On 11/28/2009 3:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
Several comments about answers here. First, to Marcus Wanner, yes, the
first
two eclipse packages work for 3.5, but they AREN'T eclipse, they are plugins for
eclipse (plugins for what I really want). The 3rd is eclipse-sdk, the only one
you don't cover
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:18:06 Chuck Robey wrote:
> Alan McKinnon's response, below, seems to be telling me that I really
> should go ahead and try to use the binary from the eclipse site, and not
> to worry about getting into dependency problems with portage. Normally,
> most package to
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009 19:20:43 Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I need to get an up-to-date version of eclipse working on my gentoo
>> box. First question is, is there a Galileo (3.5+) version of eclipse
>> available as a portage package? I can't find it, so I'd really appre
On 11/26/2009 12:55 PM, David Relson wrote:
Alternatively, one can use the autounmask command, for example:
autounmask dev-java/eclipse-ecj-3.5.1
On my AMD64 system, which has /etc/portage/package.keywords (as a
directory, rather than a file) autounmask generated file:
/etc/portage/pac
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:14:39 -0500
Marcus Wanner wrote:
> On 11/25/2009 12:20 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > Mark Knecht wrote:
> >
> >> m...@dragonfly ~/Desktop $ eix eclipse
> >> * dev-java/ant-eclipse-ecj
> >> Available versions:
> >> (3.3) 3.3.0-r1
> >> (3.4) 3.4
> >>
Chuck Robey schrieb:
> I was checking to see what version of eclipse seems to have a portage package,
> and I was kinda shocked that the package seems a bit outdated. 3.4 is the
> current portage package, but eclipse has been at 3.5 for a good while now.
> Seeing as the eclipse website has a linux
On Wednesday 25 November 2009 19:20:43 Chuck Robey wrote:
> I need to get an up-to-date version of eclipse working on my gentoo
> box. First question is, is there a Galileo (3.5+) version of eclipse
> available as a portage package? I can't find it, so I'd really appreciate
> a pointer. The o
On 11/25/2009 12:20 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
m...@dragonfly ~/Desktop $ eix eclipse
* dev-java/ant-eclipse-ecj
Available versions:
(3.3) 3.3.0-r1
(3.4) 3.4
(3.5) ~3.5.1
{elibc_FreeBSD}
Homepage:http://www.eclipse.org
Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I was checking to see what version of eclipse seems to have a portage
>> package,
>> and I was kinda shocked that the package seems a bit outdated. 3.4 is the
>> current portage package, but eclipse has been at 3.5 for a
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
> I was checking to see what version of eclipse seems to have a portage package,
> and I was kinda shocked that the package seems a bit outdated. 3.4 is the
> current portage package, but eclipse has been at 3.5 for a good while now.
> Seeing as
I was checking to see what version of eclipse seems to have a portage package,
and I was kinda shocked that the package seems a bit outdated. 3.4 is the
current portage package, but eclipse has been at 3.5 for a good while now.
Seeing as the eclipse website has a linux binary 3.5+ package, unless
11 matches
Mail list logo