On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 16:27 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Has anybody else seem this? My permissions sure seem fine.
Including /var/run? Some programs drop root privileges before
starting,
so you need the chmod 1777 /var/run.
Thanks for the reply.
/var/run is 1777 (it was before), yet it
~2.1.9
Installed: 2.1.9_rc1(11:54:59 12/07/06)(apache2 -courier -exim
postfix -qmail -sendmail -xmail)
Homepage:http://www.list.org/
Description: A python-based mailing list server with an extensive
web interface
# equery uses mailman
[ Searching
Installed: 2.1.9_rc1(11:54:59 12/07/06)(apache2
-courier -exim postfix -qmail -sendmail -xmail)
Homepage:http://www.list.org/
Description: A python-based mailing list server with an
extensive web interface
# equery uses mailman
[ Searching
?
From exim.conf:
# They are all colon-separated lists
So you want:
hostlist relay_from_hosts = 127.0.0.1 : 70.234.122.251 : 70.234.122.248
I don't think you have to put 70.234.122.250 in here if it is the same
machine as 127.0.0.1. At least I don't in my working configuration.
Also, exim needs
. It emerged. Now, how do I plug it into sendmail?
I'm using Exim and I only have no other machine at home
where I could try another MTA. As I did with Exim, it should
suffice when you take the Procmail plug of Sendmail and just
s/procmail/cropmail/g it.
A successful configuration example
Hej,
On 11/5/07 19:02, Michael Sullivan wrote:
What do I need to do to set up mailman to work with exim?
[...]
as you didn't post the relevant parts of your exim.conf I guess that you
didn't read the notes in the compile process of mailman. There you'd
have had the possibility to copy paste
On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 14:21 +0200, Dirk GROSSE OSTERHUES wrote:
Hej,
On 11/5/07 19:02, Michael Sullivan wrote:
What do I need to do to set up mailman to work with exim?
[...]
as you didn't post the relevant parts of your exim.conf I guess that you
didn't read the notes in the compile
, and finding the 1,000 mails some idiot with a Windows bot just
sent, and deleting them, is really hard.
I'm redesigning our mail setup at work,a nd I'm going to do it with exim
*and* Postfix. Exim is the front end I can see, work with, and manage.
Exim sends on to Postfix as fast as it can
case).
postfix?
exim?
It's been a long time since I've used either postfix or exim, but I
don't remember either of them being too complex to configure.
I'm guessing that Portgage is going to object to installing both msmtp
and postfix/exim, so I'll probably have to build the rx-only MTA from
? (No... just no.)
qmail? (Seems a bit overly complex for my use case).
postfix?
exim?
It's been a long time since I've used either postfix or exim, but I
don't remember either of them being too complex to configure.
I'm guessing that Portgage is going to object to installing both msmtp
and postfix
/simplest MTA to set up for that?
sendmail? (No... just no.)
qmail? (Seems a bit overly complex for my use case).
postfix?
exim?
It's been a long time since I've used either postfix or exim, but I
don't remember either of them being too complex to configure.
I'm guessing that Portgage
acting as an SMTP
server and delivering mail locally to mbox or maildir destinations.
What's the easiest/simplest MTA to set up for that?
sendmail? (No... just no.)
qmail? (Seems a bit overly complex for my use case).
postfix?
exim?
It's been a long time since I've used
'
configuration is at the default location:
,
| heimdali init.d # ls -la /etc/lxc/acheron/config
| -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 967 5. Jan 01:14 /etc/lxc/acheron/config
| heimdali init.d #
`
What am I missing?
Shorewall is used on the host, exim is running in the container, and I
want fail2ban
ying to do:
>>
>>
>> , [ cat /etc/logrotate.d/exim }
>> | /var/log/exim/exim*.log {
>> | daily
>> | missingok
>> | rotate 800
>> | compress
>> | delaycompress
>> | notifempt
On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>>> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>>> you? It certainly has all
} \
--with-mail-gid=${MAILGID} \
--with-cgi-gid=${APACHEGID} \
|| die configure failed
make || die make failed
}
# ll /etc/exim/exim.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 29452 Apr 29 13:54 /etc/exim/exim.conf
# User and group for Mailman, should match your --with-mail-gid
. something that
can deliver mail locally and receive inbound mail using SMTP), then
postfix or exim would probably the be the next step up:
I would add Sendmail to the front of that list. But I might be biased.
