VIKAS RATHEE wrote:
i suggest u should go for nte products the simple reson being that intel
uses more cache size than the AMD which AMD compensates with more clock
speed which does not in any case can give the benefit or larger cache
size ..
so i would suggest intel to you
not
--- Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VIKAS RATHEE wrote:
i suggest u should go for nte products the simple
reson being that intel
uses more cache size than the AMD which AMD
compensates with more clock
speed which does not in any case can give the
benefit or larger cache
[snip]
i also feel the time has come to redefine 'throughput' more carefully
than just look at raw computing power.
on several machines running gnulinux, have noted the swap setting can
at times slow down performance. tinkering with 'low latency' settings
in ubuntustudio just shows how every OS
Wonder if we could have a site that will allow a user to customise a
system in such a way that, as you add/change components, you get to
see meters on how the cost changes, how its performace changes, and how
its compatibility with linux changes.
Wonder if any such thing exists already!!
Vikas
On 10/7/07, Subhashish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rohit
I think technology wise both are almost on the same boat, but quality wise
Intel has unmatched reputation.
I personally suggest you to go to http://www.tomshardware.com site to know
more about Intel vs Amd.Other sites are
Rohit Kumar wrote:
I have heard and read a little about the intel series(extreme/core 2/dual
core)
and also got to know about the unavailability of intel extreme as of now. :-(
how about the 6600 quad core ? is that available at the moment ? Its by
far the best bang-for-the-buck you can get
hi
i suggest u should go for nte products the simple reson being that intel
uses more cache size than the AMD which AMD compensates with more clock
speed which does not in any case can give the benefit or larger cache
size ..
so i would suggest intel to you
vikas
On 10/6/07, Karanbir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
,--[ On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:42:21PM +0530, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
| Rohit Kumar wrote:
| But then /me just widened the scope by thinking about AMD.
| I have no info on how good (or bad)
Hi Rohit
I think technology wise both are almost on the same boat, but quality wise
Intel has unmatched reputation.
I personally suggest you to go to http://www.tomshardware.com site to know
more about Intel vs Amd.Other sites are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rohit Kumar wrote:
But then /me just widened the scope by thinking about AMD.
I have no info on how good (or bad) linux runs on AMD.
But have read on forums that AMD is actually far ahead of intel.
Please help me choose a good processor. :-)
On 05/10/2007, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rohit Kumar wrote:
But then /me just widened the scope by thinking about AMD.
I have no info on how good (or bad) linux runs on AMD.
But have read on forums that AMD is actually far
running an amd linux box since 2 years.works great
--
I m a gr8 believer in luck and I find the harder I try the more I have of
it
Abhinav Sahai
R.KG.I.T Ghaziabad
4th Yr CSE
Linux User # 438077
Moderator Ghaziabad LUG
http://sahaitherocker.blogspot.com
http://flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL
hi,
[snip]
But have read on forums that AMD is actually far ahead of intel.
Please help me choose a good processor. :-)
thanks,
rohit.
this is your friendly help:
http://anandtech.com/
:-)
niyam
___
ilugd mailinglist --
13 matches
Mail list logo
