I am storing a big list of order information in datastore. I have an
order entity which has certain properties related to the order. I have
a property called IsProcessed on the order entity. Once I process the
order, I make it as true. I do not have entity groups, transactions
etc., (not necessary
Hi, I have a parent ListContainer entity with key and name properties.
and I have a child ListItem entity with key, name and parentkey
properties. The parentkey simply refers to the key in ListContainer. I
am building a site where I list the names in listcontainer, and when
the user chooses a
, just add that to your query,
where listItem parentKey = listcontainerkey and isProcess=true or
whatnot. much easier.
On Apr 26, 9:47 pm, Pk prakash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a parent ListContainer entity with key and name properties.
and I have a child ListItem entity with key, name
Btw, I am not going to get all the isprocessed=true records at once.
I'll get only the top 100 at any given time.
On Apr 28, 7:05 am, Pk prakash...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you so much Tristan. I have another question on top of #3.
I can query on listitem parentkey = listcontainerkey
it is the first 100 records order by date descending.
On Apr 30, 10:28 am, Tristan tristan.slomin...@gmail.com wrote:
what does it mean I'll get only the top 100 at any given time. ? How
do you determine top ?
On Apr 27, 9:19 pm, Pk prakash...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, I am not going to get
just have to be wary of
transactional issues - I'd suggest using Task Queues for eventual
consistency.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Pk prakash...@gmail.com wrote:
I am storing a big list of order information in datastore. I have an
order entity which has certain properties related
The datastore statistics is a great concept. However, I consistently
see that the majority of my space goes to metadata. From other
postings I see that I am not the only one. Here is an example from my
application that contains roughly 15,000 entities:
Breakdown by Property Type Property Type
Nick,
thanks for the reply. Do you have any other recommendation on how to
accomplish what we are trying to do without using any GAE unpublished
interfaces?
Thanks,
PK
On Mar 9, 2:40 am, Nickolas Daskalou n...@daskalou.com wrote:
Yeah, I've seen posts from 2008 that were using PropertiedClass
all these multivalue properties in this entity
in my app... On the upside, storage is inexpesive, on the downside any
time I need to walk the whole table to make a change (e.g. data model
change) it is very expensive with regards to CPU time.
PK
On Mar 5, 9:05 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl
Just writing to report that I have not tried any of the new features
but at a minimum my regression tests passed. Thanks and keep up the
good work!!
PK
www.gae123.com
On Mar 16, 8:31 pm, Jason (Google) apija...@google.com wrote:
Hi Everyone. Just a quick note that we just uploaded pre-release
Unfortunately not. This is the issue to star:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=193
PK
www.gae123.com
On Mar 29, 9:09 am, Ilya Biryukov mobiled...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys.
Can I specify where to deploy my app geographically? Say I want my
data to stay in Europe only
/3265,3124,3689 for sqlite). I look forward to
seeing these fixes in the near future along with the Next Gen
queries...
PK
http://www.gae123.com
On Mar 21, 11:27 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Hey guys,
We're pretty close to releasing SDK 1.4.3. You can download
$10.00
because of overhead reasons...
I suggest GAE charges as often as once a day when the balance exceeds
$100.00 but once a month if the amount is below that, or something
along these lines so we only get many accounting entries if the amount
justifies the overhead.
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You
This is something I could put to use too. Thanks!!!
PK
www.gae123.com
On Apr 1, 7:56 am, Arcanum ark...@gmail.com wrote:
Great job!
I really need a simple but nice and effective message board for GAE.
I really like not only Google's authorisation methods.
BTW are you speak russian like me
with a new default interpreter. This is what
I do both for my Ubuntu and Mac development environment. I summarized
the steps for Ubuntu here:
http://www.gae123.com/articles/dpwf/apb.html
PK
www.gae123.com
On Apr 5, 5:48 pm, Ben Welsh ben.we...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to take this opportunity
, in __AddTasks
raise self.__TranslateError(e.application_error, e.error_detail)
TransientError
Is it worth changing the code to retry such issues? I ll attempt it
anyway.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
in the FAQ.
Thanks,
PK
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/d74be76b02238e9;
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
doing wrong in my app.
Thanks,
PK
DEBUG2011-06-03 01:35:51,954 dev_appserver.py:561] Matched /_ah/
channel/dev?command=pollchannel=.client=1 to
google.appengine.tools.dev_appserver_channel.ChannelDispatcher object
at 0x11d7dae10 with path
DEBUG2011-06-03 01:35:51,954
configurable.
CPU usage at 50%-80% on my high end Macbook Pro because I use channels
is not an acceptable development environment. Again if you observe
different results in your lab and is my fault please let me know.
Thanks again for your attention,
PK
--
You received this message because you
Once more, thanks Robert for pointing this out.
