maybe you should not just believe everything posted. Especially from a
systemd fanboi.
2013/7/22 Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
You need to get your root filesystem and /usr
On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like
the plague/all the more...
Please don't top post.
After I got LVM2, mdraid, and LUKS working with systemd, I just decided
that, for me, neither LVM2
On 02/05/14 20:06, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 05/02/2014 19:03, Joseph wrote:
On 02/05/14 18:35, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 05/02/2014 18:32, Joseph wrote:
Which program is responsible for mounting USB stick on XFCE4?
After enable systemd flag in make.conf USE=
the following packages were rebuild
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2014-02-18 4:05 PM, Sebastian Beßler sebast...@darkmetatron.de wrote:
First I thought that with systemd I have to use all the things shipped
with systemd like journald (which I don't like because I think
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:36:15 +0800 Mark David Dumlao wrote:
[...]
So, please, don't take it as an insult. In fact you have done a very good
job of patiently spelling out the advantages of systemd, to the point I'm no
longer afraid of it taking over and devouring the linux world
On Monday, 31 March 2014 16:14:44 MSK, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Aside from all the discussions around systemd, I simply gave the new
systemd-networkd a try.
It helped me to simplify my config for my main machine where I run KVM
for virtualization and need a network bridge:
I browsed
On 05/06/14 03:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
This effected stable tree of Gentoo as well, pulling undesired
different layout into stable is something that should have been
avoided. It is about time we split the profiles, systemd is not option
for people who runs openrc.
Indeed, I support the idea
On Friday 01 August 2014 10:00:40 Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
... just for completeness, systemd actually requires /etc/mtab as a
link to /proc/self/mounts, so don't be surprised if software in the
future in Linux just assumes that.
Well, that seems to imply that you can't run a systemd chroot
On 2014-09-20, Mark David Dumlao madum...@gmail.com wrote:
The only Linux systems where I care about boot time are embedded
systems which are never going to have the resources needed to run
systemd.
You are mistaken.
No, I am not.
I've helped a friend debug problems on a couple devices
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Marc Stürmer m...@marc-stuermer.de wrote:
Zitat von Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com:
Lennart claims that the embedded world loves systemd. I suspect that,
as in other corners of the Linux world, there are lovers and haters of
systemd.
Embedded systems also quite
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:49:54 +0100, lee wrote:
I wonder if the OP is using systemd and trying to read the journal
files?
Nooo, I hate systemd ...
What good are log files you can't read?
You can't read syslog-ng log files without some reading software, usually
a combination of cat
Hey all,
I've now converted two systems to systemd and so far haven't had too
much issues with systemd itself, other than me constantly forgetting
commands.
Is there a nice table or chart somewhere that lists openrc commands with
equivalent systemd commands? That would really help me from
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
I also noticed this in the USE flags for systemd:
- - sysv-utils : Install sysvinit compatibility
symlinks and manpages for init, telinit, halt, poweroff, reboot,
runlevel, and shutdown
Should I enable
I'm planning on adding USE=cron to mail-filter/spamassassin to perform
nightly updates. I have a script that works for OpenRC,
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SpamAssassin#Daily_updates
but I've commented where I would like to have something similar for
systemd users. Anybody know how to do
2016-02-09 11:31 GMT-06:00 James <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com>:
> emerge -uDvtp @world
> shows just a few updates needed but nothing pulling in systemd. What I'm
> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule
> these missteps? Is there wa
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 10:43:17 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I'd still like to know where the directory /usr/lib64/systemd/boot/efi
> came from though.
Surely it's from systemd-boot, it is installed by systemd here. What does
qfile tell you?
$ qfile /usr/lib/systemd/boot/efi
--
Neil Bo
Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400
schrieb Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org>:
> I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely
> to break things (like sys-fs/udev).
No, it's not.
I'd consider it a bug if systemd is not installed and
another package that do
It looks like systemd scripts often (always?) get installed, regardless
of USE flag settings.
Why would they? Is this a policy?
E.g., in
cat /usr/portage/net-p2p/transmission/transmission-2.92-r2.ebuild | grep
systemd_
systemd_dounit daemon/transmission-daemon.service
On 04/01/18 23:39, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 04/01/18 18:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
For variant 1 the only known vulnerability is BPF which probably
next to nobody uses
I had to enable various BPF settings in the kernel because systemd
wouldn't shut up about it. It prints warning messages
Canek Peláez Valdés caneko at gmail.com writes:
But if you are interested in systemd, I think you should try it first
in simple setups, and certainly as provided by the Gentoo devs.
