Karl Runge writes:
It is possible you have an oddly named file ^Subject: (ADV:)
that contains those missing ~ 100 emails of yours.
You're right!
$ ls -l *Sub*
-rw---1 jrv jrv 2555170 May 13 19:26 ^Subject:
Thank you very much!
- Jim Van Zandt
Thanks for all the replies.
need a * here, don't you?
^Subject: (ADV:)
Right! Ben Boulanger and Karl Runge spotted this one.
I rewrote it this way:
:0 H # recognize junk mail by subject
* ^Subject: (ADV:)
Mail/junk-subject
With this change, the rules seem to be
Rich Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you may want to have a look at razor
(http://razor.sourceforge.net/). It's a distributed SPAM checking
system.
I noticed this a while back, and it looks very interesting. However
just the other day I read a comment at Slashdot that someone has been
(http://razor.sourceforge.net/). It's a distributed SPAM checking
system.
I noticed this a while back, and it looks very interesting. However
just the other day I read a comment at Slashdot that someone has been
poisoning the razor database, so that it labeled some legitimate
mailing
I've been running a simple procmail filter to get rid of spam from
some specific sites. The sample below only includes a few of the
addresses, but even with the whole list it's no longer very effective.
Last weekend I decided to tune it up to filter out more of the spam.
I added the last three
I have no idea what's wrong with this...however you may want to have a
look at razor (http://razor.sourceforge.net/). It's a distributed SPAM
checking system. Basically you don't have to worry about keeping a list
of the senders etcyou just use procmail to pass all your mail through
On Thu, 16 May 2002, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
If someone has a non-risky way to test procmail rules, I'd appreciate
hearing about it.
Don't send to /dev/null at first, send to something you can get to with
your mail reader - ~/mail/filtered or something usually works for me.
:0 H
I heartily recommend spamassassin. It used a variety of weightings to
see if the mail you have is spam. For example, if the mail is listed
in Razor, it's worth 2 points, and if it came from a site listed in one
of the RBLs, it's worth a few points, and so on. You can configure the
weighting as
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 12:51, Mark Komarinski wrote:
I heartily recommend spamassassin. It used a variety of weightings to
see if the mail you have is spam. For example, if the mail is listed
in Razor, it's worth 2 points, and if it came from a site listed in one
of the RBLs, it's worth a
