Hello Daniel
Contents of /etc/udev/rules.d:
40-hplip.rules 70-persistent-cd.rules
56-hpmud_support.rules 70-persistent-net.rules
64-device-mapper.rules 77-nm-probe-modem-capabilities.rules
70-libgphoto2.rules 90-hal.rules
70
On Wednesday 14 July 2010 09:58:02 Stéphane Guedon wrote:
I agree with you, but I like to make things in order with the rules
(without relation to udev).
But I don't like udev, its syntax is really hard to understand for user !
Dale, here's your chance to jump in and comment.
This user
Maybe stupid question:
How to find out which physical NIC is for example eth0 ?
If I have 2 NICs in the box, for example one e1000 and one from 3com,
how to find out which one is eth0 ?
I looked up /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules where the MAC is
determining the devicefile
the rules file and
restarted udev and the first one was 1 and so on.
Because of situations like yours I think it's better to suggest
editing the file to change/delete the affected devices rather than
suggesting to delete the whole thing (though that may depend on the
user's skill level
On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:20:03PM +0200, Alex Schuster wrote:
Carlos Sura writes:
I just have one question, reciently I read in a forum that HAL might be
deprecated on Gentoo, so, I started using UDEV:
USE= -hal udev
But, then I have this problem, updating xorg-server won't work
Joost Roeleveld writes:
What about the following as a gentoo-solution:
As long as filesystem-support for /usr is in the kernel, why can't
/usr be mounted right after /?
Eg. instead of worrying with an init*, why not edit the boot-scripts to
have /usr mounted before udev and colleagues
Hi,
On Monday, 12. September 2011 10:40:02 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
The question arose, when Canek mentioned bluetoothd, that udev seems to
need in some cases.
This is wrong.
udev on its own does not require extra tools from /usr.
Though
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:38:41 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] udev + /usr:
Still, there's one program that can't be
moved, and that's /sbin/init. :-)
Says you! ... :-)
man 8 switch_root
The second parameter is the revised init.
--
Regards,
Dave [RLU #314465
On 2011-09-13 14:38, Mike Edenfield wrote:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
Yes, udev _needs_ to change to fit systemd; a tool looking for a
non-existant problem to solve (me notes that this is exactly the same
for pulseaudio). Well, isn't that nice...
PS
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:54:46 +0200
Joost Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
Using layout suggestions from install docs to justify what the udev
maintainers want to do is simply disingenuous.
I referenced that asa response to the list of distro-guides.
I was backing you up, not arguing
Did you install app-pda/ifuse and app-pda/libimobiledevice (dependency
of ifuse and gtkpod)?. I do not recall touching any udev rule.
Greetings,
--
Jorge Martínez López jorg...@gmail.com http://www.jorgeml.net
Google Talk / XMPP: jorg...@gmail.com
://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395319
It should be rolled out eventually, and the overlay won't be necessary.
Cool! :D
I think I've found one item so far that requires udev. My laptop's
graphics chip needs a binary blob from radeon-ucode. That binary blob,
in turn, requires the presence of /usr/lib
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:05:34PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote
I also did 2 {system,world}.err. system.err was empty. I've included
world.err in the enclosed tarball.
From your error listing, it looks like lvm2, kde, and gnome (including
the XFCE subset) require udev. Ouch.
--
Walter
On March 13, 2012 at 5:22 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Bruce Hill, Jr.
da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
On March 13, 2012 at 4:27 PM Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com
wrote:
snip
Fringe programs will not require udev
, and since udev is already handling the
database and the detection of connections/discovery, I agree with the
decision of leting udev to execute programs when something gets
connected. You could get that function in another program, but you are
only moving the problem, *and it can also happen very early
This reference I found:
http://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=uclinux-dist:mdev
Can someone look into it? It seems that uclinux defaults to using mdev
instead of udev, and the page provides interesting ... things we can try,
e.g., mdev -s, plug/unplug helper script, etc.