I'll keep an eye on systemd and keep reading up on it. I like what
I read so maybe I'll give it a test drive
For more information on why this has been done, see the following URL:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
s/separate-usr/systemd and udev/
Too bad I'm not a developer. If udev and systemd become mandatory on
Gentoo, I'll seriously consider LFS (Linux From
Does anyone use systemd on gentoo, with gnome3?
Would someone share a tarball of /etc/systemd/system with me (off-list)
so I could figure out what services and stuff are needed?
Tried to follow the wiki-pages, but somehow after logging into gdm the
session hangs ...
Thanks, Stefan
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
[snip]
Great to hear, thanks so far.
Looking forward to his reply
Stefan, do you use systemd? David told me that he could only check the
bug on monday, so I did a little research on the weekend. I installed
Gentoo
I just installed and booted with systemd and most services are working
normally, except syslog.service and remote-fs.service. Both of those
failed on bootup with a No such file or directory error.
I can't figure out how to make systemd tell me which files it can't
find. Any ideas?
)
(systemd ? sys-auth/pambase[systemd])
(!systemd ? sys-auth/pambase[consolekit])
sys-libs/pam-1.1.6 (sys-auth/pambase)
x11-misc/lightdm-1.4.0 (=sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2)
diffing polkit 104 and 107 ebuilds shows some changes in the systemd
related USE
On Thursday 25 July 2013 17:23:56 I wrote:
Systemd will not read /etc/conf.d/net like /etc/init.d/net.*
scripts do. You need some service that will prepare the
network.
I personally prefer netctl, it is KISS enough. It was me who
asked the devs to add it to the tree :)
I tried NM too, it does
On 28/07/13 11:22, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
Basically, systemd is now a first class citizen in Gentoo (on par with
OpenRC)
This is great. Thanks to everyone involved!
Does someone know whether a KDE system can work reliably with systemd,
or there still issues?
On 30/07/13 04:13, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
walt, are you using pam_systemd? I have a hunch that systemd-logind
should still work.
nope, logind no longer works with anything else than systemd since 205
we have given up on logind+openrc, that's why gnome also now pulls in
systemd at portage
On 07/31/2013 11:09 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
There's an idea floating around that openrc could use systemd unit files
but it's still just an idea.
I must have crossed the line into grumpy-old-man-hood. That idea is insane.
Someone is willing to re-write udev to use Lennart's config files
On 08/19/2013 10:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
Thanks for some hints,
Helmut
my 2c would be to autobuild one using genkernel
On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys
Does anyone of you successfully use aiccu in these days, especially on
systemd-based systems?
I miss the functionality of having my very own IPv6-adresses on my
thinkpad when I roam, for accessing ressources at home etc.
But aiccu doesn't work for me anymore for months, I think. No gentoo-bug
Just remove init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd from your kernel command
line, and you can boot your old openrc installation (if you did un
unmerge it)
That should mean: ..if you did not unmerge it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Feb 04 2014, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 02/04/2014 01:58 PM, Joseph wrote:
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB
sick (it mounts as root:root) and I can not even change the permission.
I am receiving
On Tuesday 04 February 2014 18:38:27 Joseph wrote:
I don't have pmount installed, and I'm not sure what XFCE4 is using.
How to find out?
You said that you have systemd installed, but did you actually *boot* systemd
as init (PID 1)?
Hi all. I am having issues with Systemd as well. I added to the GRUB2
configuration file the needed command line to get Systemd to start, but for
whatever reason, the kernel is adamant that I must use OrenRC. I recompiled
with Genkernel-next a new kernel and initramfs, and that, for whatever
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
.., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over
One little corner case; if you're running systemd 216 and syslog-ng 3.6,
you need to add ForwardToSyslog=yes to /etc/systemd/journald.conf. With
systemd 215 and earlier, messages are forwarded to syslog by default, and
syslog-ng 3.6 is journald aware.
On 04/01/2015 02:21 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Nice! Apart from the zap thing that Canek has already covered, I think it
could be useful. Could you add a link to it to the main systemd page.
I've added it to the See Also section at the end of the Systemd page.
I didn't know where else to put
walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, journalctl tells me that systemd-networkd is segfaulting
repeatedly during boot.
systemd has become very picky on cflags; e.g. -DNDEBUG
and friends cause strange behaviour and segfaults.
