On 03/22/11 07:08, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Apart from improving GTK gui robustness in these cases... can we
drop the OpenGL-ES choice from configure.ac w/out hurting anyone ?
There is a GLES renderer in my openvg branch, so dropping it is
useless, as it'll come right back when I migrate my
On 03/22/11 07:54, Sandro Santilli wrote:
It's not useless. It server the purpose of not confusing people that
build gnash. Having it back when it works if fine.
Well, the GLES renderer in the branch compiles, but doesn't have glue
code yet, so wouldn't work anyway.
Are you concerned about
On 03/22/11 01:35, Shuxiang Lim wrote:
Where can I get the libglib.so used by Gnash-android? Does it also use
libgio/libgthread..?
Gnash on Android doesn't use glib, so I never had to fight my way
through this mess. You could look at the Code Sourcery tools for ARM,
that use newlib
Now that the release is out, I plan to migrate my 'openvg' branch to
master. While I'd like to migrate this in stages, it may be difficult.
If anyone has concerns about this code, they should review the branch
*now*, and not start another endless flame war after this is merged. As
I won't be
On 03/22/11 08:59, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Reducing the noise would involve merging master into branch carefully
resolving conflicts, and then possibly reducing changes even further
by making sure _every_ change in branch is related to openvg.
Merge changes aren't really an issue for
On 03/22/11 10:34, Sandro Santilli wrote:
What do you want us to look at then ?
Real programmers can read code. :-)
Maybe it's more useful if you give an overview of what changes in terms
of interfaces, so we can give comments on that.
Actually there have been very few interface
On 03/22/11 11:48, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I actually see no GLES renderers in master, and 2 of them in openvg
branch: opengles1, opengles2. Are them in any way related to the
openvg one or completely standalone ?
GLES1 and GLES2 unfortunately have differing APIs. GLES1 is based on a
patch I
On 03/22/11 11:51, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
I can't currently compile this code because I don't have openvg on my
machines.
Currently OpenVG is available on Ubuntu Maverick or Natty. I'll be
working on the GTK-OpenVG glue this week, which you would need to
actually test it on your desktop. It
On 03/22/11 13:02, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
Wouldn't you have to merge master into your branch anyway prior to
merging your branch into master? So if you do that now, it'll be easier
for people to see the changes you want to make, which would lead to
better feedback and easier bugfixing (and
On 03/22/11 15:16, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Does this mean you think the old functions are to be replaced ?
Is it really necessary ? Can you give more details on the issue ?
It's not necessary, but as bwy pointed out, there currently there is
some duplication of accessors that work slightly
On 03/22/11 15:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Wouldn't it be easier and safer just to change the _new_ code to use the
_existing_ accessors ? It probably helps reducing bugs if changes in
interfaces are avoided as much as possible.
Changing working code seemed more unstable than leaving it
On 03/22/11 16:04, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
It would help to ensure that it doesn't get forgotten.
I don't forget things on my top of my TODO list... There's a big
difference in our styles, I do things by making several passes over
them, you seem to prefer things to be more complete. I don't
On 03/23/11 03:24, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Problem is that when you're a working in a team, your in steps work
gets in the way of others, which are forced to deal with issues
that prevent them from properly testing/debugging their own code.
The way I work has never gotten in anyone's way in
On 03/23/11 09:14, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 06:50:36AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
I thought you mentioned you wanted high-level reviews, rather than
detailed bug reports.
How can you review anything, high level or not without looking at the
code ? I'm not trying
On 03/23/11 18:54, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:06 PM, diptorup diptor...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be too late in the day, but any chance Gnash can participate
in Google Summer Of Code under the GNU flagship?
However Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva mentions here that there
On 03/24/11 14:40, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
I really, really, really do *not* want this to bloom into another
flame war. Flame wars are counter productive, and we all have work to do.
Considering the size of Gnash itself, I have a hard time believing that
the toolkit really makes much
On 03/29/11 08:21, zou lunkai wrote:
So, it's simple to solve this problem. If bwy wants to remove the dead
code(reason: reduce his maintance work), do it. But please put it back if
someone else wants to use that code. I think it's not difficult to estimate
that removing dead code is not a
On 03/28/11 07:44, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Sorry, I see little useful outcome of kicking a flame war into full
force, and you aren't even a Gnash developer anyway, so don't expect any
responses from me. I know this sounds rude, but answering endless
personal attacks is a major waste of
On 03/30/11 03:14, Abdul Karim wrote:
Any progress regarding the apk???
