On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 10:03:59 +, Michael wrote:
> > > emerge pkg should always emerge it, whether it is installed or not.
> > > Have you added anything to EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS to alter this
> > > behaviour?
> >
> > That *could* alter it, yes. That I think *would* alter it, no.
> >
> >
On Sunday, 28 November 2021 08:53:07 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 28/11/2021 07:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> >>> Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
> >>>
> >>> That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
> >>>
On 28/11/2021 07:50, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
normally with emerge @module-rebuild
"nothing to rebuild"
emerge pkg should always
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:11:57 +, Wols Lists wrote:
> > Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
> >
> > That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
> > normally with emerge @module-rebuild
> >
> "nothing to rebuild"
emerge pkg should always emerge it, whether it is
quickpg the existing modules then try the remove/reinstall fix. You can
then use "emerge -K =package" or even a manually reinstall (by coping
them over the newer ones) to replace the modules if things don't work out.
I would think in your case needing to keep kernel specific modules
around
On 27/11/2021 22:15, Kees wrote:
>The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
>Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens
normally with emerge @module-rebuild
"nothing to
>The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
>Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
Strange. try: emerge virtualbox-modules
That should be rebuild after everuy kernel upgrade and that happens normally
with emerge @module-rebuild
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:29 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
>
I can't offer any VirtualBox-specific solutions but I would try
reinstalling it as others have suggested (emerge -1
I mean that as: just reinstall Virtualbox as a first troubleshooting step.
If that works, great. If it doesn’t, then that can be marked off the list
as something that was tried.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:21 AM Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 13:03, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
> > I’d recommend
On 27/11/2021 13:03, Jeremy Hendricks wrote:
I’d recommend emerging Virtualbox again. It should just work with emerge
@module-rebuild unless Virtualbox isn’t compatible with the newer
version of kernel.
HOW !?!?
The problem is that they are already installed, so any attempt to emerge
them
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:59:49 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> >> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> >> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
> >>
I’d recommend emerging Virtualbox again. It should just work with emerge
@module-rebuild unless Virtualbox isn’t compatible with the newer version
of kernel.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 8:00 AM Wols Lists wrote:
> On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10
On 27/11/2021 12:41, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
How do I fix it !!!
What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the
On Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:29:10 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
> is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
>
> How do I fix it !!!
>
> What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the modules.
>
> The docu says "emerge
Simple problem, after a kernel upgrade, virtualbox no longer works. This
is to be expected, of course, BUT ...
How do I fix it !!!
What I always did on my old system was to re-emerge the modules.
The docu says "emerge @module-rebuild".
Both of these terminate with "nothing to rebuild".
What
On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:59:11 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > fwiw, I think I've always just copied the old .config across, then
> > > done "make menuconfig". I think that also just accepts defaults for
> > > anything new.
> >
> > It doesn't, it prompts for every change, with the default
> >
On Monday, 5 April 2021 19:43:29 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:04:18 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > > For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
> > > accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
> > > whereas oldconfig will prompt the
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 19:04:18 +0100, antlists wrote:
> > For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
> > accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
> > whereas oldconfig will prompt the user for input.
> >
> > The former is great if you just don't
On 05/04/2021 15:06, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 13:27 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
"make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig"
For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
On Mon, 2021-04-05 at 13:27 +0200, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig"
For the uninitiated, the difference here is that olddefconfig will
accept the default configuration value for any new/changed options,
whereas oldconfig will prompt the user for input.
On Mon 05 Apr 2021 13:27:01 GMT, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> I'm always using "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig" and
> had no problems upgrading to 5.10. After running "make olddefconfig" I
> use "diff" to compare the new configuration to a backup copy of the old
> one, and
On Sun 04 Apr 2021 23:56:05 GMT, Michael wrote:
> On Sunday, 4 April 2021 23:31:50 BST Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> > boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
> > Here is my make output:
Alarig,
On Monday, 2021-04-05 00:31:50 +0200, you wrote:
> ...
> Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
I'm always using "make olddefconfig" rather than "make oldconfig" and
had no problems
On Sunday, 4 April 2021 23:31:50 BST Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
> boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
> Here is my make output: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/2rRh
> And here is my config:
Hello,
Has the 5.10 LTS has been stablised, I tried to upgrade it on some of my
boxes, but `make oldconfig` doesn’t want to use my old config:
Here is my make output: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/2rRh
And here is my config: https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/YHaG
Does anyone else has to redo
On 30/12/2017 20:43, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
> from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
> .config into the new kernel source tree and type
> make oldconfig
>
> This is where I'm confused; which
This worked.
Thank you all a thousand times!
