On 29/02/2020 17:40, james wrote:
is if the US government returns to the fundamental christian value
system, that made our country great. Greed, un-bridled, is changing
the quality of our lives, regardless of your personal belief systems.
Our country? I think you mean YOUR country. And seen
On 07/04/2020 00:38, Michael wrote:
Perhaps older UEFI specifications allowed Mac-baked filesystems, or perhaps
Apple were/are doing their own thing. The current UEFI specification
*requires* a FAT 12/16/32 filesystem type on an ESP partition to boot an OS
image/bootloader from - see section
On 05/04/2020 13:52, Neil Bothwick wrote:
This isn't strictly true, the ESP must be vfat, but you can still have an
ext? /boot.
This isn't true at all - you've got the cart before the horse. The
original (U)EFI spec comes from Sun, I believe, with no vfat in sight.
A standards-compliant
On 13/04/2020 17:05, Rich Freeman wrote:
And what takes time when doing a "large" TRIM is transmitting a
_large_ list of blocks to the SSD via the TRIM command. That's why
e.g. those ~6-7GiB trims I did just before (see my other mail) took a
couple of seconds for 13GiB ~ 25M LBAs ~ a whole
On 06/04/2020 14:08, Ashley Dixon wrote:
After my thankfully-brief experience with the likes of Microsoft and their
Exchange program, I always question how much impact the content of an R.F.C.
actually has on an implementation.
:-)
Okay, it was a long time ago, and it was MS-Mail (Exchange's
On 07/04/2020 11:53, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Grant's mail server, I assume, is configured with the highest security in mind,
so I can see how a mail server with a dynamic I.P.\ could cause issues in some
contexts. I just wish my I.S.P.\ offered_any_ sort of static I.P.\ package, but
given that I
On 11/04/2020 21:33, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 4/11/20 2:08 PM, antlists wrote:
Okay, it was a long time ago, and it was MS-Mail (Exchange's
predecessor, for those who can remember back that far), but I had an
argument with my boss. He was well annoyed with our ISP for complying
with RFC's
On 02/04/2020 13:37, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Same here, the colour cartridges have been saying they're "critically low" for
the past couple of months. As they don't expire, I did order a new set when
they got low. Those are still sealed in storage.
Yup. I ordered a set when they hit critically
On 02/04/2020 12:29, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
[question 1] i wonder how do you monitor your pc?
While it doesn't look for problems, I always have xosview running on my
desktop. It tells me when the system is struggling, and it supposedly
monitors things like raid.
Cheers,
Wol
On 28/03/2020 06:19, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
From what I read on the internet:
Everything bigger than 2TB needs to be GPT-formatted.
Is there anything better than gparted for that job?
gdisk? fdisk?
Basically, I think pretty much all of the popular linux utilities have
been updated.
You
On 01/04/2020 22:46, Dale wrote:
I still haven't bought it yet. I ordered some toner cartridges a while
back for my printer. The site said that the ones I ordered fits my
printer. Well, it appears they found out that was a error because they
removed that page and relisted it but did not
On 27/04/2020 17:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
Really though a better solution than any of this is for the filesystem
to be more SSD-aware and just only perform writes on entire erase
regions at one time. If the drive is told to write blocks 1-32 then
it can just blindly erase their contents first
On 30/04/2020 18:04, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
I copied the first 230GB of that disk to an empty partition of my new
system and run "testdisk" on itafter the analysis it came back
with "this partition cannot be recovered" but did not sau. whether the
reason is a partition table, which is broken
On 01/05/2020 09:03, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
Hi Wol,
data copied !:)
I did a
mdadm --examine /dev/sdb
Except I pointed you at a utility called lsdrv, not mdadm ... :-)
Cheers,
Wol
On 03/05/2020 18:55, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 1:23 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
For anything above raid 1, MAKE SURE your drives support SCT/ERC. For
example, Seagate Barracudas are very popular desktop drives, but I guess
maybe HALF of the emails asking for help recovering
On 03/05/2020 22:46, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
On Sunday, May 3, 2020 6:27 PM, Jack wrote:
curious. how do people look at --layout=n2 in the
storage industry? e.g. do they ignore the
optimistic case where 2 disk failures can be
recovered, and only assume that it protects for 1
disk
On 03/05/2020 21:07, Rich Freeman wrote:
I don't think you should focus so much on whether read=write in your
RAID. I'd focus more on whether read and write both meet your
requirements.
