hi;
I upgraded to udev-070 recently (and now to udev-070-rc1).
Since then, I can't mount /mnt/cdrom properly.
Before, my /dev directory had a /dev/hdb, as well as /dev/hdb1,
/dev/hdb2 . Now, it only has /dev/hdb1, /dev/hdb2, but /dev/hdb is
no longer there. I still don't understand how
I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I followed
the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known) issues with
my nvidia driver and I couldn't get the USB mouse to work (yet the alps
I guess you used a livecd to boot into your computer, and then chrooted
into your existing environment?
Problem with the newest udev is that you need a kernel 2.6.15 or
newer. And the reason why touch is complaining, is because you forgot to
mount proc when you chrooted.
If you're outside
-generator.rules (and
the /lib/udev/write_net_rules script), but I'm a bit too tired to
figure it out ATM. It looks like 70-... should be created by the
write_net_rules script...
RULES_FILE='/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules'
That's the first line of write_net_rules.
Right. I just wasn't able
On Friday 01 December 2006 07:31, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi, I desparately need help!
I have upgraded from udev-087-r1 to udev-103 (and from baselayout-1.12.5
to 1.12.6)
At rebooting (I have a speedtouch usb ADSL device) I get
speedtch_find_firmware: no stage 1 firmware found
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 20:41, Mirco Bakker wrote:
Hi
For the archives: Problems solved. The missing ethernet interface resulted
from two missing links in /sbin (udev_run_devd, udev_run_hotplugd). I've
created them now manually. I think they should get installed when emerging
udev
Hi,
Just update your kernel to the latest version, and that will probably
pull udev in with it.
I don't know if you can just install udev, but the atom is called udev,
not udev-103
Regards
Shawn Singh schreef:
Hey all,
I installed Gentoo 2006.1.
I ran either:
emerge-webrsync
I recently updated portage tree kernel and using usual
genkernel --menuconfig --save-config all
produced unbootable system :(
Symptoms point most probably to udev being used by default etc. Here's
what I have in grub.conf:
title Gentoo linux (updated)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /kernel-genkernel
on that shouldn't be, and that udev might not work. When I got
logged in, I found that Mythtv was all screwed up and that it said I
didn't have any programs set to record. LiveTV didn't work at all. My
tv card (dev/video0); ls says it's there, but cat says it's not. When I
used /etc/init.d/udev I got
I've never created udev rule so the usal way does not tell me too much :)
I've checked the net for examples but it looks like very complicated for me
:)
My usb stick looks like this
Bus 007 Device 015: ID 058f:6387 Alcor Micro Corp. Transcend JetFlash Flash
Drive
Can you share with me some
then
it appears at under /dev/sda1 , this also true for the loop device ram
devices and others. I use kernel 2.6.32-xen-r1 , and
sys-fs/udev-151-r4. any help will be appreciated.
Well, I was hoping someone that knows more about udev would post
something. This is what I would check into. Did you upgrade
-20040920-r1
[blocks B ] sys-apps/coldplug (sys-apps/coldplug is blocking
sys-fs/udev-151-r4)
[blocks B ] =sys-fs/udev-089 (=sys-fs/udev-089 is blocking
sys-apps/coldplug-20040920-r1)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed
lördagen den 13 augusti 2011 07.54.37 skrev Michael Mol:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:23 AM, jonas.narst...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an ASUS USB-BT211 bluetooth dongle, I have never been able to make
it
work and it causes udev to fail at startup and sending the following msg
to
the syslog
alternative that works well with a proper
fix and for that to push udev out and render it null. I think that would
serve the dev right. Listen to the people that use it or people will use
something else. The mdev package comes to mind here. Maybe this will push
it to take udevs place. It seems
The 09/09/11, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
The question arose, when Canek mentioned bluetoothd, that udev seems to need
in some cases.
This is wrong. udev on its own does not require extra tools from /usr.
