Install udev as in portage. Then edit the kernel to remove devfs -
recompile and reboot.
Job done, it should say using udev at bootup.
Tim
Mark Knecht wrote:
Are there any instructions about on how to take an older machine (18
months) and switch it to udev from devfs? I see that udev
Hi!
After upgrading the system and hence switching to kernel 2.6.13 and udev, my
nvidia device nodes are no longer available and I did not find any way to
create them automatically by udev.
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml, I have
* nvidia listed in /etc
On 5/18/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What file would that be found in? I always see make sure udev is
starting at boot, but I have no idea what boot script is used to start
udev, as there is nothing in /etc/init.d/ that contains udev or dev
of any kind...
/lib/rcscripts
This morning I did my regular emerge --sync
and emerge -NDuva world and here's what happens:
[blocks B ] =sys-fs/udev-089 (is blocking sys-apps/coldplug-20040920-r1)
[blocks B ] sys-apps/coldplug (is blocking sys-fs/udev-103)
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-103 [087-r1] USE=(-selinux) 195 kB
Normally
On 25 November 2006 13:37, pk wrote:
Hi!
After a sync this morning I get this:
Calculating world dependencies... done!
[blocks B ] sys-apps/coldplug (is blocking sys-fs/udev-103)
[blocks B ] =sys-fs/udev-089 (is blocking
sys-apps/coldplug-20040920-r1)
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev
Mark wrote:
Actually .. just in case you are interested in using udev-103 you will
find that you can enable udev coldplugging.
I took the plunge: unmerged coldplug and upgraded to udev-103.
Everything went fine without doing anything special.
I only removed /etc/init.d/coldplug and did a rc
On Monday 18 December 2006 00:08, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 12/17/06, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht ha scritto:
That appears to be a testing version of udev. Do you always run
testing?
FYI, udev-103 is stable udev.
I run stable, and I have udev-103 as the last version (I
On 1/5/07, Shawn Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
[blocks B ] sys-apps/coldplug (is blocking sys-fs/udev-103)
I can't emerge: sys-fs/udev-103 or udev-103 b/c that's not a valid package
atom ...
The correct way to specify a particular version is =sys-fs/udev-103
(or = or = or ~, etc
Hi,
I switched from devfs to udev 10 days ago, and since then every
nth boot will hang at 'initializing random number generator'
I had at least one udev-update since then, without changes.
The box reacts to the sysrq-keys, so I am able to reboot - and the reboot is
always successfull.
I
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:37:28 +0100, brullo nulla wrote:
Does this mean that I need to install a new kernel to run udev-141 ?
Ok, I should run a new kernel *anyway* ... at this point the question
is: when I update the kernel, I can use the old udev-124-r1 until I
install the new one?
You can
James Ausmus wrote:
equery b /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules
r...@smoker ~ # equery b /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules
* Searching for /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules ...
sys-power/nut-2.4.1-r1 (/lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules)
r...@smoker ~ #
I am emerging nut again
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 09:58:02 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
I agree with you, but I like to make things in order with the rules
(without relation to udev).
But I don't like udev, its syntax is really hard to understand for user !
Dale, here's your chance to jump
On Thursday 21 July 2011 12:20:30 Florian Philipp wrote:
Also, udev will usually detect your network interfaces as new interfaces
and give them different numbers (eth1 instead of eth0 and so on).
You can solve this by deleting the respective entries in the udev config:
**
$ cat /etc/udev
On Sep 10, 2011 11:22 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, nothing of udev itself is in /usr, but instead
packages and scripts which plug themselves into udev to be triggered
by various events.
Perhaps the real solution is to circumvent udev and get those other
with an accurate name.
Which version of udev is it that has this nauseating feature of
needing
/usr loaded to boot?
Somewhere in that version's source will be several (or lots of)
/usr.
Just how difficult is it going to be to replace /usr/bin with
/bin
throughout the source
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 08:30:52 +0100
pk pete...@coolmail.se wrote:
On my notebooks and test/development VMs, that's different. Those
need udev.
Why does it need udev specifically? Just curious... if there's a
technical need for something else than /dev population (and possible
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
message as :
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
file or directory
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Chris Stankevitz
chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
# 2012-09-10: appease thunar
xfce-base/thunar -udev
This makes no sense; the udev flag in thunar only asks for
=sys-fs/udev-171, which is stable. Are you sure you don't have
anything in /etc/portage
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Anyone?
I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going on
with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know it is
safe.
Tia...