I've read claims that there are things you can do with sendmail that
Exim or Postfix can't
~ # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in
order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/exim-4.69 USE=X
exiscan-acl
ldap mysql pam perl sasl ssl syslog tcpd -dnsdb
-domainkeys -dovecot-sasl -exiscan -gnutls -ipv6
-lmtp
-mailwrapper -mbox -mbx
of december I migrated my mailing lists to a new PC. The
My installation data:
#eix mailman
[I] net-mail/mailman
Available versions: 2.1.9_rc1 ~2.1.9
Installed: 2.1.9_rc1(11:54:59 12/07/06)(apache2
-courier -exim postfix -qmail -sendmail -xmail)
Homepage:http
On Monday 06 July 2009 23:01:13 Michael Sullivan wrote:
I have three boxes (baby, camille, and catherine) in my LAN, and for
some reason (this was years ago) I set up an exim server on each of
them. camille and catherine were supposed to forward their mail to
baby, which has a working dovecot
at work,a nd I'm going to do it with exim *and*
Postfix. Exim is the front end I can see, work with, and manage. Exim sends on
to Postfix as fast as it can, and Postfix transparently relays to recipient. I
get best of both worlds :-)
Now let's contrast Postfix with sendmail. No, wait, let's
#
`
What am I missing?
Shorewall is used on the host, exim is running in the container, and I
want fail2ban (on the host) to look into the logfile of the exim which
runs in the container:
,
| heimdali fail2ban # cat paths-overrides.local
| exim_main_log = /etc/lxc/acheron/rootfs/var/log
e corresponding sin on my Debian
server: I want to run the latest version of my pet MTA, exim, and with
the features I choose, so hand compiling is the only way. And this week
it backfired on me too: I carelessly installed some package that
depended on a MTA - and boom, /usr/sbin/sendmail, whic
with such requirements:
- integration with Exim.
- LDAP support. It must allow keep user list in LDAP.
- Available for Gentoo.
I need MLM to:
1. Process bounces. If a customer sends message to support@, don't send
bounce if one of mailboxes from support@ list (alias) is not
available.
2. Limit users who can
I've unmerged ssmtp and remerged exim in its place. This used to work,
but now it's giving me the following error:
camille michael # glsa-check -m 200610-14
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/glsa-check, line 316, in ?
portage_mail.send_mail(glsaconfig, mymessage)
File /usr
]: Cannot open mailhub.adj.org:25
What am I missing ? All localy emitted mail end up in ~/dead.letter...
Thx,
You emerged it but did not configure it.
Anyway, for an easy to set-up local mail system, I'd recommend Exim.
PS:
You don't need ssmtp for local mail. You can safely unmerge it.
Michael Sullivan wrote:
dovecot doesn't seem to have a log. How do I turn on logging for
dovecot?
I'd suspect it's either logging to /var/log/mail* or /var/log/messages
Have you checked both?
I forgot:
camille log # netstat -ptln
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 18:45 -0700, kashani wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
Are you port forwarding port 143 through your NAT if you're using NAT?
Are you allowing imap in your firewall rules?
I'd also try the suggesting of changing to listen = * suggested here.
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
yes, but most knowledgable people know that exim blows the pants off qmail
and postfix.
Ok, then perhaps you could explain why a mail server (running
exim4) suddenly stops to relay emails (this worked before) and then all of
a sudden
A. Khattri wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
yes, but most knowledgable people know that exim blows the pants off
qmail and postfix.
Now why would you want to start a flame war? Noone said package X is
better than package Y - most of us are just saying what
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Mark wrote:
Hi, I'm thinking of setting up a Gentoo server to host a few different
services, primarily a small web site on Apache, an Exim mail server, a
Halafax fax server and a Squid proxy server. I intend to put the machine in
a DMZ to protect the internal network
On 29 September 2005 19:05, Mark wrote:
Hi, I'm thinking of setting up a Gentoo server to host a few different
services, primarily a small web site on Apache, an Exim mail server, a
Halafax fax server and a Squid proxy server. I intend to put the machine in
a DMZ to protect the internal
though that there is a small error that
slightly changes the sense. see below:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, Nick
Rout wrote:
You are confused. postfix, exim and qmail are MTA's - they speak smtp.
