On 10/11/14 13:04, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 9/26/2014 1:04 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 25/09/14 22:03, James wrote:
I'd be better of with a fresh install of lilblue + musl + eudev
is what you are really saying here?
that's the only usecase for eudev currently, yes
On 11/11/14 07:20, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote
I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild*
will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with
instructions on moving to something else, but that's
On 11/11/14 05:49, micro...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I've finnally detected the root cause of glibc-2.20 broken my system:
glibc-2.20 start using TLX instruction which is disabled by microcode update.
disabling microcode update brings my system back to live!
so, there is either a bug in
On 25/10/14 02:40, Joseph wrote:
Which application replaced mpeg4ip ?
I'm trying to streem mpeg4 video and in the past I was using mpeg4ip
but I can not find it.
--
Joseph
media-video/gpac has extended mpeg4 support
media-libs/libmp4v2 with USE=utils has command lines utilities
On 26/09/14 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:27:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I buy machines with one ethernet interface. What I find
particularly annoying is this doublespeak about calling
On 26/09/14 11:47, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 26/09/14 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 05:27:15 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
I buy machines with one ethernet interface. What I find
particularly
On 26/09/14 19:47, David W Noon wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:04:47 +0300, Samuli Suominen
(ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable)
alternatives ? (in 54252c2f.1030...@gentoo.org):
[snip]
Later kernels *can mark interfaces predictable in a new form of
metadata
On 26/09/14 20:59, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Which sets the group to 0 (root). The weird thing is that I don't
know where that file came from. Dong an equery belongs doesn't show
it belonging to any package. I do
On 25/09/14 18:25, James wrote:
Ok,
So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
I build up a new workstation.
So
On 25/09/14 22:03, James wrote:
Samuli Suominen ssuominen at gentoo.org writes:
Any other caveats (short term) on switching udev to eudev?
in fact, from what I last checked, eudev's networking is at same level
with udev-208, from time before the .link support at all
ah, back when ethernet
On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
install needs but 1.3.0 does. So portage wants to make it so.
Version 1.3.1 was removed from the tree, leaving only 1.3.0 to
On 17/09/14 16:16, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17/09/14 03:01, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 09/16/2014 03:14 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
For some reason xfce-power-manager-1.3.1 does not satisfy what the local
install
On 17/09/14 23:43, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
On 18/09/14 03:12, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
The code is out there. Freely available. Both systemd and sysvinit.
If you wanted to measure both, you could, literally, in the time it
took since you first posted in this thread till now you could have
measured several
On 18/09/14 07:52, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Notably Gentoo has never used entire SysV, only the init part, not the
/etc.d/rc.d part
I meant /etc/rc.d of course. Typing error. Sorry.
On 14/09/14 18:46, Joseph wrote:
I get a strange error when trying to emerge xscreensaver
checking for bc... no
configure: error: Your system doesn't have bc, which has been a
standard
part of Unix since the 1970s. Come back when your
vendor
has grown a
On 24/08/14 13:40, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org [14-08-24 12:36]:
On 24 August 2014 11:23:34 CEST, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com [14-08-24 10:32]:
On 24/08/2014 04:30, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
hi,
How can I resolve this
On 24/08/14 15:59, Grant wrote:
I'm trying to define names for my USB network interfaces keyed on the
interface location instead of the interface MAC address. This udev
rule renames one of them:
SUBSYSTEM==net, KERNEL==enp3s0u1, NAME=net0
But it doesn't work automatically at boot, I have
On 24/08/14 20:05, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to define names for my USB network interfaces keyed on the
interface location instead of the interface MAC address. This udev
rule renames one of them:
SUBSYSTEM==net,
On 23/08/14 09:53, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/22/2014 10:36 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
As I updated my system
On 29/07/14 14:50, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 29/07/2014 13:45, behrouz khosravi wrote:
Thanks every one.
I guess I got it know !
And I must say that the way Gentoo is working now, is simple, no doubts.
And I am surprised to hear that Gentoo is so strict to follow upstream.