I've been running systemd for a long time without needing to enable
the dhcpcd service at boot time. Starting with systemd-224 that is no
longer true. Today I had to enable dhcpcd.service specifically or the
network interface didn't get an ip address during boot.
Seems like this might
On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 22:18:40 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:39 PM, <mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com>
wrote:
> > are some of the available kernels not systemd,
>
> Michael's answer was correct, but I just wanted to note that the
> kerne
On 15/12/17 01:16, Marc Joliet wrote:
> [ Just to be clear: autofs is a Linux kernel feature, systemd just exposes it
> in an easy to use way. That is, BTW, a theme with systemd. ]
Likewise, cgroups. I believe Lennart is regularly "blamed" for this, but
it's been in the kernel
On 25/01/18 04:34, Dale wrote:
This is what I would do. I would make sure emerge -uDNp world comes
back clean, no remerges or updates. Change profile to generic desktop.
There's no "desktop/systemd" profile. I'm on systemd. If I switch to the
"systemd" profile
On Fri, 2021-02-05 at 01:06 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > The plex-server ebuild appears to require systemd, but it isn't listed
> > as a dependency. Am I missing something?
>
>
> Apparently so. The presence of the command systemd_newunit in the .ebuild
>
>
On Sunday, 17 April 2022 12:13:06 -00 Neil Bothwick wrote:
--->8
> It looks like this is cause my using mixed keywords, amd64 for udev and
> ~amd64 for systemd-boot/utils. Does keywording udev-250 resolve the
> blocks?
Yes, after keywording several others, thus:
~sys-apps/systemd-tm
systemd had an overwhelmingly majority of comments
positive to systemd, and just a handful of negative comments:
http://lwn.net/Articles/534210/#Comments
But that is in LWN; Gentoo is way behind, I believe.
Gentoo is not behind, it provides you the option of using systemd.
However openrc
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:27 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:19 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/05/2013 05:43 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
[I will be going to systemd since it is aparently required for
gnome-3.8. I
again, I respect ones right to use whatever one wants, but I ask
to respect mine as well. That's why I propose a separate systemd
profile for those willing to use it.
Then write. Just be aware that to write a systemd profile, you need to
use systemd.
Or to create a non-systemd profile
-
that it should be the people who *don't* want systemd doing all of
the work - was backwards, and that was what I wanted to point out.
I still believe that a non-systemd profile should be done by the
people not wanting to use systemd. But since I now support the systemd
profile (since it's trivial
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 28.01.2013 20:34, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
My gdm USE-flags are:
[ebuild R ~] gnome-base/gdm-3.6.2 USE=audit fallback gnome-shell
introspection ipv6 ldap plymouth systemd tcpd -accessibility
-consolekit
binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for
a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs myself)
You need to get your root filesystem and /usr mounted. Just keep
that
goal in mind and start adding files to support it.
There doesn't
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
Hey list
after the many discussions here about systemd I had a flash of
objectivity (“Who cares if people rant about Lennart, the concept seems
sound and I don’t care about separate /usr”). So I wanted to try systemd
On Thu, Sep 05 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:19 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/05/2013 05:43 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
[I will be going to systemd since it is aparently required for
gnome-3.8. I first want to try systemd on a test system so am building
On 02/05/14 13:06, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging it; you need to change
your init= line in grub-legacy or GRUB2 and reboot. The contents of
/proc/1/comm is systemd
On 2014-02-18 1:54 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote: On
Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I'm curious as to the extent of these programs, and to what extent
they *truly* require systemd.
I don't understand what you mean by the extent
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:14:01 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> >> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
> >>
> >> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ...
> >> so it merges only partially ...
> >
>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:42 AM Raffaele Belardi
wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Next time you do something like this, keep in mind that Gnome and xfce
> > can co-exist on the same system, and so can openrc and systemd.
