As a rhel fan I suggest Redhat MRG.
http://www.redhat.com/mrg/
Of course 64bit (I'm assuming your have servers with at least 16gb of
ram... so there's absolutely no doubt in choosing the 32/64bit
version... 32bit PAE results in too much overhead)
Il 30/08/2010 21:17, Alon Gubkin ha scritto:
Since you can tune and change every distro as you like (kernel/gcc/and
so on), there is no point in arguing about distros.
Just choose the one you like most and modify it to your needs. With 8+GB
ram and supporting CPU choose the 64bit version. In other cases you are
fine with 32bit too.
+1
On my Systems I go for the largest throughput and not highest/most
stable fps.
Without preemtion, RT and such nobody complained about the servers so far.
Am 31.08.2010 07:56, schrieb Nephyrin Zey:
+1 to Everything Gary said - RT kernels are generally a waste. They
might ensure more
In actual response to the original question, Ubuntu is fine, I find it a lot
easier to use than a lot of other distributions. As for your question about
x86 or x64, if your box can run the 64-bit version there really isn't much
of a reason not to.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Ulrich Block
Okay guys, you convinced me - I will use the 2.6.35.4 kernel without any
patches.
I'm going to configure the kernel like so:
- *General setup*:
- *RCU Subsystem* *(ignore if not present)*
- Enable *RCU Implementation (Preemptible RCU)*
- Disable *Enable tracing for
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Craig H robolea...@gmail.com wrote:
In actual response to the original question, Ubuntu is fine, I find it a
lot
easier to use than a lot of other distributions. As for your question about
x86 or x64, if your box can run the 64-bit version there really isn't
Some people have suggested to myself to use a *Zen-Kernel* and base my
compilation off of that. However, my system at the moment is broken so I
haven't been able to test any new kernels. As for your settings, if you're
looking for throughput (And what has already been stated). 100hz, Tickless,
No
On 31/08/2010 16:00, Ben Mendis wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Craig Hrobolea...@gmail.com wrote:
In actual response to the original question, Ubuntu is fine, I find it a
lot
easier to use than a lot of other distributions. As for your question about
x86 or x64, if your box can run
also ;)
Allan
-Original Message-
From: hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mendis
Sent: August-31-10 11:00 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Distribution and Kernel
...@list.valvesoftware.com
[mailto:hlds_linux-boun...@list.valvesoftware.com] On Behalf Of Ben Mendis
Sent: August-31-10 11:00 AM
To: Half-Life dedicated Linux server mailing list
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] Linux Distribution and Kernel
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Craig Hrobolea...@gmail.com wrote:
In actual
At 07:36 AM 8/31/2010, Alon Gubkin wrote:
Okay guys, you convinced me - I will use the 2.6.35.4 kernel without any
patches.
Note that I changed *time frequency* to 1000 HZ and disabled *Tickless
System (Dynamic Ticks)*. In the orginal
At 07:36 AM 8/31/2010, Alon Gubkin wrote:
Okay guys, you convinced me - I will use the 2.6.35.4 kernel without any
patches.
Note that I changed *time frequency* to 1000 HZ and disabled *Tickless
System (Dynamic Ticks)*. In the orginal
1. Do I really need to mess with the kernel default configuration for
stable 1000fps kernel?
2. Should I use 100HZ and no tickless system instead of 1000HZ and
tickless system enabled?
3. What would you suggest to do more? (For example to enable x,
disable y, or dont do z)
What linux distribution and kernel would you suggest for running source
dedicated servers? Currently I use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x86
and 2.6.33.7-rt29.
By the way, is there any reason to use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x64 instead of
x86? As far as I know, srcds doesn't support 64-bit.
At 03:17 PM 8/30/2010, Alon Gubkin wrote:
What linux distribution and kernel would you suggest for running source
dedicated servers? Currently I use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x86
and 2.6.33.7-rt29.
By the way, is there any reason to use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x64 instead of
x86? As far as I know, srcds
At 03:17 PM 8/30/2010, Alon Gubkin wrote:
What linux distribution and kernel would you suggest for running source
dedicated servers? Currently I use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x86
and 2.6.33.7-rt29.
By the way, is there any reason to use Ubuntu Server 10.04 x64 instead of
x86? As far as I know, srcds
+1 to Everything Gary said - RT kernels are generally a waste. They
might ensure more accurate wakeups, but the sleep(1) call really
limits how accurate those can be anyway even with hires timers, a
ld_preload to mess with sleep() could get you much more
accurate/efficient wakeups, but that's more
17 matches
Mail list logo
