Aggelos schrieb:
May I never get support from this list if all other users are like those.
PS: Which I believe is not true.
Leave please.
Regards,
Thomas
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2007 05:45
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
No - I meant
Agg, accept to be in an internet community and to follow the rules of
this community.
If this community labels your mail to this community as spam, this mean
that for every practical reason *it is spam*, no matter how different is
your opinion on it.
If you don't like it, fine, but look at
At this rate of discussing about if this is spam or not all the dolphins
will die. And of course... this is a Gentoo Mailing List, please don't write
thinks off-topic here. If you want to help the dolphins... go to GreenPeace!
or complain to the Japanese Government! here you don't obtain nothing.
on 02/26/2007 07:21 PM Bruno Espinoza wrote the following:
At this rate of discussing about if this is spam or not all the dolphins
will die. And of course... this is a Gentoo Mailing List, please don't
write thinks off-topic here. If you want to help the dolphins... go to
GreenPeace! or
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:32:51AM +0200, mann wrote:
Sorry, but again, that is *not* spam. You wouldn't be replying to it and
I wouldn't either if it were.
Yummm! Dolphin tastes good, I bet. Since you have so obviously little
taste when it comes to mailing list etiquette, you probably aslo
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:32:51AM +0200, mann wrote:
Sorry, but again, that is *not* spam. You wouldn't be replying to it and
I wouldn't either if it were.
Say, I bet there are mailing lists meant for save the dolphin
vegetarians. I bet a search would find them. Maybe I will go there
and
Let's stop replying to this thread and let it die already, please?
There's no Save-A-Thread society after you here...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
You mean an *off-topic*
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still *off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic
from just one e-mail account? It is annoying to have to kill-file
multiple ones.
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it
on 02/26/2007 12:29 AM Agg wrote the following:
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
It seems some people just cant miss an
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still *off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the decency to spam^H post off-topic
from just one e-mail
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with a valid reply-to address is still spam.
You mean an
Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:29 AM Agg wrote the following:
on 02/25/2007 11:50 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:12 PM Dale wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/24/2007 07:51 PM Mantas Povilaitis wrote the following:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still
*off-topic*.
Oh, come on, why can't you have the
Oh my gosh, why don't you all just STOP and let this post DIE.
--
Samuel (shardz)
Shardz's Igloo:
shardz.homelinux.net
Registered Linux User #410639
amarok.kde.org
defectivebydesign.org
usmc.mil
Mick wrote:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
If you had the decency to accept off-topic as off-topic, spam as spam,
simple as simple, and hypocrisy as hypocrisy...
You seem to be evidently void of any sense of relevance and proportionality.
This is a 'gentoo-user'
Dale wrote:
OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in
the subject line and it will be OK. ;-)
What's happening to everyone here!??
CAN'T YOU SEE THE DAMN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REAL SPAM AND SOME POOR SOUL TRYING
TO SAVE LIVES??
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Norberto Bensa wrote:
Dale wrote:
OK then. I'm going to start selling Viagra. I'll just put off-topic in
the subject line and it will be OK. ;-)
What's happening to everyone here!??
CAN'T YOU SEE THE DAMN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REAL SPAM AND SOME POOR SOUL TRYING
TO SAVE
unwanted in
this forum. Sorry for top post on my treo and only way.
-Original Message-
From: Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
Date: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:13 pm
Size: 959 bytes
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Norberto Bensa
on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
on 02/25/2007 11:14 PM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
Agg wrote:
All those that replied wouldn't reply if it were an actual spam.
An off-topic is not necessarily spam. And that's exactly the specific
case.
Spam with
on 02/26/2007 01:22 AM Mick wrote the following:
On Sunday 25 February 2007 22:45, Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:27 AM Willie Wong wrote the following:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:38:35PM +0200, Penguin Lover Agg squawked:
You mean an *off-topic* with a valid reply-to address is still
Agg wrote:
on 02/26/2007 12:58 AM Mark Kirkwood wrote the following:
No - I meant spam...
off-topic in this particular case
At last we agree - your spam is off-topic :-).
On a more serious note, I've added both your email addresses to my
delete immediately filter.