I patched the value to 5000 from the original value of 500 and things
are much better...
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
It turns out that I spoke too soon about this. Probably I just did not
properly refresh the browser when I said that changing the value from
500 to 5000 works; channel notifications do not work after such a
change so this is not a workaround.
PK
--
You received this message because you
Issue 4946 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4946
seems to be the same or closely related with what I reported here so
please star it if you want to see a resolution.
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
-channel.html
I would love to further investigate this but I do not have the time. I
am still looking for reasons that other code in my application causes
this behavior and I would like to hear other experiences on this
matter.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
to modify only
one file) and robust way.
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
feature).
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/8O2gklqWq0EJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
A lot of great long expected features. Thanks!!
I just started to experiment and the dev~ prefix is breaking scripts and
processes I have been using. What motivated this change?
Thanks
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group
our automated tests with
1.5.2_prerelease
Anyway, I am optimistic, and look forward to starting simplifying some of my
indexes next. I have been waiting for more than a year for that :-)
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
There seems to be a regression there though, could somebody confirm whether
this issue I just filed is a real issue or just a misconfiguration in my
environment?
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5329
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Alfred thanks for the clarification.
However, isn't ancestor a list too that could contribute to an explosion
(albeit minor assuming shallow hierarchies). If this is the case, would
these indexes help/work?
- kind: Model
ancestor: yes
properties:
- name: int
- name: date
direction:
I filed this enhancement request earlier today, if you also see this need as
you experiment with indexes please star it:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=5346
Building indexes for large data sets is expensive so deleting and recreating
them from scratch needs to be
@yinhm have you tried to run your server with the option --default_partition=
in 1.5.2 prerelease?
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google
/Zs_2yGKSNYgJ
Hope this helps...
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/sV5XxRBclbEJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine
My calendar says that 4:00-5:00 today it was a GAE maintenance window.
Was it? I cannot find why I put that entry there so maybe I am just
wrong...
Could somebody point me to where Google posts the up to date scheduled
maintenance calendar?
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you
I noticed another great improvement: much faster app uploads. See my
comments in this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-python/browse_thread/thread/36b40184536b3e0
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
The new features sound very exciting. However, as I routinely do with
the prereleases I put it through the test suite of my python app and
this time it failed. I include the traces below, please contact me if
you need more details.
* SERVER SIDE ***
EBUG2010-11-20 23:09:57,694
Issue 4109 filed.
Since this seems to be a regression, (ie exactly the same code works
with 1.3.x) I think you should give it high pri.
Thanks for the consideration
On Nov 21, 4:21 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi PK,
Can you please file a bug with the server-side
This (issue 4109) appears fixed in the official 1.4.0 release. Thanks
for fixing it and for giving us the opportunity to find and report
such issues before the release ships. I was also pleased to verify
that a 1.3.8 regression (issue 3895 3907) is also fixed.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
On Nov 22
This is tricky stuff, take your time to get it right. However, an
update on what the progress has been and what our expectations should
be would be very welcome.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
On Jan 4, 10:41 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ikai.l+gro...@google.com
wrote:
Guess you can't win:
Announce
me(PK change) Show
activityhttps://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!activity/google-appengine/AXJvELRV1qAJ10:38
PM (24 minutes ago)
This is tricky stuff, take your time to get it right. However, an
update on what the progress has been and what our expectations should
be would be very
. All the
spurious errors have disappeared from my app, it feels much faster and
uploads are a breeze.
Keep up the good work,
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google
for accounts in migrated Google Apps Domains?
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine
this is a stale old note or it is still a case.
I would like to switch billing to my organization's account but before
I do that I want to make sure I do not break anything.
PK
On Jan 20, 4:00 pm, Erick Fleming er...@sudogs.com wrote:
PK,
I just switched my billing admin to my Google Apps account two days
. Are there any plans for
enhancing the APIs to support this? Should I open an enhancement
request or is there one already open?
Thanks,
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google
Ikai:
Thanks!!! Prerelease 1.4.2 did pass our python test suite.
I look forward to seeing support for more mail API common file
types...
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
This started at 2011-02-15 18:16:42.285 PST Anybody else experiencing
a similar issue right now? Just filed case #4584 Dashboard shows
that everything is fine with the datastore
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
The problem is now gone. My monitoring logs show that the outage took
place for about 15 minutes from 2011-02-15 18:16:42 to 2011-02-15
18:31:09. In general, I have been having a very good experience with
GAE and this was an unpleasant surprise.
--
You received this message because you are
will not stay around for 15 minutes? And if in the
same 15 minute window an instance needs to get started several times, will
we be charged several times in the same 15 minute window?
I would appreciate the clarification from the Google team.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message
on ubuntu
10.04.3.