Though, the rules used by udev do use software in /usr. It's NOT a udev
fault _at all_
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
There's another thread for complaining about the brokenness of the
proposed udev implementation. This one is for doing something about it.
After reading the udev-complaints thread, I joined the busybox list, and
asked
On Tuesday 03 Jan 2012 15:22:29 Walter Dnes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 05:22:09PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote
(Come to think of it, has *any* distro ever attempted this...
'unconventional of going udev-free?)
Alpine linux has done it http://alpinelinux.org/ Unfortunately,
they're
The 05/01/12, Pandu Poluan wrote:
And mdev might be a 'toy' to you, but embedded Linux developers will
vehemently disagree with you.
And based on the responses in this thread, server guys will also
disagree with you.
On the embedded side, we need udev much more than you think to support
: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy sys-
apps/pciutils[-zlib].
!!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request:
- sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.7::gentoo (Change USE: -zlib)
(dependency required by sys-fs/udev-171-r5[hwdb] [ebuild
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 06:22:39PM -0500, Dale wrote
I think mdev has shown it can be fixed. Given time, it just may replace
udev then the udev dev can screw up his own stuff on not bother other
distros. I'm giving
Original Message
Subject:[gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
From: Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
Richard Yao wrote:
Dear
Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale:
Original Message
Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
From: Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-proj
Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
Me, I'm looking
On 2012-11-20 9:36 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Tanstaafltansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Anyone?
I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going on
with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know
thingy, like it used to be.
My basic question is this, has anyone started using eudev yet? From my
understanding it is basically udev with the files where they used to be
before they changed things. I'm thinking about switching but wondering
what all is involved. It appears to be as simple
Bruce Hill wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:23:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
Then came the decision to move udev inside /usr, forcing the issue.
Now, it'd been long understood that udev *itself* hadn't been broken.
The explanation given as much as a year earlier was that udev couldn't
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems to me like very happy news indeed, but I'm interested in contrary
opinions. There's a recent thread discussing how udev-197 breaks lvm2, but
that's a trivial fix once you know about it.
The problem is caused because
udev-197-r3 gave me this postinstall warning:
Upstream has removed the persistent-cd rules generator. If you need
persistent names for these devices, place udev rules for them
in /etc/udev/rules.d.
Well, I have had such a rule for a long time, and it worked ok until I
installed udev-197
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote:
Just found that I have a blocking situation ... systemd and udev don't
like each other right now ;-)
Tried various maskings ... and found some
On 31/03/13 at 12:41pm, Tanstaafl wrote:
Googled and can't seem to find an answer to this...
I've had FEATURES=buildpkg for some time on my system, so I already
have udev-171-r10 quickpkg'd...
But for the life of me, I can't seem to find instructions for how to
convert /usr/portage
You should do udev first, that way if it breaks you have the maximum
amount of time to get things working again. Not that I'm a pessimist...
PS Please don't top-post, it is frowned upon on this list.
Makes sense and I apologize for the top posts. Have everything up to
date with udev
Alan Mackenzie a...@muc.de wrote:
Hi, Dan.
On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 02:34:16PM +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
Hello List,
What is the status of using mdev (instead the ever growing udev)
together with lvm2? Reason for my question is that at
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev it says One beta
On 4/29/2013 17:35, fe...@crowfix.com wrote:
I've finally got my system settled enough to look into teh scary udev upgrade.
Especially I have all data dirs off in their own LVM partitions (/home, /encfs,
/usr/portage, /var/spool), and a backup of the most recent bootable and runable
/, so I
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:28 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31 2013, Graham Murray wrote:
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com writes:
The wiki is wrong. The script /etc/init.d/udev is part of sys-fs/udev,
which you need to uninstall before installing systemd. Perhaps it's
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular udev, or to eudev.
I've
On 02/08/13 00:49, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 01/08/13 19:28, Tanstaafl wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, rehashing this, but please don't turn it into another udev vs
systemd thread.