--
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you Responsible mailing
list users writing
Mantas Povilaitis ha scritto:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 19:51 +0200, Mantas Povilaitis wrote:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
[...precedes to flame and whine]
I just want to say that I agree with you 100%.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
b.n. wrote:
Yes, but we love it. I would continue, but I'm going to the cheese shop
in front of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
No, no, no. Go to the pet shop and buy a parrot! ;)
Be lucky,
Neil
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Mantas Povilaitis wrote:
It seems some people just cant miss an opportunity to flame and whine
about spam (and it wasted like 5 s of my oh so important life OMG,
OMFG!!!) and write pseudo-humorous juvenile nonsenses. OP at least
wrote something meaningful while all other of you Responsible
Maybe, just maybe, if we all stoped posting (mailing) to this thread,
it would go away, and we wouldn't have this problem.
Something to chew on..
--
Samuel (shardz)
Shardz's Igloo:
shardz.homelinux.net
Registered Linux User #410639
amarok.kde.org
defectivebydesign.org
usmc.mil
By the time this thread ends, the dolphins will have died of old age,
making the original point moot ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
All wight - Rho sritched mg kegtops awound?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Neil Bothwick wrote:
By the time this thread ends, the dolphins will have died of old age,
making the original point moot ;-)
If I had the money, I would go KILL all of them just to end this
thread. This doesn't even concern computers much less Linux.
Dale
:-) :-) :-)
--
On Friday 23 February 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
By the time this thread ends, the dolphins will have died of old age,
making the original point moot ;-)
Not if they don't all vanish in a puff of smoke just before the Vogons
get here, leaving behind a note that says So long and thanks for all
On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Aggelos wrote:
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
www.petitiononline.com/golfinho
For the amusement of all Gentooite's who watched this thread and
wondered what planet Aggelos comes from:
He's about to get his just rewards:
He just posted the same thing to lkml
I
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:34:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Besides, I think the second most intelligent life form on the planet
has already figured out how to deal with this onslaut from the third
most intelligent life form on the planet.
By spamming mailing lists so that we're all too busy
Neil Bothwick wrote this:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:34:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Besides, I think the second most intelligent life form on the planet
has already figured out how to deal with this onslaut from the third
most intelligent life form on the planet.
By spamming mailing lists
-Original Message-
From: Rodrigo Forlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 February 2007 13:19
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
Neil Bothwick wrote this:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:34:44 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote
Everyone had showed so much insensitivity that you make me absolutely sick.
If the OP is spam, why did all of you reply to it?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Friday 23 February 2007 14:19:21 Rodrigo Forlin wrote:
Besides, I think the second most intelligent life form on the planet
has already figured out how to deal with this onslaut from the third
most intelligent life form on the planet.
By spamming mailing lists so that we're all too
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:43:15 -, Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\) wrote:
Well... dolphins are supposed to be pretty smart but can they post to
mailing lists?
Dolphins are far smarter than humans, which is why not a single dolphin
has bought Vista :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Anything is good and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Everyone had showed so much insensitivity that you make me absolutely sick.
If the OP is spam, why did all of you reply to it?
So you joined in to huh?
Dale
:-) :-) :-)
--
www.myspace.com/dalek1967
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alan McKinnon ha scritto:
He just posted the same thing to lkml
I fear for the man, I really do.
It seems they are just ignoring him. Probably he is not the first
clueless moron spamming the lkml, so they just filter his address and go
away with it.
If he continues this way, in a few days he
On 2/23/07, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:43:15 -, Nelson, David \(ED, PARD\) wrote:
Well... dolphins are supposed to be pretty smart but can they post to
mailing lists?
Dolphins are far smarter than humans, which is why not a single dolphin
has bought
From: Rodrigo Forlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:53 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
On 2/23/07, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri
Dale wrote:
So you joined in to huh?
Yes. because I care about more than just a bunch of zeroes and ones.
Bye
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:50:54 +0200, Aggelos wrote:
there is another difference: The killing of those dolphins. each year,
in the numbers seen on the video, may be a threat to nature's ecological
system.
It may,m it may not, that is open to debate. What is not in doubt is that
this has
-Original Message-
From: Aggelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2007 18:23
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
-snip-
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Aggelos
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
The post that I made was satire. Its porpoise was to inspire a laugh, a
chuckle, at most a humorous response. Not a debate. Debates are for
serious people.
Look the fact is every day:
* A dolphin is killed
* A cow is killed
* Someone litters
* Someone is killed/tortured
Aggelos ha scritto:
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Don't care if you have a special vocabulary. It is spam.
Post your spam elsewhere.
m.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 22 February 2007, b.n. wrote:
Aggelos ha scritto:
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Don't care if you have a special vocabulary. It is spam.
Post your spam elsewhere.
OMFG, don't you heretics comprehend what you have done!!!???
