I must admit that the first time I read Zeev’s email I got anxious... but it is
frustrating that PHP has a WAY better runtime than Python and most other
dynamic languages yet is falling out of fashion. It’s strange given how much
better it actually runs (really being unbiased here). One reason
I think I heard some stat that over 50% of Azure now runs Linux (and I am sure
PHP is primarily running on Linux). So given JIT probably helps 95% of
production PHP installations I wouldn’t hold this back. If Windows ends up
being important to folks some (and possibly msft) will contribute
l.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 3, 2017 10:30:53 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: PHP Internals List; Zeev Suraski
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] UUID
Why would it go under Spl? Spl is already bloated with loads of unrelated
classes with no real logical grouping.
On 3 Sep 2017 19:03, "Andi Gutma
Why would we not just add this under Spl? Feels like an appropriate place to
put standard methods.
I would definitely not make functionality like this a top level class/namespace
both for BC reasons and it is a minor capability that fits in well into a
standard library context.
Get Outlook for
On 1/14/16, 7:47 AM, "stig.bak...@gmail.com on behalf of Stig Bakken"
wrote:
>I agree whole-heartedly with Zeev here!
>
>Anyone who has a clue about organizational psychology will tell you to
>focus on what you want more of, not on what
Is there an update on the OpenSSL front...?
Is this release of OpenSSL going to be binary compatible or just source
compatible?
Never mind. It returned. Congratulations everyone!
Amazing accomplishment. The Web is going to speed up 2x!
Everyone here has made a huge impact.
Thanks to the RMs.
Thanks to Dmitry for leading such an amazing effort on the performance
front.
Andi
On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Andi Gutmans
What just happened? It was on php.net and now it's gone?
How’s it going? Are we golden?
When do you plan on posting tomorrow?
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Anatol Belski wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sebastian Bergmann [mailto:sebast...@php.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 9:01 AM
>> To:
> On Dec 2, 2015, at 9:51 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
> Please do not get me wrong: I appreciate what Microsoft in general
> and you, Anatol, as well as Pierre in particular have done for PHP.
> But no vendor -- neither Microsoft nor Red Hat nor whoever else
> rolls
> On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:53 AM, David Zuelke wrote:
>
> Sure: http://phpversions.info/paas-hosting/
>
> The default PHP version in the absence of any explicit declaration on Heroku
> will remain 5.6.latest for a while, but if you have a composer.json with a
> bunch of
> On Nov 8, 2015, at 5:35 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>
> On 11/08/2015 05:16 PM, Anatol Belski wrote:
>> Exactly, the relevant patches are going into RC7 which is then out on 12th
>> instead of GA. The next closest release slot were then Nov 26th, either for
>> GA or for RC8
On May 11, 2015, at 9:05 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Matt Wilmas php_li...@realplain.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015
argument. I'd like to propose making the order
On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:50 PM, christopher jones
christopher.jo...@oracle.com wrote:
The current state is that we will be looking at PDO_OCI and OCI8 for
PHP 7 in a short while. Our good intentions got delayed as we have
been working on drivers for other languages
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
I spent a little bit of time today trying to debug an issue with 7
that Drupal 8 was facing, specifically regarding an array index not
behaving correctly ($array[key] returned null, even though the key
existed
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
bumping the thread as we should start the release steps (branching out 7.0,
tagging the first alpha or more likely beta) if we wanna keep up with
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php7timeline
I definitely think we should roll
On Mar 21, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 03/21/2015 08:52 AM, François Laupretre wrote:
Now, after more calls from many of you to delay it, and as Zeev himself
seemed to consider it as more acceptable, I am proposing again to delay 7.0
feature freeze to May,
On Mar 11, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
after all, some people are not happy with the current proposals about scalar
types. So, they both still possibly may fail.
Thus, I'd like to come up with a fallback proposal in case both proposals
fail:
On Feb 27, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitry and Zend,
Thank you for sharing your code. I look forward to playing with it.