I have an older server that I have been putting off this update,
debating on whether to update to the regular
On 02/08/13 05:48, Dale wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Huh? USE=firmware-loader is optional and enabled by default in
sys-fs/udev
Futhermore predictable network interface names work as designed, not a
single valid bug filed about them.
Stop spreading FUD.
Looking forward to lastrite sys-fs
On 2013-08-02 8:15 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
But what about removing the udev-postmount init script? I guess that
is the last question I need answered before jumping down the rabbit
hole Sunday...
This is what I have for that from rc-update show:
udev-postmount
Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-02 8:15 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Tanstaafl wrote:
But what about removing the udev-postmount init script? I guess that
is the last question I need answered before jumping down the rabbit
hole Sunday...
This is what I have for that from rc-update show
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:10:27 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
I can't remember what it was now, and it may have been avoidable by
making virtual/udev-206 (or whichever version it was that needed a
higher udev version than eudev could provide). It's moot now as eudev
has been updated and portage
On 12/08/2013 12:19, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2013-08-11 2:38 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/08/13 21:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
There was a blocker (small b) because virtual/udev needed sys-fs/udev
and
that gave a blocker that uninstalled eudev.
I believe it's 'b' if user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/29/2013 10:13 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 09:21:01PM -0500, Daniel Campbell wrote:
/usr/lib/udev. /usr/lib/systemd.
were both placed in /usr despite objections from a number of
folks.
So claims that udev
On 09/29/2013 11:13 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 09:21:01PM -0500, Daniel Campbell wrote:
/usr/lib/udev.
/usr/lib/systemd.
were both placed in /usr despite objections from a number of folks.
So claims that udev and systemd are not responsible are not true
Gentoo, however (note, going from testing to stable isn't fun ;p), and
noticed it when I found Gentoo ships with systemd-udev instead of
eudev.
Yep, no plans on changing the default sys-fs/udev to anything else, no
reason to.
To be clear - you are saying that the new default init system
Is this right?
# eix udev
...
[U] sys-fs/udev
Available versions: 208-r1^t 212-r1^t ~213^t **^t {acl doc +firmware-loader gudev
introspection +kmod selinux static-libs ABI_MIPS=n32 n64 o32 ABI_X86=32 64
x32}
Installed versions: 208^t{tbz2}(03:30:13 PM 12/08/2013)(acl
On 25/09/14 18:25, James wrote:
Ok,
So I have used eudev before, without issue before. Things are moving along
so now I see an udev-215 upgrade to udev-261 on a system running lxde.
I intend to migrate this system to lxqt in the next few weeks, after
I build up a new workstation.
So
On 11/10/2014 7:30 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Well, there are no plans to make udev stop working without systemd as
far as I can tell. HOWEVER, there ARE plans to require using kdbus to
communicate with udev, and for that to work there needs to be a
userspace initialization
t;> eudev don't match, portage will try to install the default for
>>> libudev, which is udev. That then causes a conflict as you can't have
>>> udev and libudev installed at the same time.
>>
>> Here is the output:
>>
>> grep -r udev /etc/portage
>>
quired for booting.
> My best guesses at the problem are either that it's udev related or that
> the various ZFS services need to be better configured to expose the zvol.
> I read the "Admin Documentation" links on the zfsonlinux.org website
> looking for mentions on "zvol&quo
On Saturday 17 December 2005 21:55, a tiny voice compelled Richard Fish to
write:
On 12/17/05, Ernie Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm obviously looking in the wrong places, but I can't find documentation
on getting udev to start at boot. Sound and a few other things you don't
notice
I tried to upgrade(?) from devfs to udev(045) today and it was
miserable.
I followed the Gentoo Udev Guide as well as DSD's guide but no go.
I've recompiled my kernel(2.6.11) to _not_ mount /dev/ automatically at
boot. (devFS is still compiled into the kernel)
edited /etc/conf.d/rc
RC_DEVICES
Am Mittwoch, 16. November 2005 08:56 schrieb ext Daevid Vincent:
I've been running 2.6.10 for some time. Then I started reading some stuff
that I should update my Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook to UDEV. So I
followed the gentoo wiki page and used kernel 2.6.13. This caused (known)
issues with my
tomorrow and try it.
