Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.20 and intel microcode

On 11/11/14 05:49, micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > I've finnally detected the root cause of glibc-2.20 broken my system: > glibc-2.20 start using TLX instruction which is disabled by microcode update. > > disabling microcode update brings my system back to live! > > so, there is either a bug

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 11/11/14 07:20, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote > >> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild* >> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with >> instructions on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 10/11/14 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 9/26/2014 1:04 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 25/09/14 22:03, James wrote: >>> I'd be better of with a fresh install of lilblue + musl + eudev >>> is what you are really saying here? >> that's the only usec

Re: [gentoo-user] mpeg4ip - replacement

On 25/10/14 02:40, Joseph wrote: > Which application replaced "mpeg4ip" ? > > I'm trying to streem mpeg4 video and in the past I was using "mpeg4ip" > but I can not find it. > > -- > Joseph > media-video/gpac has extended mpeg4 support media-libs/libmp4v2 with USE="utils" has command lines utili

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: /dev/ttyUSB* group changed from uucp to root?

On 26/09/14 20:59, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Grant Edwards > wrote: >> Which sets the group to 0 (root). The weird thing is that I don't >> know where that file came from. Dong an "equery belongs" doesn't show >> it belonging to any package. I do have dev-embedded/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 26/09/14 19:47, David W Noon wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:04:47 +0300, Samuli Suominen > (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote about "Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) > alternatives ?" (in <54252c2f.1030...@gentoo.org>): > > [snip] >> Later kernels *can mark

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 26/09/14 11:47, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 26/09/14 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:27:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >>>>> I buy machines with one ethernet

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 26/09/14 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:27:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> I buy machines with one ethernet interface. What I find particularly annoying is this doublespeak about calling it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 25/09/14 22:03, James wrote: > Samuli Suominen gentoo.org> writes: > > >>> Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev? >> in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level >> with udev-208, from time before the .link s

Re: [gentoo-user] udev (viable) alternatives ?

On 25/09/14 18:25, James wrote: > Ok, > > So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along > so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde. > I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after > I build up a new workstation. > > S

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd

On 18/09/14 07:52, Samuli Suominen wrote: > Notably Gentoo has never used entire SysV, only the init part, not the > /etc.d/rc.d part I meant /etc/rc.d of course. Typing error. Sorry.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd

On 18/09/14 03:12, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > Mark David Dumlao wrote: >> The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit. >> If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it >> took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have >> measured seve

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Linus Torvalds on systemd

On 17/09/14 23:43, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am 17.09.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann >> wrote: >>> Am 17.09.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>>> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy wha

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge output: [ebuild UD ]

On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local >> install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so. >> > Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to

Re: [gentoo-user] xscreensaver - error missing "bc"

On 14/09/14 18:46, Joseph wrote: > I get a strange error when trying to emerge xscreensaver" > > checking for bc... no > > configure: error: Your system doesn't have "bc", which has been a > standard > part of Unix since the 1970s. Come back when your > vendor >

Re: [gentoo-user] Execute udev rule before net.* scripts

On 24/08/14 20:05, Tom H wrote: > On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Grant wrote: >> I'm trying to define names for my USB network interfaces keyed on the >> interface location instead of the interface MAC address. This udev >> rule renames one of them: >> >> SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="enp3s0u1", N

Re: [gentoo-user] Execute udev rule before net.* scripts

On 24/08/14 15:59, Grant wrote: > I'm trying to define names for my USB network interfaces keyed on the > interface location instead of the interface MAC address. This udev > rule renames one of them: > > SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="enp3s0u1", NAME="net0" > > But it doesn't work automatically at b

Re: [gentoo-user] blocker between openrc and procps

On 24/08/14 13:40, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > J. Roeleveld [14-08-24 12:36]: >> On 24 August 2014 11:23:34 CEST, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >>> Alan McKinnon [14-08-24 10:32]: On 24/08/2014 04:30, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > hi, > > How can I resolve this blocker: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-fs/lvm2 question

On 23/08/14 09:53, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Alexander Kapshuk > wrote: >> On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk >>> wrote: As I updated my system today, I noticed that 'sys-fs/lvm2' got

Re: [gentoo-user] a question about updating process

On 29/07/14 14:50, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/07/2014 13:45, behrouz khosravi wrote: >> Thanks every one. >> >> I guess I got it know ! >> And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts. >> >> And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream. >> I g

Re: [gentoo-user] modules.devname not found...