Rgds,
For more information on why this has been done, see the following URL:
http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
s/separate-usr/systemd and udev/
Too bad I'm not a developer. If udev and systemd become mandatory on
Gentoo, I'll seriously consider LFS (Linux From
Am Sonntag, 18. März 2012, 13:14:48 schrieb Allan Gottlieb:
I will update to the new world order, but would very much prefer to
postpone that for a few weeks. Is it enough to put
sys-fs/udev-171-r5
in /etc/portage/package.mask ?
I have masked 171 and everything above for a while now. So
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
SNIP
So it looks like just udev-182-r2 depends upon it.
Sorry for the misinformation.
Todd
Not a problem.
So this problem is really just for folks running ~amd64 as all this
new udev stuff as well as kmod aren't marked
Hi there!
I can no longer connect to my ISDN peers. I think the reason is a recent
change in the new udev.
I have two rules in /etc/udev/rules.d/50-capi.conf:
KERNEL==capi, NAME=capi20, SYMLINK+=isdn/capi20faxCAPI,
GROUP=uucp, MODE=0666
KERNEL==capi*, NAME=capi/%n
The first renames /dev/capi
Does anyone have suggestions ?
Your logs show that the interface is being detected and is named 'eth0'.
If you can't see eth0 at the end of the boot process, the device node
has probably been renamed by udev (you should see it as eth1, e.g. in
the output of ifconfig -a). So:
# rm /etc/udev
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem seems to be the use of static libraries
I temporarily worked around by adding xfce-base/thunar -udev to
package.use. Somehow building thunar with udev introduced the mess.
Chris
Anyone else run into this problem with udev-171-r9? I updated
yesterday and my CD/DVD, which has been /dev/cdrom1 since I built the
machine 2 1/2 years ago, is now called /dev/scd0.
Machine is x86_64, mostly stable.
- Mark
going on with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating
unless/until I know it is safe.
Have you read the requirements in
/usr/portage/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-0.11.5.ebuild ?
I don't see anything in there labeled 'requirements'...
All I found was:
RDEPEND=virtual/init
Nilesh Govindrajan me at nileshgr.com writes:
It's not a udev problem. You need to recompile your kernel with
devtmpfs support.
It can be found in device-drviers - generic driver options.
Yep,
fixed now.
Gotta catch up on my gentoo readings.
thx,
James
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some
time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details.
So, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what is in the new udev
that actually
Or, just:
:; find /var/db/pkg -name CONTENTS | xargs -0 grep -l /usr/lib/udev/ | awk -F/
'{print = $5 / $6}' | xargs emerge -pv
which should be fastest.
-JimC
--
James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
That was it, sort of. emerge decided to install sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r4
(presumably this had just become stable), and this had a dependency on
=virtual/udev-197[gudev,hwdb] . So rather than refusing to merge
udisks, it insisted on merging udev-197. This strikes me as a bug
I have read the news item and still have questions. The news item
covers several points.
1. remove udev-postmount:
I did this but worry that I now cannot reboot until I upgrade
udev. Is that correct?
2. Add CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y. Easy. Kernel rebuilt and installed
in /boot (but have
I've booted into udev-197 but my network interfaces are named the same
as ever and I've read that the new naming scheme is deactivated by
default. Do you think the new naming scheme will stick? If so, how
can I activate it?
- Grant
A recent update world leads to a notice that
/etc/udev/hwdb.bin needs to be updated
When I tried cfg-update I received a waring asking
who/what updated a binary file and suggested caution.
Is there any danger in updating the file?
Since it is binary would I be better off using a simple
etc
Am 25.03.2013 23:39, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I assume I have to remove udev-init-scripts now?
rebooted
..
afai see the system doesn't detect/ start up the raid-devices anymore.
This (in my case) leads to no detected PVs for the lvm2-stuff ...
Not so funny.
Ok...
So, what is this all about?
Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away,
*totally* replaced by systemd?
If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this
*anywhere*??
On 2013-03-27 6:32 AM, fantasticfears fantasticfe...@gmail.com wrote:
sys-kernel
On 30/03/13 17:15, Tanstaafl wrote:
Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page
You should probably also read:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictably-non-persistent-names
and:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2013/03/predictable-persistently-non-mnemonic-names
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:40:09 +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
I find the OpenBSD method of different names like fxp0 usefuk
You can emulate that with suitable (e)udev rules.
