On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 06:40 +0100, Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It
works as root but not via fstab for users.
bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
mount: unknown filesystem type
On Tuesday 30 October 2012, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
Any idea how I can get the mount command to recognise exfat? It
works as root but not via fstab for users.
bunyip ~ # mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
mount: unknown filesystem type 'exfat'
bunyip ~ # mount.exfat /dev/sdc1 /mnt/tmp
FUSE exfat
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 02:35:44 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Anyway, you don't need to add something to remind you
of the partition's position; /etc/mtab will use regular device names,
so you can see what's going on with 'cat /etc/mtab' or simply 'mount'
without parameters.
cfdisk also
Hi, Nikos!
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
I'm totally confused. Doesn't sd* mean SCSI disk drive? When I was
installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive.
From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI drives.
For ATA drives I think it is 63?
Not sure if this is a Linux OS
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:05:10 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive. It's a bit like the old MS-DOS restriction to
512 MB all over again. Hey, guys, hard drives nowadays are like 200
gig, not 512meg.
Hi, Mick,
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
So the kernel guys have decided that nobody would ever want more than 15
partitions on a drive.
From memory I recall that this has always been the limit for SATA/SCSI
drives.
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to /dev/sd
then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the time to mess
about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel without legacy ATA
drivers, how would I know what my devices will be seen
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel
without legacy ATA drivers, how would I know
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new kernel
without legacy ATA drivers, how
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have
the time to mess about with it. If I were to configure a new
kernel without
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:29:19AM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
The CD/DVD-ROM can show up as /dev/sd* even with the old legacy drivers
if you have enable SCSI Emulation for it.
In any event, try to build a new kernel using the new drivers. The old
legacy driver
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Mick wrote:
[...]
What would be the recommended way of upgrading from the /dev/hd to
/dev/sd then? I have held back doing this because I didn't have the
time to mess about with it. If I were to
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
[...]
Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or any
other bootable CD, would those labels still be there?
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Dale wrote:
[...]
Question, if I were to label mine and then boot from a Gentoo or
any other bootable CD, would those labels still be there?
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when
Dale wrote:
True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which
is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then.
I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something
else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to
have to
Dale wrote:
Dale wrote:
True but I have trouble remembering which partition is home and which
is portage, until I mount them anyway. It's obvious then.
I guess according to another reply that I will have to use something
else for resierfs. I guess it can't hurt to much. Worst thing is to
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
The labels are part of the file system; they're always there. For
example, when booting the 2007.0 LiveDVD (which uses the legacy drivers,
meaning /dev/hd* instead of /dev/sd*) the labels are there and I can
mount
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo?
I've a newly installed system, now working with my own special
optimiesed keyboard layout. :-)
However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them
works, because I installed Gentoo from it.
When I do
mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom
, it
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0
This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no
mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard
drives are (don't ask!)).
Maybe there was some /dev/sda /dev/sdb or something similar?
Why
Hi, Nikos,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 10:06:15PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
However, I can't access my DVD drives. I know at least one of them
works, because I installed Gentoo from it.
When I do
mount -tiso9660 /dev/hdc /cdrom
, it comes back with special
Hi, Miernik,
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +0200, Miernik wrote:
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# mknod /dev/hdc b 22 0
This didn't help one iota. I had a look at dmesg, but there was no
mention of hdc in it. (It did mention hdg, hdh, where my main hard
drives are (don't
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
The default in new kernels is to only use /dev/sd*.
I'm totally confused. Doesn't sd* mean SCSI disk drive? When I was
installing Gentoo from the CD, I had to mount my main hard drive as
/dev/sdb5. When I built my own kernel, it needed /dev/hdh5.
This seems crazy. Is
Alan Mackenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There's /dev/sda and /dev/sda1, and no other /dev/sd*. That's where my
UBS stick gets mounted.
What about any /dev/sr*?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
Oh, thank you all for your input -- I've been a bit obsessed with rails
and let this go to the
On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
Oh, thank you all for your input -- I've
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:53:40 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
There is no need to do so. However, a fuse based filesystem for mounting
audio CDs exists, see http://castet.matthieu.free.fr/cddfs/.