They do not store mail, they pass it to another smtp server
of an LDA
Should be pass
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:09:10 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I found check_linkage.rb, but it's not installed (or linked) to any of the
standard $PATH directories. Instead, it's in a demo directory. Is it
fully functional?
Yes. You run it with ruby. It does still lack a couple of features
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 04:20 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses
with --package-names because of the lack of support for the
=category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still
supports.. :)
Hey, I'm
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 05:09 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
The equal sign was a mistake. I've actually been meaning to poke you about
that. At the same time you should drop the --emptytree parsing and just
use --deep directly. With the circular deps in the tree now that gets much
better
'network related' scripts (exim, mysql, lisa), so I don't *think* it's
'running too early'.
When I look through the init.d scripts, there are a handful that 'use dns',
but no one seems to provide it. I'm not sure this is the cause, but I'd like
to understand why no one provides it. More
R ] mail-mta/exim-4.50-r1 +X -dnsdb -exiscan -exiscan-acl +ipv6
-ldap -lmtp -mailwrapper -mbox +mysql -nis +pam +perl -postgres -sasl +ssl
-syslog +tcpd 1,401 kB
But I don't believe that's changed since:
daevid portage-logs # ll *exim*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23369 Jul 7 00:57 3190-exim-4.50
to send it?
I haven't used sendmail in ages (about 10 years). I don't remember how to do
it cleanly.
Why don't you move to a modern MTA like exim, postfix, qmail or such?
Uwe
--
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
suggest postfix or exim. I personally use Postfix
always. It's featureful and easy enough to configure.
I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
arguably THE MOST secure mail server
(http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html).
That said, I use postfix and love it.
-Mike
failed user root parsing pr 2002; Thilo
Bangertbang...@gentoo.org
I don't know why it's trying to use sendmail; I use exim...
My setup is very basic compared to yours, but on this machine I have
/usr/lib/sendmail - /usr/sbin/ssmtp
Is your sendmail a symlink also?
this obsession with ssh or telnet. Remote code
execution means that malicious party can execute any code on
affected system.
To elaborate, since exim is an SMTP server it will be listening on
TCP/25. All the attacker needs to do is run an SMTP command that will
prompt exim to perform a lookup
esome as ever set rules
> manuell.
After reading a good iptables tutorial, you may want to take a look at
shorewall and it's documentation.
If you're referring to IP addresses from which you receive emails that
are spam, I'd recommend getting familiar with exim and perhaps
spamassassin. For
smtp).
Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you need
2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for you? It
certainly has all the functionality.
--
Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
if you also post the followup to the list
fine for
non-encrypted SMTP connections. The problem is with encrypted SMTP
connections. Further the problem is in the SMTP side, not the actual
mailer / transport side.
Sendmail / exim / postfix / etc should all be able to provide the
unencrypted and encrypted SMTP side with very little
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, August 17, 2020 3:48 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Rent VPS and be your own admin. But running properly configured
> mail-server is not so easy. Setting up postfix/exim/sendmail
> is just a beginning. If you mean it seriously and do not want
> you
in
order
to make sure that all my users can log onto their
accounts on this alternate box; is it just
/etc/passwd
and /etc/shadow, or is there more?
I forgot to add in my previous post that I'm using
camille ~ # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in order
of these emails after the fact, I could open
with nail and forward. ('mail' seems to work if I reset $MAIL var as
above...)
Next, I thought to make these available via IMAP, so set up exim and
courier. I can't get IMAP to work, not sure why (perhaps Q#1 above
is related? Duh...). But at this point I
-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.8-r1 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r3 (0)
[-P-] [ ~] www-servers/thttpd-2.25b-r2 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.7-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M~] mail-mta/postfix-2.2.5-r1 (0)
[-P-] [M-] x11-libs/qt-4.1.0 (4)
[-P-] [ ] mail-mta/exim-4.43-r2 (0)
[-P
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:45 -0500, Michael Sullivan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 14:12 -0700, kashani wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
My MSOutlook 2007 and my Mozilla Thunderbird email clients on my laptop
cannot connect to my exim mail server. I can't seem to figure out
why
why I gave up using opera!
