In a message dated: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:26:59 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Seeing how they are both made from the same commodity i386 parts (and same
basic software), I don't know that means much. Cobalt's original product
line (the Qube) was a LAN server appliance (NFS/CIFS/etc). As I
Thought it was BSD, not Linux, myself.
Regardless, we've been running one for close to 4 years and sharing
Windows and Mac systems. Several of the Macs are connected via NFS
connections and they have been fine.
Ray
At 2:29 PM -0400 7/22/02, Hewitt Tech wrote:
Has anyone used any of the
Quoting Hewitt Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has anyone used any of the Quantum Snap Server products to add NAS
storage
for small office use?
Yeppers. I have a 4000.
I remember them using Linux as the hidden OS.
Nope.. Currently, BSD. In April they purchased a company that would lead
to
In a message dated: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:30:18 CDT
Thomas Charron said:
The *ONLY* concern I've had with it is ease of subverting security.
Primarily, reseting the admin password is as easy as pushing a little button
with a pencil top, and pushing it again twice, then holding it down. This
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Thomas Charron wrote:
The *ONLY* concern I've had with it is ease of subverting security.
Primarily, reseting the admin password is as easy as pushing a little button
with a pencil top, and pushing it again twice, then holding it down. This
resets the admin password..
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 12:40pm, Ken Ambrose wrote:
Ken's (security) rule-of-thumb: if you don't have physical security,
you don't have security. Period. Looked at a different way, I -like-
being able to reset passwords easily through a button ...
Yeah, what he said. :)
Even if said
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 2:29pm, Hewitt Tech wrote:
Has anyone used any of the Quantum Snap Server products to add NAS storage
for small office use?
The only caveats I hear of regularly are performance, management, and
backup. Performance is pretty poor, especially for any kind of I/O
Hewitt Tech [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone used any of the Quantum Snap Server products to add NAS storage
for small office use? I remember them using Linux as the hidden OS. I was
thinking of recommending one of these for use in a small office. So far the
I have an older model at home
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The *ONLY* concern I've had with it is ease of subverting security.
Primarily, reseting the admin password is as easy as pushing a little
button
with a pencil top, and pushing it again twice, then holding it down.
This
resets the admin password.. No way to
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 12:40pm, Ken Ambrose wrote:
Ken's (security) rule-of-thumb: if you don't have physical security,
you don't have security. Period. Looked at a different way, I
-like-
being able to reset passwords easily through a button ...
Even if
In a message dated: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:21 CDT
Thomas Charron said:
As a second note I forgot about, it also has a built in FTP and web server,
as well as the ability to run Java servlets. Definatly a nice little box..
Ahm, okay, so how is this different than a Cobalt then?
A Cobalt
, July 22, 2002 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Quantum Snap Server - Opinions?
In a message dated: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:55:21 CDT
Thomas Charron said:
As a second note I forgot about, it also has a built in FTP and web
server,
as well as the ability to run Java servlets. Definatly a nice little
box
In a message dated: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 16:49:44 EDT
Hewitt Tech said:
I'll look at the Cobalt systems though. I also saw positive comments on the
MaxAttach systems put out by Maxtor.
Cobalt is now owned by Sun. Also, keep in mind, they're meant as a
web appliance, not necessarilly an NFS/CIFS
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, at 4:07pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a second note I forgot about, it also has a built in FTP and web server,
as well as the ability to run Java servlets. Definatly a nice little
box..
Ahm, okay, so how is this different than a Cobalt then?
One is made by Sun,
14 matches
Mail list logo
