Re: [gentoo-user] [gentoo-sources-6.8.x , xen domU, netfront ] Reporting kernel bug -- Howto?

On 3/17/24 09:47, Håkon Alstadheim wrote: I get a stackdump booting the gentoo-sources-6.8.x kernels, and I'm wondering how to go about reporting. Pretty sure this can't be gentoo-specific, but kernel.org seems adamant that I should report to gentoo. gentoo-sources has lots of patches. 

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources 5.15.151 breaks amdgpu support?

I upgraded gentoo-sources from 5.15.147 to 5.15.151 this morning and amdgpu support is now borked on my system with an AMD Ryzen 5 3400G with Radeon Vega Graphics. Everything worked fine with 5.15.147, but when 5.15.151 (built with same .config via "make oldconfig") boots there's always a kernel

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-6.7.7 build error

I have a build error with latest gentoo-sources (~amd64): # eix -I gentoo-sources Installed versions: 6.7.6(6.7.6)^bs(10:37:31 02/24/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) 6.7.7(6.7.7)^bs(18:43:20 03/01/24)(-build -experimental -symlink) # eix -I gcc Installed versions:

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.15.59 un-keyworded?

On 2022-09-23 10:28+0200 "J. Roeleveld" wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a specific reason why the keywords (apart from hppa) have > been removed from gentoo-sources-5.15.59? > > I am seeing some issues with systems running this version, but not > all. And as this is recent, I don't have an older

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.15.59 un-keyworded?

Hi, Is there a specific reason why the keywords (apart from hppa) have been removed from gentoo-sources-5.15.59? I am seeing some issues with systems running this version, but not all. And as this is recent, I don't have an older kernel to quickly fall back to. Currently working on testing

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.10.103 - will not boot

On 13/03/2022 22:26, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 3/13/22 14:34, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 14:04:59 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 3/13/22 13:21, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103 and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode.

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.10.103 - will not boot

On 3/13/22 14:34, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 14:04:59 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 3/13/22 13:21, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103 and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode. I'm getting some strange looping/scrolling message

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.10.103 - will not boot

On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 14:04:59 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 3/13/22 13:21, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103 > > and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode. > > > > I'm getting some strange looping/scrolling message on the screen: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.10.103 - will not boot

On 3/13/22 13:21, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103 and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode. I'm getting some strange looping/scrolling message on the screen: Kscan: watching read  1  fsk983s I followed standard procedure: emerge -avq

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-5.10.103 - will not boot

Upgraded to: gentoo-sources-5.10.103 and kernel will not boot, not even recovery mode. I'm getting some strange looping/scrolling message on the screen: Kscan: watching read 1 fsk983s I followed standard procedure: emerge -avq =sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-5.10.103 cd /usr/src/ eselect

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 15:49:30 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > Any reason you bury the iniitrd in the options list rather that having it > on a separate line? None in particular. Perhaps I was following an example. I don't think it matters much, especially as I rarely need to change it. > This

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:01:45 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Did you also remove the leading slash from the kernel? I'm still > > > running 5.4 but I tried removing the slashes from the kernel and > > > initrds and it booted fine. Thanks for the heads up, I'll be ready > > > when 5.7+ goes

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 19:32:23 BST Andrew Udvare wrote: [Snip much interesting stuff] My motherboard is also Asus: an X99-A. I haven't overwritten the UEFI BIOS kernel image for quite a while; not since I arrived at a stable layout of /boot. This is my /boot layout: # tree /boot

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Wednesday, 10 June 2020 09:57:18 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 18:29:50 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > Did you also remove the leading slash from the kernel? I'm still running > > 5.4 but I tried removing the slashes from the kernel and initrds and it > > booted fine.

