Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via
the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for
thinkpad
there
Dnia 2010-04-26, pon o godzinie 19:10 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in
Dnia 2010-04-27, wto o godzinie 10:37 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in thinkpad
Dnia 2010-04-23, pią o godzinie 09:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for
Dnia 2010-04-22, czw o godzinie 09:47 -0700, Grant pisze:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device
Strangely, now my laptop's brightness adjustment doesn't work via the
keyboard shortcuts. Any ideas on that?
- Grant
Please share the beast model :P (or maybe ive missed it).
in kernel config You have multiple option for backlight eg. for thinkpad
there is extra one in thinkpad specific
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:51:19AM -0700, Grant wrote:
And (its only my private opinion - could base on wrong facts :P) dont be
used to hal because the 1.8 xorg-server dont like it any more,
preferring udev, and future versions wouldn't probably support hal at
all.
Lately i delete hal
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8.
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since xorg-server-1.7 doesn't have a udev USE flag, I should
probably stick with hal until 1.8.
Mike Edenfield wrote:
On 4/23/2010 1:37 PM, Grant wrote:
Can anyone confirm that as users we should be moving away from hal?
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.8-upgrade-guide.xml
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/XorgHAL
OK, and since
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
directory
(EE) intel(0): Failed to become
On Thursday 22 April 2010 17:47:23 Grant wrote:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
You only
On 21 April 2010 12:26, Adam a...@jaftan.com.au wrote:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
You only
On 4/21/2010 3:07 PM, Grant wrote:
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
Could this be the problem?
# grep ^\(EE /var/log/Xorg.0.log
(EE) Failed to load module vesa (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) Failed to load module fbdev (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to open DRM device for : No such file or
directory
(EE) intel(0): Failed to become
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got bad
performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Grant wrote:
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
I
Dnia 2010-04-19, pon o godzinie 20:24 -0500, deface pisze:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
moreover its discouraged to use one. (or just i think so)
Exactly.
Dnia 2010-04-20, wto o godzinie 11:51 -0700, Grant pisze:
ummm .. ok ? so your using the default xorg.conf .. could be why youve got
bad performance.
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/xorg-config.xml
-
deface
But the new version of xorg (from circa 1.7) dont really need xorg.conf,
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
in order to fix it? Do I need to disable or enable DRI?
- Grant
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
On Apr 19, 2010, at 5:06 PM, Grant wrote:
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything to try
in
did etc-update over write xorg.conf ?
I actually don't use an xorg.conf at all.
- Grant
I just updated a lot of packages on my laptop including xorg stuff,
the intel-drivers, and firefox. Firefox is running really slowly now,
with kind of a lag to everything. Does anyone know of anything
Hi Lists,
I have recently made some plans out of my ideas about the bugday
project. They have ended up in a forum thread[1] in the userrep forum.
Feel free to comment on it or contact me directly or any of my team
members if you have any questions about this. We are hanging around in
#Gentoo-Bugs
regardless of the kernel generation method chosen.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Roy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 11:16 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
Roy~
Thanks for the reply. I actually used
Yes, it is.
JD
-Original Message-
From: Qian Qiao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 7:00 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
On 10/30/05, John Dangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy~
Thanks for the reply. I actually used
I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to install a new
kernel, I know that there are certain packages that will not come back, and
need to be re-emerged on the new kernel. Is there a way to setup a list of
these based on what I have installed on my current Gentoo kernel to
Message-
From: Holly Bostick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 1:52 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler schreef:
I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to install a
new
kernel, I know
John Dangler schreef:
John Dangler schreef:
Holly Bostick schreef:
I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to
install a new kernel, I know that there are certain packages that
will not come back, Is there a way to setup a list of these based
on what I have installed
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 2:35 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler schreef:
John Dangler schreef:
Holly Bostick schreef:
I'm trying to get a definitive answer to this - when I want to
install a new kernel, I
John Dangler wrote:
Holly~
Thanks for the reply. It seems fairly straightforward. From reading this,
I would think that running module-rebuild populate would be the first task.
Add/Del package would be for building discriminate versions of a kernel
(presumably for locating problems or just
, 2005 3:12 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
Holly~
Thanks for the reply. It seems fairly straightforward. From reading this,
I would think that running module-rebuild populate would be the first task.
Add/Del package would be for building
John Dangler wrote:
hrmm...
I recompile the new kernel, before rebooting, I run module-rebuild list...
and get one entry - =media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.6629-r4
So, I reboot the new kernel, and get no Ethernet, no wireless, no sound,
nonvidia, and the vga mode is wrong. (the grub entry is an
: Roy Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:27 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
hrmm...
I recompile the new kernel, before rebooting, I run module-rebuild list...
and get one entry - =media-video/nvidia-kernel
On 10/30/05, John Dangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roy~
Thanks for the reply. I actually used genkernel to make the kernel. I used
'genkernel all'. That's why I'm a little confused as to why this didn't
take effect. The previous kernel was also built with genkernel and didn't
have any
John Dangler wrote:
Roy~
Thanks for the reply. I actually used genkernel to make the kernel. I used
'genkernel all'. That's why I'm a little confused as to why this didn't
take effect. The previous kernel was also built with genkernel and didn't
have any problems.
Regards,
JD
I'm
I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a short list updates
that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates. However,
if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new version of the
John Dangler wrote:
looking at the list of updates after a fresh install of 2005.1 (2.6.12-r6)
on my laptop which has both wired and wireless networking, I see an entry
which says.
[blocks B] =net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.0 (is blocking
net-wireless/ieee80211-1.0.3)
.
.
.
[ebuild N]
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 9:22 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates with B
John Dangler wrote:
looking at the list of updates after a fresh install of 2005.1 (2.6.12-r6)
on my laptop which has both wired and wireless networking, I see an entry
John Dangler wrote:
I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a short list updates
that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates. However,
if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new
you might also want to try
man emerge
most commands on your system will have a manpage, and they will probably
give you helpful hints as to how they function. you can also do it
with any other command:
man ls
man gcc
man ldd
man man
...
Hope that helps,
Marco
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 10:02 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] updates
John Dangler wrote:
I just finished the base install of the 2005.1 system (2.6.12-r6). When I
run emerge -sync, and then emerge -uDvp system, I get a short list updates
John Dangler wrote:
That makes some sense. (Gentoo is all about choices)
So, basically, I emerge the new 'slot' and then re-compile the new kernel
version according to the handbook, giving me both the existing kernel
version and the new version...
Exactly, installing the new kernel sources does
Would
John Dangler
GenoFit
800-505-4078 (Corporate)
386-767-3730 (Direct)
www.genofit.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: John Dangler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:31 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] updates with B
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 9:31 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] updates with B
That fails with this...
!!! ERROR: net-wireless/ipw2100-1.1.2-r1 failed.
!!! Function linux-mod-src-compile, Line 491, Exitcode 2
!!! Unable to make KSRC=/usr/src
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:31:14AM +1200, Peter O'Connor wrote:
An interesting conundrum indeed.
You can't install (due to it being blocked) ieee80211-1.0.3 with
ipw2100-1.1.0 merged
And from the error message you posted it looks like you can't merge
ipw2100 (1.1.0) without having the
51 matches
Mail list logo