If you think about it, it's obvious that raid-1 will read faster than it
writes - it has to write two
On 04/05/2020 20:57, Dale wrote:
Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
At least
gimp-help
scribus
nut
fbpanel
are Python2 only, didn't check stuff from overlays
That makes sense. I can see where some can work with old and new python
but some appeared to be still stuck on the old 2.7. Guess I'll have
On 10/05/2020 20:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
I did find a WD Red 8TB drive. It costs a good bit more. It's a good
deal but still costs more. I'm going to keep looking. Eventually I'll
either spend the money on the drive or find a really good deal. My home
directory is at 69% so I got some time
On 15/05/2020 11:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:19:06 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
How are you generating the initramfs? If you use dracut, there are
options you can add to it's config directory, such as install_items to
make sure your service files are included.
I presume
On 15/05/2020 12:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:16 AM antlists wrote:
On 15/05/2020 11:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Or you can create a custom module, they are just shell scripts. I recall
reading a blog post by Rich on how to do this a few years ago.
My custom module calls
On 17/03/2020 11:54, madscientistatlarge wrote:
The issue is not usually end of trusted life, but rather random failure. I've
barely managed to recover failed hard drives, That is less likely on SSD though
possibly less likely to happen.
The drive may be less likely to fail, but I'd say
On 17/03/2020 14:29, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2020-03-17, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Same here. The main advantage of spinning HDs are that they are cheaper
to replace when they fail. I only use them when I need lots of space.
Me too. If I didn't have my desktop set up as a DVR with 5TB of
On 17/03/2020 05:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
Hi,
currentlu I am setting up a new PC for my 12-years old one,
which has reached the limits of its "computational power" :)
SSDs are a common replacement for HDs nowaday -- but I still trust my
HDs more than this "flashy" things...call me retro or
On 21/05/2020 21:14, Ashley Dixon wrote:
Hello,
I am attempting to set up sub-addressing on my Courier mail server, allowing
senders to directly deliver messages to a particular folder in my mailbox. For
example, I want to provide my University with the address
On 14/09/2020 08:48, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Just before this started, I booted Win-10 on /dev/sdb and ran its update
process. I don't use it for anything at the moment, just keeping it up to date
in case I ever do. I do this most weeks, but is it possible that Win-10
tampered in some way that it
On 13/09/2020 11:17, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Morning all,
My ~amd64 system uses partitions 1 to 18 on /dev/nvme0n1, and it has two SATA
disks as well, for various purposes. Today, after I'd taken the system down
for its weekly backup (I tar all the partitions to a USB disk) and started up
again,
On 09/09/2020 00:55, Neil Bothwick wrote:
That's the sort of thing I was thinking of. It could cause issues for
those that run emerge without checking what it is going to do, but they
are going to hit problems sometime anyway so they may as well learn their
lesson sooner;-)
Hmm, I hadn't
On 14/10/2020 20:22, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Alternatively, for more instant updates, you could look at
net-p2p/syncthing.
Not sure what you use for it, but there are mirrored filesystems that
run over a network. So the two systems will update in sync if they're
both switched on, or will defer
On 14/10/2020 19:58, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2020-10-14, antlists wrote:
Does your mobo support NVMe drives? Just be aware my mobo is crap in
that it says it supports two graphics cards, NVMe, etc, but if you stick
an NVMe in the second graphics card is disabled, or if you use both the
NVMe
On 13/10/2020 17:52, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Let's see if this is a correct bottom post. I've never seen anything in
this life. Eyes never developed enough for me to see.
Perfect, great!
Cheers,
Wol
On 15/10/2020 17:31, Jack wrote:
On 2020.10.15 00:03, Wols Lists wrote:
On 14/10/20 22:37, Jack wrote:
Why do you need two graphics cards? I've been driving two monitors
off each of the last several graphics cards I've used - both nVidia
and ATI, from simple PCI to PCIE needing the extra
On 15/10/2020 21:07, Jack wrote:
However, and I have no experience here, although some systems can boot
in BIOS mode to a GPT partitioned disk, there may be extra hoops to jump
through. I'm sure others will chime in with additional information.
I don't think my current system has EFI, and it
On 05/10/2020 17:01, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 05.10.20 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
So my issue seems to be: non-working arcconf doesn't let me "enable"
that one drive.
