Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

Hi Yeun,

You would not want to use MIGP for this and this isn’t for running melodic 
directly on CIFTI files.  If you are acquiring no more than a total of 1652 
frames of fMRI per subject, you shouldn’t have any issues with that version 
that I can think of.  Tim Brown might have further thoughts though.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 5:04 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>, "Brown, 
Tim" <tbbr...@wustl.edu<mailto:tbbr...@wustl.edu>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Hi Matt,

Great, thanks. I was able to use the multi-run ICA+FIX with MELODIC from FSL 
5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1.

Is it correct to use MELODIC from this FSL release (5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1) for HCP 
multi-run ICA+FIX? We would like to lock down the software versions for our 
pipelines very soon.
According to their change logs, the 5.0.10 version of MELODIC has the following 
updates:
MELODIC can run on CIFTI files; temporal concatenation in MELODIC now defaults 
to using MIGP.

Thank you,
Yeun


On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
Hi Yeun,

I think you should use multi-run ICA+FIX given the relatively short runs you 
have.  If your data are all from the same session, I would recommend cleaning 
all fMRI runs together (resting state and task).

As for which version to use, I think using the original is fine, as the other 
may have modifications specific to the HCP computer system.  I’ve CCed Tim 
Brown who made the additional changes in case he has further comment.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, July 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

To follow up, which script should I work with? hcp_fix_multi_run or 
hcp_fix_multi_run.original?

Thanks,
Yeun

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Yeun Kim 
<yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Matt,

We're a Depression-HCP site, using nearly identical sequences as ongoing HCP 
Aging projects. For rs-fMRI: TR = 800ms, 488 volumes, voxel size 2mm^3, for 2 
runs (one AP, one PA phase encoding).  Total time when concatenating the two 
runs is about 13 minutes.  Task fMRI runs are the same but shorter (300 volumes 
for CARIT; 338 vol x 2 runs for an in-house task).

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
Hi Yeun,

How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition 
resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of the 
Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies. Since it 
is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent for optimal 
reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used FSL 
5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer version 
is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because this will 
require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data processing. Or, 
if I can find the modified melodic in another repository separately.

Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of 
task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?

Thank you,
Yeun

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
The latest of everything will work for most applications.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in 
previous re

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

Hi Matt,

Great, thanks. I was able to use the multi-run ICA+FIX with MELODIC from FSL
5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1.

Is it correct to use MELODIC from this FSL release (5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1) for
HCP multi-run ICA+FIX? We would like to lock down the software versions for
our pipelines very soon.
According to their change logs, the 5.0.10 version of MELODIC has the
following updates:
MELODIC can run on CIFTI files; temporal concatenation in MELODIC now
defaults to using MIGP.

Thank you,
Yeun


On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Yeun,
>
> I think you should use multi-run ICA+FIX given the relatively short runs
> you have.  If your data are all from the same session, I would recommend
> cleaning all fMRI runs together (resting state and task).
>
> As for which version to use, I think using the original is fine, as the
> other may have modifications specific to the HCP computer system.  I’ve
> CCed Tim Brown who made the additional changes in case he has further
> comment.
>
> Matt.
>
> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
> Date: Friday, July 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM
>
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>
> To follow up, which script should I work with? hcp_fix_multi_run
> or hcp_fix_multi_run.original?
>
> Thanks,
> Yeun
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> We're a Depression-HCP site, using nearly identical sequences as ongoing
>> HCP Aging projects. For rs-fMRI: TR = 800ms, 488 volumes, voxel size 2mm^3,
>> for 2 runs (one AP, one PA phase encoding).  Total time when concatenating
>> the two runs is about 13 minutes.  Task fMRI runs are the same but shorter
>> (300 volumes for CARIT; 338 vol x 2 runs for an in-house task).
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yeun,
>>>
>>> How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition
>>> resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM
>>>
>>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>
>>> I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of
>>> the Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies.
>>> Since it is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent
>>> for optimal reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used
>>> FSL 5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer
>>> version is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because
>>> this will require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data
>>> processing. Or, if I can find the modified melodic in another repository
>>> separately.
>>>
>>> Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of
>>> task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Yeun
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The latest of everything will work for most applications.
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM
>>>>
>>>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>>
>>>> Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in
>>>> previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?
>>>>
>>>> Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~
>>>> steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the latest release - version 1.065) the correct
>>>> one to use, then?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the
>>>>> latest FSL release.

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

Hi Yeun,

I think you should use multi-run ICA+FIX given the relatively short runs you 
have.  If your data are all from the same session, I would recommend cleaning 
all fMRI runs together (resting state and task).

As for which version to use, I think using the original is fine, as the other 
may have modifications specific to the HCP computer system.  I’ve CCed Tim 
Brown who made the additional changes in case he has further comment.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Friday, July 21, 2017 at 1:38 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

To follow up, which script should I work with? hcp_fix_multi_run or 
hcp_fix_multi_run.original?

