Apache JDO and maven

/user-guide.html#Using_Proxies. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Meeting 11-Feb-2005

are mapped to a single table. Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, we also discussed that classes Insurance and Employee of the TCK company model should be abstract. I checked the current implementation: - Insurance is abstract already. - I will make Employee abstract which

Re: Assertion numbers in renumbered JDO spec chapters

think? Regards Michael Yes, that does need to be done. I can do that when I have my turn at the spreadsheet. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, hi Michelle, some chapters of the JDO spec are renumbered from 1.0 to 2.0: ChapterJDO 1.0 JDO 2.0 Extent

Re: TCK assertion spreadsheet

as soon as Michelle added the query assertions to the spec. What do you think? Regards Michael Thanks, Craig On Feb 17, 2005, at 8:10 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, attached you find a new version of the spreadsheet with the following changes: - I renamed POM to POModel and updated

Re: TCK assertion spreadsheet

Hi Craig, yes, I forgot about the legal issues adding an annotated version of the spec to the wiki. I changed the text of the assertion section on the wiki. Regards Michael Hi Michael, On Feb 18, 2005, at 2:56 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, Hi Michael, Can you please make sure

Re: Running TCK with JPOX

are: PERSONS.FIRSTNAME DEPARTMENTS.NAME COMPANIES.NAME -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Jira Administration

[...] -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: New Apache db project loosely coupled to Apache JDO

in the Apache DB group. Any of this make sense? Thanks, Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL

Re: pmf not closed

that PersistenceManagerTest then tries to delete when CurrentTransaction is run. These two run in sequence when you run maven runtck.jdori, so you can just watch for them to scroll by. Or you can be more clever and just run the two tests in sequence. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi

Re: Commitability

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Dependencies between ri11 runtime and r11 query

workspace. Otherwise, the project won't compile! The reason for the 3 .java files: I'm not familiar with svn diff and was not able to figure out how I can include new files into the patch. If anybody has a solution for this, please let me know. Regards, Michael [...] -- Michael Bouschen

Re: pmf not closed

and PersistenceManagerTest. Regads Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: pmf not closed

a similar change for ri11. Thanks! Regards Michael Thanks, Michelle -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D

Re: svn commit: r169919 - /incubator/jdo/trunk/tck11/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/api/persistencemanager

/jdo/tck/api/persistencemanager/PersistenceManagerTest.java incubator/jdo/trunk/tck11/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/api/persistencemanager/RefreshAllWithNoParameters.java incubator/jdo/trunk/tck11/test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/api/persistencemanager/Retrieve.java [...] -- Michael Bouschen

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 13, 9 am PST

. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 13, 9 am PST

://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 13, 9 am PST

: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Additional dependency from r11 runtime to r11 query

assign package org.apache.jdo.query (and all of its classes/interfaces/resources) to runtime20. If you do not have any objections, I'll send the svn diff on Monday. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Patch for JDO JIRA issue JDO-45

including this change for tck11 and tck20. You can run the patch by calling 'patch -p0 JDO-45.patch' in the directory trunk. Please let me know whether it works for you, then I can check in the change. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto

Re: FieldsOfDouble problem

: -2.225E-307 These limits are different from the java.lang.DoubleJava type limits. Any suggestions on how to handle this? -- Michelle -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: Patch for JDO JIRA issue JDO-45

runtck.jdorisingle, and the test found company.xml. Thanks very much, Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, I looked into the JIRA issue JDO-45: Need to do full build to get company.xml copied to target dir http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-45 I propose to rename the maven goal copyloggingprops

CVS dependenvy (was: Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, May 13, 9 am PST)

this would go away if you would simply toss all the dependency jars into a maven repo and ship it with the project. You can set the relative repo location through a standard maven property. -geoff --- Michelle Caisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is now JDO-51, assigned to me. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen

Re: CVS dependency

it with the project. You can set the relative repo location through a standard maven property. -geoff --- Michelle Caisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is now JDO-51, assigned to me. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, yes, we need to describe the dependencies

Re: JDO TCK TestRunner ideas

have a new property that just lists all the configuration files you want to run and then run the above in a loop iterating the configuration list. I did not try this, I'm just thinking loud here ... Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, I had an action item to investigate

Re: Patch for JDO-1

project.properties M maven.xml M project.xml Regards, Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012