What you can do is setting up a mail server, (postfix, exim, qmail) as an
imap server on your machine. Fetchmail keeps its business as before, now
feeding your mail server; you can point opera to your server.
Procmail would not be used in this case, but you can
Bornier wrote:
OK, sorry, I remember now why I gave up using opera!
What you can do is setting up a mail server, (postfix, exim, qmail) as an
imap server on your machine.
You are confused. postfix, exim and qmail are MTA's - they speak smtp.
They do not store mail, they pass it to another smtp
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:52:35 -0700
Daevid Vincent wrote:
BTW, someone on the mailman list said, Yes, it has the flags, but what is
the value of the ${MAILGID} parameter? The error message you received says
it's 'mailman' and
should be 'mail'.
My system runs postfix, not exim
several times. But around Sept 7th is when it stopped
working.
I have mail from the list on 9/5 for sure. I'm fairly certain that exim is
not to blame here, as that hasn't changed in over two months.
Didn't you say in one of the original posts that you had tried to re-install
mailman? That would
t03d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps
> (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80)
> (envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
> id 1eImhw-IJ-SK
> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 02:30:12 +
>
> Message #2:
>
> Received: from [82.69.80.10
On 2017-11-26 11:00, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=peak.localnet)
> by smarthost03d.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps
> (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256)
> (Exim 4.80)
> (envelope-from <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk>)
> id 1eImhw-00
On 2018-01-19, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/01/2018 21:43, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>> On 2018-01-19 18:49, Grant Edwards wrote:
>>
>>>> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you
>>>> need 2 pi
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 22:29 +0200, Sergey Kobzar wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thursday, March 13, 2008, 10:15:33 PM, you wrote:
It didn't work:
Mar 13 15:13:31 baby exim[26470]: 2008-03-13 15:13:31 unqualified
recipient rejected: amy H=([192.168.0.2]) [192.168.1.100] (failed to
find host
My MSOutlook 2007 and my Mozilla Thunderbird email clients on my laptop
cannot connect to my exim mail server. I can't seem to figure out
why.
camille ~ # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/exim
queues. Border controls are
hard, and finding the 1,000 mails some idiot with a Windows bot just
sent, and deleting them, is really hard.
I'm redesigning our mail setup at work,a nd I'm going to do it with exim
*and* Postfix. Exim is the front end I can see, work with, and manage.
Exim sends
. But, and this makes me sad, it
doesn't really want *me* to manage it's queues. Border controls are
hard, and finding the 1,000 mails some idiot with a Windows bot just
sent, and deleting them, is really hard.
I'm redesigning our mail setup at work,a nd I'm going to do it with
exim *and* Postfix. Exim
.
I'm redesigning our mail setup at work,a nd I'm going to do it with
exim *and* Postfix. Exim is the front end I can see, work with, and
manage. Exim sends on to Postfix as fast as it can, and Postfix
transparently relays to recipient. I get best of both worlds :-)
I can't say
Hi Michael,
See comments below.
Here's the config. I think I have my sed command correct to remove the
commented lines from the listing:
baby ~ # cat /etc/exim/exim.conf | sed /#/d
domainlist local_domains = @ : espersunited.com :
^^^ - Did you really spit
Michael Sullivan wrote:
The problem is with dovecot. (port 110 is the IMAP port, isn't it? I
can't telnet to it.)
camille log # emerge -pv dovecot
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] net-mail/dovecot-1.1.1-r1 USE=doc
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 16:49 -0700, kashani wrote:
Michael Sullivan wrote:
dovecot doesn't seem to have a log. How do I turn on logging for
dovecot?
I'd suspect it's either logging to /var/log/mail* or /var/log/messages
Have you checked both?
I forgot:
camille log # netstat -ptln
lookup. (Google for
IDENT and you will see what it is).
Don't know much about sendmail (apart from it being horrible to configure
- much better to go with postfix, exim or qmail IMHO).
--
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 29 September 2005 12:05, Mark wrote:
Hi, I'm thinking of setting up a Gentoo server to host a few different
services, primarily a small web site on Apache, an Exim mail server, a
Halafax fax server and a Squid proxy server. I intend to put the machine in
a DMZ to protect
can do much of that I'ld like
| to keep this process.
