Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com writes:
A change to a gene does not make you to have a extra bone. It can
make you to have your hand slighltly longer. or shorter.
Actually I suspect it does - or at least can do. It's just a rather
rare event.
Bodily development is regulated by a
On 08/12/10 20:25, Luke Palmer wrote:
I could upload a new version of mtl if I wanted. Plenty of people
would install it.
Correct me if i'm wrong; You would appear in the UploadedBy, and then
you might be challenged by the traditional uploaders or attentive users
(most users wouldn't know
Mitar mmi...@gmail.com writes:
Neither Haskell nor any conventional language has [evolved to evolve]
True.
Well - thinking about it, there's no fundamental difference between
genetic algorithms - where you have a genome in the form of a set of
parameters and genetic programming - where the
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 19:11, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for rendering
multipart emails. This new release introduces:
Very nice! Are you
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 19:11, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for
Tony Morris tonymor...@gmail.com writes:
I teach haskell quite a lot. I recommend using .ghci files in projects.
Today I received complaints about the fact that ghci will reject .ghci
if it is group-writeable.
Huh? That's pretty weird.
I am wondering if these complaints have legitimate
On 08/12/10 10:41, Ketil Malde wrote:
Yes. And you should start with assessing how much cost and
inconvenience you are willing to suffer for the improvement in
security you gain. In this case, my assertion is that the marginal
worsening of security by having a mirror of hackage even without
Am 09.12.2010 08:01, schrieb Tony Morris:
I teach haskell quite a lot. I recommend using .ghci files in projects.
Today I received complaints about the fact that ghci will reject .ghci
if it is group-writeable. I didn't offer an opinion on the matter. I am
wondering if these complaints have
On 09/12/10 07:01, Tony Morris wrote:
I teach haskell quite a lot. I recommend using .ghci files in projects.
Today I received complaints about the fact that ghci will reject .ghci
if it is group-writeable. I didn't offer an opinion on the matter. I am
wondering if these complaints have
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:10:59 +, Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:11 +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
package. mime-mail is a package providing support for rendering
My take on the issue is that we should make it possible to easily mirror
hackage (what the OP asked for), so that people could use it when they
wanted to, and have a list of the mirrors on the wiki. This way those who
are interested can use them. Like when the mirror is faster/closer to them
or to
On 9 December 2010 20:55, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
You might have misunderstood what I was talking about. I'm proposing signing
on the hackage server on reception of the package,
where it can be verified by cabal that the package hasn't been signed
properly.
By cabal, are you
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 10:45:39PM +1100, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
On 9 December 2010 20:55, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
You might have misunderstood what I was talking about. I'm proposing signing
on the hackage server on reception of the package,
where it can be verified
Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org writes:
You might have misunderstood what I was talking about. I'm proposing
signing on the hackage server on reception of the package,
Okay, fair enough. You can't *enforce* this, of course, since I might
work without general internet access but a local mirror,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org writes:
You might have misunderstood what I was talking about. I'm proposing
signing on the hackage server on reception of the package,
Okay, fair enough. You can't *enforce* this, of course,
On 9 December 2010 23:04, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
[snip]
This way, somebody is likely to actually *notice* when some evil person
uploads a trojan mtl or bytestring or whatever. The downside is more
mail, and the people who run Hackage have been wary about this. So
perhaps even
=
Call for Papers
ICFP 2011: International Conference on Functional Programming
Tokyo, Japan, Monday 19 -- Wednesday 21 September 2011
http://www.icfpconference.org/icfp2011
Hi Ketil,
2010/12/9 Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org
Mitar mmi...@gmail.com writes:
Neither Haskell nor any conventional language has [evolved to evolve]
True.
Well - thinking about it, there's no fundamental difference between
genetic algorithms - where you have a genome in the form of a
On 08/12/2010 16:34, Andrew Coppin wrote:
On 08/12/2010 03:29 PM, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote:
Then build your CGIs restricted. Restricting the runtime by default,
*especially* when setting runtime options at compile time is so much of a
pain, is just going to cause problems. I'm already
On 09/12/2010 12:48 PM, Simon Marlow wrote:
On 08/12/2010 16:34, Andrew Coppin wrote:
It appears that with GHC 7, you can just say something like
|-with-rtsopts=-H128m -K1m| while compiling your program, and now that
will forever be the default RTS settings for your program.
Nice! I didn't
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
assign rates of mutation for each statement,
This could be assigned by evolution itself. If if will have high
probability of mutation then resulting programs will not survive. So
those probabilities can be assigned
In order to simulate nature, you need to have the mutation and selection
process itself be part of the programs (and not the interpreter).