Charles
The ebuild will usually take
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:07:11 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
This is indeed the device I meant, and the serial number is the
E68911000519 substring. But this symlink exists because udev created
it. I need to somehow dig it out of /sys, not out of /dev. IOW, how did
udev retrieved the information
Am 11.01.2013 16:14, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Running this command (all in one line):
emerge -p1 $(for p in $(qfile -Cvq $(find /usr/lib/udev/) | sort -u); do
echo =$p; done)
should re-emerge all packages that still have files there. After that,
/usr/lib/udev should no longer exist
On Sunday 20 January 2013 08:51:43 Philip Webb wrote:
I just tried upgrading to udev-197 , which is supposed to be stable.
There were multiple problems I'm now back with udev-171 .
My daily update pulled in udev-197-r3. The installation went smoothly but I
decided I ought to reboot to check
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Am 26.03.2013 00:10, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 25.03.2013 23:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I assume I have to remove udev-init-scripts now?
rebooted
..
afai see the system doesn't detect/ start up
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:46:43 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Because you're running stable? Versions higher than 197-r8 are still
in testing.
Right... hence my question... why if I comment out those lines do I
now see all of these other weird updates for udev-200?
--tree should
On Wednesday 03 Apr 2013 20:46:37 Bruce Hill wrote:
Therefore, all's well that's still working! And AFAIR, on at least 2 of
those machines, the 70-persistent-net.rules was never something I did
manually.
Right, it used to be auto-generated by udev scripts. With udev-200 you are
meant
On 04/06/2013 11:19 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Michael,
Is it because you disabled udev's renaming entirely via the kernel
command-line parameter? Because you've done some magic in
/etc/udev/rules.d/?
I did not change 70-something contents. I deleted it and let udev regenerate
Am 01.08.2013 18:28, schrieb Tanstaafl:
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from
in
everything working smoothly. So, am going to wait until next weekend to
do this.
I have two last question...
1. When I unmerge 'everything udev', what exactly does that consist
of *in addition to* sys-fs/udev?
and
2. Would anyone who is using eudev please post udev/eudev related
On 2013-08-01 2:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:28:38 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to eudev.
emerge -Ca udev
emerge -1a eudev
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 07:12:50 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
I've googled until my fingers are blue, but cannot for the life of me
find any explicit instructions for *how* to switch from udev to
eudev.
emerge -Ca udev
emerge -1a eudev
Two last questions (first one never got answered
On Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:36:59 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I expect it to happen around every new udev release that causes
slight incompability; the default of the virtual/udev, sys-fs/udev,
doesn't have to wait for the alternative providers.
The elegant solution is outlined in my post
On 13/05/14 16:50, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
the ChangeLog for sys-fs/udev, specifically the entry on 03 Apr 2014.
Thanks - a half hour of googling didn't find this.
03 Apr 2014; Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
udev-212-r1.ebuild, udev-.ebuild:
Punt USE=openrc and always pull in sys-fs/udev-init-scripts to match
behavior of sys
Hello
So, I've been wanting to test eudev for a while now. I found these
instructions in many places, so I have it a whirl:
# emerge -Ca udev
# emerge -1a eudev
# etc-update
# emerge @preserved-rebuild
Problem is I had the 'udev' flag set in the make.conf, so it just
reinstalled udev (216
Helmut Jarausch jarau...@skynet.be wrote:
It turned out that something has installed /lib/udev
while removing the symlink /lib - /lib64 on my machine.
Therefore /lib did contains nothing but udev
This sounds like a very serious bug of portage or
of the ebuild; but it did not happen here
your local overlay
Thanks Anna, done so.
> > Or is there another way to solve this ?
> Try libudev-zero (install it and add udev/libudev virtuals to
> package.provided)
> https://github.com/illiliti/libudev-zero
I'll be looking into that, but on some level, why should I be force
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 7:15 PM Dale wrote:
>
>
> root@fireball / # ls -al /etc/udev/rules.d/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1903 Apr 4 2012 70-persistent-cd.rules
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 814 Jan 1 2008 70-persistent-net.rules
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Mar 22 2015 80-net-nam
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 20:07:11 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > With udev the filenames you want are:
> > 80-net-name-slot.rules
> > 80-net-setup-link.rules
> >
> > Or at least, that is what I am using with the systemd-bundled udev and
> > my physical interface
i did read that document, to find the doc is trivial.
what i got is just similar. the udev just create the device
files which were detected by kernel, and handle the operations
like add or remove dynamically. i tried this feature with my usb
devices already, i really like the way udev works. i
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:48:59PM -0700, Penguin Lover Richard Fish squawked:
On 8/17/06, Willie Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any ideas?