Thanks,
Yeun

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Yeun Kim 
<yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Matt,

We're a Depression-HCP site, using nearly identical sequences as ongoing HCP 
Aging projects. For rs-fMRI: TR = 800ms, 488 volumes, voxel size 2mm^3, for 2 
runs (one AP, one PA phase encoding).  Total time when concatenating the two 
runs is about 13 minutes.  Task fMRI runs are the same but shorter (300 volumes 
for CARIT; 338 vol x 2 runs for an in-house task).

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
Hi Yeun,

How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition 
resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of the 
Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies. Since it 
is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent for optimal 
reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used FSL 
5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer version 
is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because this will 
require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data processing. Or, 
if I can find the modified melodic in another repository separately.

Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of 
task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?

Thank you,
Yeun

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
The latest of everything will work for most applications.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in 
previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?

Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the 
latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest FSL 
release.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of 
melodic:

Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
fi
Debug "End of melodic version log"

# "old" melodic command
#$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 
--nobet --r

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

To follow up, which script should I work with? hcp_fix_multi_run
or hcp_fix_multi_run.original?

Thanks,
Yeun

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> We're a Depression-HCP site, using nearly identical sequences as ongoing
> HCP Aging projects. For rs-fMRI: TR = 800ms, 488 volumes, voxel size 2mm^3,
> for 2 runs (one AP, one PA phase encoding).  Total time when concatenating
> the two runs is about 13 minutes.  Task fMRI runs are the same but shorter
> (300 volumes for CARIT; 338 vol x 2 runs for an in-house task).
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yeun,
>>
>> How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition
>> resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM
>>
>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>
>> I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of
>> the Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies.
>> Since it is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent
>> for optimal reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used
>> FSL 5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer
>> version is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because
>> this will require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data
>> processing. Or, if I can find the modified melodic in another repository
>> separately.
>>
>> Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of
>> task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Yeun
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The latest of everything will work for most applications.
>>>
>>> Peace,
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM
>>>
>>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>
>>> Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in
>>> previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?
>>>
>>> Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz 
>>> (the
>>> latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the
>>>> latest FSL release.
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
>>>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>>
>>>> In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version
>>>> of melodic:
>>>>
>>>> Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
>>>> Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic
>>>> used"
>>>> Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
>>>> Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
>>>> if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
>>>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
>>>> fi
>>>> Debug "End of melodic version log"
>>>>
>>>> # "old" melodic command
>>>> #$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d
>>>> -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o
>>>> ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall
>>>> --tr=$tr
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Or should I be using the old melodic?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What is this in reference to?
>>>>>
>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Yeun Kim <
>>>>> yeun...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
>>>>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>>>> Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot find the modified version of melodic in
>>>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is the modified melodic?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Yeun
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> HCP-Users mailing list
>>>>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>>>>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

Hi Matt,

We're a Depression-HCP site, using nearly identical sequences as ongoing
HCP Aging projects. For rs-fMRI: TR = 800ms, 488 volumes, voxel size 2mm^3,
for 2 runs (one AP, one PA phase encoding).  Total time when concatenating
the two runs is about 13 minutes.  Task fMRI runs are the same but shorter
(300 volumes for CARIT; 338 vol x 2 runs for an in-house task).

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Yeun,
>
> How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition
> resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.
>
> Matt.
>
> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM
>
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>
> I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of the
> Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies.
> Since it is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent
> for optimal reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used
> FSL 5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer
> version is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because
> this will require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data
> processing. Or, if I can find the modified melodic in another repository
> separately.
>
> Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of
> task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?
>
> Thank you,
> Yeun
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> The latest of everything will work for most applications.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM
>>
>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>
>> Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in
>> previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?
>>
>> Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the
>> latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the
>>> latest FSL release.
>>>
>>> Peace,
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
>>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>
>>> In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version
>>> of melodic:
>>>
>>> Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
>>> Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
>>> Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
>>> Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
>>> if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
>>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
>>> fi
>>> Debug "End of melodic version log"
>>>
>>> # "old" melodic command
>>> #$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d
>>> -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
>>> #
>>>
>>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o
>>> ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall
>>> --tr=$tr
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Or should I be using the old melodic?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is this in reference to?
>>>>
>>>> Peace,
>>>>
>>>> Matt.
>>>>
>>>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Yeun Kim <
>>>> yeun...@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
>>>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>>> Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I cannot find the modified version of melodic in
>>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.
>>>>
>>>> Where is the modified melodic?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Yeun
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> HCP-Users mailing list
>>>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>>>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

Hi Yeun,

How long are your scans in frames and minutes.  What is your acquisition 
resolution and TR?  Using hcp_fix_multi_run might be helpful.

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:33 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of the 
Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies. Since it 
is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent for optimal 
reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used FSL 
5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer version 
is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because this will 
require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data processing. Or, 
if I can find the modified melodic in another repository separately.

Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of 
task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?

Thank you,
Yeun

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
The latest of everything will work for most applications.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM

To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in 
previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?

Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the 
latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest FSL 
release.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of 
melodic:

Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
fi
Debug "End of melodic version log"

# "old" melodic command
#$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 
--nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
#

${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o 
${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr

---
Or should I be using the old melodic?