--
Neil Bothwick
Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 2013-04-01, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/01/2013 03:26 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
You know that both udev and eudev have exactly the same issue with
separate /usr right?
The problem there isn't in the udev code, but it has to do with what is
happening in rules that other
在 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:43:53 -0900，Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
h.v.bruineh...@fu-berlin.de 写道:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:41:26AM -0900, Jackie wrote:
Hello all,I was trying to reinstall gentoo on my PC and when I was
emerging gentoo-sources-3.8.5,sys-fs/udev-200 was required.However,after
the old way that is least likely to cause problems
down the road (ie, if/when udev is subsumed by systemd). Currently I
count 3 different ways
The no.ifrename kernel option mentioned in the news item.
Or, as an alternative, *how* to switch to eudev (their web page does
*not* have simple/precise
Am Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:23:04 -0400
schrieb Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com:
On 04/06/2013 11:19 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Hello Michael,
Is it because you disabled udev's renaming entirely via the kernel
command-line parameter? Because you've done some magic in
/etc/udev/rules.d
On 2013-08-01 12:28 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
Neglected to mention, it is still running 171-r10
Am 01.08.2013 19:16, schrieb Marc Stürmer:
net.ifnames=0
Worked like a charm to me.
Forgot to mention the more thorough documentation though, so here it is:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade
You
I see an update to udev come up when investigating installing various
other pkgs. eix shows I'm on 197-r3 and the most recent is 206.
Will that be a hefty amount of change... and concomittant amount of
work? Or something a lazy slug can manage?
On 04/08/13 05:56, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 05:02:39AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote
Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs/eudev just like
sys-apps/module-init-tools already was removed as unnecessary later on.
You want eudev removed, and Lennart Poettering wants udev on
non
Why is was forked you ask? Because of the predictable Name stuff and some
People disliked the attitude of the udev programmer which was either my
way or the high way. aside choice is always Good to have so in the end IT
was bound to happen sooner or later and is a Good thing to have.
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:18:38PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:24:27 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
But there's not a lot of point as eudev isn't that different to udev
now, AFAICT, and a recent update forced me to switch back to udev
because eudev hadn't been updated
On 2013-08-09 7:12 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Last - is simply restarting udev good enough, or should I go ahead and
reboot anyway before continuing with other updates?
Never got a response to this...
I'd prefer to not reboot if I don't have to, but it isn't *that* big
On 2013-08-12 6:48 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/08/2013 12:19, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hmmm... so is it eudev that would need to be updated to 'fix' this? Or
virtual/udev? Or both?
It has to do with how virtuals work.
If you have the virtual in @world, and none
On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:18:54 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Róbert Čerňanský
ope...@tightmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am currently updating my system and Portage wants to replace udev
(204) with systemd (208). My question is (hopefully
setting: root:dialout 600
How to change it?
My VituralBox complain and will not start with owner: root:dialout
/dev/ttyS0
It's a udev rule. Mine looks like this, tweak yours
$ grep -r uucp /lib/udev/rules.d/
/lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:KERNEL==tty[A-Z]*[0-9]|pppox[0-9]*|ircomm[0-9
after restart it goes back to previous setting: root:dialout 600
How to change it?
My VituralBox complain and will not start with owner: root:dialout
/dev/ttyS0
It's a udev rule. Mine looks like this, tweak yours
$ grep -r uucp /lib/udev/rules.d/
/lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB sick
(it mounts as root:root) and I can not even change the permission.
I am receiving Hylafax fax transmission reports (email) on all incoming faxes and now these emails are empty
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
If udev wants systemd, and you don't, but you want to continue using
udev, it's _your_ job to look for a method or patch or package or
script that makes it work.
That's already done. It's called eudev. :-D
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said
What is the meaning of this change?
[ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-212-r1 [208] USE=acl firmware-loader gudev
introspection kmod -doc (-selinux) -static-libs (-openrc%*) 2,660 kB
--
Regards,
Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
I'm having a problem starting the USB network interfaces properly on
one of my systems. I brought the problem to the udev list and they're
indicating that it's a Gentoo problem:
https://www.mail-archive.com/systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18840.html
Should I file a bug?
- Grant
Ok, Getting ready to do this update, but the wiki text is confusing...
It states:
udev 208 to 212
The following special attention is required:
snip
File /lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules was replaced with
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup
:31 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org
wrote:
*Why* was it removed/no longer needed? And why was it needed
previously?
Read the ChangeLog for sys-fs/udev, specifically the entry on 03 Apr
2014.
Thanks - a half hour of googling didn't find this.
03 Apr 2014; Samuli Suominen ssuomi
I'm trying to define names for my USB network interfaces keyed on the
interface location instead of the interface MAC address. This udev
rule renames one of them:
SUBSYSTEM==net, KERNEL==enp3s0u1, NAME=net0
But it doesn't work automatically at boot, I have to execute 'udevadm
trigger --action
James wrote:
Hello
So, I've been wanting to test eudev for a while now. I found these
instructions in many places, so I have it a whirl:
# emerge -Ca udev
# emerge -1a eudev
# etc-update
# emerge @preserved-rebuild
Problem is I had the 'udev' flag set in the make.conf, so it just
Am 07.01.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Alan McKinnon:
The tricky one is going to be that persistent interface names from udev
18 months or so back. When you get to that, you'll probably want to
re-read the huge threads from that time, as you only get one chance to
get it right.
One addition
I could install openrc with USE=-netifrc now ... then it doesn't pull
in netifrc which depends on udev etc etc
Not a real solution as now I miss net.lo ... oh my.
I scp'ed it over ;) just to make that one reboot work ...
walt wrote:
On 05/14/2015 10:56 PM, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
I have an amd64 system with an old 3.3.x kernel. Recently (I think after
last udev update to 217) the boot process became very slow due to udev
waiting for uevents to populate /dev. After a minute or so udev prints
something about
Am 08.08.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Rich Freeman:
Udev installs into such a path, and currently does not depend on
systemd (in fact, they block each other).
They block each other because udev is part of systemd. So if you install
systemd you already have udev and don't need the separate udev package
e/intel/fw_sst_22a8.bin
/lib64/modules/3.2.11-gentoo/modules.isapnpmap
/lib64/modules/3.2.11-gentoo/modules.ieee1394map
/lib64/modules/3.2.11-gentoo/modules.pcimap
/lib64/modules/3.2.11-gentoo/modules.order
/lib64/modules/3.2.11-gentoo/modules.symbols.bin
/lib64/modules/4.1.2-gentoo/modules.dep
/li
Helmut Jarausch <jarau...@skynet.be> wrote:
>
> Since the hard drives within theses enclosures have different
> capacities, there is a different ATTR{size} value in the
> block-subsystem.
>
> How can I write to different udev rules to distinguish these two
> external h
Corbin Bird wrote:
>
> The "sys-fs/eudev" package is the Gentoo fork of "sys-fs/udev" for
> people who don't want systemd.
Ehm... I still use "sys-fs/udev" (not eudev) without systemd.
No problems so far. Do I have to worry?
-Matt
On Wednesday, 27 February 2019 13:50:58 GMT Dale wrote:
> Little info here. I don't run systemd here but I also have that file.
I checked on a non-gentoo systemd based distro and this file is not there. It
seems it is related to sys-fs/udev-init-scripts.
> I checked with eq
Grant,
On Wednesday, 2019-12-18 15:57:41 -, you wrote:
> ...
> I do it by manually writing udev rules that watch for specific devices
> and mount them at particular paths.
It used to work out of the box without writing udev rules.
> handled by the "desktop" enviro
I have "eudev" installed but I think it will be obsolete as of Jan.1/22
according to news: 2021-08-24-eudev-retirement
Does converting from: sys-fs/eudev
to: sys-fs/udev
is as simple as: emerge -C sys-fs/eudev
emerge sys-fs/udev
On Sun, 2021-11-28 at 10:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
Boot with udev and do either ifconfig -a or ip addr show and look for
them. If they are not there, just load the modules e1000e or the other
one r8whatever it was. Should autoload, but who knows why they are not.