On 29/07/14 20:22, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:25:15 +0200, Jarry wrote: > >> >> * Creating list of required static device nodes for the current >> kernel... Warning: /lib/modules/3.12.21-gentoo-r1/modules.devname not >> found - ignor >> >> What does it mean and

Re: [gentoo-user] Regular user can't mount/unmount mtpfs; root is OK

On 25/07/14 12:35, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 25/07/14 09:36, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:07:10AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote >> >>> Install gnome-base/gvfs with USE="gphoto2 mtp" and then use gvfs-mount >>> to mount the device, b

Re: [gentoo-user] Regular user can't mount/unmount mtpfs; root is OK

On 25/07/14 09:36, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:07:10AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > >> Install gnome-base/gvfs with USE="gphoto2 mtp" and then use gvfs-mount >> to mount the device, because gvfs-mount >> will make use of your PolicyKit

Re: [gentoo-user] Regular user can't mount/unmount mtpfs; root is OK

On 24/07/14 07:59, Walter Dnes wrote: > I sent this a day or 2 ago, but it doesn't show up on the list for me. > Apologies to anyone seeing a duplicate. > > I'm a total noobie at mtpfs/FUSE. My "excellent adventure" started > yesterday when I got a clearout 7" tablet, and took a sample photo,

Re: [gentoo-user] =media-gfx/blender-2.71 use flag constraints

On 08/07/14 09:23, List Reader wrote: > Hello, I don't fully understand this packages use flag constraints. > > emerge -pqv =media-gfx/blender-2.71 > http://bpaste.net/show/445090/ > > emerge --info =media-gfx/blender-2.71 > http://bpaste.net/show/445091/ > > I have keyworded =dev-lang/python-3.4.

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 15:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>>> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completel

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely >> unofficial >> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay >> >&g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100 > Mick wrote: > >> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a >> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they >> want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate? > For them to hav

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 14:11, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Greg Woodbury wrote: >> Unfortunately, the advocates and implementers made some major political >> choices when they (apparently deliberately) chose to put the systemd >> stuff in /usr/lib instead of /lib. It was pointed ou

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote: > On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote: >>> Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a >>> gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote: >>> On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200 >>> >>> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>>> The good news is that the version of upower prior t

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 03:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > This effected stable tree of Gentoo as well, pulling undesired > different layout into stable is something that should have been > avoided. It is about time we split the profiles, systemd is not option > for people who runs openrc. Indeed, I support the i

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 02:25, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >> On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>> On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>>> On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: >>>>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 02:15, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>> On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: >>>> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: >>>>> On 04/06/14

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Systemd upower

On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote: > On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200 > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision >> still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been >> bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils. >> >> Anyone th

Re: [gentoo-user] Power management

On 04/06/14 22:27, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes, >> I >> know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-ser

Re: [gentoo-user] Power management

On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes, > I > know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-server without > any PM at all? Of course. It's USE="-upower" to make.conf and couple of

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: >> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: >>> On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>>> No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 16:47, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:21:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than >> build it to work independently of the init system), > Reusing existing, proven code is not laziness, it is efficiency. Yes, > th

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 15:58, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than build it >> to work independently of the init system), this will in fact result in >> *users* (read: those lacking the skills to code eve

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 15:21, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 6/3/2014 1:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Tanstaafl >> wrote: >>> On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more infrastructure migr

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 15:15, Daniel Troeder wrote: > Am 04.06.2014 13:22, schrieb Daniel Troeder: >> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: >>> On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: >>>> No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the > emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay. > Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency > was an issue, I'll still be showing som

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 04/06/14 02:13, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> systemd should not be visible at any time, nor its implications. > Nobody is here to deal with other people's OCD. > > +1 your assesment in this threads seems to be accurate otherwise too, I'm glad not everyone has lost their mind over _a word_ li

Re: [gentoo-user] Systemd upower

On 03/06/14 18:10, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> Maybe a news item explaining the switch of upower would help those who >> haven't >> blundered into this yet. > Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more > infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item ev

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils

On 03/06/14 14:48, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable. And that's exactly what happened.

Re: [gentoo-user] re: sys-power/upower-pm-utils

On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone > now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild > select systemd as a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set. > And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bluez 5 not connecting

On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote: > Hmm ... am I alone in this quest? See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 15/05/14 02:59, Grant wrote: >>> I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on >>> one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're >>> indicating that it's a Gentoo problem: >>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@list

Re: [gentoo-user] The writing on the wall ... sys-apps/util-linux

On 16/05/14 10:34, Mick wrote: > I got this message after an update: > > * Messages for package sys-apps/util-linux-2.24.1-r2: > > * The mesg/wall/write tools have been disabled due to USE=-tty-helpers. > > > I understand that wall has been moved from sys-apps/sysvinit to sys-apps/util- > linux,

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote: > I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on > one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're > indicating that it's a Gentoo problem: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesk

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote: > I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on > one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're > indicating that it's a Gentoo problem: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesk

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 14/05/14 03:18, Grant wrote: >>> I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on >>> one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're >>> indicating that it's a Gentoo problem: >>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/ms

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 13/05/14 16:58, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote: >> I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on >> one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're >> indicating that it's a Ge

Re: [gentoo-user] udev or Gentoo issue?

