello, Neil.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:07:37 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
But I really meant what functionality udev has that mdev lacks. For
example, mdev this morning recognised my USB stick being inserted, and
created
On March 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just what I was saying: I said (right there) the probability of it
needing udev (directly or indirectly) will increase. I did not say it
would *need* udev for sure; just that the probability of it needing
udev would
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hello, Neil.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:07:37 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
But I really meant what functionality udev has that mdev lacks. For
example, mdev this
On March 13, 2012 at 6:13 PM Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Anyone else seeing this?
No bugreport yet, and I rebuilt and revdeped
Stefan
There is a stabilization request for it:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=407559
--
Happy Penguin Computers`)
126 Fenco
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just what I was saying: I said (right there) the probability of it
needing udev (directly or indirectly) will increase. I did
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:20:19 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
udev does a *lot* more than that, for example the persistent naming of
network interfaces. More significantly, it can run programs based on
device rules.
This is where I start getting unhappy. Is there any need for this
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:38:08PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hello, Neil.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:07:37 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
But I really
Thank you very much Alan!
I keep the finger away of it. And continue running Gnome2. Not important
for me updating the wm to gnome3.
It's a developer machine. :-)
Tamer
Am 13.03.2012 23:10, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
Let's deal with your biggest mistake first. You are running a stable
system
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:03:50PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:20:19 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
udev does a *lot* more than that, for example the persistent naming of
network interfaces. More significantly, it can run programs based on
device rules.
This is
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 04:38:08PM -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hello, Neil.
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:33:30PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 13
On Mar 14, 2012 7:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
8 snippage
So, you need something to handle device files on /dev, so you don't
need every possible device file for every possible piece of hardware.
But then you want to handle the same device with the same device
I am trying to get my system(s) ready for the new (read crappy) way
mandated by udev and am having some issues.
I usually manually compile my kernels, use tuxonice and dont use an
initrd/initramfs.
As ToI is not available for the latest kernels, I updated openrc and
installed genkernel but then
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:13 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I am trying to get my system(s) ready for the new (read crappy) way
mandated by udev and am having some issues.
I usually manually compile my kernels, use tuxonice and dont use an
initrd/initramfs.
As ToI is not
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 11:13 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
I am trying to get my system(s) ready for the new (read crappy) way
mandated by udev and am having some issues.
I usually manually compile my kernels, use tuxonice and dont use an
initrd/initramfs.
As ToI is not available for
93 matches
Mail list logo