Anybody who noticed similar behavior? Any explanation from the SDK team, do
you have any internal benchmarks that you use before each release?
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion
I described here how I solved this problem. It works fine for me in
production, ubuntu and macos:
http://www.gae123.com/articles/dpwf/djgae1x.html
Good luck,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion
I just got a 404 trying to download, other content like the 1.5.4 SDK
downloaded fine. The page is here: Is it only me or there is a real issue
with the link?
http://code.google.com/appengine/downloads.html#Download_the_Google_App_Engine_Documentation
Thanks,
PK
--
You received
there is enough time to get in, do a
20 second urlfetch and return in worst case.
Thanks,
PK
PS Yes I have thought of doing the urlfetch from a task but the code gets
pretty complicated pretty fast.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group
do it or something. Then I spent a night working around the issue. I am
wondering: Couldn't somebody from Google reply to this thread and mention
that this will be coming in the next release???
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
it means that they have been
thinking about it for some time.
Java already has multithreading and when MT comes to python the instance time
issue you are raising will be no issue. While the thread sleeps waiting for the
urlfetch to complete other threads will make use of the instance.
PK
PS
Hi Ikai,
it passed our test harness, no obvious regressions with the SDK.
Thanks,
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine
need to ask them to add this
domain to their antispam filters.
Is this something that could be fixed? Should I open a case?
Thanks,
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Could somebody from Google be kind enough to reply to this?
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/vjUy8UBESS8J.
To post to this
until suddenly it
stopped working today.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/kfTpUUzGeHwJ.
To post to this group, send email
Please, let's not mix apples and oranges
Regarding the post that started this thread, it took about three hours and
then the e-mails were delivered. Usually---for about a year now-- it has
been taking seconds!!
Anyway, everything seems fine right now again for me, and e-mails take
seconds
This remains an annoying issue for my users. I filed issue
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6243 to track it.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
really unbearable.
Thanks for reading through,
PK
http://www.gae123.com
PS My experience is with the Python SDK only, I cannot talk about the Java
or GO
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
*Rekby*: Using --sql_lite does not work for me because to this day there is
no parity between the --sql_lite version and the production datastore.
Others and I have filed issues about it. Others have reported that sqllite
helps with large datasets. It used to be that the SDK datastore would get
Today I run the test again on a high end MacBook Pro 10.7.2. Python is
2.5.5. Exactly the same code base, I just change the SDK and run the test
again to get the numbers!!!
Here are the results, it seems to be getting worse:
SDK:*1.5.2 1.5.51.6.0*
to a number of options
to work with Google to get to the bottom of this:
1. come in the Mt. View campus with the code
2. show you through a gotomeeting/webex session
3. run the tests with instrumentation code you provide and send you the
results
Let me know
Thanks,
PK
--
You received
But, what is even more annoying and new with 1.6.0 is that very often the
datastore decides to go out for lunch in the middle of executing a query.
Look for example at this one: about a minute to run a really simple query
that returns one entity, in a datastore that I just created and maybe it
I see the following on the dev server:
BadRequestError: can't operate on multiple entity groups in a single
transaction
I think that it happens because although all my entity activity is in the
same TG, I also use blobs that behind the scenes access the datastore at
the non ancestor TG. This
R.S. in another
threadhttps://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-appengine/CBIsXJQn-f0/discussionwas
kind enough to point me to the issue and workaround reported in issue
6005 http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6005. I
rerun the test using the workaround. It indeed is
Robert:
1. The static content issue I know about is an issue on all platforms and
has primarily to do with the single threaded nature of the dev server. See
here about what I mean: http://www.gae123.com/articles/gaet/fir-tim-exp.html
2. Issue 6005 is definitely part of the what I see, I
Hi Robert,
I Updated issue 6355 with appstats data, let me know if this is what you
want to see.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google
.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/uvLDuYTD_TYJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com
To close this thread, It turns out that XG transactions are not turned on
automatically; it is controlled per transaction and an API has to be called
first to do this. This is explained in the documentation but I had missed
it, sorry... After I turned the XG on, things work as expected on the
they
leave the Google infrastructure would be welcome for the rare cases when
the customer calls and says: my e-mails were not received.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
, given how unreliable
e-mail is to start with, I am surprised how good my experience has been.
Best,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine
Have you guys looked at this
postinghttp://www.gae123.com/articles/dpwf/djgae1x.html,
the solution described has worked very well for me on both Ubuntu and MacOS.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group
I want to close the loop on this thread with some positive notes. For the
past few days, I have been working with a super fast dev environment thanks
to the workarounds I describe below, follow the links for the kudos. In
addition, to how the server feels during the development cycle, the
back to where this thread started I would like to hear
that you will also/first add some benchmarks in your internal SDK testing
process so that huge performance regressions like the ones described here will
be less likely to happen again.