I haven't been working on apk packaging support at all. First I did
the release, and now I'm working on OpenVG, which the Android port needs
anyway.
- rob -
___
On 03/31/11 10:40, Sandro Santilli wrote:
If we *should* then why we didn't ?
Who should check that it gets done ?
That is up to whomever does the release to decide on whether the
release should be delayed till certain bugs are fixed or to put the
release out with known bugs. Last time I
On 03/31/11 17:51, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
I think the rest of us were doing it the way Sandro was describing. In
my case that was more of a knee-jerk response rather than any formal
agreement to do it that way. I'm actually rather neutral on which way is
better (it doesn't matter so long as
On 04/01/11 00:44, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The experience of 0.8.9 showed that you didn't even query the bug
tracker to check which blockers we had. And, when pointed out that
You have no clue what I did for this release, nor past releases. Just
because I may consider the importance of a bug
On 04/15/11 04:10, Andrew Guertin wrote:
Over the past few days I've been doing some work on cleaning up gnash's
Makefile.ams. The end goal that I'd like to reach is to transition to
non-recursive automake.
The current Gnash style is a mix of recursive and non-recursive
Makefiles. The
On 04/18/11 02:32, Andrew Guertin wrote:
Why do you often build only a directory or two?
For example, lately I've been doing much hacking on librender, so
often just do make -C librender gui/fb-gnash -vv test.swf. Since
it's a small library, it recompiles quickly. If you look at the hwaccel
On 04/19/11 04:12, Andrew Guertin wrote:
So it looks like you're mainly using it to hack around the normal
build method to gain speed.
Speed of development, not speed of an entire build. I've been in this
discussions of recursive vs non-recursive Makefiles several times over
30 years. Each
On 04/19/11 06:52, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Just a note: Ubuntu 10.04 (LTS) shipped a gold incompatible with
libc. I've had an hard morning trying to debug random segfaults the
other day. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/673893
More reasons to run a more up-to-date
On 04/20/11 11:24, Richard Wilbur wrote:
Had I not already upgraded to the version on getgnash.org, the error
mentioned above would make it impossible to do so with the normal
tools. Thus, in the past when the Release file expired, I have
resorted to disabling the getgnash.org repository.
On 04/21/11 09:31, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Wouldn't it be enough to hook all your chroots as build slaves
for it to happen automatically ?
First we'd have to actually upload binary packages from buildbot to
the repositories, which I don't believe we're currently doing. Also that
laptop can
I updated packages for maverick-amd64, natty-amd64 squeeze-amd64,
since people wanted those. I also updated some i386 platforms, and
working on a few more. The ones I tested installing worked for me...
Note that these packages are signed by me, and not the gnash-dev@gnu.org
key currently on
On 04/22/11 14:24, Chris Leonard wrote:
and commit after the PO was finalized. Our Pootle server would merely serve
as a collaborative tool for finding and completing the PO.
Sure more complete coverage of our translations would be great. The
process you described for getting them upstream
On 04/26/11 04:05, John Gilmore wrote:
It's great to finally see apt-get update wanting to update gnash on
my Ubuntu lucid i386 system. But when I try to install it, it also
wants to install gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 for some reason. This
dependency seems to have been added in the gnash
On 04/26/11 18:25, John Gilmore wrote:
Thanks -- it installed cleanly and works pretty well.
Good to know. I got a bunch of the other distributions updated
yesterday without this dependency on the fluendo plugin.
While running, gnash identifies itself as
Gnash 0.8.10~git.master20401
On 05/03/11 01:22, Sandro Santilli wrote:
It's linked from the homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/
I just added the link yesterday after it was suggested.
It's been down for one day or two recently, but seems to be back up.
Problems with rural ISPs... sometimes the only phone
On 05/07/11 06:01, Sandro Santilli wrote:
AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_VAAPI, test x${found_va_incl} = xyes)
But there's no code, anywhere, setting found_va_incl variable,
so no wonder it doesnt' work.
