Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-15 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
Holly Bostick wrote: The thing is Portage doesn't *remember* ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, beyond the original compile in which it is used. So if you use it, and keep the package, as soon as you do an emerge -u world, Portage will try to downgrade the package to the last stable version, which is the

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-15 Thread Zac Medico
Steve [Gentoo] wrote: The only way in which I'm not yet as convinced as you are is with respect to dependencies. I'm comfortable with the idea that I browse the bugs to verify that none of the issues affect my install directly - then to accept an unstable version of a specific package...

[gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
I'd have thought lots of people in the gentoo crowd would have been eagerly awaiting subversion 1.2.x with its substantial new reserved checkout - but nothing seems to have moved forward. Portage (by default) still gives me version 1.1.3... but version 1.2 has been available for a couple of

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Kurt Guenther
Steve [Gentoo] wrote: I'd have thought lots of people in the gentoo crowd would have been eagerly awaiting subversion 1.2.x with its substantial new reserved checkout - but nothing seems to have moved forward. Portage (by default) still gives me version 1.1.3... but version 1.2 has been

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Marco Matthies
Steve [Gentoo] wrote: I'd have thought lots of people in the gentoo crowd would have been eagerly awaiting subversion 1.2.x with its substantial new reserved checkout - but nothing seems to have moved forward. you must have missed this link from the gentoo homepage (on the left):

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Steve [Gentoo]
Marco Matthies wrote: Gentoo leaves packages in unstable for a default period of time to make sure they work allright. If you want the newest version of a package, you must tell portage to do so by putting the appropriate stuff (subversion and it's dependencies) in

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Petteri Räty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve [Gentoo] wrote: Hmmm - that all sounds sane, but what is this default period of time? What criteria must be met in order for a masked package (and specifically for Subversion) to become unmasked? At least a month and there can't be any

Re: [gentoo-user] Subversion 1.2

2005-07-14 Thread Marco Matthies
Steve [Gentoo] wrote: Hmmm - that all sounds sane, but what is this default period of time? What criteria must be met in order for a masked package (and specifically for Subversion) to become unmasked? I *think* it is something along the lines of 30 days without a bug, not 100% sure though.