On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote: > I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on > one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're > indicating that it's a Gentoo problem: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.htm

Re: [gentoo-user] Why is udev now having USE (-openrc%*)

On 10/05/14 09:43, Mick wrote: > On Friday 09 May 2014 23:25:06 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Fri, 9 May 2014 21:56:45 +0100, Mick wrote: >>> What is the meaning of this change? >>> >>> [ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE="acl firmware-loader >>> gudev introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -st

Re: [gentoo-user] cpufrequtils can't find expected /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq

cpufreqd, cpufrequtils are both dead packages for years now, it's propably cpupower you want instead, the only package getting updated for constantly changing paths in /sys On 24/04/14 09:27, Walter Dnes wrote: > I'm finishing up on installing Gentoo on a laptop. I tried testing > cpufrequtil

Re: [gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

On 08/04/14 04:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you >> know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like >> regression from 0.1, speak up now. >> >&

[gentoo-user] Stabilization of netifrc-0.2.2, "extra testers wanted"

Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like regression from 0.1, speak up now. See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070 (I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.) - Samuli

Re: [gentoo-user] CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be

On 19/03/14 04:22, Joseph wrote: > I'm getting a message from sys-fs/udisks > ERROR: setup > CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be. > WARN: setup > > I checked my kernel config there is not such options: CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND > It's only checked for older kernels than 3.10 by the 'ke

Re: [gentoo-user] python-updater: updating cracklib forever...

http://bugs.gentoo.org/503648 for stabilization of 2.9.1 which has been migrated to the new python eclasses, should solve many of the python related cracklib problems

Re: [gentoo-user] more bluetooth troubles with 5.14

On 03/03/14 21:21, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Mick wrote: > >> On Sunday 02 Mar 2014 13:05:10 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: >> >>> I don't even have any /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf. >> What do you have in your /etc/conf.d/bluetooth? This is mine: >> = >> # Bluetoo

Re: [gentoo-user] custom boost in /usr/local = problem with libkolabxml, libixion

On 01/03/14 13:23, Kacper Kopczyński wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I've installed newest boost into /usr/local - it's a custom > installation and not via emerge/portage. > > > > Today, after upgrading system, I've found that I need to use > > > > emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps

Re: [gentoo-user] Debian just voted in systemd for default init system in jessie

On 28/02/14 08:47, Stroller wrote: > On Wed, 26 February 2014, at 8:29 pm, Walter Dnes > wrote: >> … >> * Netscape (under AOL) aimed at becoming a pseudo-OS on top of Windows. >> We know how that turned out. > You appear to be underestimating it - whilst the AOL suite was hated by many > of t

Re: [gentoo-user] Peeve - finding kernel config options

On 27/02/14 22:33, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:24:50 +0100, Dan Johansson wrote: > >> But if you press "1" in the example above you will "jump" directly to >> the menu item. Clue --> (1) > Damn you, why didn't you let us in on this secret year ago? > > because Linux 3.8'ish wasn

Re: [gentoo-user] Peeve - finding kernel config options

On 27/02/14 21:49, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 27/02/14 19:24, Dan Johansson wrote: >> On 26.02.2014 22:24, Poison BL. wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tanstaafl >>> wrote: >>>> Hello all, >>>> >>>> This is for those o

Re: [gentoo-user] Peeve - finding kernel config options

am I missing something? >>> >>> Given the most recent gentoo news item: >>> >>>> # eselect news read 10 >>>> 2014-02-25-udev-upgrade >>>> Title Upgrade to >=sys-fs/udev-210 >>>> Author

Re: [gentoo-user] Debian just voted in systemd for default init system in jessie

On 16/02/14 23:28, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 16/02/2014 20:11, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote: >>>> On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>>>> For Slackware, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Debian just voted in systemd for default init system in jessie

On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >>> For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]: >>> >>> 1. sysvinit (status quo) >>> 2. systemd >>> 3. upstart >>> 4. openrc (experiment

Re: [gentoo-user] [poll] What is your session state?