Another api20 change

Hi, attached you find some changes of the api20 project. It adds method isDetached to the StateManager interface and add since tags to two PM methods. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Re: Another api20 change

Bouschen wrote: Hi, attached you find some changes of the api20 project. It adds method isDetached to the StateManager interface and add since tags to two PM methods. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Re: Another api20 change

did of course mean to say the jdoIsDetached() method. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Fwd: Changes for review

Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235

Re: VOTE: Change handling of null primary key during makePersistent of SingleFieldIdentity classes

. [ ] approve [ ] disapprove. Why? Thanks, Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: VOTE: Add ObjectIdentity to single field identity classes

Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66

Re: Patch for date issue

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JDO API compability with JDK 1.3

) at org.jpox.enhancer.GeneratorBase.readJDOConfig(GeneratorBase.java:1307) at org.jpox.enhancer.JPOXEnhancer.main(JPOXEnhancer.java:249) Exception in thread main Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael

Re: Antlr 2.7.5

of problems. Michael Bouschen is the expert who can tell us whether and how we can use the latest release. Craig -Brian Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael

Re: Inheritance proposal

) REFERENCES persons(PERSONID); disconnect; -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Running a single test in fostore20 (was Re: Problem with self-referencing relationship)

PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Inheritance proposal

) In table TB. No join element is needed since TB includes columns for the inherited fields. So TA only has rows for class A instances, not for B instances. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de

Re: Inheritance proposal

TA). -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Antlr 2.7.5

? We coul djust go to 2.7.5 which is in the repo... We added international character support in a non-standard way in 2.7.0 and have had to carry it forward through a few releases. Each release had its own set of problems. Michael Bouschen is the expert who can tell us whether and how we can

Patch for review: remove the text JDORI from error messages in *20 projects

Hi Craig, some Bundle.properties files in core20, runtime20, query20 and fostore20 define error messages that still use the phrase JDO Reference Implementation (jdo.jar and jdo-ri.jar). I changed the error messages. Please find a patch file for review attached. Regards Michael -- Michael

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

is marked as primary-key field and the persistence-modifier of a primary-key field defaults to persistent. So we thought there is no need to add persistence-modifier=persistent to the field metadata, when changing the type from util.Date to sql.Date. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen

Re: Please review this patch for JDOImplHelper

, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Problem with self-referencing relationship

. Regards Mchael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

-- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Does JPOX support PK fields of type java.sql.Date?

when the enhancer is called for applicationidentity. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D

Re: JIRA JDO-115

Hi Andy, done. Regards Michael Hi Michelle, your fix for SimpleInterface is confirmed. Can someone with the necessary JIRA privileges please close this issue (since I can't ...). -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Re: errors while running tck20 tests

: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time: 0.552 seconds. [java] Excluded tests: [org.apache.jdo.tck.enhancement.FieldAccessModified, org.apache.jdo.tck.enhancement.ImplementsPersistenceCapable] [java] [ERROR] Java Result: 1 -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH

Re: JDO-109

.resourcepool.BasicResourcePool.checkoutResource( BasicResourcePool.java:208) [java] at com.mchange.v2.c3p0.impl.C3P0PooledConnectionPool.checkoutPooledCon nec tion( C3P0PooledConnectionPool.java:232) [java] ... 25 more On 8/13/05, Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Karan, Hi, I

Re: TCK logging proposal

]Buelowstr. 66 Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ --- -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: 2nd patch implementing logging proposal

/ --- -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012D-10783 Berlin

Re: 2nd patch implementing logging proposal

-companyAllRelationships.txt: Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time: 11 seconds. --- Result: 10 of 14 configurations failed. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: Bug in XML testdata

Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ --- -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de

Re: Bug in XML testdata

rebuild each time you get a new jpox build. I suppose that in maven.xml we could put a dependency of the enhanced classes on the jpox enhancer in the uptodate test, but it seems a bit unorthodox. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michael, thanks for the patch, I checked it in. I noticed

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

___ Name: svn:executable + * -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

Hi Michelle, I installed cygwin on my windows which is a Linux-like environment for Windows. It comes with a chmod command. What do you think about the overwrite question from below: is this a problem? Regards Michael Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, two remarks

Re: Patch for new tests of schema orm attribute

Hi Michelle, Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, I installed cygwin on my windows which is a Linux-like environment for Windows. It comes with a chmod command. Okay, I have cygwin. So there is no preventative solution for this problem, just a cure? Not that I am aware