Since udev is seeing the events, I'm guessing something in your udev
rules. Have you done an etc-update? Anything relevant in
/etc/udev/rules.d/10
On 02/19/2011 10:41 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
SNIP
Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the OP's
don't think anyone is claiming that there are *currently*
plans to require /var, either on / or via initramfs.
The claim being made is that /var suffers from the exact
same problem that /usr does, with regard to udev, namely
that arbitrary programs running from within udev rules could
booting:
-
/lib/udev/write_root_link_rule: line 17: udevadm: command not
found /etc/init.d/udev: line 74: udevadm: command not
found /etc/init.d/udev: line 74: udevadm: command not
found
* Starting
udev ... /lib/udev/udevd: error while loading shared libraries:
libkmod.so.2
:
-
/lib/udev/write_root_link_rule: line 17: udevadm: command not
found /etc/init.d/udev: line 74: udevadm: command not
found /etc/init.d/udev: line 74: udevadm: command not
found
* Starting
udev ... /lib/udev/udevd
Bryan Gardiner bog at khumba.net writes:
I did recently put these into my package.keywords.
=sys-fs/udev-196-r1 ~amd64
=virtual/udev-196 ~amd64
=sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1 ~amd64
My guess is that you've unmasked sys-fs/udev-196 only partially.
Portage tries to calculate
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:50:12PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Gentoo!
After synching, I've got a whole lot of programs to emerge, amongst them
being udev-197. :-( I'd rather do this on its own, in peace and quiet,
rather than together with 12 or 13 other programs.
emerge -puND
Am 26.01.2013 19:30, schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I have read the news item and still have questions. The news item
covers several points.
1. remove udev-postmount:
I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
udev. Is that correct?
It's a bit of a gamble but I guess
is not mounted. But darned if I know
why...Isn't udev supposed to handle that?
Why did you remove udev-mount from the sysinit level? I left mine alone
and it all works just fine.
Because, when I initially rebooted, openrc failed to launch the
udev-mount service, and I couldn't get any farther
... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/systemd-198-r5 [198-r2] USE=gudev%*
introspection%* -doc%
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev (sys-fs/udev is blocking
sys-apps/systemd-198-r5)
# emerge -1 udev
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-198-r6 [198-r5]
[blocks B ] sys-apps/systemd
On 02/08/13 07:42, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating
I had a similar issue after upgrading to sys-apps/systemd-212-r3. Turned
out it was due to udev rules.d directory location. I still had a bunch
of udev rules under /usr/lib64/udev/rules.d and it looks like the new
systemd/udev is only looking at rules under /lib/udev/.
The particular issue
On 14/05/14 15:42, Grant wrote:
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
Should I file a bug?
- Grant
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:41:47 Andrey Vul wrote:
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-114 (sys-fs/udev-114 is blocking
media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.19-r2, media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.2)
My usual solution for problems of this kind is to mercilessly unmerge any
packages that stand in my way
On 5/30/05, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unless someone has a better idea, try turning on udev logging in
/etc/udev/udev.conf, and compare the results from booting to what
happens when you rmmod/insmod driver. The log message will appear in
/var/log/messages.
-Richard
OK, here
On 6/19/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Recently saw that i have a udev-tarball enabled setup and think of
disabling it.
Wanna make a backup of the tarball before doing that, but can't find
where it is located/saved.
TIA. Rumen
/lib/udev-state
Hi,
It seems that on two of my machines, after recent updates, I no
longer have /dev/cdroms and therefore cannot mount CDs, etc. I can
mount them by hand using the old style /dev/hda. The hardware works.
It just seems that udev is now doing something different.
Has anyone else seen
Richard Fish wrote:
On 12/6/06, Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice that 50-udev.rules has references to
/sbin/udev_run_devd|hotplug
Nope, the helper programs moved to /lib/udev/ in udev-103. etc-update
should take care of the files that udev currently supplies (like
50
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08:51, Zarick Lau wrote:
Hi,
I switched from devfs to udev 10 days ago, and since then every
nth boot will hang at 'initializing random number generator'
It try to read a /dev/urandom, does this device node created properly by
udev
locate that file on my system...
carcharias linux # equery belongs
/etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules
[ Searching for file(s) /etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules in *...
]
sys-fs/udev-096-r1 (/etc/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules)
HTH,
-Richard
--
gentoo
However emerge -puv world these days tells me:
('ebuild', '/', 'sys-fs/udev-141', 'merge') pulled in by
sys-fs/udev required by ('installed', '/',
'net-wireless/bluez-utils-3.36', 'nomerge')
sys-fs/udev required by ('ebuild', '/',
'sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.29-r5', 'merge')
sys-fs
Philip Webb wrote:
090910 Dale wrote:
I noticed I now have a udev in /etc/init.d/.