Some kind of progress.
Searched for more and older releases of arcconf, found Version 1.2 that
doesn't
On 04/10/2020 22:17, Michael wrote:
Random (guest) devices connected to the router will still be allocated
dynamically some IP address by its dhcp server, typically starting from 2 and
incremented from there. Since most of your devices IP addresses start from
the top it's unlikely there'll be
On 11/10/2020 21:55, n952162 wrote:
I ran into this:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1108636-start-0.html
but I really don't understand anything about these alternative
instruction sets and would think my CPU is pretty vanilla.
I mean, I hope to avoid trail-and-error approaches to
On 19/10/2020 12:33, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Mystery solved. It was a disk failure: a 256GB NVMe drive. It was 4.5 years
old, which doesn't seem a long life to me.
Doesn't sound old, but if it breaks in the fault-tolerance-management
area, then you're stuffed. Bit like old MFM (pre-IDE) drives
On 09/10/2020 20:19, Jude DaShiell wrote:
available profiles
eselect profile list
returns three profiles I might use all in the 17.0 version number.
stable, desktop, and desktop-gnome. I suspect stable would return a
console environment, desktop-gnome would get a gnome desktop, but how is
On 14/10/2020 14:58, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'd like to keep my "hot backup" machine more up-to-date. The most
important directory is my home directory. So far, I've been doing
occasional tarballs of my home directory and pushing them over. I
exclude some directories for "reasons". I'd like to
On 14/10/2020 18:38, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Let's see, yes that was a typo, those ssd disks are each 120GB and
unfortunately the Alien ATX case used only has room for one of them.
However external ssd drives are on the market.
Does your mobo support NVMe drives? Just be aware my mobo is crap in
On 17/08/2020 13:11, Dale wrote:
We put all the keywords in emails with white letters and a white background.
And how do I do that when I use plain latin-1 (or unicode) emails ... ?
Cheers,
Wol
On 26/08/2020 19:51, Grant Taylor wrote:
Just because it's possible to force something to use HTTP(S) does not
mean that it's a good idea to do so.
The main reason other applications use "TCP over HTTP(S)" is because
stupid network operators block everything else!
Cheers,
Wol
On 26/08/2020 18:40, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 8/21/20 10:15 PM, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
just to double check i got you right. due to flushing the buffer to
disk, this would mean that mail's throughput is limited by disk i/o?
Yes.
This speed limitation is viewed as a necessary limitation
On 26/08/2020 21:21, Grant Taylor wrote:
so basically total expected number of protocols/layers used in the
universe, per second, will be much less if we, on planet earth, use a
mail system that uses HTTP* instead of RESXCH_*.
I obviously disagree.
Exactly. You now need a protocol/layer
On 28/08/2020 20:34, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Cheers,
Wol
I think you meant that Caveman doesn't understand what TCP (and UDP) actually
is.
Grant does seem to know what he is talking about.
Sorry yes I did. I got rather confused ... not surprising really :-)
Cheers,
Wol
On 28/08/2020 19:10, james wrote:
A council member, from say England, could manage how 1/2 of what they
raise is spent. It could even "english centric" but must comply with USA
IRS standards. Our council could be expanded to many members, from other
countries, with a centic goal of spending
On 19/08/2020 04:44, Grant Edwards wrote:
How are the AMD "Wraith Stealth" fans? I've been using the fan that
came with the old Core-i3, and it gets a little annoying when it's
time to compile chromium (or when flying planes/helicopters).
If you're talking about what I think you are, I'm
On 19/08/2020 16:19, Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 7:10 PM, Grant Taylor
wrote:
Per protocol specification, SMTP is EXTREMELY robust.
It will retry delivery, nominally once an hour, for up to five (or
seven) days. That's 120-168
On 29/09/2020 09:02, Dale wrote:
If Seamonkey dies, I have no idea what I'm going to do for emails. I
got emails going back to when I first started using the internet. Heck,
I may have the first email I ever sent. o_O Whatever I use, I hope I
can import or just copy them over. Otherwise,
On 30/09/2020 15:57, Grant Edwards wrote:
If you wait many months between updates, things tend to get more
difficult, and you may have to futz with things to get updated
(e.g. remove a package or two, update, then reinstall the removed
packages). It's sometimes not obvious how to proceed.