Thanks for all your suggestions and comments! When I have more info, I
will report back to this thread. Hopefully we can solve it w/o a
reinstall.
Okay, I have to oddities:
1. system will not proceed in boot process beyond the configuring
system to use udev
2. when
. There is some
interaction between that and 75-persistent-net-generator.rules (and
the /lib/udev/write_net_rules script), but I'm a bit too tired to
figure it out ATM. It looks like 70-... should be created by the
write_net_rules script...
RULES_FILE='/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent
nothing
is ideal in computer science.
Maybe it's not enough for you, but I repeat: we need dynamic /dev
trees, udev giveus that, the udev code lives in user space, we need an
early user space = initramfs.
I didn't say I don't use udev, I do. I too have cameras, USB gadgets
and a huge array
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:50:13PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Hi Alan,
On Monday, 12. September 2011 17:17:37 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Hi, Michael.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 05:33:34PM +0200, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
Hi Alan,
Well, I'm a hacker. udev is free source
On Sun, Aug 12 2012, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
I have been masking udev-181 so that I can continue to keep my current
system with / and /usr separate partitions.
This has required masking pciutils and usbutils as well
Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 13.11.2012 04:20, schrieb Dale:
Original Message
Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date:Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
From:Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org
Reply-To:gentoo-proj...@lists.gentoo.org
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:20:05AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2012-12-14 10:39 AM, Bruce Hill da...@happypenguincomputers.com wrote:
What Mark wrote you is golden. I might only add that if you put:
=sys-fs/udev-181
into
/etc/portage/package.mask
you will have the present
, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what is in the new udev
that actually requires the initrd?
eselect news read is yore frnd ;)
2012-03-16-udev-181-unmasking
Title udev-181 unmasking
AuthorWilliam Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
Posted
On 2012-12-24, Bruce Hill wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
Now, also, from my understanding, this was already the case for some
time (maybe even years?). And that's why I've asked for more details.
So, if the udev you use is OK with no initrd, what
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:42:37AM -0600, Canek Pel??ez Vald??s wrote
No, because the problem has never been in udev (nor systemd, for that
matter). It fixes how *Gentoo* packages udev; probably the devs read
the following comment from Lennart (note it was written almost a month
ago
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:35:06 -0500
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both.
The news item instructions specified that I had to remove
udev-postmount from my
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:35:06 -0500
Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
So, I botched the upgrade to udev-191. I thought I'd followed the
steps, but I apparently only covered them for one machine, not both
On 2013-03-31 1:10 PM, Yohan Pereira yohan.pere...@gmail.com wrote:
What you need to do is add the original ebuild for udev-171 to your
local overlay as is. Then run emerge using the -g option see man
emerge.
Hmmm... I had thought that the local ebuild was gone due to it being
removed from
udev is not running, who/what comes up with the name
eth0? How does that person/thing know how many ethernet devices
there are and in what order to enumerate them? What happens if
ethernet devices are dynamically added (e.g. a USB ethernet device or
a driver being loaded/unloaded
First hint: it's a mess -- don't do it on a critical machine.
(My main machine is ~amd64 and that's why I'm doing it on virtual
~amd64 machines first.)
The new gnome-shell demands that systemd be installed, even if you
don't intend to use it.
The latest systemd conflicts with udev because
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable).
I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents
systemd-204.
OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200.
I thought
emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys-apps/systemd-204
would do it. But this failed (see below
On 02/04/2014 02:29 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04 2014, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 02/04/2014 01:58 PM, Joseph wrote:
Is it possible to go from systemd to udev?
I don't like the way systemd works. I have a problem with mounting USB
sick (it mounts as root:root) and I can
I have in make.conf USE: ... -systemd
But gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon wants to pull in systemd-208
so I need to emerge sys-apps/systemd-208-r2 and I have installed udev which
conflicts with systemd.
