On 12/05/13 14:29, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried
to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following:
I didn't
On 13/05/13 04:57, Walter Dnes wrote:
I ran into this today while installing Gentoo on my new machine.
making executable: usr/lib64/preloadable_libintl.so
.[33;01m * .[39;49;00mQA Notice: Missing soname symlink(s):
.[33;01m * .[39;49;00m
.[33;01m * .[39;49;00m usr/lib64/libgnuintl.so.8 -
On 13/05/13 09:19, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 13/05/13 04:57, Walter Dnes wrote:
I ran into this today while installing Gentoo on my new machine.
making executable: usr/lib64/preloadable_libintl.so
.[33;01m * .[39;49;00mQA Notice: Missing soname symlink(s):
.[33;01m * .[39;49;00m
.[33;01m
On 17/05/13 21:30, Silvio Siefke wrote:
alsa.conf (generated by alsaconf)
Gentoo's alsa-guide.xml is outdated and is incorrectly suggesting the
use of alsaconf
When in reality alsaconf doesn't work at all with sys-apps/kmod because
it doesn't generate 'modules.pcimap' and 'modules.usbmap'
On 06/06/13 14:52, Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
i have a new netbook buy and want install Gentoo on it. So the Installation
run without problems, but i understand not why the network want not start.
I make the installation with Sabayon Linux and from there i compile the
Kernel with make
On 07/06/13 18:05, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding this string eth0:
1. What does this string represent? Is it a file on a filesystem?
(no!) Is it okay for me to call it an ethernet *device*
It's just a name.
On 07/06/13 21:09, Samuli Suominen wrote:
[ .. ]
One more link related,
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/src/udev?id=97595710b77aa162ca5e20da57d0a1ed7355eaad
From there you can find the code that does the renaming in udev.
On 26/06/13 07:58, Dale wrote:
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e 's/\\//\\//g'`; \
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -MM -I.
On 26/06/13 09:31, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 26/06/13 07:58, Dale wrote:
I can't seem to get lvm2 to compile. I get this error:
FILE=`echo lvchange.d | sed 's/\\//\\//g;s/\\.d//g'`; \
DEPS=`echo ../make.tmpl ../VERSION ../Makefile
../include/.symlinks_created | sed -e 's
On 11/07/13 12:32, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 07/11/2013 10:31:04 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:36:29 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Error getting authority: Error initializing authority: Error calling
StartServiceByName for org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1:
On 22/07/13 10:03, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
How did you resolve this conflict?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut
As a maintainer of sys-auth/consolekit, and xfce-base/xfce4-meta I can
assure you sys-auth/consolekit is not about to be removed and the
support for systemd-logind will be
On 22/07/13 18:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did that almost a year ago.
It's how you look at it. I call it mature but
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally intended.
not possible, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart, and such
On 23/07/13 09:11, András Csányi wrote:
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and
On 23/07/13 09:54, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 23/07/13 08:43, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally
intended.
not possible
On 30/07/13 04:13, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
walt, are you using pam_systemd? I have a hunch that systemd-logind
should still work.
nope, logind no longer works with anything else than systemd since 205
we have given up on logind+openrc, that's why gnome also now pulls in
systemd at portage
On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
I've googled until my fingers are
On 02/08/13 00:49, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular
On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to
On 02/08/13 03:19, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 07:42, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have
On 02/08/13 04:01, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:42:36AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
nope, you just believed all the FUD there has been out there. i've said
it many times, and i'll say it again:
the only real different is USE=rule-generator and that's it
and sys-fs/eudev
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default in
sys-fs/udev
Futhermore predictable network interface names work as designed, not a
single valid bug filed about them.
Stop spreading FUD.
Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs
On 02/08/13 06:14, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default in
sys-fs/udev
Futhermore predictable network interface names work as designed, not a
single valid bug filed about them
On 02/08/13 08:28, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 06:14, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default in
sys-fs/udev
Futhermore predictable network interface names work
On 02/08/13 09:06, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:17 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On 02/08/13 11:01, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default in
sys-fs/udev
On 04/08/13 05:56, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 05:02:39AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs/eudev just like
sys-apps/module-init-tools already was removed as unnecessary later on.
You want eudev removed, and Lennart Poettering wants udev on
non
On 05/08/13 13:27, Marc Stürmer wrote:
Why is was forked you ask? Because of the predictable Name stuff and
some People disliked the attitude of the udev programmer which was
either my way or the high way. aside choice is always Good to have so
in the end IT was bound to happen sooner or later
On 07/08/13 03:38, walt wrote:
I was so hot to prove to myself that I could do the Big Update on both
systemd and openrc gentoo machines that I didn't spend much time actually
*using* gnome-3.8 until yesterday.