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 18:29:50 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:07:40 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Nope. Didn't help. All I have now is dredging through the kernel > > > config yet again, or possibly even trying an initrd. I hope I'm not > > > being forced down that road

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On 09/06/2020 12:07, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 15:56:52 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > # cat /boot/loader/entries/30-gentoo-5.7.1.conf > title Gentoo Linux 5.7.1initrd=/intel-uc.img > linux /vmlinuz-5.7.1-gentoo > options root=/dev/nvme0n1p4 initrd=/intel-uc.img net.ifnames=0 >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:07:40 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Nope. Didn't help. All I have now is dredging through the kernel > > config yet again, or possibly even trying an initrd. I hope I'm not > > being forced down that road after all these years. > > It was so simple, and the clue was

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x [FIXED]

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 15:56:52 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 15:46:43 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Other than that, the naming scheme may have changed but I don't know > > > about > > > this. For better future-proofing, use a UUID of your root partition > > > rather > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 16:45:56 BST Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hello, Peter. > > Either an annoyance, or some potentially useful info: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 15:46:43 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > I'll try this in a minute - thanks for the idea. I've stuck with device > > names so far

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

Hello, Peter. Either an annoyance, or some potentially useful info: On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 15:46:43 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I'll try this in a minute - thanks for the idea. I've stuck with device > names so far because (i) I can read them, and (ii) I can't ever have > more than one NVMe

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On Tuesday, 9 June 2020 15:46:43 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Other than that, the naming scheme may have changed but I don't know about > > this. For better future-proofing, use a UUID of your root partition rather > > than a device name. > > > > root=UUID=... > > > > You can get this UUID

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On Monday, 8 June 2020 16:32:07 BST Andrew Udvare wrote: > Sounds like missing drivers. oldconfig didn't do everything it was > supposed to. Moving across multiple major versions, this is to be > expected. A lot of names of things have changed. > > Do a comparison of your configuration between

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:38:03 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > # cat /boot/loader/entries/30-gentoo-5.7.1.conf > > title Gentoo Linux 5.7.1 > > linux /vmlinuz-5.7.1-gentoo > > options root=/dev/nvme0n1p4 initrd=/intel-uc.img net.ifnames=0 > > raid=noautodetect > > > > That file hasn't changed, other

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:06 AM Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Afternoon all, > > Is there something special for me to set in the kernel config to enable it to > find the root partition? I copied the config from 5.4.38, ran oldconfig and > followed most of the suggested answers; but it won't boot. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

On 08/06/2020 11:06, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Afternoon all, > > Is there something special for me to set in the kernel config to enable it to > find the root partition? I copied the config from 5.4.38, ran oldconfig and > followed most of the suggested answers; but it won't boot. Sounds like

[gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources 5.7.x

Afternoon all, Is there something special for me to set in the kernel config to enable it to find the root partition? I copied the config from 5.4.38, ran oldconfig and followed most of the suggested answers; but it won't boot. # cat /boot/loader/entries/30-gentoo-5.7.1.conf title Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram

From: Bill Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 02:50 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram Hi, not sure anyone can help with this as its a bit off the reservation :) I have a Odroid N2 with 4G ram that is only seeing 1G. (even from rig

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram

by this board so you are trying to copy those from the 'hardkernel' sources, correct? Raffaele -Original Message- From: Bill Kenworthy Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 02:50 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram Hi, not sure anyone can

RE: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram

, correct? Raffaele > -Original Message- > From: Bill Kenworthy > Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 02:50 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources kernel not seeing 4G ram > > Hi, not sure anyone can help with this as its a bit off the

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Sunday, 1 July 2018 16:58:15 BST Mick wrote: > On Saturday, 30 June 2018 10:28:11 BST Philip Webb wrote: > > 180626 Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: > > >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is > > >> 4.9.xx ? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Saturday, 30 June 2018 10:28:11 BST Philip Webb wrote: > 180626 Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: > >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is > >> 4.9.xx ? I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

180626 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx ? >> I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . >> The tree contains versions of 4.14 4.16 4.17 , but all are still

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:51 AM Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > I think its more complex than just falling behind - anything later gets > the spectre fixes etc. and it appears not to be quite stable yet in some > cases. This may have been your intent and I might be misreading your email, but I just

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:41 PM Philip Webb wrote: > > 180626 Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: > >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx > >> ? > >> I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Wed, 27 Jun 2018 09:23:55 +0100, Mick wrote: > I had to revert to gentoo-sources-4.9.95 because on a Dell-XPS all > kernels on the 4.14, 4.15, 4.16 series broke bluetooth and suspend to > RAM. I have an XPS and have run all those versions, now on 4.17.2, and have had no problems with suspend