I checked, it is not running but udevd is not running either:
r...@smoker / # /etc/init.d/udev status
* status: stopped
r...@smoker / # ps aux | grep udev
root 30451 0.0 0.0 1888 504 pts/0 R
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:15:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Mar 16 01:55:54 smoker udevd[1275]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a
future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or
ATTRS{}= to match a parent device,
in /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules:42
There are more
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:15:15 -0500, Dale wrote:
Mar 16 01:55:54 smoker udevd[1275]: SYSFS{}= will be removed in a
future udev version, please use ATTR{}= to match the event device, or
ATTRS{}= to match a parent device,
in /lib/udev/rules.d/70-nut-usbups.rules:42
On 02/19/2011 03:41 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 02/19/2011 10:14 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
SNIP
Should I be enabling udev globally in make.conf? I'm currently not. I
do have it on xorg-server so I'm not seeing the OP's
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:14:26AM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote
* Keep udev as it was before (i.e., living in / instead of in /usr) and
somehow make sure that everyone RTFM/RTFFAQ, or
* Make two versions of udev, one which lives in / for those who've done
their homework, and another version
On 9/13/2011 10:40 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:50:13PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
it works for you, because your udev-rules need nothing from /usr/*
It's *not* udev requiring /usr, it's the scripts triggered by the rules.
Ah. OK. Maybe I've misunderstood
2011/9/27 Jesús J. Guerrero Botella jesus.guerrero.bote...@gmail.com:
Check that the consolekit service is also on at bootup.
Besides that, the udisks, upower, consolekit, policykit and udev flags
apply here. Check they are on, particularly for kde-base/kdelibs
(emerge -pv kdelibs).
All
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:32:09 +0100
Nicolas Sebrecht nsebre...@piing.fr wrote:
The 03/01/12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
(Come to think of it, has *any* distro ever attempted this...
'unconventional of going udev-free?)
mdev is not an udev replacement. It's a very minimalist udev designed
I have been masking udev-181 so that I can continue to keep my current
system with / and /usr separate partitions.
This has required masking pciutils and usbutils as well.
/etc/portage/package.mask/udev-181 contains
=sys-fs/udev-181
=sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.9-r2
=sys-apps/usbutils-005-r1
Now
I udev problems after updating to udev 191 on an almost fresh install,
then downgraded to 189 in order to match a working system. This was
working before the latest upgrade cycle.
The problem is most (not all !) device nodes getting root/root
owner/group. So /dev/snd, /dev/video belongs to root
and gentoo-source kernel 3.6.2 .
Is this another case of not noticing the warning when updating Udev
to run 'rc-update add udev-postmount' ?
I can not find service udev-postmount.
Udev version is 194, services udev and udev-mount start at runlevel.
It was part of the update to udev-171-r8 , so
...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
What Mark wrote you is golden. I might only add that if you put:
=sys-fs/udev-181
into
/etc/portage/package.mask
you will have the present stable udev from*before* those weirdos starting
messing it up, forcing systemd to take over udev.
Hmmm
sys-kernel/dracut
still requires udev, please update it.
And what to do with udev USE flag?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.atwrote:
Am 26.03.2013 15:57, schrieb Mike Gilbert:
apcupsd-3.14.10-r1 still installs its rules into /lib/udev/rules.d
On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
I've googled until my fingers are blue
On 2013-08-05 4:18 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:24:27 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different to udev
now, AFAICT, and a recent update forced me to switch back to udev
because eudev hadn't been updated
On 2013-08-11 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev and
that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev.
I believe it's 'b' if user doesn't have sys-fs/eudev in
/var/lib
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 09:21:01PM -0500, Daniel Campbell wrote:
/usr/lib/udev.
/usr/lib/systemd.
were both placed in /usr despite objections from a number of folks.
So claims that udev and systemd are not responsible are not true.
Udev is installed in / in gentoo. I am a co
eix.
Those dirs are really portage categories, so use the -C category option:
$ eix udev
[I] sys-fs/udev
...
I] virtual/udev
...
$ eix -C sys-fs udev
[I] sys-fs/udev
...
alanm@khamul ~ $ eix -C virtual udev
[I] virtual/udev
...
{huge chunks of snippage in there for clarity
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
Should I file a bug?
