[PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.2.12RC2 Testing

2009-11-27 Thread Dirk Haun
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: The second release candidate of 5.2.12 was just released for testing FWIW, I'm getting a ./configure: 91396: Syntax error: fi unexpected when trying to run the configure script (on Ubuntu 8.04) like so: ./configure --enable-mbstring --with-mysql=/usr/local/mysql

[PHP-DEV] RAW_POST_DATA in PHP 5.2.2RC2

2007-04-29 Thread Dirk Haun
I just spent about an hour debugging some XML-RPC communication only to find that the problem was not in my code but in PHP 5.2.2RC2 apparently. I'm using PEAR::XML_RPC (current version) which seems to rely on $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA. And even though I had always_populate_raw_post_data = Off in my

[PHP-DEV] Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two

2007-05-04 Thread Dirk Haun
I believe this is a bug in PHP 5.2.2. I've tried to report this for PHP 5.2.2RC2 but apparently wasn't making myself clear or wasn't following the proper procedures ... Anyway, as I wrote before[1], raw POST data isn't making it through in PHP 5.2.2 which results in XML-RPC communications to

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two

2007-05-04 Thread Dirk Haun
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: Is your always_populate_raw_post_data enabled? Yes: ; Always populate the $HTTP_RAW_POST_DATA variable. always_populate_raw_post_data = On As I already said: On or Off doesn't seem to make a difference. Also, have you tried accessing the data from php://input ? I

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two

2007-05-05 Thread Dirk Haun
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: Also, have you tried accessing the data from php://input ? Okay, that appears to work. Using this script as the receive.php: ?php echo (file_get_contents(php://input)); ? I now get ---GOT--- HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 08:01:49 GMT Server: Apache/1.3.37

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two

2007-05-07 Thread Dirk Haun
David Coallier wrote: Anyone has an answer/tests to that bug* so we can stop this discussion ? :) The bug has apparently been fixed in CVS. Haven't had a chance to test it, but will do as soon as possible. Now the question is: When can we expect an update? I see people talking about what

Re: [PHP-DEV] Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two

2007-05-07 Thread Dirk Haun
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: The bug has apparently been fixed in CVS. Haven't had a chance to test it, but will do as soon as possible. Please let me know how it works out. I've tested php5.2-200705071830.tar.gz from snaps.php.net and the bug seems to be fixed. Thanks. One interesting feature

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.8 Released!

2011-08-24 Thread Dirk Haun
Quoting Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de: I have the impression that very few people actually test these. When creating an RC we inform the primary testers as well as qa and internals list members. From there I get one or two responses in general. What happens to the reports that make

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.3.8 Released!

2011-08-24 Thread Dirk Haun
Quoting Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Ryan McCue li...@rotorised.com wrote: Ferenc Kovacs wrote: the aggregated report summaries are available at http://qa.php.net/reports/ thanks to Oliver Doucet who make this happen. Which, incidentally, doesn't appear

Re: [PHP-DEV] CI for 5.4

2011-11-08 Thread Dirk Haun
Quoting Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com: There is only three failing tests left on the debian slaves: For 5.3 ext/phar/tests/phar_oo_005.phpt.Phar and RecursiveDirectoryIterator 0.01 20 ext/spl/tests/bug60082.phpt.Bug #60082 (100% CPU / when using references with ArrayObject($ref)) FWIW, the

[PHP-DEV] What's the correct way to report a regression?

2011-11-10 Thread Dirk Haun
I've notice, back in PHP 5.4.0 beta 2, that this test was failing: Bug #48555 (ImageFTBBox() differs from previous versions for texts with new lines) [ext/gd/tests/bug48555.phpt] So I went to https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=48555 and left a comment. The same test still fails in 5.4.0RC1 and

Re: [PHP-DEV] Change all XFAIL tests to FAIL

2012-03-30 Thread Dirk Haun
Stas Malyshev wrote: And if we had rule of no failing tests, we'd have no releases for years now, because nobody is fixing those tests and bugs behind them. I was about to suggest that maybe PHP should have a rule: no release with failing tests. What's the point of a test that fails (or

[PHP-DEV] Status of PHP 4.4.3?

2006-06-25 Thread Dirk Haun
a friendly reminder that there are people out there that are still deploying applications that will have to run on PHP 4 and a plea for not neglecting that part of your user base. Thanks for your attention. regards, Dirk Haun (Maintainer, Geeklog 1.x) [1] We're one of the projects on the PhP4zy list

Re: [PHP-DEV] dangerous handling of security bugs

2010-07-14 Thread Dirk Haun
Am 13.07.2010 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: it would be an interesting to check how many bugs were first marked as bogus then re-opened and fixed. I've been wondering for a while now if much of the emotional reaction to bugs being closed as bogus is due to that very word. I mean, the