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 06:51:50 BST Bill Kenworthy wrote: > I think its more complex than just falling behind - anything later gets > the spectre fixes etc. and it appears not to be quite stable yet in some > cases. I am on 4.9.95 for everything except a surface pro4 with 4.16.17 > (as stable

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

I think its more complex than just falling behind - anything later gets the spectre fixes etc. and it appears not to be quite stable yet in some cases.  I am on 4.9.95 for everything except a surface pro4 with 4.16.17 (as stable as anything can be on those things) which needs latest. BillK On

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

180626 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: >> Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx ? >> I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . >> The tree contains versions of 4.14 4.16 4.17 , but all are still

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:58 PM Philip Webb wrote: > > Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx ? > I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . > The tree contains versions of 4.14 4.16 4.17 , but all are still testing. > I believe that some

[gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources : stable versions

Does anyone know why the latest stable version of Gentoo-sources is 4.9.xx ? I installed 4.9.16 , which I continue to use, on 2017-04-06 . The tree contains versions of 4.14 4.16 4.17 , but all are still testing. -- ,, SUPPORT

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On 12/13/2016 06:09:19 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: Hello list, Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me with a blank display and no booting activity. The display card is an AMD/ATI Tonga

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Wednesday 14 Dec 2016 09:02:38 Rich Freeman wrote: > I haven't really had time to investigate but I've had an issue like > this with my radeon card (using KMS) for a few weeks now. I'm on the > 4.4 upstream kernel. > > sddm and X11 in general work just fine, but if I try to switch to >

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the > .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me with a > blank display and no booting activity. > > The

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Wednesday 14 Dec 2016 15:29:12 Adam Carter wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Peter Humphrey > > wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the > > .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Tuesday 13 Dec 2016 20:46:45 Tsukasa Mcp_Reznor wrote or forwarded: > ... I would also recommend doing a diff of the radeon related code in the > source tree. Maybe only selected files were changed and cause the issues. > It's worth a check. Good idea. I've attached the output to the bug

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:09 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the > .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me with a > blank display and no booting activity. > > The

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

Frame Buffer Support? Regards On 12/13/2016 09:53 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Tuesday 13 Dec 2016 19:39:09 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:09:19 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the .config from 4.8.14, tweaking

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Tuesday 13 Dec 2016 19:39:09 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:09:19 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying > > the .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me > > with a blank display and no

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

Kernel now has two possible kernel modules for a lot of the radeon cards, "radeon" and "amdgpu" . Don't remember the differences, google is your friend. "amdgpu" in 4.9 supports more cards than it used to. Rather prominent in the linux-4.9 announcements. Are you now (automatically? ) loading

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

From: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 2:46 PM To: Gentoo mailing list Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0 Forwarding the email below to the list. -- Forwarded message -

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

Forwarding the email below to the list. -- Forwarded message -- From: andymenderunix <andymenderu...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 9:28 PM Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0 To: Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> I second this, but

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 17:09:19 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying > the .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me > with a blank display and no booting activity. I don't know if it's related, but I was

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the > .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me with a > blank display and no booting activity. > > The

[gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources-4.9.0

Hello list, Has anyone stumbled over a display problem with this kernel? Copying the .config from 4.8.14, tweaking with oldconfig and compiling left me with a blank display and no booting activity. The display card is an AMD/ATI Tonga Radeon R9 380X and I load the latest microcode during

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo sources

On Sunday 20 March 2016 13:03:36 bitlord wrote: > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:52:12 + > Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Does anyone know what's happened to > > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.15-r1? It was the latest stable version > > until today, when it just disappeared. I can't

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo sources

On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 10:52:12 + Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Does anyone know what's happened to > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.15-r1? It was the latest stable version > until today, when it just disappeared. I can't see anything in the > change log, and

[gentoo-user] Gentoo sources

Hello list, Does anyone know what's happened to sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.15-r1? It was the latest stable version until today, when it just disappeared. I can't see anything in the change log, and Google doesn't help. -- Rgds Peter linuxcounter.net reg 5290, 1994/04/23

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

Pandu Poluan wrote: On Feb 25, 2012 9:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: 8snip That is true BUT the docs are for 100% certainty. Well, 99% at least. They almost always have the safest way to do anything but not necessarily the most used way.