On 10/02/14 00:43, walt wrote: > Recent threads about consolekit vs logind(systemd) have made me curious, so > I've been studying... > > A few of us have had recent problems with things like plugging USB sticks, > which once worked transparently but now require root privileges. > > I've discovered

Re: [gentoo-user] ttyS0 - ownership as root:dialout

On 20/01/14 18:45, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 01/20/14 18:30, Joseph wrote: >> After upgrade to "systemd" my /dev/ttyS0 shows up as: root:dialout >> ownership and permission 600 >> >> When I change as root manually to: chown uucp:dialout /dev/ttyS0 >> chmod 666 /dev/ttyS0 >> >> after restart it goe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE slow / console-kit-daemon POLKIT_IS_AUTHORITY failed

On 19/01/14 23:31, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:45:00 +, Mick wrote: > >> This thread confused me. I have this in my system and I have not >> changed the permissions from when it was installed: >> >> ls -la /usr/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper >> -rws--x--- 1 root messagebu

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: KDE slow / console-kit-daemon POLKIT_IS_AUTHORITY failed

On 16/01/14 19:39, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:19:22 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > Helmut is still using consolekit. Are you still using consolekit? >>> Yes, it's the default for kdm so it is enabled on both computers. >> I don't think it will be the default for m

Re: [gentoo-user] Do I require static nodes?

On 27/11/13 12:22, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > 2013/11/27 Chris Stankevitz > > > Hello, > > Portage recently told me this: > > * You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for > * kernel modules to have required static nodes! >

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 21/10/13 08:31, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote >> >>> That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but >>> from top of my head: &

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 21/10/13 05:34, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote > >> That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but >> from top of my head: >> We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offend

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote: > >> It's true that sys-fs/eudev restored the *broken* rule_generator from >> old sys-fs/udev, you can get it by USE="rule-generator". >> But it's lot saner to keep using sys-fs/udev and just write custom rules >> to rename interfaces based on MACs to like lan*,

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-10-20 9:02 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> Like I mentioned in a prior e-mail, the change didn't affect me when it >>> was pushed, and doesn't affect me now. I did

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/20/2013 04:55 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>>> On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>>>> On 10

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>>> Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell: >>>>> On

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd and kernel developers cooperating to turn it into a global cgroup manager?

On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell: >>> On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote: https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/200-libby-clark/733595-all-about-the-linux-kernel-cgr

Re: [gentoo-user] re: automounting removable drives

On 08/10/13 21:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On 10/08/2013 09:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote: On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to me

Re: [gentoo-user] re: automounting removable drives

On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote: On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to mention that I do have xfce4-mount-plugin installed. box0=; equery list '*xfce*'|grep mount xfce-extra/x

Re: [gentoo-user] re: automounting removable drives

On 07/10/13 00:01, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: I want to be able auto-mount removable drives. I'm running xfce: box0=; equery list xfce-base/xfce4-meta * Searching for xfce4-meta in xfce-base ... [IP-] [ ] xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4

Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents systemd-204. OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. I thought e

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, "Tanstaafl" mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org>> wrote: > > Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top post. Please disable HTML from your mail clie

Re: [gentoo-user] looking for a couple of systemd units

On 27/08/13 09:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:10 AM, wrote: Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:52 PM, wrote: Hi. I am looking for a couple of systemd units which I have not been a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Advice needed regarding udisks

On 24/08/13 08:39, Grant wrote: Just saying you should be using `udisksctl` command instead of the now obsolete `udisks` command udisksctl command = new udisks 2 udisks command = old udisks 1 OK, but first I need to figure out how to get gvfs to use udisks instead of gdu. by emerging gnome-b

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Advice needed regarding udisks

On 20/08/13 09:21, Grant wrote: This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the slotting behavior. I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the problem is. It happens with an applicatio

Re: [gentoo-user] re: xfce4-sensors-plugin pulling in nvidia-settings

On 22/08/13 22:22, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: What course of action would you recommend taking with regard to my original post? I'm not sure if I understand your problem but... Looks like nvidia-drivers-319.32 was stabilized without stabilizing nvidia-settings-319.32 together with it. You can f

Re: [gentoo-user] re: xfce4-sensors-plugin pulling in nvidia-settings

On 22/08/13 22:03, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: On 08/22/2013 09:59 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote: As I figured in the package's changelog, some work on it is being done by Samuli Suominen . He is also on this list, so I guess he could get involved as soon as he reads the list. Understood. T

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Advice needed regarding udisks

On 17/08/13 22:00, Grant wrote: This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the slotting behavior. I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the problem is. It happens with an application

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 16:39, hasufell wrote: On 08/12/2013 02:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: Huh? USE="firmware-l

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 15:38, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's how maintainership works. But

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 15:19, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's how maintainership works. But trying to lie to people it's

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's how maintainership works. But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is annoying as 'ell and

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote: Samuli Suominen wrote: Huh? USE="firmware-loader" is optional and enabled by default in sys-fs/udev Futhermore predictab

Re: [gentoo-user] Moving from old udev to eudev

On 12/08/13 13:19, Tanstaafl wrote: On 2013-08-11 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote: There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev and that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev. I believe it's 'b' if user does

Re: [gentoo-user] about LIBRARY_PATH

On 12/08/13 05:49, 东方巽雷 wrote: It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for /usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink to /usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in /usr/lib3

  1   2   >