- Grant
I have an amd64 system with an old 3.3.x kernel. Recently (I think after
last udev update to 217) the boot process became very slow due to udev
waiting for uevents to populate /dev. After a minute or so udev prints
something about a lazy device (a TV tuner) then the boot continues.
Yesterday I
waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:16:57AM -0500, Dale wrote
>> k...@aspodata.se wrote:
>>> Dale:
>>> ...
>>>> Can a system even boot without udev?
>>> Yes, use sys-fs/static-dev (unless you have some special boot
>>
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:02:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > >=sys-fs/eudev-1.3 required by (virtual/udev-215:0/0::gentoo,
> > >installed)
> >
> > (sys-fs/udev-225-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
> > in by
>
> > libudev, which is udev. That then causes a conflict as you can't have
> > udev and libudev installed at the same time.
>
> Here is the output:
>
> grep -r udev /etc/portage
> /etc/portage/package.use:sys-fs/udev extras
> /etc/portage/package.use:=sys-fs/eud
imagine this is a back-port they have
done?
Dunno. The kernel driver still uses fd internally. However, here's the
relevant udev rules from Gentoo:
% grep -r floppy /etc/udev/rules.d
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:# floppy devices
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:KERNEL==fd[0-9]*, NAME=floppy/%k
couldn't agree more. And this is what Udev, as a user space app, does.
The only thing it doesn't handle is communicating with other user space
apps; this is currently Hals job.
the current model uses udev as the interface to the kernel's nodes and
HAL as the interface to exactly what hardware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
Hi folks,
I was browsing around and noticed that I now have a udev in
/etc/init.d/. I checked, it is not running but udevd is not running
either. See below:
r...@smoker / # /etc/init.d/udev status
* status: stopped
r...@smoker
On 02/08/13 03:19, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 07:42, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/08/13 02:27, William Kenworthy wrote:
On 02/08/13 00:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have
with your udev config.
Please:
1. start udevmonitor as root
2. plug the disk in
3. post all reported evsanduleak ~ # udevmonitor
sanduleak ~ # udevmonitor; # plug
udevmonitor prints the received event from the kernel [UEVENT]
and the event which udev sends out after rule processing [UDEV
cups apng minizip hwdb emerge -vp --newuse --tree
--update --deep system
[snip]
[blocks B ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4
(sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186 is blocking
sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-23)
[blocks B
of doing it.
Thanks,
--
Valmor
- USE=libkms cups apng minizip hwdb emerge -vp --newuse --tree
--update --deep system
[snip]
[blocks B ] sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4
(sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186
-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 is blocking sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2)
[blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-186 (sys-fs/udev-186 is blocking
sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-23)
[blocks B ] sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 (sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.97-r1 is
blocking sys-fs/udev-197-r8)
!!! Multiple package instances within a single
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 05:34:52 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 08:45:01PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote
On Tuesday, May 06, 2014 02:31:08 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
I'm trying to set up USB-key-encryption for use with a laptop. I'm
running mdev instead of udev
2009/3/24 Albert Hopkins mar...@letterboxes.org
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0900, SOrCErEr wrote:
Hello,
My gentoo system has a problem.
It has not mounted sysfs while boot process.
I have to do mount sysfs by my hand now.
Of course, udev rc scripts has line of need sysfs
hand now.
Of course, udev rc scripts has line of need sysfs. And udev rc
script was added in sysinit service.
So I would like to know who mounts sysfs when Gentoo in boot process
in general.
Your friends at udev.
The need sysfs means that udev needs the sysfs service to start
, how does one restart udev? Does going to rc single then back
to rc default restart udev? Surely a person doesn't have to reboot to
do this.
/etc/init.d/udev restart
is what i would try :)
If I had one, I would too. lol
r...@smoker / # ls -al /etc/init.d/ud*
-rwxr
, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, how does one restart udev? Does going to rc single then back
to rc default restart udev? Surely a person doesn't have to reboot to
do this.
/etc/init.d/udev restart
is what i would try :)
If I had one, I would too. lol
r...@smoker / # ls -al
udev is now default. If you've built your kernel with udev and emerged udev
then you should be able to uninstall devfs. I did - but I've been running udev
for a long time now. There is a doc on Gentoo about how to move to udev so
make sure you've done that first.
From: gentuxx [EMAIL
? Udev has been the standard way to service kernel firmware requests for
quite some time. The relevant bit is in
/lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules .
Ok so that must be working on my laptop (automatically, i didn't
configure anything) but failing on my desktop.
However, udevd is only
201 - 300 of 8452 matches
Mail list logo