I guess it makes
On 29/07/14 20:22, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 18:25:15 +0200, Jarry wrote:
* Creating list of required static device nodes for the current
kernel... Warning: /lib/modules/3.12.21-gentoo-r1/modules.devname not
found - ignor
What does it mean and how can I
On 25/07/14 09:36, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:07:10AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
Install gnome-base/gvfs with USE=gphoto2 mtp and then use gvfs-mount
to mount the device, because gvfs-mount
will make use of your PolicyKit with ConsoleKit or systemd-logind
authorization
On 25/07/14 12:35, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 25/07/14 09:36, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:07:10AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
Install gnome-base/gvfs with USE=gphoto2 mtp and then use gvfs-mount
to mount the device, because gvfs-mount
will make use of your PolicyKit
On 24/07/14 07:59, Walter Dnes wrote:
I sent this a day or 2 ago, but it doesn't show up on the list for me.
Apologies to anyone seeing a duplicate.
I'm a total noobie at mtpfs/FUSE. My excellent adventure started
yesterday when I got a clearout 7 tablet, and took a sample photo, and
On 08/07/14 09:23, List Reader wrote:
Hello, I don't fully understand this packages use flag constraints.
emerge -pqv =media-gfx/blender-2.71
http://bpaste.net/show/445090/
emerge --info =media-gfx/blender-2.71
http://bpaste.net/show/445091/
I have keyworded =dev-lang/python-3.4.0 in
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine
On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep
On 05/06/14 14:11, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Greg Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the advocates and implementers made some major political
choices when they (apparently deliberately) chose to put the systemd
stuff in /usr/lib instead of /lib. It
On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely
unofficial
Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay
Enough said
- Samuli
Sorry, but this isn't just
On 05/06/14 15:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely
unofficial
Gentoo developers are just as much
On 04/06/14 15:15, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 13:22, schrieb Daniel Troeder:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff
On 04/06/14 15:21, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 6/3/2014 1:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Tanstaafl
tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 6/3/2014 11:10 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep
On 04/06/14 15:58, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than build it
to work independently of the init system), this will in fact result in
*users* (read: those lacking the
On 04/06/14 16:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jun 2014 08:21:51 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
And yes, as devs get lazier (decide to rely on systemd rather than
build it to work independently of the init system),
Reusing existing, proven code is not laziness, it is efficiency. Yes,
they
On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff
On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes,
I
know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-server without
any PM at all?
Of course. It's USE=-upower to make.conf and couple of
On 04/06/14 22:27, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/14 21:44, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello list,
The current debate over upower and upower-pm-utils has got me thinking (yes,
I
know): is it possible to install Gentoo on a desktop or a mini-server
without
any PM at all?
Of course. It's
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
On 05/06/14 02:15, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked
On 05/06/14 02:25, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Dutch Ingraham s...@gmx.us wrote:
On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote:
Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 04
On 05/06/14 03:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
This effected stable tree of Gentoo as well, pulling undesired
different layout into stable is something that should have been
avoided. It is about time we split the profiles, systemd is not option
for people who runs openrc.
Indeed, I support the idea
On 03/06/14 14:30, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now. A proper solution would have been to have the upower ebuild
select systemd as a dependency ONLY when the systemd useflag is set.
And depend on upower-pm-utils when it is not set. --
On 03/06/14 14:48, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable.
And that's exactly what happened.
On 03/06/14 18:10, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Maybe a news item explaining the switch of upower would help those who
haven't
blundered into this yet.
Maybe. The thing is, this is going to keep happening, as more and more
infrastructure migrates towards systemd. Perhaps a news item everytime
On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote:
No, sys-fs/udev is not masked, but an update is indicated in the
emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay.
Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency
was an issue, I'll still be showing some
On 28/05/14 21:42, Mick wrote:
Hmm ... am I alone in this quest?
See here, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505362
On 16/05/14 10:34, Mick wrote:
I got this message after an update:
* Messages for package sys-apps/util-linux-2.24.1-r2:
* The mesg/wall/write tools have been disabled due to USE=-tty-helpers.
