Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-07 Thread Steven Conway
@bama.ua.edu 04/30/2009 06:04 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our production environment. Has anyone

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-07 Thread Steven Conway
SP3 in Production - Original Message - From: Carlson, Steven steven.carl...@nsc.com Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:16 PM Subject: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-07 Thread Steven Conway
@bama.ua.edu To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production One of my pre-reqs for JOBTRAC V11 is to be able to fall back to JOBTRAC V35. I am still working on this problem with CA, because I am unable to convert the database back to V35 format

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-07 Thread Steven Conway
Eric asked if CA-11 worked with Datacom. FSVO OK Used to share CA11 between lots of systems Not simple, when the Datacom-running system needs an IPL. Yeah, yeah, Shadow MUF, blah, blah. I'm not a Datacom guy, don't want to be. We are a DB2 shop, and do you think the DB2 guys want

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-07 Thread Bobbie Jo
Datacom, the black hole, er, I mean, as c/a states, -- datacom, the black box. just when I thought I had seen it all, along came datacom. Bobbie Justice Steven Conway steven_con...@freddiemac.com wrote in message

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Burrell, C. Todd (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR)
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Carlson, Steven Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our production

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread John Kelly
snip I have been trying to upgrade our Jobtrac 3.5 system to 11.0 for over a year going through the various service packs up to SP3 unsnip Todd, you are ahead of us. We've been trying for a year to get to production but the DBCOM is an 'interesting' effort. From what you've indicated, I think

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Carlson, Steven
...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Burrell, C. Todd (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR) Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 6:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been trying to upgrade our Jobtrac 3.5 system to 11.0 for over a year going through the various service packs up to SP3. I

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Pinnacle
- Original Message - From: Carlson, Steven steven.carl...@nsc.com Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 6:16 PM Subject: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our production

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Hoesly, Bret
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Carlson, Steven Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 5:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our production environment

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Carlson, Steven
Of Hoesly, Bret Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production We do currently have Jobtrac v11 SP3 running in production, but it hasn't been the most stable or reliable version by any means. The addition of Datacom was a challenge

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Eric Bielefeld
- From: Hoesly, Bret bret.hoe...@teldta.com Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 11:37 AM Subject: Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production We do currently have Jobtrac v11 SP3 running in production, but it hasn't been the most stable or reliable

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread John McKown
On Fri, 1 May 2009 11:49:17 -0500, Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote: I'm curious about something. The last time I was going to upgrade CA11, either in 2004 or 2005, they made you use Datacom as the database, instead of a PDS. I remember getting so frustrated with the install, that I

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread Bobbie Jo
-ibmm...@wi.rr.com Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:49 PM Subject: Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production I'm curious about something. The last time I was going to upgrade CA11, either in 2004 or 2005, they made you use Datacom

Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-05-01 Thread John McKown
On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:09:34 -0400, Bobbie Jo just...@peoplepc.com wrote: Does CA11 work ok with datacom?. Eventually, but what a pain in the neck that was to get working correctly at my previous place of employment. . Why c/a went with datacom is one of the great mysteries of the universe.

Datacom for CA-11 (was Re: Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production)

2009-05-01 Thread Mark Zelden
On Fri, 1 May 2009 12:17:48 -0500, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote: On Fri, 1 May 2009 13:09:34 -0400, Bobbie Jo just...@peoplepc.com wrote: Does CA11 work ok with datacom?. Eventually, but what a pain in the neck that was to get working correctly at my previous place of employment. . Why

Using CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in Production

2009-04-30 Thread Carlson, Steven
I have been working on getting CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 to be implemented into our production environment. Has anyone else been able to use CA-JOBTRAC V11 SP3 in their production environment? Steve Carlson z/OS Systems Services National Semiconductor Corporation 2900 Semiconductor Drive Santa Clara,