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:17:34AM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boot? I'd say it's more likely to be getting it from /proc/config.gz. But why start

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:08:22PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:48:35 +0200 Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote: On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:11:24 -0800, ny6...@gmail.com wrote: Or just import .config into the 'New' directory, and run plain ol' make menuconfig. Menuconfig will import what it can from the old config. From what I've read of the docs, make oldconfig is the dangerous part that should be avoided

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:02:38 +, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:11:24 -0800, ny6...@gmail.com wrote: Or just import .config into the 'New' directory, and run plain ol' make menuconfig. Menuconfig

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:11:24 -0800, ny6...@gmail.com wrote: Or just import .config into the 'New' directory, and run plain ol' make menuconfig. Menuconfig will import what it can from the old config. From what I've read of the docs, make oldconfig is the dangerous part

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:02:38PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:11:24 -0800, ny6...@gmail.com wrote: Or just import .config into the 'New' directory, and run plain ol' make menuconfig. Menuconfig will import what it can from the old config. From what I've read of the

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

ny6...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:02:38PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:11:24 -0800, ny6...@gmail.com wrote: Or just import .config into the 'New' directory, and run plain ol' make menuconfig. Menuconfig will import what it can from the old config. From

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Feb 25, 2012 9:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: 8snip That is true BUT the docs are for 100% certainty. Well, 99% at least. They almost always have the safest way to do anything but not necessarily the most used way. There are lots of things I do differently from the docs

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

Hello all, Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel went as follows: eselect kernel set {new kernel} cd /usr/src/linux make menuconfig and then there was a totally clean config which I would then customize for the specific setup. On one box I am currently

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 08:10:56 Coert Waagmeester wrote: Hello all, Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel went as follows: eselect kernel set {new kernel} cd /usr/src/linux make menuconfig and then there was a totally clean config which I would then

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On 02/23/2012 10:25 AM, Mick wrote: On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 08:10:56 Coert Waagmeester wrote: Hello all, Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel went as follows: eselect kernel set {new kernel} cd /usr/src/linux make menuconfig and then there was a totally

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boot? I'd say it's more likely to be getting it from /proc/config.gz. But why start with a clean config each time? That means you have plenty of

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:10 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: Hello all, Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel went as follows: eselect kernel set {new kernel} cd /usr/src/linux make mrproper make menuconfig ... BillK

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boot? I'd say it's more likely to be getting it from /proc/config.gz. But why start with a clean config each

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:48:35 +0200 Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za wrote: On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boot? I'd say

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources: can't make menuconfig with user? User can't access ncurses?

In linux.gentoo.user, Mick wrote: I use a separate output directory that is under control of the user. What I do as an ordinary user: mkdir kerneloutputdir zcat /proc/config.gz kerneloutputdir/.config # assuming you have this option set in your kernel ie the current kernel # config

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-3.2.0-r1 and genkernel

Il 06/01/2012 10:51, András Csányi ha scritto: under /boot directory. Did I missed something? Is there anything new in genkernel? Should I report it? Check /etc/genkernel/genkernel.conf maybe is commented the option that install it into /boot . hth A.

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-3.2.0-r1 and genkernel

On 10 January 2012 10:12, Andrea Perotti apero...@cutaway.it wrote: Il 06/01/2012 10:51, András Csányi ha scritto: under /boot directory. Did I missed something? Is there anything new in genkernel? Should I report it? Check /etc/genkernel/genkernel.conf maybe is commented the option that

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-3.2.0-r1 and genkernel

On 6 January 2012 11:11, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: On 01/06/2012 10:51:26 AM, András Csányi wrote: Dear All, I updated my system and there is a new gentoo-sources version 3.2.0-gentoo-r1. I reconfigured my system to use this kernel and I compiled the kernel with

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

Hi, since xen got into the mainstream kernel the way to go is to use gentoo-sources for dom0 and the domUs. However the blktap modules are not there. Is there any way to get this to work? Konstantin -- Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de Altersheimerstr.