I understand that wall has been moved from sys-apps/sysvinit to sys-apps/util-
linux, but I
On 15/05/14 02:59, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 13/05/14 16:58, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd
On 14/05/14 03:18, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
On 10/05/14 09:43, Mick wrote:
On Friday 09 May 2014 23:25:06 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014 21:56:45 +0100, Mick wrote:
What is the meaning of this change?
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE=acl firmware-loader
gudev introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -static-libs
cpufreqd, cpufrequtils are both dead packages for years now, it's
propably cpupower you want instead,
the only package getting updated for constantly changing paths in /sys
On 24/04/14 09:27, Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm finishing up on installing Gentoo on a laptop. I tried testing
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.
See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
(I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)
- Samuli
On 08/04/14 04:27, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 04/07/2014 04:08 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.
See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
(I'm purposely
On 19/03/14 04:22, Joseph wrote:
I'm getting a message from sys-fs/udisks
ERROR: setup
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND: is not set when it should be.
WARN: setup
I checked my kernel config there is not such options: CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND
It's only checked for older kernels than 3.10 by the
http://bugs.gentoo.org/503648 for stabilization of 2.9.1 which has been
migrated to the new python eclasses,
should solve many of the python related cracklib problems
On 03/03/14 21:21, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 02 Mar 2014 13:05:10 cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
I don't even have any /etc/bluetooth/rfcomm.conf.
What do you have in your /etc/conf.d/bluetooth? This is mine:
=
On 01/03/14 13:23, Kacper Kopczyński wrote:
Hello list,
I've installed newest boost into /usr/local - it's a custom
installation and not via emerge/portage.
Today, after upgrading system, I've found that I need to use
emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world
On 28/02/14 08:47, Stroller wrote:
On Wed, 26 February 2014, at 8:29 pm, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
wrote:
…
* Netscape (under AOL) aimed at becoming a pseudo-OS on top of Windows.
We know how that turned out.
You appear to be underestimating it - whilst the AOL suite was hated by
gentoo news item:
# eselect news read 10
2014-02-25-udev-upgrade
Title Upgrade to =sys-fs/udev-210
AuthorSamuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Posted2014-02-25
Revision 1
The options CONFIG_FHANDLE
On 27/02/14 21:49, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/02/14 19:24, Dan Johansson wrote:
On 26.02.2014 22:24, Poison BL. wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
Hello all,
This is for those of use who to choose to roll our kernels by hand...
So, am I
On 27/02/14 22:33, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:24:50 +0100, Dan Johansson wrote:
But if you press 1 in the example above you will jump directly to
the menu item. Clue -- (1)
Damn you, why didn't you let us in on this secret year ago?
because Linux 3.8'ish wasn't released
On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options were[1]:
1. sysvinit (status quo)
2. systemd
3. upstart
4. openrc (experimental)
On 16/02/14 23:28, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 20:11, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 16/02/14 18:41, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 16/02/2014 17:46, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2014-02-15 3:32 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
For Slackware, I have no idea. For Debian, no the only options
On 10/02/14 00:43, walt wrote:
Recent threads about consolekit vs logind(systemd) have made me curious, so
I've been studying...
A few of us have had recent problems with things like plugging USB sticks,
which once worked transparently but now require root privileges.
I've discovered that
On 19/01/14 23:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:45:00 +, Mick wrote:
This thread confused me. I have this in my system and I have not
changed the permissions from when it was installed:
ls -la /usr/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
-rws--x--- 1 root messagebus 322984
On 20/01/14 18:45, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 01/20/14 18:30, Joseph wrote:
After upgrade to systemd my /dev/ttyS0 shows up as: root:dialout
ownership and permission 600
When I change as root manually to: chown uucp:dialout /dev/ttyS0
chmod 666 /dev/ttyS0
after restart it goes back to
On 16/01/14 19:39, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:19:22 -0600, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Helmut is still using consolekit. Are you still using consolekit?
Yes, it's the default for kdm so it is enabled on both computers.
I don't think it will be the default for much
On 27/11/13 12:22, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
2013/11/27 Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com
mailto:chrisstankev...@gmail.com
Hello,
Portage recently told me this:
* You need to add kmod-static-nodes to the sysinit runlevel for
* kernel modules to have required
On 21/10/13 05:34, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but
from top of my head:
We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts the offending code.