I
On 27/05/2020 01:44, William Kenworthy wrote:
I have a few different pi's and similar Odroid arm systems running
Gentoo on sdcards - the failure rate is a real and constant problem (and
seems worse on pi's no matter what brand/type of sdcard so keep an up to
date spare+backups) and I am thinking
On 26/05/2020 19:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2020 19:14:18 +0100, antlists wrote:
That's the Gentoo version that I'm using. But I'm looking for a way
to make it bullet-proof to having the plug pulled.
Don't use an SD card? Seriously, pulling the power on an SD card has
been
On 26/05/2020 19:27, Neil Bothwick wrote:
This will mitigate the reduced life as you are hardly writing to the
card. Booting from a read-only / has caused problems for me in the past,
because of the inability to write to /etc.
Well, if we can get a loopback into the boot sequence before you
On 26/05/2020 18:28, Frank Tarczynski wrote:
That's the Gentoo version that I'm using. But I'm looking for a way to
make it bullet-proof to having the plug pulled.
Don't use an SD card? Seriously, pulling the power on an SD card has
been known to corrupt it beyond recovery. BUT.
Is the big
On 22/05/2020 16:43, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 11:32 AM Michael wrote:
An interesting article mentioning WD Red NAS drives which may actually be SMRs
and how latency increases when cached writes need to be transferred into SMR
blocks.
Yeah, there is a lot of background on
On 22/05/2020 18:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:47 PM antlists wrote:
What puzzles me (or rather, it doesn't, it's just cost cutting), is why
you need a *dedicated* cache zone anyway.
Stick a left-shift register between the LBA track and the hard drive,
and by switching
On 22/05/2020 19:23, Rich Freeman wrote:
A big problem with drive-managed SMR is that it basically has to
assume the OS is dumb, which means most writes are in-place with no
trims, assuming the drive even supports trim.
I think the problem with the current WD Reds is, in part, that the ATA-4
On 19/07/2020 15:18, Peter Humphrey wrote:
So I'm asking what systems other people use. I can't be unusual in what I
want, so there must be lots of solutions out there somewhere. Would anyone
like to offer me some advice?
Doing my best to remember my setup ...
Running postfix as my mail
On 01/08/2020 19:48, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/31/20 2:05 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Nit: DHCPv6 can be (and usually is) dynamic, but it doesn't have to
be. It's entirely possible to have a static IP address that your OS
(or firewall/router) acquires via DHCPv6 (or v4). [I set up stuff
like
On 01/08/2020 19:52, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 7/31/20 2:01 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
There may be half way decent ISPs in the US, but I haven't seen one in
over 20 years since the last one I was aware of stopped dealing with
residential customers. They were a victem of the "race to the bottom"
On 01/08/2020 03:03, Adam Carter wrote:
I used to be able to scan on my gentoo box from an HP officejet pro on
the network. This is now failing and i can see that the gentoo box is
attempting to connect to TCP/6566 on the HP, but the HP is not listening
on that port.
Test command is;
hp-scan
On 30/07/2020 00:23, james wrote:
Very, Very interested in this thread.
Another quesiton. If you have (2) blocks of IP6 address,
can you use BGP4 (RFC 1771, 4271, 4632, 5678,5936 6198 etc ) and other
RFC based standards to manage routing and such multipath needs? Who
enforces what carriers
On 12/08/2020 20:28, Никита Степанов wrote:
livecd gentoo # mount /dev/md1 /mnt/gentoo
mount: unknown filesystem type 'linux_raid_member'
what to do?
cat /proc/mdstat ?
Cheers,
Wol
On 12/08/2020 18:53, Никита Степанов wrote:
which filesystem is best for raid 0?
DON'T.