Perhaps after 7 stabilizes (and ships) you could write up your
thoughts around it? Why decisions were made and the findings that
On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:36 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitry,
That's not to say there's anything wrong with this approach, nor that
there isn't a ton we can learn from it. I think it's a fantastic
research effort and plan on digging through it myself. Thank you for
On Feb 7, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf ras...@lerdorf.com wrote:
On 02/07/2015 09:51 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
tan(1);
echo strstr(test, est, 1);
Banning int-float and float-int is both a pain point and sometimes a
life-saver. It’s annoying that tan(1) doesn’t work. On the other
plus a small minority of total voters who can't really move the needle much.
Let's keep the conversation pragmatic. I will try and refrain from any humor.
Andi
Stelian
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
The folks who really want all this great strict typing
+1
On Feb 5, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Adam Harvey ahar...@php.net wrote:
On 6 February 2015 at 04:14, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
At long last, I’m going to put the RFC to a vote. It’s been long enough - I
don’t think there needs to be, or will be, much further discussion.
True, and I
I have to say I’m pretty disappointed at the opening of the vote.
We had a pretty good RFC (thank you) for weak type hinting which was aligned
with the spirit of PHP and everyone was able to rally around it.
This has now been morphed into something very hard to swallow and IMO having
such a
think the consensus is not so far away.
As far as I understand the rules, it is possible to vote yes and put up a
new RFC to remove strict-declare after the voting ends?
Regards
Thomas
Andi Gutmans wrote on 06.02.2015 00:22:
I have to say I’m pretty disappointed at the opening of the vote
OK. But maybe that's why PHP is better than those languages :)
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Rowan Collins rowan.coll...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 5 February 2015 23:22:26 GMT, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
having such a declare(…) syntax will be ridiculed by the broader app
dev community
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi Andi,
On 5 Feb 2015, at 23:50, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
I am not sure.
I think we need to explicitly vote on a weak type hinting option.
Andrea, I think this should be an option in any vote. Right now
running in
parallel but I think that would do a disservice to the good work you've
done.
Andi
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi Andi,
On 5 Feb 2015, at 23:22, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
I have to say I’m pretty disappointed at the opening of the vote
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Hi Andi,
On 5 Feb 2015, at 23:57, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
The folks who really want all this great strict typing should head over
to Oracle.com and download free open-source Java? I hear it's got a lot of
strict
Can you provide more info re: operating system and version? Compiler version?
Thanks.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 24, 2015, at 11:57 PM, Sebastian Bergmann sebast...@php.net wrote:
Nut sure whether this is an issue or not but I see it a lot while
compiling master:
On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:51 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
I’m not really sure this is true. I agree that strict types aren’t entirely
in keeping with the “PHP way”. However, there are plenty of people who are
against them not for that reason, but simply because they don’t work well
On Jan 9, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that hhvm implements a significant part of the extensions (or
other areas) using PHP+additional syntax as well as adding cleaner
APIs or
On Dec 30, 2014, at 12:26 AM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
I’m going to put the PHP 5.7 RFC to a vote, since it’d been 2 weeks.
I’m not entirely certain myself whether it’s a good idea, but I’d
like it for us to vote on it so we can settle the matter. If people
vote
, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Andi Gutmans a...@zend.com wrote:
Hi Nikita,
I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that wasn’t
clear to me.
This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral changes in addition to the AST.
Are these as a side-effect of how AST was implemented
Hi Nikita,
I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that wasn’t
clear to me.
This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral changes in addition to the AST.
Are these as a side-effect of how AST was implemented? Or are they unrelated to
the AST patch?
I think some of them
On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
I also think
On Jul 20, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
As for the PHP 7 section, this is by far the dominant part of the RFC. Both
in terms of physical presence, but also points and counter-points.
It also contains, IMO unnecessarily, light-hearted and jokey comments not
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 8:20 PM
To: Anthony Ferrara
Cc: Laruence; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Disabling the GC during shutdown
However, that's not really fixing the situation either, as the
Hi,
Just reading the excellent PHP 5.5 Upgrades Notes -
https://raw.github.com/php/php-src/php-5.5.0beta1/UPGRADING
Some questions:
- Dropped support for Windows XP 2003:
o Was this an RFC? At what point was it decided? (I may have missed it in
that case I’d just appreciate a
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Ferrara [mailto:ircmax...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 1:58 PM
To: Philip Olson
Cc: David Soria Parra; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Integrating Zend Optimizer+ into the PHP
distribution
Philip,
Shouldn't we be
It is absolutely related to how the PHP project approaches things.