OK, sorry, I remember now why I gave up using opera!
What you can do is setting up a mail server, (postfix, exim, qmail) as an
imap server on your machine. Fetchmail keeps its business as before, now
feeding your mail server; you can point
looking for something
like ssmtp, but with a queue.
most mtas (postfix, sendmail, and exim for sure) have multiple ways
of being called. One of which is a send your queue and die mode.
pick an mta and read the docs.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Tom
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I am looking for is a simplified howto describing how I could
set up sendmail to deliver mail for me...
Uhm, if you don't know sendmail, then why start with sendmail
in the first place? There are quite some easier MTAs out there.
I personally like Postfix best, but Exim seems to be popular
as well
to an email I sent from my
hotmail. Does anyone have any ideas?
Look, Dave, almost all people on this list and virtually anywhere in planet
Internet have dumped sendmail years ago and moved to some modern MTA like
exim or postfix or some such. It is highly unlikely you get a spot-on answer
here
has changed recently under Gentoo, so you
would emerge netqmail instead of qmail. There are many different mta
softwares out there. I would suggest trying a few of them, and see which
one seems to fit your thought process the best. For me it's qmail, but
you might be more of an exim or postfix
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 05:39:01 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
However, paludis does have some missing features that may be critical for
your environment: binary packages (both building and using)
True. And it misses pkgmoves and slotmoves (profiles/updates/*).
and a revdep-rebuild
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 07:20:45 Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2007 05:39:01 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
However, paludis does have some missing features that may be critical for
your environment:
a revdep-rebuild equivalent (although this can be hacked around)
With the
On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:57:53 Paul Varner wrote:
But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses
with --package-names because of the lack of support for the
=category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still
supports.. :)
Hey, I'm proud of
On Friday 08 December 2006 00:43, Richard Fish wrote:
On 12/7/06, David Corbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have exim installed, but I'm guessing it depends on logger,
It does.
which can be provided by either sysklogd or syslog-ng.
Probably:
1. You had sysklogd installed at one point
servers in August 2007 detected as
running Sendmail in a study performed by E-Soft, Inc.[2] Sendmail is
trailed by Microsoft Exchange Server, Exim, and Postfix; these four
being the only mail servers with more than 10% of the total.
[...]
On Monday, August 08, 2016 06:55:40 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 12:29, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hello Guys
> >
> > I need to install postfix and exim at the same Gentoo server.
>
> Why?
>
> You either have them running on different ports (mighty unusua
o you really need lmtp for that, though? As far as I remember simply
piping the messages to the /usr/lib/dovecot/deliver program, as the
deilivery mechanism, will ensure the same thing. I don't know postfix
much though, so maybe that's hard to do with postfix, unlike my pet
exim.
Also, even if yo
tfix, unlike my pet exim.
It's easy, see mailbox_command et al. One could even configure different
commands for each recipient, but I think LMTP beats launching an external
process per delivery.
-Ralph
deilivery mechanism, will ensure the same thing. I don't know postfix
> > much though, so maybe that's hard to do with postfix,
> > unlike my pet exim.
>
> In that case, why bother with Postfix at all. Can't fetchmail send mails
> directly to an MDA? I use getmail and it doesn't n
ard to do with postfix,
> unlike my pet exim.
In that case, why bother with Postfix at all. Can't fetchmail send mails
directly to an MDA? I use getmail and it doesn't need Postfix at all.
--
Neil Bothwick
WinErr 013: Unexpected error - Huh ?
pgp2kvYSXgF9S.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
on the same server the mail is
generated on, the MTA can use a local transport mechanism to store mail
instead of passing it on via SMTP.
I suggest you clarify your goal, and ask on the Postfix mailing list
(or Exim, etc.) for more information.
-Ralph
to handle a few messages per week, and doesn't need to
handle more than one connection at a time.
exim?
postfix?
emailrelay?
What I can't figure out for the above is how you configure them to
send the mail using a command line MTA like /usr/bin/sendmail or
/usr/bin/msmtp instead
passing them to a command-line MTA (e.g. /usr/bin/sendmail
>> replacement provided by msmtp).
