Hi, It works!
All your posts are of great help. Thanks a ton!
David Bolen-2 wrote:
Peter Jin jinyup...@gmail.com writes:
Let's take a look at activity1 and activity2. If activity1 has more
records
than activity2, some of the records of activity2 will be joined multiple
times. This is
Hi David,
Thanks for your reply. Union is ok, but seems there are issues with Join.
SELECTid, name,
count(a1.distance) as a1_cnt, sum(a1.distance) as a1_total,
count(a2.hits) as a2_cnt, sum(a2.hits) as a2_total,
count(a3.weight) as a3_cnt,
We have an audit system which uses separate tables with similar structure to
store different kinds of activities for a user. We want to report the number
of activities per activity type per user.
David Bolen-2 wrote:
Peter Jin jinyup...@gmail.com writes:
Grouping can not solve my issue
Peter Jin jinyup...@gmail.com writes:
We have an audit system which uses separate tables with similar structure to
store different kinds of activities for a user. We want to report the number
of activities per activity type per user.
Still sounds pretty standard in terms of database schema.
Hi Peter,
If I understand your requirements correctly I think grouping would be better
than having multiple subreports.
Grouping the data on users allows you to create a seperate table for each
user, you can also have a header and footer for each user and you can also
perform calculations and
Sorry I forgot to mention that the info I gave is based on using
iReport/jasperReports, not sure what you are using now but I definately
recommend iReport.
Chris
chr15athome wrote:
Hi Peter,
If I understand your requirements correctly I think grouping would be
better than having
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your reply.
Grouping can not solve my issue because it works on one data source only. In
my case, data for a user scattered in 5 tables. UNION might be a way to
combine all tables to a data source, but I can not use it either (explained
in the first post). any thoughts?
--
Peter Jin jinyup...@gmail.com writes:
Grouping can not solve my issue because it works on one data source only. In
my case, data for a user scattered in 5 tables. UNION might be a way to
combine all tables to a data source, but I can not use it either (explained
in the first post). any