Have you ever lived or worked in a building during a big remodeling? With
most of
On 07/08/13 05:25, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06 2013, Samuli Suominen wrote:
that's only because gnome 3.8 hasn't been stabilized yet. as in, there
are no plans in keeping gnome 2.x available after gnome 3.8
stabilization.
Am I correct in believing that gnome-3.8 (whether
On 09/08/13 01:59, walt wrote:
On 08/07/2013 06:17 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
And in particular, all the GNOME stack includes their necessary unit files.
That's good to know. The only reason I haven't already made the switch to
systemd is lvm2 -- I just couldn't puzzle out how to get
On 05/08/13 23:18, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:24:27 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different to udev
now, AFAICT, and a recent update forced me to switch back to udev
because eudev hadn't been updated (on ~amd64).
Can you elaborate
On 10/08/13 17:36, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
When I do a
beagleboneblack:/rootswapon /dev/sda2
beagleboneblack:/rootfree
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:507476 50812 456664 0 13108
On 11/08/13 08:36, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 09:57:52AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
I expect it to happen around every new udev release that causes slight
incompability; the default of the virtual/udev, sys-fs/udev, doesn't
have to wait for the alternative providers
On 11/08/13 20:12, Dale wrote:
I notice this starts but never does anything. I end up doing a ctrl c
to stop it. I tried with two different versions of portage so I don't
think it is portage itself.
But it is. It's either Portage, or Python it's using itself. But it's
not about
On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 11:52:26 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
but the issue here was eudev *not* being updated when the virtual
was, and both cause and result were quite clear.
Right, but I was talking about not updating *anything* related to any
mission
On 12/08/13 05:49, 东方巽雷 wrote:
It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any
more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for
/usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink
to /usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in
On 12/08/13 13:19, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-11 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev
and
that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev.
I believe it's 'b' if user
On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default
in sys-fs/udev Futhermore predictable network
On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
how maintainership works.
But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is
annoying as 'ell
On 12/08/13 15:19, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
how maintainership works.
But trying
On 12/08/13 15:38, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
On 12/08/13 16:39, hasufell wrote:
On 08/12/2013 02:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader
On 17/08/13 22:00, Grant wrote:
This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a
way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the
slotting behavior.
I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the
problem is. It happens with an
On 22/08/13 22:03, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:59 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
As I figured in the package's changelog, some work on it is being done
by Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org. He is also on this list, so
I guess he could get involved as soon as he reads the list
On 22/08/13 22:22, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
What course of action would you recommend taking with regard to my
original post?
I'm not sure if I understand your problem but...
Looks like nvidia-drivers-319.32 was stabilized without stabilizing
nvidia-settings-319.32 together with it.
You can
On 20/08/13 09:21, Grant wrote:
This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a
way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the
slotting behavior.
I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the
problem is. It happens with an
On 24/08/13 08:39, Grant wrote:
Just saying you should be using `udisksctl` command instead of the now
obsolete `udisks` command
udisksctl command = new udisks 2
udisks command = old udisks 1
OK, but first I need to figure out how to get gvfs to use udisks instead
of gdu.
by emerging
On 27/08/13 09:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:10 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:52 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
Please disable
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
On 07/10/13 00:01, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I want to be able auto-mount removable drives. I'm running xfce:
box0=; equery list xfce-base/xfce4-meta
* Searching for xfce4-meta in xfce-base ...
[IP-] [ ]
On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to mention that I do have
xfce4-mount-plugin installed.
box0=; equery list '*xfce*'|grep mount
On 08/10/13 21:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/08/2013 09:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to mention
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell:
On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell:
On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
https
On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:55 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02
On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-10-20 9:02 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote:
Like I mentioned in a prior e-mail, the change didn't affect me when it
was pushed, and doesn't affect me now. I did recently have to reinstall
On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote:
It's true that sys-fs/eudev restored the *broken* rule_generator from
old sys-fs/udev, you can get it by USE=rule-generator.
But it's lot saner to keep using sys-fs/udev and just write custom rules
to rename interfaces based on MACs to like lan*, internet*
On 21/10/13 05:34, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but
from top of my head:
We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offending code.
As in, that's nothing
On 21/10/13 08:31, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but
from top of my head:
We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts
On 27/11/13 12:22, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2013/11/27 Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com
mailto:chrisstankev...@gmail.com
Hello,
Portage recently told me this:
* You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for
* kernel modules to have required
On 16/01/14 19:39, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:19:22 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Helmut is still using consolekit. Are you still using consolekit?
Yes, it's the default for kdm so it is enabled on both computers.