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

Konstantinos Agouros wrote, at 01/07/2012 03:51 PM: since xen got into the mainstream kernel the way to go is to use gentoo-sources for dom0 and the domUs. However the blktap modules are not there. Is there any way to get this to work? blktap drivers were excluded from kernel mainline since

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

On Jan 7, 2012 8:44 PM, victor romanchuk r...@persimplex.net wrote: Konstantinos Agouros wrote, at 01/07/2012 03:51 PM: since xen got into the mainstream kernel the way to go is to use gentoo-sources for dom0 and the domUs. However the blktap modules are not there. Is there any way to get

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Jan 7, 2012 8:44 PM, victor romanchuk r...@persimplex.net wrote: Konstantinos Agouros wrote, at 01/07/2012 03:51 PM: since xen got into the mainstream kernel the way to go is to use gentoo-sources for dom0 and the

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

On Jan 8, 2012 12:43 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Jan 7, 2012 8:44 PM, victor romanchuk r...@persimplex.net wrote: Konstantinos Agouros wrote, at 01/07/2012 03:51 PM: since xen got into the mainstream

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources and xen blktap driver?

On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Jan 8, 2012 12:43 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: On Jan 7, 2012 8:44 PM, victor romanchuk r...@persimplex.net wrote: Konstantinos

[gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-3.2.0-r1 and genkernel

Dear All, I updated my system and there is a new gentoo-sources version 3.2.0-gentoo-r1. I reconfigured my system to use this kernel and I compiled the kernel with genkernel. But there is no compiled file under /boot directory. Did I missed something? Is there anything new in genkernel? Should I

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources: can't make menuconfig with user? User can't access ncurses?

On Tuesday 03 Jan 2012 01:13:17 Gregory Shearman wrote: In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:58:18 -0200 Claudio Roberto França Pereira spide...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not currently at my Gentoo box, sorry for this, but if I don't post this now I'll probably forget to

[gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources: can't make menuconfig with user? User can't access ncurses?

I'm not currently at my Gentoo box, sorry for this, but if I don't post this now I'll probably forget to post it at all. Anyways, last time I tried upgrading my kernel, I copied my .config and ran make menuconfig as my main user, but it whined about missing ncurses libraries or something. After

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources: can't make menuconfig with user? User can't access ncurses?

On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:58:18 -0200 Claudio Roberto França Pereira spide...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not currently at my Gentoo box, sorry for this, but if I don't post this now I'll probably forget to post it at all. Anyways, last time I tried upgrading my kernel, I copied my .config and ran make

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo-sources: can't make menuconfig with user? User can't access ncurses?

In linux.gentoo.user, you wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 20:58:18 -0200 Claudio Roberto França Pereira spide...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not currently at my Gentoo box, sorry for this, but if I don't post this now I'll probably forget to post it at all. Anyways, last time I tried upgrading my kernel,

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Saturday 18 December 2010 14:40:07 Mick wrote: On 30 November 2010 11:11, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote: On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote: Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work. I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On 30 November 2010 11:11, Peter Humphrey pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote: On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote: Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work. I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword to gentoo-sources. Just compiled

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote: Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work. I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword to gentoo-sources. BtW, is it really necessary to quote the entire thread in every post? -- Rgds Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Monday 29 November 2010 06:42:26 Petri Rosenström wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 29 November 2010 06:42:26 Petri Rosenström wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday 27

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote: $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set CONFIG_ATA=y # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set # CONFIG_ATA_VERBOSE_ERROR is not set CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y # CONFIG_ATA_SFF is not set

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Monday 29 November 2010 09:01:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote: $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set CONFIG_ATA=y # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set #

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On 29 November 2010 10:30, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 29 November 2010 09:01:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote: $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

Mick wrote: Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-( The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what I have configured: $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set CONFIG_ATA=y # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set #

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Mick wrote: Ughh!  Spoke too soon.  :-( The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner.  This is what I have  configured:  $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set #

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

Mick wrote: On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Mick wrote: Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-( The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what I have configured: $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA # CONFIG_ATALK is not set #

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12 causes kernel panic

On Monday 29 November 2010 15:17:42 Dale wrote: Mick wrote: On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Mick wrote: Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-( The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what I have configured: $ cat

  1   2   >