>
> Good point, I did not know, in particula
Re
20121109171149.1d8a3e18@dartworks.biz20121109171149.1d8a3e18@dartworks.biz509D9C62.9040909@gmail.com509D8E00.4030208@coolmail.sek7k1hn$ce6$1...@ger.gmane.org,
Canek Peláez Valdés said:
Just a word of advice: if you are a normal laptop user, systemd has
replaced most of the functionality
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 01:49:03PM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
hate is a natural reaction if something you don't need and don't want is
forced upon you. If it is also based on lies, hate is a valid reaction. A lot
of people don't need nor want pulseaudio or systemd. Now it is forced
On 22 July 2013 21:57, Michael Hampicke m...@hadt.biz wrote:
Am 22.07.2013 17:02, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
ConsoleKit is for all practical purposes unmaintained, and all of the
packages you mentioned it support systemd just fine. Emerge systemd,
and purge CK from your system; I did
On 23/07/13 08:43, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally
intended.
not possible, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Wang Xuerui idontknw.w...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2013-8-1 上午10:26， cov...@ccs.covici.com写道：
Can a shell script tell if systemd is the init? I have a couple of
places where it would be nice to know this.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Check /proc/1
(I brought an old system upto the state of my real one and am trying to
follow the wiki for converting to systemd).
I am upto the part where the wiki says
emerge --ask systemd
I believe the wiki left out unmerging or something since the emerge
gives conflicts (as expected).
What must I
=systemd? I am converting an old ~amd64
machine to systemd for practice so that I can convert my main laptop
(also ~amd64) to systemd. The purpose of the conversions is to run
gnome-3.8 and higher. I have other machines running stable. Will I
need to convert them to systemd when gnome-3.8 becomes
On 08/19/2013 04:55:29 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Helmut Jarausch
jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Hi,
what binaries and libraries have to be put into an initramfs for a
system
booting with init=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd ?
(I am building the initramsfs
On Fri, Dec 06 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I hadn't synced one of my stable boxes for a while and tried today.
This brings in gnome-3.8 and with it systemd. I realize I will need to
*run* systemd to go to gnome-3.10. Indeed I do
On Dec 6, 2013 9:20 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:45 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I hadn't synced one of my stable boxes for a while and tried today.
This brings in gnome-3.8 and with it systemd. I realize I will need
On Thu, Dec 19 2013, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:07:16 -0500, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
Switched to systemd and all was well for weeks.
Then failure occurred (non-global ctrl_ifname).
Tried network-manager (NM) with no success.
New.
Canek told me off-list that, when using
On 02/05/14 14:02, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/05/14 13:06, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
[ humongous snip ]
4. Using systemd is more than just emerging
I thought I'd have another look at systemd, so switched profiles, made
sure I had all the kernel options needed and then did an emerge -uN world.
It seems the systemd profile masks the static and static-libs USE flags,
which are needed by crytsetup and lvm for my initramfs, which mounts /
from
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:41:22 -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
Run make menuconfig
Press /
Type FHANDLE
Then you can see it is enabled by switching on systemd support in the
Gentoo specific options.
I did say that I know how to search - that is how I was able to find it.
But... I
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:30:11 +
J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Sounds like Samuli is being a pr*ck by forcing systemd on everyone
now.
AIUI from https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-992290.html, no one
is maintaining systemd-independent power management anywhere upstream
any more
Am 17.09.2014 um 21:02 schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
Now you use this to advertise for systemd?
Systemd fanbois are becoming more and more desperate.
So, systemd is used (or it has been announced
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 07:19:21 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Is systemd starting to encompass too much? I think so, but who cares?
If we want an init manager that reads systemd-like files but doesn't
do anything else (hostnamectl, logging, udev, etc.), I guess we'll
have to make one
On 11/14/2014 12:46 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14/11/2014 18:18, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
The only unusual message is
Systemd is not detected as the running init system;
which is true since I still use openrc (but with systemd installed, as
well)
Could
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
So far, it's better than openrc in that there's a bug shutting down an
imsm raid that's still not been addressed. It causes the array to do a
rebuild next time it starts up and from my testing systemd doesn't have
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:46:54 + (UTC), James wrote:
Given that CoreOS have sponsored some systemd development
(systemd-networkd), I think it is reasonable to assume they plan to stick
with systemd for the foreseeable future.
CoreOS a gentoo derived
2015-08-06 10:34 GMT-06:00 James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com:
I think the Handbook is getting better and better. However the
systemd-openrc choice is something that needs to be explained early in the
handbook from a neutral prospective. Let's face it, lots of folks become
interested in Gentoo
Hi. On my latest update of world, I have a few blockers which I am
unable to figure out how to solve -- I will put the related output below
with inserted comments. I am using unstable gentooand I have masked
ncurses-6 for the time being. Portage also wants to downgrade my
systemd from 221(0/2
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got it, finally :-)
>
> fail2ban wants sys-apps/systemd[python(-)], and systemd-219_p112 is the
> highest version with an explicit python USE flag. All later versions do
> not have the flag at
Jc García gmail.com> writes:
> >> What I'm
> >> missing is why the "-systemd" setting in make.conf did not overrule
> >> these missteps? Is there way to set something, anything anywhere
> >> what no packages with require systemd can be install
rsuade someone to backport the fix
from systemd or switch bootloaders.