The GNASH_PKG_FIND macro uses variable substitution to create that
name, which is why a grep
On 05/24/11 09:48, zhonghua zhu wrote:
Are you trying to build the development version from git master branch ?
Yes, I am building gnash from git master branch.
This should be fixed now as of
5e9371a025ed644b8ac8e12221b54d65479028e0. There was a bad test for cross
compiling where it
On 06/01/11 17:01, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:00:56PM +0200, karol wrote:
sorry translate
Can I ask you to release the file updates getgnash.org
Currently the file has expired release: Release file expired,
ignoring
On 06/07/11 23:07, Sergey Sukhoi wrote:
Can I build Gnash on Android ARMv6-platform with OpenVG support?
You can try... :-) I've been using a Freescale Babbage board for this
work up till now. The long term goal is to be able to use OpenVG on
Android to solve the current performance problems
On 07/27/11 08:21, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
The issue here is that std::random_shuffle needs a functor that returns
a random number from 0..n, and boost random evidently didn't provide
this functionality in 1.34. It could be done another (less good) way, so
it's not a big problem, but it joins
As of Aug 1, 2011, the Open Media Now non-profit I set up for Gnash
funding is shutting down for a variety of reasons, including a major
lack of donations. Several other non-profits, including the FSF have
agreed to handle directed donations to the Gnash project. My suggestion
to the other Gnash
On 08/04/11 08:03, Sandro Santilli wrote:
If you'll ever be willing to shut them down please let us know in time
for a clean data migration. It'd be nice not to loose the data on
the wiki, the master buildbot config, all domain names and eventually
also the drupal site (altought I'm not sure
On 08/04/11 10:51, Robinson Tryon wrote:
What AVM2 pieces are feasible to implement for $1,400? I was under the
impression that AVM2/AS3 was a much bigger job.
Well, now you see the problem... I didn't raise that funding for that
task, cause it isn't really sufficient. My guess is that would
On 08/04/11 15:37, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Several weeks are still too much for 1.4k USD ...
Right, but as that funding was for AVM2, I don't feel comfortable
spending it on anything else. So I'm stuck holding onto it till somebody
makes a reasonable offer to at least make some progress on
On 08/12/11 23:47, Chris Leonard wrote:
like to draw your attention to this message from OLPC inviting
applications to it's Contributor's Program for developers willing to
address critical issues (like Gnash function on ARM acrhitecture) on
the limited number of B1 prototypes that have been
On 08/13/11 05:29, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
On 08/13/2011 06:04 AM, brayden meyer wrote:
I'm currently got gnash running on a ShevvaPlug (Armel CPU - Debian
Squeeze) but it is only version 8.5.5.
I'm running Gnash from git master on my DreamPlug.
gnashdev.org doesn't host packages for arm
On 08/15/11 06:13, Sandro Santilli wrote:
(just back from my mountaineering trip...)
In order to reduce the impact of the hwaccel merge I'd
like to propose the following procedure:
Why do you assume there will be any special impact of this branch
merge anyway ? I would only agree to this
On 08/31/11 09:10, Robinson Tryon wrote:
One easy fix, as there are relatively few new legitimate users each
month, would be to simply require new users to email
registrat...@gnashdev.org to get an account. We could just restrict
access to the create-a-new-account page[1], and post the
On 08/31/11 10:04, Robinson Tryon wrote:
I'd be happy to be on the alias list for that email address.
You're on it now. :-)
Yep, if we just put a note on that registration page To reduce spam
on the wiki, please take the following steps to register: ... I think
that we can avoid pretty
On 09/07/11 10:36, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Now that the hardware acceleration branch was merged to master,
can we have an overview of what changes in terms of architecture ?
This has been answered in great detail on this list in the past, so I
see no need to waste time duplicating all those
On 09/11/11 13:12, Sandro Santilli wrote:
What about getting out next release in time for ubuntu 11.10 ?
It doesn't really matter, as whenever we do a release, it'd show up as
an update. Getting out before the Ubuntu code freeze only means it makes
the initial CD images. Since Gnash currently
On 09/11/11 13:37, Micah Gersten wrote:
We have a distro patch for that now.
Cool, thanks. Got a URL for it ?
Regardless, we can probably SRU a new release when it comes out. We
should probably actually update all the stable releases with a new gnash
since I'm sure that the flash support
On 09/12/11 05:44, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:58:36AM -0400, Brad wrote:
Are you saying the master branch still doesnt' build ?