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Linux_Raid
If you're thinking about raid 0, I'll suggest using btrfs instead. Just
don't forget that, by default, btrfs mirrors the metadata (I think that
means
On 22/06/2020 19:50, Dale wrote:
Anyway, the 8GB cards have been plenty large enough so it could be any
number of reasons they say the limit is 32GB. It could be they know it
will run out of file names. Most pics are named with four digit
numbers. So, 9,999 files and it either stops taking
On 22/06/2020 14:19, Dale wrote:
So if I bought a 64GB card, I forced it to be formatted with FAT on
say my Linux box here, it would work in my trail cameras anyway? It
makes sense. It would seem it is more of a file system issue since
accessing a device shouldn't be affected my its
On 22/06/2020 11:56, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:28:17AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
The SD standard says >33G should use exFAT, this is why many devices
state they only support cards up to 32G. The really mean they only
support FAT. My Dashcam is like this but it happily
On 22/06/2020 20:22, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Warning 2: I did exactly that, and it LOOKED like it was working
happily, until it overflowed some internal limit and my 1G card turned
into a 128M card or whatever it was. Have you actually TESTED that card
IN THE DASHCAM and made sure it can actually
On 22/06/2020 21:42, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:40:49 +0100, antlists wrote:
Warning 2: I did exactly that, and it LOOKED like it was working
happily, until it overflowed some internal limit and my 1G card
turned into a 128M card or whatever it was. Have you actually TESTED
On 14/06/2020 08:01, n952162 wrote:
I think the problem is, vbox's NAT interface acts as a router, but only
uni-directionally. That means, it will establish a "connection" for
VM-initiated sessions, but there's no mechanism for establishing a
session for external-initiated sessions.
Somebody,
On 18/06/2020 12:03, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
Neil,
On Thursday, 2020-06-18 09:32:35 +0100, you wrote:
...
Am I getting old or do others also wish they could just get a text howto
instead of watching a video every time they want to do something new?
Don't know anything about your age ...
On 16/06/2020 12:26, Dale wrote:
I've also read about the resilvering problems too. I think LVM
snapshots and something about BTFS(sp?) has problems. I've also read
that on windoze, it can cause a system to freeze while it is trying to
rewrite the moved data too. It gets so slow, it
On 16/06/2020 13:25, Rich Freeman wrote:
And of course the problem with these latest hidden SMR drives is that
they generally don't support TRIM,
This, I believe, is a problem with the ATA spec. I don't understand
what's going on, but something like for these drives you need v4 of the
spec,
On 07/06/2020 10:07, antlists wrote:
I think it was LWN, there was an interesting article on crypto recently.
https://lwn.net/Articles/821544/
Cheers,
Wol
On 06/06/2020 08:49, Dale wrote:
First drive seems to have died. Got part way copying files and things
got interesting. When checking smartctrl, it even puked on my
keyboard. Drive only had a few hundred hours on it so maybe the drive
was iffy from the start or that enclosure did damage
On 06/06/2020 11:32, Michael wrote:
Of particular interest to me is recovery of encrypted files/partitions, using
a different installation than the original. Having to keep a copy of the
original installation kernel keys for ext4 with any data backups and
additionally remembering to refresh
On 06/06/2020 09:23, Michael wrote:
Yes, getting the thread wrong and damaging the female thread in the enclosure,
while thinking this/almost/ fits, is not good for your nerves. There are
thread gauges which you can match the pitch of a screw/bolt and help determine
the thread specification,
On 06/06/2020 14:57, antlists wrote:
Oh - the other thing - if it's PMR and you're copying files onto it,
expect a puke! That thing on WD Reds going PMR, I copied most of that on
to the linux raid mailing list and the general feeling I get is "PMR is
bad".
Whoops have I got my P
On 07/06/2020 10:50, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 7 June 2020 09:41:16 CEST, antlists wrote:
On 06/06/2020 20:14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
One of my old cases had plastic strips with little sticks on them
that would fit into the screwholes. Those strips would then slot into
the mounting points
On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You don't boot from an encrypted drive (yet) or use unusual hardware,
that's what I meant by a plain system. Dracut handles booting from a a
btrfs root on a LUKS encrypted block device here with no fancy
configuration. It really is impressive the way it
On 06/06/2020 23:11, Neil Bothwick wrote:
You don't boot from an encrypted drive (yet) or use unusual hardware,
that's what I meant by a plain system. Dracut handles booting from a a
btrfs root on a LUKS encrypted block device here with no fancy
configuration. It really is impressive the way it
On 06/06/2020 21:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
To do this I'm just going to store my
keys on the root filesystem so that the systems can be booted without
interaction. Obviously if somebody compromises the files with the
keys they can decrypt my drives, but this means that I just have to
protect a
On 06/06/2020 20:14, J. Roeleveld wrote:
One of my old cases had plastic strips with little sticks on them that would
fit into the screwholes. Those strips would then slot into the mounting points
for the disks.