Re: Upgrade derby version in tck20

Michael, +1. Craig On Aug 30, 2005, at 4:41 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, derby recently released version 10.1.1.0 and graduated from apache incubator. So how about upgrading the derby version in tck20? The major reason is that the new derby version is available from ibiblio, so

Re: 2nd version of inheritance patch 1 of 2

enough to be working on right now ;-) -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

this helps. Regards Michael [...] -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

); + ALTER TABLE departments ADD CONSTRAINT EMP_MO_FK FOREIGN KEY (EMP_OF_THE_MONTH) REFERENCES persons(DATASTORE_IDENTITY); -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: TCK Schema : M-N relations

the latter form already, but not all of them. Regards Michael Hi Michael, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Craig, Hi Michael, I believe that the patch applies to the other datastoreidentityschemafiles as well. Yes, this is what I think, too. I will check in the change for all datastoreidentity

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

with subversion, because the property svn:executable is not set for all these files. Instead it might have to do with how windows sets file permissions for file created during the svn checkout. Do you have any idea? Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, some more remarks about

Re: Bug in latest SVN test/conf/configurations.list

Currently says schemaAttributeORM.conf Should be schemaAttributeOrm.conf Can someone fix this please -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax

Re: Spurious executable file property in svn repository

on how to change Windows file permissions in the last paragraph of the subversion wiki page. You check a box so that the default permissions get propogated to all child directories of the directory whose permissions you modify. I see, thanks! Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote

Re: javadoc

Hi Michelle, Thanks, everyone. Should we add attainGoal javadoc to the build goal in api20 and api11? Yes, I think this makes sense for the api11 and api20. Regards Michael -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, please try maven javadoc. It generates the javadoc under

Re: Connection Pooling

Watzek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Buelowstr. 66 Tel.: ++49/30/235 520 36 10783 Berlin - Germany Fax.: ++49/30/217 520 12 http://www.spree.de/ --- -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: New subpackages for TCK query tests

Hi Craig, Hi Michael, On Sep 7, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, Michael W. and I started looking into JDO assertions testing JDO query features that have been added with JDO2. None of them are implemented yet, so we will have to add a couple of new query test classes

New query assertions

, setResultClass, setFilter, declareVariables, declareParamters, declareImports, setGrouping, setOrdering, and setRange override the corresponding settings from the single string query. What do you think? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto

Re: New query assertions

Hi Michelle, thanks! Regards Michael Hi Michael, Sounds good. I've added this assertion to the working draft of the spec and the spreadsheet. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Michelle, I think we need a new assertion in the query chapter. It is about overriding elements

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

the sysproperty, too. Good catch! Regards Michael Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, nice work! I would like to propose three small changes: - All tck property names start with jdo.tck, so how about renaming cleanup.data to jdo.tck.cleanupdata? - I propose to specify a default (true

Re: error while sending attachments

email saying that i cannot send .zip files. So i have jarred it up. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D

Re: error while sending attachments

this would overload the diagram. If we think there should be an UML diagram for the interfaces and the factories, we should add a new one. Regards Michael On 9/12/05, Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Karan Singh, AFAIK you cannot send jar files either to the mailing list. Actually

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

Michael Craig On Sep 11, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, Hi Michael, Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests? The patch which i submitted earlier does not add the sysproperty for iut tests in maven.xml. yes, I think we need the same

Re: JDO-131 patches for review

should indicate that it's cleaning up after the test, something like: jdo.tck.cleanupafter or jdo.tck.cleanupaftertest Craig On Sep 11, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi Karan Singh, Hi Michael, Do you think we would need the same property for the iut tests? The patch which i

Re: Please review this patch for PersistenceCapable, FetchPlan, JDOImplHelper

. Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: JDO-131 patch (updated)

(localTearDown, t); -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: JDO-131 patch (updated)

of an issue, I have added the comment to JDO-131 that it is FIXED. On 9/13/05, Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66

Re: status update: ri11 enhancer support for jdk 1.5

] This sun-specific JDK class seems to be missing or renamed in JDK 1.5. I guess we only have to change the entry in ri11/test/conf/jndi.properties. If anyone knows, let me know. -- -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED

Patch for review: changes in top level maven.xml

if the jars of dependend projects are not available. I found a solution in the mail archive of the 'Maven User List'. It redefines the goal multiproject:clean. I copied the solution in the maven.xml in trunk and it works perfect. You find it in the attached patch file. Regards Michael -- Michael