On 30/12/17 19:11, Mick wrote:
to remove the symlink pointing to the previous kernel,
to create a new symlink to the new kernel sources directory,
Or, to use the supplied gentoo tools ...
eselect kernel list
eselect kernel set n
to see what kernels the system thinks are available, and to
Hi Jalus,
On Saturday, 30 December 2017 18:43:12 GMT Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
> Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
> from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
> .config into the new kernel source tree and type
> make oldconfig
>
>
Hi Jalus,
> This is where I'm confused; which .config file (/proc/config.gz or
> /boot/config)
The two should have the same content most of the time. You can use
either. config.gz needs to be decompressed (e.g. with zcat).
> where in the kernel source tree do I put this file in.
In the root of
On 30/12/17 18:43, Jalus Bilieyich wrote:
Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
.config into the new kernel source tree and type
make oldconfig
This is where I'm confused; which .config file
Recently there was a kernel update and I don't want to reconfigure it
from scratch. In the official documentation, it told me to move the old
.config into the new kernel source tree and type
make oldconfig
This is where I'm confused; which .config file (/proc/config.gz or
/boot/config) and where
On April 27, 2016 12:59:18 PM GMT+02:00, Hans wrote:
>Tried to upgrade the kernels of my desktop and notebook fron kernel
>4.1.12 upgrade to 4.4.6. Both systems freeze during booting with 4.4.6.
>
>No dmsg, No messages logs. Previous kernel upgrades always worked
>smooth
>as
Tried to upgrade the kernels of my desktop and notebook fron kernel
4.1.12 upgrade to 4.4.6. Both systems freeze during booting with 4.4.6.
No dmsg, No messages logs. Previous kernel upgrades always worked smooth
as silk.
Using: OpenRC, eudev, Xfce,
Desktop configration:
Genkernel with
Hi.
Im trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.35-gentoo-r12 to
linux-2.6.36-gentoo-r5 just copied the .config from the old one and did a
make oldconfig as i usually do
but when i tried to compile it got this message:
--
localhost linux #
Fzinc wrote:
Hi.
Im trying to upgrade the kernel from 2.6.35-gentoo-r12 to
linux-2.6.36-gentoo-r5 just copied the .config from the old one and
did a make oldconfig as i usually do
but when i tried to compile it got this message:
--
Am 03.05.2010 18:56, schrieb Jason Dusek:
I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
around, to
I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
around, to 2.6.32-r7, I installed and rebooted and then my
Am 03.05.2010 18:56, schrieb Jason Dusek:
I have an encrypted block device, `/dev/sda2', which is
mounted as my root filesystem. I recently installed this
system -- I've been away from Gentoo for awhile -- and used
gentoo sources 2.6.31-r6. When the kernel upgrade rolled
around, to
I noticed yesterday gentoo-sources-2.6.29 was released, and was wondering if
it's required that the kernel be upgraded (I'm currently running 2.6.28. I
did download the sources (Should I have done that?), but in the event it's
not mandatory or anything to upgrade the kernel I'd really like to not
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:43:56 James Homuth wrote:
I noticed yesterday gentoo-sources-2.6.29 was released, and was wondering
if it's required that the kernel be upgraded
no
(I'm currently running 2.6.28.
nothing wrong with that
I did download the sources (Should I have done that?),
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 17:43:56 James Homuth wrote:
Related, however, if I do recompile it and
decide to do so with genkernel,
Yuck. I tell people to stay away from that thing.
Just learn how to do it yourself. It's not hard, you get only what you want,
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
will it respect the settings I've compiled
into 2.6.28 or will they need to be reset again before 2.6.29 is
compiled?
No. Not unless you give it the old config to use. IIRC it has some
feature to use the config for the currently running
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
Why not copy the config from the old kernel over and run make
oldconfig? May need to do some cleaning after genkernel tho.
That's the correct way :-)
But the OP asked if there was some magic way to get genkernel
On (03/06/09 15:40) Dale wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 18:39:56 Dale wrote:
Why not copy the config from the old kernel over and run make
oldconfig? May need to do some cleaning after genkernel tho.
That's the correct way :-)
But the OP asked if
김무성 writes:
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source
files’ version no match.
I have to kernel upgrade.
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 00:19:03 -0400, Saphirus Sage wrote:
Please trim your quotes.
I saw that, I just found it very odd that you don't keep the initramrd
and kernel image in /boot. Therefore, I was wondering if your issue
was having not properly configured genkernel. I've never seen anyone
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source files’
version no match.
I have to kernel
±è¹«¼º wrote:
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that¡¯s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source
files¡¯ version no match.
, 2009 11:58 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel upgrade error. help me
±è¹«¼º wrote:
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that¡¯s version 2.6.27-gentoo
: Saphirus Sage [mailto:saphirus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:58 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kernel upgrade error. help me
±è¹«¼º wrote:
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I
Hello list.
For installing vmware
My kernel version is 2.6.24-gentoo-r5. But I have no source files.