No messing around with screws and really easy to swap drives. They would be
On 07/06/2020 09:08, Dale wrote:
I notice that one can use different encryption tools. I have Blowfish,
Twofish, AES and sha*** as well as many others. I know some have been
compromised. Which ones are known to be secure? I seem to recall that
after Snowden some had to be redone and some
On 29/07/2020 16:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 July 2020 13:59:11 BST Grant Edwards wrote:
Pricing isn't based on cost. Pricing is based on what people are
willing to pay. People are willing to pay extra for a static IPv6
address, therefore static IPv6 addresses cost extra.
On 30/07/2020 12:13, Remco Rijnders wrote:
An IPv6 address is 128 bits in length. Usually an ISP allocates 64
bits to a single customer, allowing the systems on/behind that
connection to automatically assign themselves an address based on
their MAC address for example. Note that also allocations
On 30/07/2020 14:28, Remco Rijnders wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 01:48:05PM +0100, antlists wrote in
:
I don't think an ISP is supposed to allocate less ...
I think your original message was open for multiple interpretations,
or at least I read it as you saying there are 32 bit addresses
On 20/07/2020 15:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
fatal: in parameter smtpd_relay_restrictions or smtpd_recipient_restrictions,
specify at least one working instance of: reject_unauth_destination,
defer_unauth_destination, reject, defer, defer_if_permit or
check_relay_domains
Which of those
On 11/01/2021 19:26, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
I don’t really live the RAW way. They take up sooo much space and my
camera’s OOC jpegs always look far nicer than anything I can produce with
darktable/rawtherapee.
Okay, dunno about your Olympus stuff, but my Nikon cameras, the Nikon
software
On 27/12/2020 18:51, Michael wrote:
Restarting the desktop using Xorg does NOT fix this problem. Otherwise, both
Plasma on Wayland and Xorg work fine - except the clipboard does not work on
Wayland (middle click won't paste selected text on another window).
This sounds to me like a
On 07/01/2021 02:22, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 04/01/2021 23:37, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
However I noticed that the latter procuces larger files for the same
quality
setting. So currently, I first save with a very high setting from
Showfoto
and then recompress the whole directory in a
On 25/11/2020 15:17, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:55 AM Wols Lists wrote:
On 25/11/20 13:31, Rich Freeman wrote:
Now, one area I would use UUIDs is with mdadm if you're not putting
lvm on top. I've seen mdadm arrays get renumbered and that is a mess
if you're directly
On 25/11/2020 15:13, Dale wrote:
I can't think of a reason not to use labels, at the very least, in most
situations. The only one I can think of, a laptop that has only one
hard drive. Sort of hard to install two hard drives on a laptop. A
external one can be done but never seen one with two
On 25/11/2020 22:59, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:37:48 -0600, Dale wrote:
First I've heard of a laptop having space for two hard drives. I
need to make a note of that. Now one has reason to use labels on
laptops too. o_O
You already have. what if you boot with a flash drive
On 25/11/2020 23:03, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:37:32 - (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote:
I'm not sure chainloading would work as that requires a drive
definition from which to load the boot sector.
I thought that's what LVM provided was a drive definition.
It's more like a
On 06/12/2020 07:55, Martin Vaeth wrote:
Dale wrote:
It sounds like a rather rare problem. Maybe even only during boot up.
It is a non-existent problem on openrc if you clean /tmp and /var/tmp
on boot (which you should do if you use opentmp):
Which breaks a lot of STANDARDS-COMPLIANT
On 06/12/2020 12:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
I think the idea of having something more cross-platform is a good
one, though there is nothing really about systemd that isn't "open" -
it is FOSS. It just prioritizes using linux syscalls where they are
useful over implementing things in a way that
On 07/12/2020 18:21, Jack wrote:
I do an emerge -C --oneshot to uninstall those packages. That way,
when emerge finally starts to update world, it pulls them all back (at
least, the ones that are needed) itself without me needing to worry
about it.
I don't think the --oneshot is doing
On 03/12/2020 20:33, n952162 wrote:
I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks ago,
but it seems not to work. Can somebody explain to me why?
I've got a similar problem - an "emerge --sync" said "portage has been
updated, you really should emerge it first before doing
On 07/12/2020 14:30, Grant Edwards wrote:
I ended up uninstalling packages mentioned in those 150 lines 2-3 at a
time and until emerge was willing to update world.
After that I guess I start trying to re-install what was removed.
I do an emerge -C --oneshot to uninstall those packages. That
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