Use dmesg. Not that hard to debug.
for it if it's not already there. The kernel should not be interrogating
the device for all possible info - that is expensive - and doesn't need
to. It only needs enough info to know what driver, major and minor
numbers to use. X OTOH, can
I couldn't agree more. And this is what Udev, as a user space
-0.8.2 [0.6.2] USE=-debug -doc%
-test 36 kB
[ebuild U ~] sys-fs/udev-171-r1 [151-r4] USE=acl%* gudev%* hwdb%*
keymap%* rule_generator%* -action_modeswitch% -debug% -edd% -floppy%
(-introspection) (-selinux) -test (-devfs-compat%)
(-extras%*) (-old-hd-rules%) 595 kB
[ebuild U ] net-ftp
starting a new thread with an accurate name.
Which version of udev is it that has this nauseating feature of needing
/usr loaded to boot?
Somewhere in that version's source will be several (or lots of) /usr.
Just how difficult is it going to be to replace /usr/bin with /bin
throughout
. September 2011 15:02:48 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hope nobody minds me starting a new thread with an accurate
name.
Which version of udev is it that has this nauseating feature of
needing /usr loaded to boot?
Somewhere in that version's source will be several (or lots of)
/usr
are with the device files, whose ownership is set
to root root (rather than, e.g., root audio) and whose permissions
are set to crw--- (rather than the expected crw-rw).
I'm still running udev-171-r10. This might well make a difference.
Needless to say, everything works under kernel 3.6.11
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 11:48:22 J. Roeleveld wrote:
Then the dependencies should have been fixed prior to making this stable.
Actually, though it may be marked as stable, it isn't, by which I mean that I
can't emerge -uaDvN world today - I get udev and systemd blocking each other.
I ran
fixed prior to making this
stable.
Actually, though it may be marked as stable, it isn't, by which I mean
that I
can't emerge -uaDvN world today - I get udev and systemd blocking each
other.
I ran another sync and tried again, but that wasn't the cause.
Usually I fix blockages like this by removing
Samuli,
So, is the above still true?
eudev is looking more attractive every day... but can it continue to
work and be supported if Lennart gets his way and upstream udev stops
working without systemd?
Just saw reference to the following thread on the debian-user list, and
it includes a couple
Mick michaelkintzios at gmail.com writes:
$ eix -l ntfs3g
I have been using it for some time now on data (non-OS) partitions and had no
problems. YMMV.
Yep, same here ntfs3g is wonderful!
Also, I'm thinking about a udev rule or fstab entry
on the gentoo system to uniquely identify
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 10:34:40 Mick wrote:
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 05:01:36 SOrCErEr wrote:
No, that isn't. That file exists.
So I tested like below.
/etc/init.d/udev stop
/etc/init.d/sysfs stop
/etc/init.d/udev start
/etc
pk wrote:
Dale wrote:
Hi,
I have a Canon PowerShot A95 camera that until today worked fine. Gtkam
could see it and download my pictures. I'm on the same old kernel but
did upgrade some stuff recently.
UDEV?
Also, there might be other stuff that messes with the udev rules
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, how does one restart udev? Does going to rc single then back
to rc default restart udev? Surely a person doesn't have to reboot
I'm working on a manual QEMU install (that is, I'm installing from
source downloaded from their website).
There's a reference in their kqemu documentation about setting UDEV
permissions on /dev/kqemu. I initially disregarded this, but now it's
become an issue. It was easily resolved by /manually
On 2/12/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about dsp and such? Shouldn't there be rules to create them as well?
Yes, your 50-udev.rules file should contain:
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:KERNEL==adsp,
NAME=sound/%k, SYMLINK+=%k, GROUP=audio
/etc/udev/rules.d/50
On 13 February 2006 08:52, Richard Fish wrote:
On 2/12/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about dsp and such? Shouldn't there be rules to create them as well?