How about you have a world consisiting of some memory, bombard this
world with cosmic radiation, and add some enzymatic activity in the
form of an
On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Peter Simons wrote:
you said that a dependency of one of those packages would require
process = 1.0.1.4. Now, what I don't understand is why you added
that restriction to hledger then?
Picture this common scenario, which I saw during installability
testing - you
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
assign rates of mutation for each statement,
This could be assigned by evolution itself. If if will have high
probability of mutation then resulting programs will not survive. So
those probabilities can be
Hi Ketil,
In order to simulate nature, you need to have the mutation and selection
process itself be part of the programs (and not the interpreter).
Hence the interpreter can itself be modified?
How about you have a world consisiting of some memory, bombard this
world with cosmic radiation,
You can do all sorts of fun things with computers. Assuming that you
are interested in modeling really real life, how will you estimate
parameters (e.g. mutation rates) based on real data? How will you
quantify whether this a good or a bad model? I think living in a
fact-free world is a bit
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Peter Simons wrote:
I can tell it's doing more harm than good. The situation right now is
that it's impossible to install hledger on ArchLinux -- not because
Why ?
I haven't yet heard why depending on the higher process version is a
problem.
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Simon Michael wrote:
On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Peter Simons wrote:
that it's impossible to install hledger on ArchLinux -- not because
Why ?
I haven't yet heard why depending on the higher process version is a
problem.
Oh, is it because you are avoiding use
Hi Simon,
[Are you] avoiding use of cabal-install and hackage entirely?
yes, I'm trying to provide a package for hledger 0.13 that can be
installed using ArchLinux's native package manager. The current version
is available here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20762.
How did
The good fact about evolutionary simulations is that all is theoretically
possible . The bad fact is that in practice is very hard to achieve results.
Biota.org has links to some artificial life projects.Some of them are naive,
but some others may be interesting.
http://www.biota.org/
Dear Haskellians,
Keepin' it light. For your amusement this weekend: monads in the
hoodhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYANU61J5eY
.
Best wishes,
--greg
--
L.G. Meredith
Managing Partner
Biosimilarity LLC
1219 NW 83rd St
Seattle, WA 98117
+1 206.650.3740
http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com
Perhaps ghc should also ignore all group-writable *.hs, *.lhs, *.c, *.o,
*.hi files.
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Perhaps ghc should also ignore all group-writable *.hs, *.lhs, *.c, *.o,
*.hi files.
dot-ghci files are *run* if you just start ghci (or ghc -e) in that
directory
(even if you don't intend to compile, load, or run any Haskell code).
Claus
___
On 10-12-09 01:57 PM, Claus Reinke wrote:
Perhaps ghc should also ignore all group-writable *.hs, *.lhs, *.c,
*.o, *.hi files.
dot-ghci files are *run* if you just start ghci (or ghc -e) in that
directory
(even if you don't intend to compile, load, or run any Haskell code).
Haskell
What does # mean in this code ? (from Data.List)
findIndices p ls = loop 0# ls
where
loop _ [] = []
loop n (x:xs) | p x = I# n : loop (n +# 1#) xs
| otherwise = loop (n +# 1#) xs
--
View this
Hi. I Wrote a simple iteration library. It was not intensively tested,
so it MAY contatin bugs, but it is very unlikely. The library is
currently on github: https://github.com/permeakra/iteration
I'm not ready to upload it to hackage, as some testing and extension is
really needed. However, I'd
I only have some surface level questions/comments -
What existing packages is this similar to? How is it different from
any previous work in the area?
Also, likes looks like you don't need the 'Monad m' constraint on your
various Monad and Functor instances in Data.Iteration.Types, which I
think
Original Message
Subject:Re: [Haskell-cafe] A home-brew iteration-alike library: some
extension quiestions
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:07:49 +0300
From: Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com
To: Antoine Latter aslat...@gmail.com
On 12/09/2010 10:54 PM, Antoine
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a monadic list in the
inner monad, with explicit errors.
How does this change the operation of the Iterator type?
I hope I am not
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, c8h10n4o2 asaferibei...@ymail.com wrote:
What does # mean in this code ? (from Data.List)
It's a magic hash denoting here on the one hand unboxed machine ints (0#)
and on the other the constructor wrapping such a raw machine int to a
Haskell boxed Int (I#). GHC
On 12/09/2010 11:17 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a monadic list in the
inner monad, with explicit errors.