As a project we have always valued backwards compatibility and migration path.
That focus and approach is one of the reasons why PHP is so pervasive. It is
sometimes more fun to break (fix) everything but the reality is that
Hi,
As many of you know we made huge improvements in PHP 5.4 memory usage (enabling
higher concurrency) and runtime performance.
We've done our own benchmarks but it'd be great to hear from others re: what
you're seeing with your real-world apps.
If you have any experiences to share please do.
Cache results are of course important. Memory usage would be great too.
Thanks!!
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:19 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
hi
are seeing.
Thanks,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:37 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
hi!
I could add zend optimizer to the stack but we do not have
Absolutely. Will gather those and send them over...
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:49 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 Benchmarks
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:22 PM
To: Stas Malyshev
Cc: PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] E_STRICT in production
hi Stas,
The idea of E_STRICT when we introduced it was to help developers. So I
tend to think that
-Original Message-
From: Pascal COURTOIS [mailto:pascal.court...@nouvo.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:28 AM
To: Lester Caine
Cc: PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Give the Language a Rest motion (fwd)
Le 16/06/2011 09:19, Lester Caine a écrit :
when you have a bug in PHP it
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:33 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Give the Language a Rest motion (fwd)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Andi Gutmans
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 7:36 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Pierre Joye; Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Give the Language a Rest motion (fwd)
Hi,
I think that -in any context- the if it aint broke don't fix it is a very
depressing attitude to have
Hi Derick and all,
I think we have had some reasonable additions to the language in PHP 5.3 + will
have a couple of good ones in PHP 5.4. That said, I do agree we should have a
strong bias against language feature creep unless there is a really strong
compelling reason.
I do think that an
Hi Felipe,
Read the archives. We discussed T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM extensively and agreed
to keep it as a historical landmark. Let's not have the discussion yet again
within the same year. Google it just to see the # of mentions.
What we could do as a compromise between history and improving
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:41 PM
To: PHP Internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
Hi!
I would like to propose the following process (of course, dates can be moved
around, etc. - I consider phase lengths be more
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 4:41 PM
To: PHP Internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
Hi!
I has been almost a month since we did our routine talk about 5.4, so here it
goes again. The patch for the scalar
-Original Message-
From: Marcelo Gornstein [mailto:marce...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:20 AM
To: Stas Malyshev
Cc: guilhermebla...@gmail.com; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again
mm i don't remember saying anything like that :) i dont want to start
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Jones [mailto:christopher.jo...@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:28 AM
To: internals@lists.php.net; Guilherme Blanco
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
On 05/09/2011 07:44 AM,
-Original Message-
From: guilhermebla...@gmail.com [mailto:guilhermebla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:51 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Christopher Jones; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
Hi Andi,
That's all I want.
Someone to at least look
-Original Message-
From: a...@adamharvey.name [mailto:a...@adamharvey.name] On Behalf
Of Adam Harvey
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 8:26 AM
To: internals Mailing List
Is there any thought that we might stop throwing things into trunk soon and
start thinking about some sort of
I really like the idea.
Just to be clear though I'd change:
Server is listening on localhost:8000... Press CTRL-C to quit.
To something like:
PHP Development Server is listening on localhost:8000... Press CTRL-C to quit.
I think that makes it very clear this is for development and enhancements
HI Martin,
Is it only file size you worry about or also memory footprint? I assume it'd
also be the latter.
If so, we can share a patch we've worked on which could allow you to reduce the
memory footprint at compile time somewhat more (on the expense of performance,
...).
We were going to send
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Grimm [mailto:mathiasgr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 9:12 AM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] RFC - MACRO
I want to request a C/C++ feature that i think is good.
MACRO
?php
MACRO('PF','private function _');
...@prohost.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 4:16 PM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Jonah H. Harris; Andi Gutmans; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Performance of buffer based functionality (JSON, AES,
serialize())
Just read over the BSON spec, looks fairly interesting, the only bit
-Original Message-
From: Jani Taskinen [mailto:jani.taski...@iki.fi]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 12:25 AM
To: da...@php.net
Cc: PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4
Who says it has to be 5.4? People seem to be a bit fixated on the version
there.
Major BC
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 9:21 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Jani Taskinen; da...@php.net; PHP Internals
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 17:11 +, Andi Gutmans wrote
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 9:27 AM
To: Johannes Schlüter
Cc: Andi Gutmans; Jani Taskinen; da...@php.net; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4
Looking through trunk I think we are in pretty
Hi,
Completely different topic :)
I've been looking a bit into performance around json encoding,
hashing+encryption (aes) and serialize()/unserialize(). Data that is marshaled
and often transmitted over the wire.
I know there have been some high-end apps that have benefited from some custom
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:26 AM
To: Ilia Alshanetsky
Cc: Johannes Schlüter; Andi Gutmans; Jani Taskinen; da...@php.net; PHP
Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4
We also need that non-null
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 10:46 AM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky; Johannes Schlüter; da...@php.net; PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Hold off 5.4
Yes I agree. We may be able to skip
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 9:39 PM
To: Derick Rethans
Cc: Felipe Pena; internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Release Process
Hi!
With the recent chaos in the way we begin and ended releases, we
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 5:47 PM
To: PHP internals
Subject: [PHP-DEV] git anyone?
hi,
We have moved not too long ago and for what I see it gave some opportunities
to many of us to see what are the
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 8:21 PM
To: Rasmus Lerdorf
Cc: internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding path_len to all stream functions in trunk
Hi!
Ok, I went through all the 5.3 code. This should fix the
-Original Message-
From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:ras...@lerdorf.com]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:25 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Stas Malyshev; internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Adding path_len to all stream functions in trunk
Well, it changes the signature of that function, so
Hi Rasmus,
Hope I understood the problem correctly. If not, this answer won't make sense :)
I do not see a major problem in passing path_len but wonder how much it'd
actually solve as we end up calling OS APIs that do not accept path_len, no? I
assume we don't want to start searching all these
-Original Message-
From: Scott MacVicar [mailto:sc...@macvicar.net]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 8:22 AM
To: Stefan Marr
Cc: Kenan Sulayman; PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] GPU Acceleration
What's not constructive about it? Seems pretty constructive to me. The
original
The first google entry when you search for it gives you the answer. It is
actually unbelievably easy to find the answer via search. If a new PHP
developer can't find it then maybe they shouldn't be writing code.
This is a piece of history from the PHP 3 days and think it adds some
character, a
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 5:19 AM
To: rquadl...@googlemail.com
Cc: Zeev Suraski; Ilia Alshanetsky; Stas Malyshev; Johannes Schlüter; Kalle
Sommer Nielsen; Internals; Derick Rethans
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV]
I wouldn't mind living with neither but I think it's two separate discussions.
-Original Message-
From: Ilia Alshanetsky [mailto:i...@prohost.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:52 AM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: Stas Malyshev; Johannes Schlüter; Kalle Sommer Nielsen; Internals;
Derick
Can we deduct from that a 6 version number for trunk? :) just kidding
I am also +1 on bundle but not on default. I think we should also reach out to
other OSS caches to ensure they know they still have a place in our Eco system.
Some are preferred by certain use cases.
On Jun 21, 2010, at
So which RFC should I be reviewing? Does this RFC reflect what Ilia's
patch does? I just want to be sure we are talking about the same thing
and can review and comment on it in detail. We've had many discussions
on this topic over the years and different people had different things
in mind so we
Benjamin,
Thanks for testing and sharing the data. These are great results and validate
the progress made.
Glad to see you're also seeing the improved memory usage which means that the
runtime is not only faster but you can typically run more concurrent PHP
instances.
Andi
-Original
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Schlüter [mailto:johan...@schlueters.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:40 AM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Gwynne Raskind; Ilia Alshanetsky; Kalle Sommer Nielsen; Lukas Kahwe
Smith; Andi Gutmans; Derick Rethans; PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP
-Original Message-
From: Stanislav Malyshev [mailto:s...@zend.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 12:34 PM
To: Pierre Joye
Cc: Ralph Schindler; internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] On constructors: BC Break and Class compiler
Improvements
Hi!