I don't think it will be the default for much
On 19/01/14 23:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:45:00 +, Mick wrote:
This thread confused me. I have this in my system and I have not
changed the permissions from when it was installed:
ls -la /usr/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rws--x--- 1 root messagebus 322984
On 20/01/14 18:45, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 01/20/14 18:30, Joseph wrote:
After upgrade to systemd my /dev/ttyS0 shows up as: root:dialout
ownership and permission 600
When I change as root manually to: chown uucp:dialout /dev/ttyS0
chmod 666 /dev/ttyS0
after restart it goes back to
On 10/02/14 00:43, walt wrote:
Recent threads about consolekit vs logind(systemd) have made me curious, so
I've been studying...
A few of us have had recent problems with things like plugging USB sticks,
which once worked transparently but now require root privileges.
I've discovered that
On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]:
1. sysvinit (status quo)
2. systemd
3. upstart
4. openrc (experimental)
On 16/02/14 23:28, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 20:11, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options
gentoo news item:
# eselect news read 10
2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
Title Upgrade to =sys-fs/udev-210
AuthorSamuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Posted2014-02-25
Revision 1
The options CONFIG_FHANDLE
On 27/02/14 21:49, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/02/14 19:24, Dan Johansson wrote:
On 26.02.2014 22:24, Poison BL. wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
Hello all,
This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
So, am I
On 27/02/14 22:33, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:24:50 +0100, Dan Johansson wrote:
But if you press 1 in the example above you will jump directly to
the menu item. Clue -- (1)
Damn you, why didn't you let us in on this secret year ago?
because Linux 3.8'ish wasn't released
On 28/02/14 08:47, Stroller wrote:
On Wed, 26 February 2014, at 8:29 pm, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
wrote:
…
* Netscape (under AOL) aimed at becoming a pseudo-OS on top of Windows.
We know how that turned out.
You appear to be underestimating it - whilst the AOL suite was hated by
On 01/03/14 13:23, Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
Hello list,
I've installed newest boost into /usr/local - it's a custom
installation and not via emerge/portage.
Today, after upgrading system, I've found that I need to use
emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world
On 03/03/14 21:21, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2014 13:05:10 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I don't even have any /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf.
What do you have in your /etc/conf.d/bluetooth? This is mine:
=
http://bugs.gentoo.org/503648 for stabilization of 2.9.1 which has been
migrated to the new python eclasses,
should solve many of the python related cracklib problems
On 19/03/14 04:22, Joseph wrote:
I'm getting a message from sys-fs/udisks
ERROR: setup
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be.
WARN: setup
I checked my kernel config there is not such options: CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND
It's only checked for older kernels than 3.10 by the
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.
See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
(I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)
- Samuli
On 08/04/14 04:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.
See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
(I'm purposely
cpufreqd, cpufrequtils are both dead packages for years now, it's
propably cpupower you want instead,
the only package getting updated for constantly changing paths in /sys
On 24/04/14 09:27, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm finishing up on installing Gentoo on a laptop. I tried testing
On 10/05/14 09:43, Mick wrote:
On Friday 09 May 2014 23:25:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014 21:56:45 +0100, Mick wrote:
What is the meaning of this change?
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE=acl firmware-loader
gudev introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -static-libs
On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 13/05/14 16:58, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd
On 14/05/14 03:18, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 16/05/14 10:34, Mick wrote:
I got this message after an update:
* Messages for package sys-apps/util-linux-2.24.1-r2:
* The mesg/wall/write tools have been disabled due to USE=-tty-helpers.
I understand that wall has been moved from sys-apps/sysvinit to sys-apps/util-
linux, but I
On 15/05/14 02:59, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild
select systemd as a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set.
And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set. --
On 03/06/14 14:48, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable.
And that's exactly what happened.
On 03/06/14 18:10, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Maybe a news item explaining the switch of upower would help those who
haven't
blundered into this yet.
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more
infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay.
Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency
was an issue, I'll still be showing some
On 04/06/14 15:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 13:22, schrieb Daniel Troeder:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff
On 04/06/14 15:21, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 6/3/2014 1:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep
On 04/06/14 15:58, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than build it
to work independently of the init system), this will in fact result in
*users* (read: those lacking the
On 04/06/14 16:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:21:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than
build it to work independently of the init system),
Reusing existing, proven code is not laziness, it is efficiency. Yes,
they
On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff
On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes,
I
know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-server without
any PM at all?
Of course. It's USE=-upower to make.conf and couple of
On 04/06/14 22:27, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes,
I
know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-server
without
any PM at all?
Of course. It's
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
On 05/06/14 02:15, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