So I downloaded source files. But that’s version 2.6.27-gentoo-r8.
When I installed vmware, it told me kernel version and kernel source files’
version no match.
I have to kernel
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:56 PM, David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Dirk,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. The combination of gentoo-sources
and genkernel has been working quite well for the 2 yrs I've been
running Gentoo. It's convenient to have grub.conf auto-magically
G'day,
Due to problems experienced with 2.6.25-gentoo-r7, I've built
2.6.27-gentoo-r2. I started with the 2.6.25-r7 .config file, ran
make oldconfig, then genkernel all. The new 2.6.27 kernel appears
to load modules OK, then hangs. The old 2.6.25-r7 kernel displays
Activating mdev after it
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 20:51:10 schrieb David Relson:
Due to problems experienced with 2.6.25-gentoo-r7, I've built
2.6.27-gentoo-r2. I started with the 2.6.25-r7 .config file, ran
make oldconfig, then genkernel all.
Don't know if that helps, but anyway, here's what I usually do:
I
Hello Dirk,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. The combination of gentoo-sources
and genkernel has been working quite well for the 2 yrs I've been
running Gentoo. It's convenient to have grub.conf auto-magically
updated and that's not been an issue.
When upgrading from one kernel revision to
On Friday 22 February 2008 16:22:34 Grant wrote:
Too bad that 'oldconfig' isn't always working :-(
Is there a better way to update the config for a new kernel?
What I do is to run menuconfig against the most recent .config, and search
(visually) for items marked [NEW] and read their Help
I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
firewall:
requires NAT which is disabled
ERROR: Command /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT Failed
I used make oldconfig carefully
On (22/02/08 06:37) Grant wrote:
I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
firewall:
requires NAT which is disabled
ERROR: Command /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
I upgraded my router's kernel from linux-2.6.18-hardened-r6 to
linux-2.6.23-hardened-r7 and now I get errors when starting the
firewall:
requires NAT which is disabled
ERROR: Command /sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -m state --state
ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT Failed
I
On Friday 22 February 2008, Grant wrote:
Too bad that 'oldconfig' isn't always working :-(
Is there a better way to update the config for a new kernel?
Not really.
You are dealing with a complex system of configuration settings that
react in mysterious ways. AND that seeing as this is a
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
If you post the output of this command:
lspci -s 01:0a.0 -n
We will have the PCI id to search for. Might make it easier to find bug
reports.
The output of this command:
dmesg|egrep -i -A3 (alsa|sound)
Should give us an idea of whether your kernel actually detects
On Friday 15 June 2007, Dale wrote:
Well, you won't believe this but I rebooted into the newer kernel to get
the info for you, now it works fine. O_O I have sound when I change
desktops, it plays a CD fine, it seems to be working now.
That's so great. I couldn't find any reason why it would
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
01:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live!
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
01:0a.0 Multimedia audio
On Thursday 14 June 2007, Dale wrote:
Thanks for the info but I build everything in the kernel. I never liked
modules. I suspect that something did change about the kernel though.
I may just stick with the older kernel for now and try another version
later.
Still open to ideas though.
If
Hi,
I upgraded my kernel the other day and now I have no sound at all. I
have checked Alsamixer and Kmix to make sure it is not muted and it
appears to be turned up there. This is lspci:
01:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1
(rev 0a)
I have this built into my
hello,
here's something weird i ran into after upgrading my kernel from
2.6.18-r6 to 2.6.19-r5. now if i compile the kernel with framebuffer
enabled with vesafb-tng support and set the resolution to anything
other than [EMAIL PROTECTED] in grub, i get this error upon booting.
Block device
hello, im trying to upgrade my kernel to 2.6.10. I'm using vidalinux
with genkernel. i followed a guide
http://forums.vidalinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=2690highlight=kernel
+upgrade+2+6+10 but after reboot i get 'Error 15: File not found after
kernel grub selection. Also a get error stating that
Jose Moreira wrote:
hello, im trying to upgrade my kernel to 2.6.10. I'm using vidalinux
with genkernel. i followed a guide
http://forums.vidalinux.com/viewtopic.php?t=2690highlight=kernel
+upgrade+2+6+10 but after reboot i get 'Error 15: File not found after
kernel grub selection. Also a get
On 4/16/05, Jose Moreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i joined gentoo-users because vidalinux is gentoo-based. if i did rong
tell me and i'll leave, no prob.
It's not wrong, but you're the first person I've seen ask about
videlinux here. I hadn't even heard of it.
Christoph's comment seems about
On 4/16/05, Jose Moreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ive tried updating the fstab from ext2 to reiserfs but then it doesnt
boot :|
Jose,
Sorry but I didn't keep the original message. I think the problem
Christoph was seeing was that you had something like:
/dev/BOOT / ext3.
/dev/HOME
72 matches
Mail list logo