The dolphins are being massacred. We
on 02/21/2007 07:48 PM Aggelos wrote the following:
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
www.petitiononline.com/golfinho
I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or watever, for
this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it
here. If I had posted it to a
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:42:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
The dolphins are being massacred. We need them:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ eix dolphin
* kde-misc/dolphin
Available versions: (~)0.8.1
Homepage:http://enzosworld.gmxhome.de
Description: A file manager
-Original Message-
From: Aggelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 February 2007 18:20
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
on 02/21/2007 07:48 PM Aggelos wrote the following:
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
Aggelos wrote:
I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or watever, for
this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it
here.
If you don't care about the other subscribers here, I suggest you to host
your own mailing list, i.e.
on 02/22/2007 08:30 PM Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote the following:
I don't see a problem with OT posts that have some vague relevance e.g: List
policies, Linux security issues (for example OT - Some miscellanous
questions about hack attacks and dealing with them). By your logic people
Can you, please, continue this discussion in your private emails?
Thanks!
--
FABRÍCIO L. RIBEIRO
===
[icq: 66770900]
[e-mail, gtalk e msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[blog: http://opalavrorio.blogspot.com]
z� ��(��j)b� b�
on 02/22/2007 08:48 PM Ralph Seichter wrote the following:
Aggelos wrote:
I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or watever, for
this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it
here.
If you don't care about the other subscribers here, I suggest you
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:20:28 +0200, Aggelos wrote:
I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or watever, for
this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it
here.
What outstanding arrogance!
This list is primarily a vehicle for peer support. You total
His arrogance is a desperation signal. He, in fact, knows and are
conscient of his mistake and because of a lack of justification to
give due to what he did, he act like this.
I suggest to ignore such users and do what Neil said: wait for this
user need to use the list for its write propose and
... for its **right** propose ...
2007/2/22, Leandro Melo de Sales [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
His arrogance is a desperation signal. He, in fact, knows and are
conscient of his mistake and because of a lack of justification to
give due to what he did, he act like this.
I suggest to ignore such users
on 02/22/2007 09:14 PM Neil Bothwick wrote the following:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:20:28 +0200, Aggelos wrote:
I really don't care if consider the above as spam or not or watever, for
this list or for any list. I am subscribed to this list so I posted it
here.
What outstanding arrogance!
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 07:34 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
Look the fact is every day:
* [some things happen]
* and someone hijacks a thread.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled mailing list, already in
progress...
Ob-Linux: If you use the forcedeth ethernet driver then I'd advise you
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
www.petitiononline.com/golfinho
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: Aggelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2007 17:49
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
www.petitiononline.com/golfinho
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
on 02/21/2007 07:58 PM Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote the following:
-Original Message-
From: Aggelos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 February 2007 17:49
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] off topic : Dolphin massacre in Japan
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:58 +, Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote:
[...]
I hate to be a nasty evil person and say this, but I will anyway - this has
no place on a Gentoo mailing list IMO. Post it in the off topic section of
the Gentoo forums I guess but posting these on a mailing list is
You see every day, like the poor Japanese Dolphins, countless numbers
of
cows are murdered every day. They are slaughtered, cut up, ground into
little bits, you name it, all in the name of greed (both in terms of
money and food). These innocent little souls are brought to an early
death so that
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 01:39:02 pm Albert Hopkins wrote:
Today 01:39:02 pm
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:58 +, Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote:
[...]
I hate to be a nasty evil person and say this, but I will anyway - this
has no place on a Gentoo mailing list IMO. Post it in the
Aggelos wrote:
www.glumbert.com/media/dolphin
www.petitiononline.com/golfinho
Thanks for the info. Signed both this and and thepetitionsite.com version.
Best regards
Peter K
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007, Aggelos wrote:
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Aggelos
I would.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:54:43 -0500, Jerry McBride wrote:
Mmmm roasted penguin...
Die, heretic!
--
Neil Bothwick
Self-explanatory: technospeak for Incomprehensible undocumented
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:22:40 +0200, Aggelos wrote:
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Of course not, you sent it.
--
Neil Bothwick
Today's subliminal message is: .
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Aggelos wrote:
I would not define such a mail as spam.
Aggelos
The relevant part of http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
[...]
This is a very risky thing to do, however, because the hackers' metric for
what is exciting probably differs from yours.
on 02/21/2007 08:39 PM Albert Hopkins wrote the following:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:58 +, Nelson, David (ED, PARD) wrote:
[...]
I hate to be a nasty evil person and say this, but I will anyway - this has
no place on a Gentoo mailing list IMO. Post it in the off topic section of
the
80 matches
Mail list logo