It still didn't build as of a few days ago, cause I was trying to
build deb packages for our repository. I have two machines that run
On 09/11/11 22:04, Micah Gersten wrote:
Well, final freeze is Sept 29. However, we could still probably get it
in sometime the following week. As always, earlier is better here,
since it's at the discretion of the release team (of which I am not a
That might not be enough time, usually our
On 09/12/11 11:53, Sandro Santilli wrote:
It was tested by Igor Murzov, original bug submitter, see
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?33696#comment7
Additionally, it was tested by Gabriele Giacone, who pushed the patch.
We don't have any Ubuntu oneiric build slaves (I have two), and
On 09/12/11 16:32, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
Now we have one and it builds current master as well as sid one.
http://www.gnashdev.org:8010/builders/oneiric-linux-i386/builds/3
How up to date is the oneiric slave ? When oneiric was in alpha,
master still built. Then one day ffmpeg got
On 09/13/11 05:48, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Any chance to get those 7 additional distributions setup as build slaves ?
No, they're chroots on an old laptop, so I only run one at a time.
- rob -
___
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
On 09/14/11 12:06, Sandro Santilli wrote:
All segfaults come from sound/media tests, so most likely culprit is ffmpeg
use.
This calls for a revert of those last commits, doesn't it ?
Rob: are you willing to do that ?
I had reverted my last commit shortly after committing it, so any
On 09/16/11 03:16, Sandro Santilli wrote:
It turns out I was wrong. The happy run of buildbot was with
a patch prepared by Gabriele truly reverting your ffmpeg commits.
I reverted my patch fully, I saw the segfaults with the existing
patch, not the one I applied.
What do we do now ?
On 09/18/11 10:52, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
given seems no one is willing to start writing (once again) an AVM2
implementation and there's been a pledge [0] for that, I propose to use
such money to fund ...(drum roll)... Gnash-LightSpark integration.
So some time ago I spent some time
On 09/26/11 10:06, Pete Hobson wrote:
I've been trying to understand better gnash's relationship with gameswf.
Have you essentially branched completely?
Yes, many years ago. Just as a note, Gnash already has mobile device
support...
Is there anyplace (other than source :) ) where i can
On 09/29/11 03:55, Sandro Santilli wrote:
In moving forward toward a release, do we all agree about calling
feature freeze now ? I'd like to get an agreement on this and an
official statement afterwards.
Considering the Ubuntu Final freeze starts today, I don't really think
there is time to
On 09/29/11 08:38, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Just releasing the improvements produced so far would be good. For
example, there's support for the new ffmpeg (which lacks an entry in
the NEWS file, btw). But the NEWS file itself contains many
improvements since last release:
Right, the purpose
On 09/29/11 09:13, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Rob: no new features includes no refactoring for double buffering
but rather re-abilitation of the old code for FB/AGG ?
I'd consider that more of a bug fix than a new feature... We could
just fix the old double buffering code to work, ignoring
After much screwing around, almost bricking my XO 1.75 beta unit several
times, I managed to get build Gnash rpms for anyone that wants a recent
version. These are snapshots built from master like the rest of our
repository. Note that these will only work on the ARM based units, I'll
see about
On 10/18/11 11:29, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Rob, I'll take the chance to ask: will you also find the time to fix
the regression in framebuffer gui performance [1] ?
I was actually working on it some this week, but it's going to take
more work. The old implementation was hardcoded into the
On 10/29/11 00:24, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Given OpenMediaNow can't act anymore as a sponsor I think it would
be helpful to have access to the FSF donations.
Correct, Open Media Now is 100% shut down. As a note, the IRS is
declining all non-profits that want to do free software projects. They
Adobe gives up on mobile flash for HTML 5, so I guess now Gnash is the
only option for mobile flash. It sounds like they basically couldn't get
it stable and fix all the performance problems.
http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/09/tech/mobile/adobe-mobile-flash-wired/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
- rob -
On 11/20/11 16:56, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
22:19 gg0 what's the difference between /tmp/gnash-cookies* and stuff
under ~/.gnash/SharedObjects?