Oh, thank you all for your input -- I've been a bit obsessed with rails
and let this go to the back
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:15:48 + (UTC), Thufir wrote:
In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives. The drives mount
fine in Fedora and read these particular discs fine (music CD's).
You don't mount audio CDs.
--
Neil Bothwick
Procrastinate now!
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 07:36:44 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
I also found (with Google) one forum posting where it was stated that
the cause was a bad, self-burned disk in the drive. When the poster
changed the disk, the problem disapeared.
In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives.
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:11:06 +
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:15:48 + (UTC), Thufir wrote:
In this case, the discs are fine, as are the drives. The drives
mount fine in Fedora and read these particular discs fine (music
CD's).
You don't mount
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:20:43 +, Stroller wrote:
A Google seems to suggest that mount: No buffer space available is
commonly returned when the device is already mounted.
Oh, I wasn't finding that or didn't know how to interpret it.
The manpage for `mount` indicates that `mount -a` will
Harry Putnam wrote:
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexander, Do you know if the system described above is what ntfs-g3
does too?
One could never determine something that basic from the man page
supplied with it. After reading it, I still know nothing about how it
works.
With a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yikes ... looks like my literacy level is greviously low..
First, sorry this got somewhat disjointed.
I think you may have already ansered what I wanted to know but for the
sake of clarity.
The `puppy' live cd described in my quotation says it can create a
file
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. It's called ntfs3g. There's an ebuild for it.
Thanks for that tip, Alexander - it works well here.
Peter or Alexander, can you give a few details of what you are able to
do with it?
Can I put that on a live CD and boot with the cd, then be able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Peter Ruskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. It's called ntfs3g. There's an ebuild for it.
Thanks for that tip, Alexander - it works well here.
Peter or Alexander, can you give a few details of what you are able to
do with it?
I don't use it - I just read about
Or does anyone know if any of the Live CDs `knoppix' style have this
tool on board?
ntfs3g is *VERY* *VERY* new. I don't think that a knoppix style
CD already has it. But I *bet*, that they'll have it quite soon.
Hi
On
Gian Domeni Calgeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or does anyone know if any of the Live CDs `knoppix' style have this
tool on board?
ntfs3g is *VERY* *VERY* new. I don't think that a knoppix style
CD already has it. But I *bet*, that they'll have it quite soon.
Hi
On
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alexander, Do you know if the system described above is what ntfs-g3
does too?
One could never determine something that basic from the man page
supplied with it. After reading it, I still know nothing about how it
works.
With a disk mounted under this
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:15:14 -0800, Grant wrote:
Hello, I'm trying to upgrade my server to the latest hardened-sources
kernel. I'm trying to mount my /dev/hda1 partition to /boot but I'm
getting the error:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext2'
It's true that I don't have ext2 support
Hello, I'm trying to upgrade my server to the latest hardened-sources
kernel. I'm trying to mount my /dev/hda1 partition to /boot but I'm
getting the error:
mount: unknown filesystem type 'ext2'
It's true that I don't have ext2 support compiled into my kernel, but I
never have.
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:02:07 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
So far I've used the old MS refrain `reboot, reboot, and reboot' to
clear up the mounts but I'm sure there is some better way or maybe a
way to prevent this from the start.
umount -l
Harry Putnam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Still I can't get to those shares without a reboot of gentoo it seems.
That reboot must clear something that probably can be cleared manually
without a reboot
Even the above referenced reboot was frozen at the point of umounting
local fs. Requiring
I found HFS HFSPLUS file system support in the kernel so I'm
building that now.
There are also hfsutils and hfsplusutils but the later seems to be
masked in a way that I don't know how to get around:
lightning linux # emerge -pv hfsutils hfsplusutils
These are the packages that I would merge,
On 10/15/05, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found HFS HFSPLUS file system support in the kernel so I'mbuilding that now.
Actually OS X disks are formated HFS+ so no need to build HFS support.
There are also hfsutils and hfsplusutils but the later seems to bemasked in a way that I don't
On Thursday 14 April 2005 22:12, Al Bayrouni wrote:
Hello all,
I want to mount an iso file ont /mnt/iso directorie.
I have this message when I run this command:
mount /mnt/packages-x86-2005.0.iso /mnt/iso -o loop=/dev/loop0,
/dev/loop0: no such file or directorie
mount -o loop
45 matches
Mail list logo