>
> Just like the others writing in this thread, I am wondering why you need
> 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for you?
> It certainly has all the functionality.
sendmail/postfix/exim. It looks like
they'll all do what I want (modulo the no-queue desire).
I think that it's extremely likely that you can configure the MTAs to
not queue messages. - Inquire in MTA specific support groups.
(I expect that someone else would have chimed in to this thread
normal e-mail.
>
> I would expect that you can use any of those in place of msmtp to send
> email too.
That would require seperate outbound transports that are selected
based on how the mail was read: smtp vs. /usr/bin/sendmail (the real
one). I get the impression from exim and post
On 2018-07-17 16:04, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Do you have any problems with roundcube?
Yes:
ahiker!90 exim$ apt-cache show roundcube-core | grep '^Depends'
Depends: dbconfig-common, debconf, libapache2-mod-php | php, libmagic1,
php-pear (>= 1:1.10.1), php-cli, php-intl, php-json, php-mcrypt,
rou
/procmailrc, for example:
DEFAULT=$HOME/.maildir/
WARN: postinst
FEATURES=sfperms removes the read-bit for others from
/usr/bin/procmail
/usr/bin/lockfile
If you use procmail from an MTA like Exim, you need to
re-add the read-bit or avoid the MTA checking the binary
exists.
--
Nei
"Michael Orlitzky" , 07.04.2020, 20:34:
> Blaming lists.gentoo.org (or any other MTA) for not retrying after a 4xx
> without evidence is seeing hoof prints and thinking zebras. Ockham's
> razor: you fucked up.
I'm watching my exim logs right now and can confirm that the
on how to maximally satisfy these
requirements?
Rent VPS and be your own admin. But running properly configured
mail-server is not so easy. Setting up postfix/exim/sendmail
is just a beginning. If you mean it seriously and do not want
your IP to land on blacklists (and you vps suspended), there is
much
postmaster
postmaster: root
# General redirections for pseudo accounts.
adm:root
bin:root
daemon: root
exim: root
lp: root
mail: root
named: root
nobody: root
postfix:roo
.
You've explicitly pulled in a boot manager package. You can't expect
portage to keep a bunch of implicit package managers (systemd, sysV,
openrc etc) lying around when you haven't asked for them. I've installed
postfix as my mailer - I don't want exim, sendmail, etc etc lying around
"just in
the appropriate DNS records
on all machines, so how can I fix this? Is it possible to set camille's
exim to forward all mail it receives to the equivalent accounts on baby?
This bothers me:
camille log # dig camille.espersunited.com MX
; DiG 9.4.2-P2 camille.espersunited.com MX
;; global options
/exim-4.60-r1
media-gfx/imagemagick-6.2.5.5
net-im/gaim-1.5.0
net-irc/irssi-0.8.10
net-nds/openldap-2.2.28-r3
perl-core/Test-Simple-0.62
snip
Fri Jun 2 22:55:16 CDT 2006 : There are no unmasked ebuilds to satisfy
app-editors/vim. Skipping
dev-perl/Locale-gettext-1.05 is not the latest available. Use
feel like "currently have (broken, as you say)" is inaccurate.
Use ssmtp, unless the mail isn't coming from localhost and you need simple
(use postfix); otherwise if your setup is tricky use exim.
I don't think there is enough information to know that ssmtp / postfix /
exim / sendma
read, I am wondering why you
>>>>> need 2 pieces here. Why won't e.g. exim do both sides of this for
>>>>> you? It certainly has all the functionality.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see how you can say that when you don't know the method that
>>>>
-2.61-r2 USE=ipv6 ssl -mailwrapper
-md5sum 53 kB
Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 53 kB
baby is running exim:
baby ~ # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/exim-4.67 USE=exiscan
I tried to send a comic strip as an attachment to my wife and I got a
Mailbox Unavailable error. I'm running:
baby log # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild R ] mail-mta/exim-4.68 USE=exiscan exiscan-acl ldap
On Jan 6, 2008 7:42 AM, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to send a comic strip as an attachment to my wife and I got a
Mailbox Unavailable error. I'm running:
baby log # emerge -pv exim
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies
101 - 200 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