22:20 strk SharedObjects are flash-specific cookies while
/tmp/gnash-cookies* are common HTTP ones
Correct. The /tmp/gnash-cookies* are standard
On 11/24/11 03:59, Kevin Ahn wrote:
By the way, I've found the newest version 0.8.9 but it has some bugs so I'm
waiting new release.
Can I ask when will it be released?
Yesterday I built new debs for a variety of Ubuntu and Debian
releases, you can install those snapshots from master using
On 11/29/11 11:57, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
Well, while it would be nice to use lightspark as a library, given
that this won't happen, the question to ask is: how much effort would
it be to *fork* the lightspark code, to use as a base for AVM2
support in Gnash?
I'm not sure
On 12/29/11 11:16, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I'd just check if there's any known regression pending.
Last time I checked, I wasn't the only person interested in having a
release go out... But I'll take this response as you don't have anything
major I need to wait for that should go in this
On 12/29/11 10:42, Chris Leonard wrote:
I would like to make sure that any work done on the PO files hosted on
the Sugar Labs Pootle instance are incorporated into the upcoming
release. It is in the nature of using Pootle that strings are entered
or modified without necessarily submitting a
On 12/31/11 02:42, Sandro Santilli wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 09:24:34AM +0100, Benjamin Wolsey wrote:
It would help if log_debug messages weren't marked as translatable,
since they are of interest only to developers and it's not helpful if we
get debugging reports in Spanish or Japanese
On 01/13/12 00:16, Joshua Beck wrote:
I'm interested in doing the make FLVParser a push parser and remove
internal threading project, assuming it hasn't been done. What does
that mean anyways? I assume it means that FLVParser fires off events to
the main thread as it parses the FLV.
This
On 01/17/12 14:35, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Is it just me or fb-gnash doesn't work at all in current master ?
I see zero sign of it running, no matter how many -v I pass.
GDB always stops at nanosleep.
As of last week, the fb-gnash was working fine for me on Ubuntu 11.04.
I guess the other
I've been working on getting Gnash ready to be released, mostly fixing
packaging issues from adding the Framebuffer and dump GUIs as separate
deb rpm packages. Since master is stable (nobody else appears to be
working on anything), my plan is to make the release branch the same as
master except
On 01/20/12 13:51, Christopher Brunning wrote:
Quoting Rob Savoye r...@welcomehome.org from Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:12:33
-0700:
I updated rpms and debs with a snapshot from master (as of yesterday)
in our repository at http://www.getgnash.org/packages/. It would be
helpful if a few people
I think the release is about ready to go out, but before I commit to
that, I figured I'd see if anyone had bothered to do any testing of
either master or the release branch.
- rob -
___
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
On 03/11/12 05:24, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
regarding AVM2 pledge [0] created by Petter, given AVM2 task won't be
accomplished, how about poking all 15 donors and proposing an
alternative? Or giving their money back?
There may be a way to have PayPal return donations, but I have no clue
On 06/04/12 14:54, chris janusz wrote:
Unfortunately, I am cross-compiling for mips platform. I've done some
manual tweaks, after configuration, to make the compilation going.
And now, it finally got compiled. My gui is Qt, it crashed right after
I typed in qt4-gnash -h, a little gdb
On 06/14/12 05:23, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
It won't. Gnash project abandoned AVM2 implementation time ago.
...
Lightspark is younger but actively developed, whereas Gnash is in
maintenance mode, no new features except IPv6 support introduced few
weeks ago and OpenGLES2 renderer implementation
I just updated my full C++ toolchain for Android, and also have an
improved sysroot. This one mostly compiles Gnash other than one file.
(the next thing to fix). Most all the changes have been to the sysroot,
and not Gnash.
I updated the wiki, so http://wiki.gnashdev.org/Building_for_Android,
On 01/25/13 08:48, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Is it just me having problems with loading the fileio extension
at make check time ? The messages printed when manually running
the test:
Extensions aren't built by default, so configure with:
--enable-extensions=fileio.
- rob -
On 01/25/13 08:56, Sandro Santilli wrote:
The fileio.so file exists, exactly where lt_dlopenext looks.
As a test, does the fileio extension load if you do a make install
first ?
- rob -
___
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
On 01/25/13 09:07, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Nope. And ldd path/to/fileio.so gives me no not found records either.
You can file a bug report on it, but I'll look into this problem anyway.
- rob -
___
Gnash-dev mailing list
Gnash-dev@gnu.org
On 01/31/13 03:22, Sandro Santilli wrote:
After a pull I'm getting this error at configure time:
ERROR: No Boost chrono package installed
Install it from http://www.boost.org
or .deb users: apt-get install libboost-chrono-dev
It wasn't needed
On 02/13/13 13:11, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Many to configure, none to make:
Huh ?
configure --enable-maintainer-mode --prefix=/extra/gnash-dev
--disable-jemalloc --enable-fps-debug --disable-visibility
--with-swfdec-testsuite=/usr/src/swfdec/swfdec/test
On 02/22/13 14:37, George Thomas wrote:
In any case note that RTMP support is NOT implemented in Gnash.
It's not minor work, but you're welcome if you want to give it a try.
Well, RTMP support is sort of implemented in Gnash, not just once, but
twice. Unfortunately those implementations are
On 02/27/13 09:15, George Thomas wrote:
Will have a look at understanding the existing support and will try to get
the code organised so that everything works.
You can bounce RTMP questions off me, I did the reverse engineering of
this protocol, and wrote our first implementation, which is
On 03/01/13 11:40, Sandro Santilli wrote:
I'm gettin a lot of failures in NetStream with current
master branch. Am I the only one ?
I tested the original patch pretty heavily, I don't see any new
failures. I'm currently doing some test framework hacking in a branch,
I'll compare it to master,
On 03/08/13 17:28, Markus Gothe wrote:
When should we schedule the next release Rob, it is almost 3.5 years
since 0.8.9 went live. :-/
Well, 0.8.10 went out only a year ago, so you missed a release. :-)
Anyway, I have been planning for a new release, that's mostly been
waiting for me to
On 04/23/13 20:27, 张军 wrote:
hi all: i am trying to porting gnash into Android for flash play, but
blocked on gnash self configuration when build libbase/rc.cpp
because of undefined DEFAULT_FLASH_PLATFORM_ID; i used android NDK as
compile environment(cross compiler and related libs), copyed
On 04/24/13 19:56, 张军 wrote:
thank much for your reply. can you share your local branches? or how
long can we get the merge dev branches? i just want to verify the
performance using gnash play flash in normal android device(1G
cpu,normal gpu,512RAM), maybe i need optimize the parser or render
On 04/23/13 03:16, Siebren wrote:
I'm using the current git HEAD (almost: 265125f4) of Gnash on an ARM omap3
device, directly on the framebuffer with TSLIB touchscreen support and I
don't get it to work properly.
The touchscreen is working correct (tested with ts_test).
While the
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:55:58PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
I tried to file a bug at the Savannah bug tracker and got:
Maybe savannah is having problems... I just tried, and it seems like it
would let me submit a bug report. What distribution are you on these days ?
Did you install the
For folks in the Boston area, this weekend is the 30th birthday of the
GNU project! https://www.gnu.org/gnu30/celebration. As part of this
celebration, most of the weekend is a hackathon, and Gnash is one of the
GNU projects we'll be working on. My plan is to use this weekend to get
started on
On 10/02/2013 06:49 PM, scott092...@aol.com wrote:
[I asked this question at Mozilla's site, but the only response so far is to
get the latest Flash version - which is not exactly what anyone here wants to
hear...]
I have Lubuntu 12.04 and Gnash. Up until yesterday (when Upgrade Manager
On 01/30/2015 05:05 PM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Rob, any news about the servers ?
Is there anything I can do to help ?
I can host some of the services if needed.
It's a hardware problem in the server. I've been slammed by software
release week, so haven't had the time to tear it apart.
gnash-dev@gnu.org
Cc: Rob Savoye <r...@welcomehome.org>
Subject: gnashdev down
All gnashdev.org sites are unreachable for me at the moment,
can anyone else access them from other routes ?
I'm coming from:
3 border-gw2.cwnet.it (80.249.32.33) 28.761 ms 29.630 ms 30.911 ms
4 gin-c
On 01/29/2016 12:37 AM, Sandro Santilli wrote:
> Website is still down, shall content be moved elsewhere ?
The server is having hardware problems, and I've been out of town
since before the holiday, and won't be back physically till mid March.
I'll see if I can have somebody kick it back
701 - 799 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
