Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 25/08/2017 09:21, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: >> J.

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Friday, 25 August 2017 08:21:53 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote: > > [3] In this case, I'd be willing to > > s/pain/enormous amounts of pain, on shaming youtube video/g > > Don't forget to share the link to that video... > > -- >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:12:52 PM CEST Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote: > >> Alan McKinnon wrote: > >>> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: > J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

wabe wrote: > wabe wrote: > >> Dale wrote: >> >>> OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are >>> using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to >>> something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did. >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:41:58 PM CEST Dale wrote: > >> root@fireball / # du -shc >> /home/dale/.mozilla/seamonkey/q6o6ulhz.default/Mail/ >> 3.9G/home/dale/.mozilla/seamonkey/q6o6ulhz.default/Mail/ >> 3.9Gtotal >> root@fireball / # > Mine is at about 40G That's

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24/08/2017 22:20, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon > wrote: >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

wabe wrote: > Dale wrote: > > > OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are > > using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to > > something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did. > > > > To put it

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

"J. Roeleveld" wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: > > >> J. Roeleveld wrote: > > >>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon > wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Dale wrote: > OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are > using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to > something stupid like Seamonkey/thunderbird just did. > > To put it simply, I'm considering switching away from

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:35:23 PM CEST Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: > >> J. Roeleveld wrote: > >>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Thunderbird. > > I have no formatting or

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday, August 24, 2017 6:41:58 PM CEST Dale wrote: > J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Thunderbird. > >> > >> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in > >> dovecot imap folders and

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: >> J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon >>> wrote: Thunderbird. I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in dovecot imap folders and

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24/08/2017 18:41, Dale wrote: > J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon >> wrote: >>> >>> Thunderbird. >>> >>> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in >>> dovecot imap folders and every client out there can

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24/08/2017 19:54, Mick wrote: > On Thursday, 24 August 2017 16:59:21 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: > >>> OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are >>> using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday, 24 August 2017 16:59:21 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: > >OK. I'm nosy now. Can you folks share what email software you are > >using? Is it GUI based etc? Stable and doesn't change settings to > >something

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon > wrote: >> >> Thunderbird. >> >> I have no formatting or storage problems as local mail is kept in >> dovecot imap folders and every client out there can read them. MUA >> incompatibilities just

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24 August 2017 17:15:25 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: >On 24/08/2017 16:50, Dale wrote: >> Mick wrote: >>> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: >>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't >set some

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24 August 2017 16:50:32 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >Mick wrote: >> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: >> >>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't >set some >>> idiotic font or background colours) >> I don't mind

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24/08/2017 16:50, Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: >> On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: >> >>> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some >>> idiotic font or background colours) >> I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday 24 August 2017 09:50:32 Dale wrote: > Mick wrote: > > On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set > >> some idiotic font or background colours) > > > > I don't mind messages which contain

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Mick wrote: > On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some >> idiotic font or background colours) > I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the mail client > render the content

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Tuesday 22 August 2017 19:37:10 Mick wrote: > PS. I think Peter may be around the corner any minute now, to correct my > English too! Ha, ha, ha! Funny you should say that :) I've been offline for a few days and I'm only just catching up. I don't often waste everybody's time trying to

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 24 August 2017 10:55:52 GMT+02:00, Mick wrote: >On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't >set some >> idiotic font or background colours) > >I don't mind messages which

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Thursday, 24 August 2017 09:36:43 BST J. Roeleveld wrote: > I can handle HTML emails and won't complain. (As long as they don't set some > idiotic font or background colours) I don't mind messages which contain both formats and let the mail client render the content according to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 23 August 2017 22:10:10 GMT+02:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: >On 23/08/2017 21:26, Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote: You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative >problem, except one message (Subject: Re:

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 23/08/2017 21:26, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except >>> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where >>> multipart/alternative went through.

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

J. Roeleveld wrote: > On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >> Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, >> except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) >> where multipart/alternative

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except >> one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where >> multipart/alternative went through. >> >> I would never design an email

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 23/08/2017 09:03, Thomas Mueller wrote: > You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except > one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where > multipart/alternative went through. > > I would never design an email client to send

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 23 August 2017 18:49:39 GMT+02:00, Dale wrote: >Thomas Mueller wrote: >> You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, >except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) >where multipart/alternative went through. >> >> I would

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Thomas Mueller wrote: > You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except > one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where > multipart/alternative went through. > > I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by > default,

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 22/08/2017 17:41, Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: >>> Howdy, >>> >>> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone >>> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings >>> says it is. Can someone tell me

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

You (Dale) seem to have corrected the multipart/alternative problem, except one message (Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc) where multipart/alternative went through. I would never design an email client to send multipart/alternative by default, and might design an email client

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Mick wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: Howdy, I have this > You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a > determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: > >> Howdy, > >> > >> I have this You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a sentence defining

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone >> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings >> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as it should? Text only I hope. > > Thanks. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as it should? Text only I

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Dale wrote: > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

I only see content-type text/plain. So it seems to be working from my POV. Todd On 8/22/2017 9:01 AM, Dale wrote: Howdy, I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings says it is. Can someone

[gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Howdy, I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is sending as it should? Text only I hope. Thanks. Dale :-) :-)