Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade
The mailing list are a public forum. Let that sink in for a moment. As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in question. When was it sent? What

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread Gregory K . Ruiz-Ade
On Apr 5, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in question. When was it sent? What was the

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread Gus Wirth
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: The mailing list are a public forum. Let that sink in for a moment. As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in question.

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade wrote: The mailing list are a public forum. Let that sink in for a moment. As such, Helge should have been more careful, and not (presumably) put an email address in the Subject: header of an email sent to a mailing list. I can't seem to find the email in

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Gregory K.Ruiz-Ade wrote: .. I still haven't found the message (dated today, not the original thread) which you say included me in the recipients. To be clear, if someone can cough up the Message-ID for today's message, not the original thread, that'd be great. Todays message was direct, NOT

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point [added [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

2007-04-05 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
James G. Sack (jim) wrote: .. I can envision an argument that diddling email-addresses within the body might have unforseen (undesirable) consequences, but.. Looking at the archive of todays messages shows that email addresses within body text *do get obfuscated*. But it looks like it didn't

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point [added [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

2007-04-05 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
James G. Sack (jim) wrote: Hmmm, maybe it's already implemented? I think I'll add to the subject line of this email -- as a test message. http://www.kernel-panic.org/pipermail/kplug-steer/2007-April/003223.html !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN HTML HEAD TITLE Helge has a

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread James G. Sack (jim)
Gus Wirth wrote: .. Although you are correct in that the lists are a public forum, it is evident that we do try to do some minimal obfuscation to protect e-mail addresses. Evidently, the list manager doesn't look in the subject line since that's not an obvious place to look. That's the main

Re: Helge has a gripe AND a point

2007-04-05 Thread Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade
On Apr 5, 2007, at 3:27 PM, James G. Sack (jim) wrote: Helge is evidently a man's name. I was thinking of Helga, I suppose. Bah, I made that mistake too. We're all stupid americans, anyway, so he shouldn't have expected any better. :D Gregory -- Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade [EMAIL PROTECTED]