Thanks for your attention,
PK
On Nov 30, 2011, at 11:20
You might want to check out the workarounds suggested
herehttps://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-appengine/CBIsXJQn-f0/discussionand
star some of the issues mentioned.
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
,
plenty of time to port the code to Azure”
This was exactly what it was not invented to be :-) Even when the notice is
three years...
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
.
BTW, this is a recent annoyance that started after switching to the new
improved Groups layout.
Thanks,
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https
Wow!! I just benchmarked the same test case with 1.6.1 prerelease without
any workarounds and am happy to report that that performance issues have
been addressed:
real *0m35.221s*
user 0m16.330s
sys 0m2.460s
Thanks for taking care of the issues!!!
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received
seriously and addressing them in the next
immediate opportunity.
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/j0JPmIXcI3cJ
Very happy to report that 1.6.1 prerelease has addressed the performance
regressions reported here. Many thanks to everybody who starred the issues
and to Robert and the rest of the Google team who followed up.
PK
http://www.gae123.com
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
and brought 1.6.1 that has made development fun again!! Thanks for fixing
the performance problems that had impacted our productivity for a few
months and for all the great improvements 2011 brought to the app engine.
Please keep it up in 2012.
Happy Holidays!!
PK
http://www.gae123.com
PS I
Sagi,
read here how I have solved this problem:
http://www.gae123.com/articles/dpwf/djgae1x.html
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine
I was getting the same error with mail quota although I am below budget.
That was a very serious issue, I think is fixed now. I filed issue 6899
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
I am glad it is not only my app because I had started wondering if I am
doing something wrong
This is very serious!!! In the three years I have been using App Engine the
severity of this seconds only a stuck indexes issue I faced a couple of
years ago. I have 10s of users calling asking
Just cleared for me too, but the huge numbers are still there. I am sending
some of the notification e-mails from tasks too so the issue I see might be
related to your observation.
The problem has come and gone a few times this week so I will wait a bit
before I declare victory.
PK
Just as a positive data point it passed our python 2.5 app's regression
test suite with usual performance characteristics.
I was hoping for some update on the status of python 2.7 (especially the
SDK support) and SSL custom domain. Hopefully, next time...
PK
www.gae123.com
--
You received
to seeing further latency improvements from
the Google Team.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine
We filed issue 7155 two hours ago could somebody follow up?
Error 503: --- begin server output ---
Try Again (503)
An unexpected failure has occurred. Please try again.
--- end server output ---
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google
to fix them, at least please let us know that mail is
just a toy/prototype/experiment and not a professional platform so we can
move elsewhere.
Thanks,
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web
Thanks for quickly taking care of this
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:22:11 PM UTC-7, Anand Mistry wrote:
Thanks. I'm following up.
On Friday, 16 March 2012 11:51:56 UTC+11, PK wrote:
We filed issue 7155 two hours ago could somebody follow up?
Error 503: --- begin server output ---
Try
the work around is. It
is really not clear to me and many others. If you do not have the time, I
fully understand and it is OK to stay silent, you do not have to reply to
every message.
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group
Professor at Stanford. I
cannot control what e-mail clients my users use and I should not
Thanks for reading,
PK
On Friday, March 16, 2012 3:12:35 AM UTC-7, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Friday, March 16, 2012 11:14:30 AM UTC+3, PK wrote:
Issue 2383http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues
a customer because of it.
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/ngCn-w4_AaUJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine
+1 I never got an answer on this one and would like to know too.
Please star http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6243
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https
coming
roadmap items like SSL for custom
domains released.
PK
On Monday, March 19, 2012 5:10:45 PM UTC-7, Marce (Google) wrote:
Hi,
The 1.6.4 prerelease SDKs are now available to download for Python and
Java here: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/list
Please see release
+1 Just filed a production issue. I am on the python27 runtime. System
status shows everything green
BTW, there is nothing worse than trying to upload a fix and not being able
to do it because of such issues.
PK
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
40 minutes have gone by, the problem persists, no acknowledgment from
Google here or in the production issue I opened
The production issue I opened is 7267 if anybody wants to star it.
Is this problem isolated on our end of the infrastructure, has anybody able
to upload the past 40
I was just able to successfully upload...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/lK2Yhvfcxh0J.
To post to this group, send email to
,
PK
On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:09:59 AM UTC-7, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote:
Hey everyone,
The App Engine 1.6.5 prerelease SDKs are now available. You can get them
here:
Python:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/downloads/detail?name=google_appengine_1.6.5_prerelease.zip
Java
1 - 100 of 385 matches
Mail list logo