As in, that's nothing
On 21/10/13 08:31, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 09:34 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 05:03:51PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
That's a bridge we will cross when there is a bridge to be crossed, but
from top of my head:
We will maintain a minimal patchset that reverts
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell:
On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02, schrieb Daniel Campbell:
On 10/17/2013 11:27 PM, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
https
On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 04:55 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 12:24, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/20/2013 02:37 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 20/10/13 09:34, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 10/19/2013 06:35 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am 19.10.2013 17:02
On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-10-20 9:02 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 20/10/13 13:47, Daniel Campbell wrote:
Like I mentioned in a prior e-mail, the change didn't affect me when it
was pushed, and doesn't affect me now. I did recently have to reinstall
On 20/10/13 17:01, Tanstaafl wrote:
It's true that sys-fs/eudev restored the *broken* rule_generator from
old sys-fs/udev, you can get it by USE=rule-generator.
But it's lot saner to keep using sys-fs/udev and just write custom rules
to rename interfaces based on MACs to like lan*, internet*
On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to mention that I do have
xfce4-mount-plugin installed.
box0=; equery list '*xfce*'|grep mount
On 08/10/13 21:55, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/08/2013 09:21 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 08/10/13 20:19, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:45 PM, victor romanchuk wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:36 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Thanks for your responses. I'm sorry I forgot to mention
On 07/10/13 00:01, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 07:01:09PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
I want to be able auto-mount removable drives. I'm running xfce:
box0=; equery list xfce-base/xfce4-meta
* Searching for xfce4-meta in xfce-base ...
[IP-] [ ]
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd
like the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
Please disable
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
On 27/08/13 09:24, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:10 AM, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:52 PM, cov...@ccs.covici.com
On 24/08/13 08:39, Grant wrote:
Just saying you should be using `udisksctl` command instead of the now
obsolete `udisks` command
udisksctl command = new udisks 2
udisks command = old udisks 1
OK, but first I need to figure out how to get gvfs to use udisks instead
of gdu.
by emerging
On 20/08/13 09:21, Grant wrote:
This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a
way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the
slotting behavior.
I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the
problem is. It happens with an
On 22/08/13 22:03, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:59 PM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
As I figured in the package's changelog, some work on it is being done
by Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org. He is also on this list, so
I guess he could get involved as soon as he reads the list
On 22/08/13 22:22, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
What course of action would you recommend taking with regard to my
original post?
I'm not sure if I understand your problem but...
Looks like nvidia-drivers-319.32 was stabilized without stabilizing
nvidia-settings-319.32 together with it.
You can
On 17/08/13 22:00, Grant wrote:
This is actually a portage question. How can I install udisks-2 in a
way that will fix this problem? I'm confused by how to handle the
slotting behavior.
I think the issue here is that we are not understanding what the
problem is. It happens with an
On 12/08/13 05:49, 东方巽雷 wrote:
It seems that this variable is hard-code by gcc.I cannot change it any
more.When I use gcc -m32 to compile a 32bit program,gcc is looking for
/usr/lib rather than /usr/lib32.But in my system,/usr/lib is a symlink
to /usr/lib64.The real 32bit librarys is in
On 12/08/13 13:19, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-11 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev
and
that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev.
I believe it's 'b' if user
On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default
in sys-fs/udev Futhermore predictable network
On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
how maintainership works.
But trying to lie to people it's somehow solving something currently is
annoying as 'ell
On 12/08/13 15:19, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
how maintainership works.
But trying
On 12/08/13 15:38, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/08/13 15:17, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-12 8:06 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
True, it won't be dropped for long as people are maintaining it. That's
On 12/08/13 16:39, hasufell wrote:
On 08/12/2013 02:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 12/08/13 14:37, hasufell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2013 05:01 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader
On 11/08/13 20:12, Dale wrote:
I notice this starts but never does anything. I end up doing a ctrl c
to stop it. I tried with two different versions of portage so I don't
think it is portage itself.
But it is. It's either Portage, or Python it's using itself. But it's
not about
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