I've no idea how tightly bootctl (as gummibot is now called after its
assimilation in the the systemd collective) is bound to systemd. It may
well be feasible to create an ebuild that builds bootctl from the systemd
sources w
> The names are suggestive enough, but I have no clue about what does it
> mean to use 8304 instead of just plain 8300 for /.
The reason is that with efi bootloader the partitions with that GUID in the GPT
table are
automatically mounted by systemd-gpt-auto-generator.
Here some links:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 05:25:20AM +0100, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote
> sys-apps/systemd:0= required by (sys-apps/dbus-1.10.12:0/0::gentoo,
> ebuild scheduled for merge)
>
>
> For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following
> section of th
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:45:59 +0200, Kai Krakow wrote:
> All those services are well integrated with each other and suitable for
> most stuff. Tho, systemd-networkd is not explicitly developed as a
> desktop daemon currently, systemd folks still tend to recommend
> NetworkManage
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Heiko Baums <li...@baums-on-web.de> wrote:
> Am Wed, 30 Aug 2017 23:27:12 +0100
> schrieb Mick <michaelkintz...@gmail.com>:
>
>> BTW, if you run ps axf and come across '/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd
>> --daemon' don't panic.
On 2017-11-12 12:47, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 10:55:04 +, Akater wrote:
It looks like systemd scripts often (always?) get installed,
regardless
of USE flag settings.
Because they are tiny so impact of them is negligible. On the other
hand,
if you don't have them
On 2018-11-19 08:14, "Stefan G. Weichinger" wrote:
> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
>
> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ... so it
> merges only partially ...
>
> after that I see:
>
> # systemctl --version
> syst
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 5:48 AM james wrote:
> On 8/16/19 12:44 PM, Jack wrote:
> > ps auxf | grep systemd
>
> This is new turf for me. Upon issuing this command string I get::
>
> # ps auxf | grep systemd
> root 24947 0.0 0.0 13964 996 pt
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 11:41:23 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've been using bootctl from sys-boot/systemd-boot for several years,
> with some success, but I'm stuck after today's --sync.
>
> First I was told I had to keyword sys-apps/systemd-utils, so I did
> that, but now I ge
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 April 2022 16:42:35 -00 Martin Vaeth wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> > On Sunday, 17 April 2022 14:54:50 -00 Rich Freeman wrote:
>> >> Can't you just fix your USE flags with systemd-utils? Why revert?
>> >
>
Am 19.11.18 um 09:41 schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 08:14:38 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
>> upgrading from sys-apps/systemd-236-r5 to 239-r2
>>
>> the emerge runs through and warns me that it overwrites files ...
>> so it merges only parti
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
I just installed and booted with systemd and most services are working
normally, except syslog.service and remote-fs.service. Both of those
failed on bootup with a No such file or directory error.
I can't figure out how to make
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:42 PM, João Matos jaon...@gmail.com wrote:
I found the solution a few hours ago here
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Systemd#PAM_support:_su.2C_sudo.2C_screen...
. Now everything is fine :)
About the packages you mentioned, you've ran 'equery uses pambase polkit
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not bet on that ;) too much resistance. However it is
certainly getting better and better: the LWN article on The Biggest
Myths about systemd had an overwhelmingly majority of comments
positive to systemd
in via
portage if there are any changes planned or in the pipeline.
If it is possible to correct things now I'd be happy to do so while I am
online and my system is up and running ;-)
Do you prefer a bug report? For later reference?
Right now I get:
# emerge -1 systemd
Calculating dependencies
reference?
Right now I get:
# emerge -1 systemd
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/systemd-198-r5 [198-r2] USE=gudev%*
introspection%* -doc%
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev (sys-fs/udev is blocking
sys-apps/systemd-198-r5)
# emerge -1 udev
Calculating dependencies
:
On 23/07/13 00:46, Mark David Dumlao wrote:
This would be a lot less of an issue if someone just wrote a logind
ebuild (wink wink) that provides consolekit like it was originally
intended.
not possible, logind since systemd = 205 requires systemd and won't
work on openrc, upstart
201 - 300 of 6173 matches
Mail list logo