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
What is this in reference to?

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Hi,

I cannot find the modified version of melodic in 
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.

Where is the modified melodic?

Thank you,
Yeun

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users




___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

I've been creating the preprocessing pipeline for CRHD Perturbation of the
Treatment of Resistant Depression Connectome by Fast-Acting Therapies.
Since it is a longitudinal study, I need all the versions to be consistent
for optimal reproducibility. All preprocessing workflows so far have used
FSL 5.0.9-3~nd14.04+1. I would like to know if an installation of a newer
version is necessary to obtain the modified version of melodic, because
this will require re-processing of all data to ensure consistency in data
processing. Or, if I can find the modified melodic in another repository
separately.

Also, we have multiple fMRI scans (2 sets of rs-fMRIs and 2 sets of
task-fMRIs). Should we use hcp_fix_multi_run?

Thank you,
Yeun

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
wrote:

> The latest of everything will work for most applications.
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM
>
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>
> Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in
> previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?
>
> Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the
> latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest
>> FSL release.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
>> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>
>> In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version
>> of melodic:
>>
>> Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
>> Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
>> Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
>> Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
>> if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
>> fi
>> Debug "End of melodic version log"
>>
>> # "old" melodic command
>> #$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d
>> -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
>> #
>>
>> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o
>> ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall
>> --tr=$tr
>>
>> ---
>> Or should I be using the old melodic?
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What is this in reference to?
>>>
>>> Peace,
>>>
>>> Matt.
>>>
>>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Yeun Kim <
>>> yeun...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
>>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>>> Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I cannot find the modified version of melodic in
>>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.
>>>
>>> Where is the modified melodic?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Yeun
>>>
>>> ___
>>> HCP-Users mailing list
>>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>>
>>
>>
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

The latest of everything will work for most applications.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:20 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in 
previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?

Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the 
latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest FSL 
release.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of 
melodic:

Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
fi
Debug "End of melodic version log"

# "old" melodic command
#$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 
--nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
#

${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o 
${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr

---
Or should I be using the old melodic?

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
What is this in reference to?

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Hi,

I cannot find the modified version of melodic in 
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.

Where is the modified melodic?

Thank you,
Yeun

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users



___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

Latest release meaning 5.0.10? Or were the modifications implemented in
previous releases/patches (in 5.0.9)?

Is the hcp_fix script in http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz (the
latest release - version 1.065) the correct one to use, then?


On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
wrote:

> I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest
> FSL release.
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu>
> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>
> In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of
> melodic:
>
> Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
> Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
> Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
> Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
> if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
> fi
> Debug "End of melodic version log"
>
> # "old" melodic command
> #$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d
> -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
> #
>
> ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o
> ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall
> --tr=$tr
>
> ---
> Or should I be using the old melodic?
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> What is this in reference to?
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Yeun Kim <
>> yeun...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
>> Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I cannot find the modified version of melodic in
>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.
>>
>> Where is the modified melodic?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Yeun
>>
>> ___
>> HCP-Users mailing list
>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>
>
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

I wouldn’t worry about that.  Those modifications should be in the latest FSL 
release.

Peace,

Matt.

From: Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:14 PM
To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of 
melodic:

Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
fi
Debug "End of melodic version log"

# "old" melodic command
#$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 
--nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
#

${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o 
${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr

---
Or should I be using the old melodic?

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
<glass...@wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> wrote:
What is this in reference to?

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Yeun Kim <yeun...@gmail.com<mailto:yeun...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Hi,

I cannot find the modified version of melodic in 
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.

Where is the modified melodic?

Thank you,
Yeun

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users


___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Yeun Kim]

In the script ICAFIX/hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a, it uses the modified version of
melodic:

Debug "Modified version of melodic in use"
Debug "melodic located at: ${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic used"
Debug "instead of melodic located at: ${FSLDIR}/bin/melodic"
Debug "Beginning of melodic version log"
if [ "${DEBUG}" = "TRUE" ] ; then
${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic --version
fi
Debug "End of melodic version log"

# "old" melodic command
#$FSLDIR/bin/melodic -i $fmri -o ${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250
--nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr
#

${HOME}/pipeline_tools/fix1.06a/melodic -i $fmri -o
${fmri}.ica/filtered_func_data.ica -d -250 --nobet --report --Oall --tr=$tr

---
Or should I be using the old melodic?

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew 
wrote:

> What is this in reference to?
>
> Peace,
>
> Matt.
>
> From:  on behalf of Yeun Kim <
> yeun...@gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" 
> Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot find the modified version of melodic in
> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.
>
> Where is the modified melodic?
>
> Thank you,
> Yeun
>
> ___
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Re: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

[Glasser, Matthew]

What is this in reference to?

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
>
 on behalf of Yeun Kim >
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:04 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" 
>
Subject: [HCP-Users] hcp_fix.for_fix1.06a

Hi,

I cannot find the modified version of melodic in 
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve/ftp/fix.tar.gz.

Where is the modified melodic?

Thank you,
Yeun

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

___
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users