How does this change the
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Permjacov Evgeniy permea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/09/2010 11:17 PM, Antoine Latter wrote:
Also, one thing that tripped me up is that your Stream type is
fundamentally different from the Stream types in the
iteratee/enumerator libraries - yours is more of a
On 10/12/2010, at 12:18 AM, Markus Läll wrote:
My take on the issue is that we should make it possible to easily mirror
hackage (what the OP asked for), so that people could use it when they wanted
to, and have a list of the mirrors on the wiki. This way those who are
interested can use
Dear Haskellers,
We are pleased to announce the release of haskell-mpi-1.0.0, a suite of
Haskell bindings to the C MPI library and convenience APIs on top of it.
About MPI
-
MPI, the Message Passing Interface, is a popular communications protocol for
distributed parallel computing
Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I thought X is a mirror of Y meant X would be a read-only replica of Y,
with some sort of protocol between X and Y to keep X up to date.
As long as the material from Y replicated at X is *supposed* to be
publicly available, I don't see a security
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 10/12/2010, at 12:18 AM, Markus Läll wrote:
My take on the issue is that we should make it possible to easily mirror
hackage (what the OP asked for), so that people could use it when they
wanted to, and have a
Michael Lesniak mlesn...@uni-kassel.de writes:
Hence the interpreter can itself be modified?
Well - the interpreter in nature is chemistry. Living organisms are
just chemistry programs.
-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
Have you read: Fontana Buss : What would be conserved if 'the tape
were played twice'? in PNAS? It's quite fun - they model chemical
reaction as alpha-reduction in the lambda calculus and look at
evolution.
Tom
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:
Michael Lesniak
Hello all,
I'm very glad to announce the 0.0.2.0 release of the digestive
functors library. The library provides a general API to input
consumption, and is an upgrade of formlets.
I've written an announcing blogpost and tutorial with more information here:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 11:53 +0200, Michael Snoyman wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 19:11, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
Hi all (again),
I'm happy to announce the second major release of the mime-mail[1]
On 9 December 2010 21:04, Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
On 10/12/2010, at 12:18 AM, Markus Läll wrote:
My take on the issue is that we should make it possible to easily mirror
hackage (what the OP asked for), so that people could use it when they
wanted to, and have a list of
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgt...@chello.nl wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:03:40 +0100, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Formerly, I had IORef and some state monad to do the task of keeping
states.
Now in haskell 2010, I cannot find
On 10/12/2010, at 10:50 AM, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I thought X is a mirror of Y meant X would be a read-only replica of Y,
with some sort of protocol between X and Y to keep X up to date.
As long as the material from Y replicated at X is *supposed* to
On 10 December 2010 01:40, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Henk-Jan van Tuyl hjgt...@chello.nl wrote:
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:03:40 +0100, Magicloud Magiclouds
magicloud.magiclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Formerly, I had IORef and some
Very nice. I like the addition of the CLI interface.
I was inspired by this library and Chris Eidhof's Formlets to try to
port this idea to Scala.
https://github.com/wrwills/scormlets
It's not as elegant or as complete as this but it helped me to get my
head around this very
cool idea.
-Rob
I found out how to compute a good memory limit for the GHC runtime on
Linux systems. One opens /proc/meminfo, and sums the free memory with
the reclaimable memory. The memory allocated to file buffers and the
disk cache are reclaimable, and can be added to the memory of a
growing GHC process.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43, Michael Snoyman mich...@snoyman.com wrote:
For the record, enumerator (and I believe iteratee as well) uses
transformers, not mtl. transformers itself is Haskell98; all FunDep
code is separated out to monads-fd.
Michael
iteratee also uses 'transformers', but
Hello,
according to
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Monad.html
Control.Monad exports 20 Functor instance declarations in base-4.3.0.0.
However:
bash# ghc-pkg list | grep base
base-4.3.0.0
bash# ghci --version
The Glorious Glasgow Haskell
Hi Sebastian,
I imagine that many of the instances are defined in the module that
defines the data type. For example, the STM instance is defined in the
same module as the STM type.
Are there any particular ones you're running into problems with?
Take care,
Antoine
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:10
Hi Antoine,
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 23:20 -0600, Antoine Latter wrote:
Are there any particular ones you're running into problems with?
Yes, I cannot find the instance for ((-) r).
Even if I import
Control.Monad
Control.Monad.Reader
Control.Applicative
Data.Functor
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 14:35 +0900, Sebastian Fischer wrote:
Yes, I cannot find the Functor instance for ((-) r).
As the Applicative instance for ((-) r) depends on the Functor instance
I only needed to go through the imports of Control.Applicative to find
that the Functor instance of ((-) r) is
Does haskell 2010 include binary IO? If no, what was the reason?
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
62 matches
Mail list logo