Well, I think the question here is
Hi,
I think that if we were ever to implement threading we would be best off
to enable spawning worker threads that have their own context with no
shared data (and therefore no requirement for locking). We could then
have a message passing API between the threads.
Advantages:
- Real
-Original Message-
From: Derick Rethans [mailto:der...@php.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:05 AM
To: PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: [PHP-DEV] trunk is alive and open
Hello,
I've just created trunk for 5.3 again. I've set the version to
5.3.99-dev as to
explicitly not
-Original Message-
From: Antony Dovgal [mailto:t...@daylessday.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:25 AM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.4 branch and trunk
On 03/16/2010 07:13 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
+ merge php-fpm branch?
Can't see why not. Is
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Hill [mailto:olivier.h...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 10:15 AM
To: Derick Rethans
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6
We need to focus on Unicode more than what some says, whether this
means descoping the
-Original Message-
From: Tim Starling [mailto:tstarl...@wikimedia.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 7:19 PM
To: Stas Malyshev
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] About optimization
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
opcodes can be cached (bytecode caches do it) but
-Original Message-
From: Tom Boutell [mailto:t...@punkave.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:30 AM
To: Marco Tabini
Cc: Pierre Joye; jani.taski...@iki.fi; Andi Gutmans; Joey Smith;
internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] shebang skipping in 5.3.0
-snip-
Classic CGI
Shebang is for command line scripts (php-cli). It does not make sense to
support it for Web server scripts. It just adds unnecessary
code/complexity to that code base. Removing the support from php-cgi was
really a remnant of the old days when cli and cgi were the same SAPI.
I think we are better
You may want to look at pcntl_exec() which is the UNIX equivalent of
what you want to do. It does not use sh and the pcntl extension is not
supported on Windows.
A Windows implementation may not fit this function signature but it's a
good place to start.
Andi
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Lukas,
Thanks for stepping up and helping Johannes make the PHP 5.3 release
come together.
Your tracking skills are definitely an asset :)
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:06 AM
To: PHP internals
Subject:
This really does not look like a very safe commit at this point in the
RC cycle.
These kind of patches are very challenging and can affect behavior of
applications. They are affected by many things incl. user permissions,
CIFS, applications that move files, and more... I am sure you have
tested it
that
should go in at a late RC stage or even at any stage in an RC as they
take some time to stabilize.
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:a...@zend.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 10:37 PM
To: Pierre-Alain Joye
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP-DEV] RE: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php
-Original Message-
From: Elizabeth M Smith [mailto:auroraeosr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:43 PM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Notes from the PDM in Chicago
yes Hannes - interfaces for userland implemented streams would help
people trying to
-Original Message-
From: Pierre Joye [mailto:pierre@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 11:50 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: Elizabeth M Smith; internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Notes from the PDM in Chicago
Btw, this is also true for PDO. We would want interfaces
Hi Paul,
This is something I have considered in the past esp. as it would also reduce
dependency of extensions on PHP runtime and make it easier for 3rd parties to
distribute PHP extensions which don't have to be rebuilt per-PHP version. This
is similar to JNI.
There are some real challenges
I don't see a fundamental issue why it could not be arbitrary.
The only challenge which may be an issue is that this code clearly allocates
the buffer on the stack for what are probably performance reasons. If you allow
arbitrary chunk size and use alloca() (do_alloca()) for stack allocation you
-Original Message-
From: shire [mailto:sh...@tekrat.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 11:02 AM
To: Lukas Kahwe Smith
Cc: PHP Internals List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3 todos
Seeing as I have an interest in this getting in 5_3, I'll work up a
patch for
this unless someone
-Original Message-
From: Hannes Magnusson [mailto:hannes.magnus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 6:04 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: shire; Lukas Kahwe Smith; PHP Internals List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.3 todos
And you are?
CTO of some company? Claiming you wrote PHP
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:57 PM
To: Andi Gutmans
Cc: php-dev List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release
Well we have established the primary testers mailinglist for this
purpose
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Kahwe Smith [mailto:m...@pooteeweet.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:42 AM
To: php-dev List
Subject: [PHP-DEV] towards the next 5.3 release
--snip--
5) upgrading guide
--snip--
RC really signifies a feature complete + should be releasable
1 - 100 of 1734 matches
Mail list logo