Hi Dickson,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:24 PM Dickson Rodrigues <
rodrigues.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> However when I introduced a second bindings file with a separate package
> mentioned in both bindings.xml files. The access classes for both bindings
> are generated in the package mentioned in
Hi Archie,
For a single binding file it works fine, JIBX_*.access class file is
generated in the package mentioned in the bindings.xml file.
However when I introduced a second bindings file with a separate package
mentioned in both bindings.xml files. The access classes for both bindings
are
Hi Dickson,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 1:51 PM Dickson Rodrigues <
rodrigues.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will you please take a look at the attached project and see why we get the
> access files generated in the billing package? I am using ant 1.9.14 and
> running it on mac.
>
Hang on - the
Hi Dickson,
Happy to help. Of course now I'm curious what the key difference is... keep
us posted.
-Archie
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:08 AM Dickson Rodrigues <
rodrigues.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Archie,
>
> Thanks a lot for your response and spending time on this.
>
> I created a new
Hi Archie,
Thanks a lot for your response and spending time on this.
I created a new sample project just like you did and it worked for me as
well. However when I try the same configuration in my project it doesn't
seem to work. I will continue to debug and keep you posted on how it goes.
Not sure why but I was unable to reproduce your issue using a slightly
modified version of your files.
Here's a shell script trace:
$ tree
.
├── binding.xml
├── build.xml
├── lib
│ ├── jibx-bind-1.3.3.jar
│ └── jibx-run-1.3.3.jar
└── src
└── java
└── com
└── blahblah
Hi Archie,
Thanks for responding.
Please see the details below,
Build.xml
Jars included -
ant-1.8.4.jar
ant-launcher-1.8.4.jar
bcel-6.4.1.jar
jibx-bind-1.3.3.jar
jibx-run-1.3.3.jar
joda-time-2.10.5.jar
xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar
jibx-extras-1.3.3.jar
Removed the old jibx jars
Can you create and post a *minimal* test case Maven project demonstrating
the problem?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:35 AM Dickson Rodrigues <
rodrigues.dick...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am facing the same issue as few others who have reported those here.
>
Hi Don,
Just wanted to say thank you!
I'm still using JiBX in several projects and it continues to work
beautifully for my purposes.
Glad it's going to continue to be usable for a long time.
-Archie
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:09 AM Don Corley wrote:
> JiBX 1.3.3 has been released.
>
> This