Do I need to unmerge udev and emerge systemd. I'm not planning on switching to systemd
bInterfaceNumber0
bAlternateSetting 0
bNumEndpoints 0
bInterfaceClass 0
bInterfaceSubClass 0
bInterfaceProtocol 0
iInterface 0
On the web site of digistump there is listed the following udev-rule,
which I
bDescriptorType 4
> bInterfaceNumber0
> bAlternateSetting 0
> bNumEndpoints 0
> bInterfaceClass 0
> bInterfaceSubClass 0
> bInterfaceProtocol 0
> iInterface 0
>
> On t
Yes, but then udev sees that eth0 is already
allocated to another card so
makes this one eth1. Just delete the file as
mentioned previously to have
udev forget about the old card and start again with
eth0.
What file? Cause now I'm getting this:
localhost heathen # dmesg|grep eth0
eth0
not it. I also get the two odd entries for / with no change to
fstab. /dev/root is a symlink to the actual block device, with no
obvious culprit in the udev rules.
Actually its relatively obvious, but its a 'dynamic' rule
in /lib/udev/write_root_link_rule, that
creates /dev/.udev/rules.d/10-root
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for replying to my own message, just had a thought. Could this all
be a udev rules problem? I mean could some new rules in the updated udev
package be causing my lvm/raid devices to not be picked up and
activated?
I've been trying to break
:
Just updated udev to 114 and it left me an einfo with the following:
You still have the directory /etc/dev.d on your system. This is no
longer used by udev and can be removed.
However I _DO NOT_ have an /etc/dev.d.
Should I file a bug report on this?
--
Those who would give up essential
Hello,
googling around I do not seem to be able to reconcile the current state of
affairs. Should we still be using coldplug or hotplug or has udev
robustly replaced cold and hotplug?
Now on an old i586 (K-6 amd) firewall, that has iptables
and not much else installed. should I still use cold
On 2007-09-24, Grant Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-09-24, Randy Barlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
And the most recent version of sys-apps/hotplug is over three
years old?
I could be wrong, but if I remember correctly udev is supposed to
replace cold/hotplug
Hi guys,
Not particularly a show-stopper, but I recently did an emerge, and one
of the packages that was upgraded was udev. Intermittently, at least
since the upgrade, my udev has been giving me prolonged spikes of cpu
usage. It doesn't hog the whole cpu or anything, but it does use up
some 60-70
After upgrading to xorg-server-1.5, the /dev/sdb1 device no longer
appears when I insert a memory card. Does anyone know why that is?
- Grant
you also did an udev update and nuked some config files?
It looks like udev was updated on March 31st and xorg-server on April
6th. I suppose it's
After upgrading to xorg-server-1.5, the /dev/sdb1 device no longer
appears when I insert a memory card. Does anyone know why that is?
- Grant
you also did an udev update and nuked some config files?
It looks like udev was updated on March 31st and xorg-server on April
6th. I suppose
2009/6/2 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:31:20 +0100, Mick wrote:
My log shows that wlan0 is renamed to wlan1:
Not sure why this happens. Any ideas?
It's udev, you probably used another wireless device, with a different
MAC address, as wlan0 in the past. Edit
hi
Gentoo udev Guide didnt answer my question, is it good idea to remove fstab
entry for removables, i have this
/dev/hdc /media/cdrecorder autouser,exec,noauto,managed 0 0
since fresh install and then there was devfs. Am I right that udev will handle
mounts for /dev/hdc
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 16:15 schrieb ext Martins Steinbergs:
Am I right that udev will handle mounts for /dev/hdc/ (DVD+CDRW)
according to udev.rules what media is inserted?
No, udev handles device node creation. You still have to mount yourself or
use an automounter
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:30:08 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
udev handles the creation of the device nodes, mounting is handled by
hal. hal normally creates its own mount points in /media, but if the
device is listed in /etc/fstab, it will use whatever is in there.