Re: Latest version of spec with assertions?

intermediation software that combines heterogeneous data with services to easily develop and deploy transactional composite applications. Enterprises can quickly respond to changing business requirements and dramatically reduce the costs of data access and service integration. -- Michael Bouschen

Re: JDO2 §12.7.2: fetch-depth only for recursive fetch group references?

if you (Craig?) could clarify whether fetch-depth really should be limited to recursive fields only. If I'm not mistaken entirely, that means generic replication using detach/attach is made unusable in many cases unless e.g. you maintain your own version of JPOX. Thanks, Jörg -- Michael Bouschen

Patrch for review (was: [Fwd: [jira] Updated: (JDO-92) Remove support for GUI test runner])

Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin ---BeginMessage--- [ http

Re: class loader issue in java model - ri11 security manager tests failing

. Thx, Martin Michael Bouschen wrote: About the issue of a class argument of a wrong classloader passed to the JavaModel method getJavaType: I agree the code should use the class loader from the class object. The only issue is that the call clazz.getClassLoader() might result

Re: Assertion A14.6-21 (Query.getFetchPlan)

/ --- -- Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012D-10783 Berlin

Re: build failed

hosting the following jar files: antlr-2.7.2.jar antlrall-2.7.4.jar If 2.7.5 is not needed then i can submit a patch and fix this issue (i thought this thing was fixed earlier). -- Karan Malhi -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL

Re: build failed

, I need to check whether using antlrall-2.7.4 is ok. Regards Michael On 10/22/05, Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I found the following message talink about cleaning up ibiblio: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@maven.apache.org/msg39867.html It lists files in ibiblio

Re: Apache JIRA : project JDO - disappearing issues

page that shows all issues for the JDO project). I'm wondering how are people supposed to develop systems when the issue tracker is unreliable so no one knows the issues ? hm -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http

Re: class loader issue in java model - ri11 security manager tests failing

(until 9:30am) or on Friday during or after our JDO phone con. Craig and I discussed this issue briefly today. Thx, Martin -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66

Re: Apache JIRA : project JDO - disappearing issues

wondering how are people supposed to develop systems when the issue tracker is unreliable so no one knows the issues ? hm -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: Query : setRange clarification

TO toPosition with a TO keyword. Which one is correct ? The one in Chapter 24 is what was originally the accepted syntax and what JPOX implements currently. Thanks. -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49

Re: build failed

] Regards On 10/22/05, Michael Bouschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Karan, Hi Michael, I also had the same impression that once something is uploaded on ibiblio, it will not be removed. So what should be done about it? Does a request need to be sent to the maintainer of maven to upload

Re: Apache JIRA : project JDO - disappearing issues

Hi, the problem seems to be fixed. The All list now shows all the 192 JDO issues again. Regards Michael I see the same thing. Very weird. -- Michelle Michael Bouschen wrote: Hi, some news: the two issues Andy resolved yesterday (JDO-170 and JDO-174) are back on the list. But now

Re: Help me understand this

in JDO-188. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin

Re: class loader issue in java model - ri11 security manager tests failing

be a PreDefined type. Correct? The javadoc on that class already has it, so it's not a real lack of information there, just redundancy. Martin Michael Bouschen wrote: I have implemented the JavaModel changes as we discussed. Now the Class.forName is called in a doPrivileged block to avoid

Re: Range queries

, NegativeRange) will now pass with the fix to QueryElementHolder, and with JPOX CVS (nightly build dated 02/11/2005 or later). -- Andy -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33

Re: JDO-195 patch for review (JDO11 RI enhancer support for JDK1.5 classfiles)

, and jdoCopyField methods. Once resolved, we might address this by a second patch. Martin -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66 Fax.:++49

JDOQL and public static final fields

in the field access, as I would do in Java? This means, are Integer.MAX_VALUE and com.xyz.hr.Department.MAX_DEPARTMENTS valid JDOQL expressions? I think they are valid JDOQL expressions, what do you think? Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL

JDOQL: comparing char field with multi-character string literal

compile or does the expression just evaluate to false at runtime? I would expect a compile error. Regards Michael -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.tech.spree.de/ Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66

Re: Issue 135: Remove attachCopy from PersistenceManager

for deep copies is left to the implementation, as there is no standard way to deep copy. Craig Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! -- Michael Bouschen[EMAIL

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >