On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Karl J. Runge wrote:
I'm primarily interested in:
- any upgrading issues/gotchas?
- for you did it break any (non-Redhat-supplied) apps, scripts, etc.
I ran the upgrade on my RH 6.2 installation and it broke my modules and my
X installation. Rather than
I've had a couple folks want to know where I got the RA version of the
NPR interview with Linus. Here's the link:
http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/fa/20010604.fa.01.ram
--
There's so much comedy on television. Does that cause comedy in
the streets? - Dick Cavett, mocking the TV-violence debate
I'm just learning XML myself, so my details are slim right now, but w/ XSL
style sheets you could have a style defined for normal web-browsing, one for
printing, and even one for cell-phone browsers. Depending on which style you
use to display your XML document it will look exactly as you wish.
OK, for those who say you can't make money on Open Source (who were wrong
anyway since Cygnus Solutions was profitable), Red Hat has joined the
profitability group:
http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-06-19-016-20-PS
jeff
Very true. I myself have never had a case where what I want to display is
EXACTLY the ONLY way I want to display it. I understand the tremendous
advantage the PDF[1] format provides when someone already has printed work
they want to distribute (it's great for game companies that resell old
If anyone on this list attended this meeting please contact me privately.
THANKS!
--Bruce McCulley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People,
This is not a public hearing. It could be a chance to pitch Linux to the
people who are appointing additional members to the state IT advisory board.
Bob
http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2774242,00.html
Of note:
at nearly 13,000 transactions/sec, the Tux 2.0 kernel-based web server,
coupled with the 2.4.5 kernel was 3 times faster than Apache, and more than
twice as fast as IIS 5.0
The 2.0 release is still missing SSL sockets
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I myself have never had a case where what I want to display is
EXACTLY the ONLY way I want to display it.
Me neither. Read on...
Personally, though, I absolutely hate going to a website to find that it
works great when I look at it from work
- Original Message -
From: Tilly, Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 8:44 AM
Subject: RE: Open Formats (was ZD on Linux)
I'm just learning XML myself, so my details are slim right now, but w/ XSL
style sheets
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rich C wrote:
3. Providing content that is guaranteed virus-free (as opposed to
transmitting word processor documents.)
The security analyst in me feels a need to point out that it would be quite
possible for Adobe Acrobat Reader to have a buffer-overflow or similar bug
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Open Formats (was ZD on Linux)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rich C wrote:
3. Providing content that is guaranteed virus-free
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rich C wrote:
Following that logic, such an exploit could be accomplished with a JPG
viewer or, for that matter, Paint.
Very true. Such things *have* happened. In fact, many popular mail
programs (including Microsoft Outlook, Netscape Messenger, and Pine) have had
From: Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open Formats (was ZD on Linux)
Following that logic, such an exploit could be accomplished with a JPG
viewer or, for that matter, Paint.
Yep. And there probrably are. The thing with an image viewer or the
such is the formats are fairly locked
- Original Message -
From: Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Open Formats (was ZD on Linux)
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group [EMAIL
Well, We, Charlie and I, just took of Caldera 2.4 and replaced it
with Mandrake 7.2 on my home machine. What a classy install and
distribution. We have also installed the Win4Lin 2.0 eval with Win 98
and MS Office to see what would happen. A couple of problems, but
Charlie IS THE MAN!!
If
Karl J. Runge wrote:
Anybody using Redhat 7.1? I believe we all decided to skip 7.0 and let
it soak until the next release. Is RH 7.1 working better now?
I'm primarily interested in:
- any upgrading issues/gotchas?
It would not install on my Toshiba laptop (whereas 7.0 was
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rich C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: Open Formats (was ZD on Linux)
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Rich C wrote:
Well if you're surfing the 'net as root in Linux (or any 'NIX,) you
deserve
Kenneth E. Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Personally, I never understood PDF. What is so wrong with HTML and
embeded images? I have yet to see any real need for PDF's. There is no
real benefit to it.
PDF essentially grew from Postscript. In the Olde Days, every printer had
its own
18 matches
Mail list logo