How do you know
/HOWTO_Install_a_USB_scanner#UDEV
No, doesn't work. I've tried the given udev rule and the 'usbscanner'
init script, without success.
BTW, that page has some errors on it. Particularly, for udev where it
says .rules, it should be .permissions. However I didn't have to do
any of that to get my
On 1/18/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:58:26 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
That only happens under certain circumstances. udev generally stops at
the first matching rule. := is the safest option though.
This behavior changed at some point in the last 20
actions. Custom udev rules should go
in /etc/udev/rules.d/10-udev.rules, like in says in the guide.
/etc/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules is for system rules and may be
updated along with the software.
--
Neil Bothwick
Computer (n): A device designed to speed and automate errors.
signature.asc
device, sync up a directory, and then
unmount the device everytime I plug my USB drive into the computer.
Udev will take care of this. all you need is a udev rule that matches the
particular device and calls a script that carries out the actions you
want. See http://www.reactivated.net/udevrules.php
How would that help udev to create the relevant special device files?
as seen before, your ALSA devices are present, so it doesn't seem to be
an udev problem.
ALSA apps don't output sound using device files.
cat /proc/asound/cards
should list your cards,
ls -l /dev/snd/
should show
Not likely to happen during installation, but if you use udev, the
device nodes may not exist in your backups (depending upon how you do
your backups...). So a restore of a backup of your root filesystem
from a crash recovery or live CD may not restore any device nodes to
your root
On 2006-02-18 19:42:03 +0100 (Sat, Feb), Marco Calviani wrote:
!!! Digest verification Failed:
!!!/usr/portage/sys-fs/udev/files/udev.rules.post_012
!!! Reason: Filesize does not match recorded size
i have tried with emerge sync, but nothing changed.
Any help?
Compare your file
Iain Buchanan wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the combined idea of hal, dbus, udev
and auto mounting that you don't need entries in fstab?
Yes, you're right. You don't need to manually add entries
to fstab. udev/hal will do that on the fly for you.
And with Gnome, this works
On 2/25/06, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there a way to rescan for devices after bootup? like if i
hot-plugged a scsi drive into the machine after it was already
running? how can i re-detect the hardware?
If you are using udev, and have configured the kernel for hotplug
support
:
Install udev as in portage. Then edit the kernel to remove devfs -
recompile and reboot.
Job done, it should say using udev at bootup.
Worked for me :-)
I've got a question regarding this switch: Can sys-fs/devfsd be unmerged
or is it still somehow needed?
Sigi
signature.asc
Description
. Schwartz wrote:
Tim Igoe wrote:
Install udev as in portage. Then edit the kernel to remove devfs -
recompile and reboot.
Job done, it should say using udev at bootup.
Worked for me :-)
I've got a question regarding this switch: Can sys-fs/devfsd be unmerged
or is it still somehow needed?
Sigi
You
Check that RC_DEVICE_TARBALL is set to no in /etc/conf.d/rc
I think having this set to yes can cause the behaviour you are seeing.
On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 12:04 -0300, Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
Hi All, sorry by the dumb question, but , I belive I am using udev, my
kernel is set, my grub
Arran Fraser wrote:
Based on the log, I would say udev is the most likely point of
failure. Have you run etc-update yet?
Yes... although I may have rebooted before doing so.
Shouldn't matter...as long as you made the appropriate updates to the
configuration files, it should be ok
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Allan Spagnol Comar wrote:
One more info, udev had crashed and I have to downgrade from 7.0 to
6.8-r1 to get the system to boot
A. You're top posting
B. yeah, udev-070 is bad. Use udev-070-r1...
- --
[Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled
On 11/1/05, Digby Tarvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that non-standard? I only see
* sys-fs/udev
Latest version available: 068
Latest version installed: [ Not Installed ]
Size of downloaded files: 436 kB
Homepage:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/kernel/hotplug
801 - 900 of 8450 matches
Mail list logo