Yes, your 50-udev.rules file should contain:
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:KERNEL==adsp,
NAME=sound/%k, SYMLINK+=%k
On 2/26/06, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/25/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way to rescan for devices after bootup? like if i
hot-plugged a scsi drive into the machine after it was already
running? how can i re-detect the hardware?
If you are using udev
Hi,
I don't require scsi emulation for use with my USB camera/storage
devices. I don't use ide-scsi (its not in my kernel).
You might like this:
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/~fac075/howto/udev.txt
Which is a simple udev howto I did.
Thanks
Mark
On 02/03/06, Wes Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
I use udev and have /dev/cdrom mapped to /dev/cdrom - hda. I have all
SCSI except for the CD/DVD unit. Here's the udev rule
# cdrom symlinks and other good cdrom naming
BUS=ide, KERNEL=hd[a-z], PROGRAM=/etc/udev/scripts/cdsymlinks.sh
%k, SY
On Wed, 4 May 2005, Dave Nebinger wrote:
I have
I can sync my palm fine using jpilot by hitting sync on the palm, then
sync on jpilot. udev creates the nodes (I have set them
as /dev/tts/USB0 and /dev/tts/USB1) when the palm sync is run, and
deletes them when finished.
The problem is that most software (pilot-link, gnome-pilot, ...) seems
William Kenworthy schrieb:
I can sync my palm fine using jpilot by hitting sync on the palm, then
sync on jpilot. udev creates the nodes (I have set them
as /dev/tts/USB0 and /dev/tts/USB1) when the palm sync is run, and
deletes them when finished.
The problem is that most software (pilot-link
gentuxx wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I went to do my routine emerge -Duptv world and it came back with
devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm
using udev now or not. I remember compiling into the kernel last time
I did a kernel
Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Hi!
After upgrading the system and hence switching to kernel 2.6.13 and udev, my
nvidia device nodes are no longer available and I did not find any way to
create them automatically by udev.
According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/udev-guide.xml, I have
* nvidia
driver can be used.
http://www.talkaboutsoftware.com/group/linux.kernel/messages/166276.html
This one says you need to run MAKEDEV usb, but I'm not sure this needs to
occur on a udev box.
There is of course the wiki article for evolution, palm, and udev; perhaps the
udev stuff will help:
http
25, 2005 12:52 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo system initialization scripts UDEV
message
Budd, Tracy wrote:
Whenever I boot up my machine, I get a message to the effect The
Gentoo system initialization scripts have detected that your system
does not support
the eject button, the DVD goes out,
but ivman doesn't react. I've tried to reemerge udev, dbus, hal, ivman,
and kdebase and kdelibs, without success.
I've also tried to do it without ivman, only with the KDE Hal support,
but after mounting it, the kioslave doesn't show anything, and it kinda
get
On 11/17/05, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sooo:
I did notice The dvd devices are missing:
ls -alg /dev/dvd
Does /dev/hdc exist? If so, what are the permissions there? What
about /dev/cdrom?
What does /sbin/cdrom_id /dev/hdc report?
You can also try setting udev_log=7 in /etc/udev
Perhaps a udev problem? What is your kernel version and what is your
udev version? I had a problem several months ago when a usb mass
storage device gets scanned but udev would not create the entry in
/dev. For me the solution is to either downgrade udev to a version
compatible with the running
Christoph Eckert ce at christeck.de writes:
Sure, I can put manual entries in to fix this, but, isn't that what
udev and hal/ivman/dbus are support to do, automagically? Every time
I want to use 2 usb memory sticks on any computer, my only option is
to manually edit the fstab
~ #
This is (sadly) consistent with the lack of /dev/sda1 device.
So be it, let's suppose there is something wrong with your udev config.
Please:
1. start udevmonitor as root
2. plug the disk in
3. post all reported events here
With that, we can distinguish between some kernel driver issue and wrong
On 12/17/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2006 00:08, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 12/17/06, b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Knecht ha scritto:
That appears to be a testing version of udev. Do you always run
testing?
FYI, udev-103 is stable udev.
I
601 - 700 of 8452 matches
Mail list logo
