moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin',
As reported last evening the fired lead investigator for the House committee headed
by
Dan Burton was the man responsible for the Arkansas Project..a group set up to defame
Bill
and Hillary Clinton. The following may provide a little insight
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
He is probably an Evil Evidence Planter (EEP) who forced Monica Lewinsky to
visit the White House dozens of times to tempt President Clinton to betray
his marriage vows but we are glad
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afternoon,
Newt Gingrich has visited New Hampshire for the third time for some believe is a
prelim
towards his running for president. He was there to give a speach on policy to the New
Hampshire legislators. When asked before his speach about
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
HI Mac,
Even the original story in the New York paper was basically correct in
its reporting. Thousands of candidate compounds are screened every year
to evaluate potential activity against cancer cells. 99
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
The real question is why release ANY of the tapes? It's not up to the
public to indict anyone. It's not up to the public to convict anyone.
Doesn't releasing
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afternoon,
In January 1998 doctor's founfd two lumps on Susan McDougal's breast. She
requested a 3 day medical furlough , quitely, as to not alarm her mother by having the
news reach her via the media, to have them checked. Starr files a written motion
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"The widespread reactions from patients have raised questions
about how the media report word of preliminary medical advances.
Those questions were deepened in the current case
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evenin',
Ron thinks my recent absence from the list was welcomed by all. I would hate to
think
that was true. But since Ron has elevated himself to be your spokesperson ( ie Susan
Carpenter McMillian) it must be true. ;) So, I'll take my smart ass
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Leonard Booth wrote:
Leonard Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey Mac
Don't do anything rash like leaving this list. Ron's opinion is worth Zero
to me and others so stick around. I, for one enjoy your input and rational
thinking.
Len
Mornin
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D. wrote:
"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dear Mac:
No! Cease, Desist, all that! Or to put it positively: Stay! Continue!
Ron felt about the same and left the list, and now
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet another meaningful post from one of Mac's fans :-) Ron
Mornin', Which is one more than you have!
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of t
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I spent over 20 years in RD. I think I know something about hype of
technology. If Mac and Bill think I am lying again so be it. That was
actually my job.
Best, Terry
Afternoon,
Were you in RD for 20yrs. or a liar
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Often the same thing, Mac. Anybody involved in RD can tell you about the
fights over funding.
Only so many tax dollars to go around.
I was a technical program manager for Rome Air Development Center, which was
one
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Viola Provenzano wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
Hi Mac,
You are not only wanted, but would be sorely missed. Don't even think of
leaving, but consider the source and go on your merry aay,
Vi
Evenin' Vi,
I'm not going
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly the point. The press made leaps that the researches didn't. The
media put their spin on the story but in no way does that point towards a hoax.
So the reporters tell a different story than the results of a test would
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' All,
Over the weekend a major breaktrough in the cure for cancer was announced. It seems
a
combination of two new drugs injected into tumors in mice was successful in eliminating
the tumors. This is a MAJOR breakthrough and the media, in all
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh huh. If you have a mouse with cancer, Mac, you are in luck. If you are
a human with cancer you better hold on for a while.
One of the people that used the c-word was you, Mac.
Evenin', Why don't you put
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ignorance can be rectified but being an asshole is a
lifetime
position and you might as well get comfortable.
...Mac
Just because Kathy and Ed seem to have disassociated thems
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anybody with delayed broadcast might be interested in the demolition of
Burton by Tim Russert over the Hubbel tapes.
Best, Terry
Mornin' Terry,
I watched that this morning. It proved to me
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A small correction, Mac. Burton is a representative.
I stand corrected.
Al D'Amato (God help
us) is chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. That clown did a
reasonably responsible job (so help me) as did Fred Thompson
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HI Mac,
Nice to see you back! The bunker is a bit muddy but still impenetrable.
As long as the sump pump continues to work we are still in business. G
Bill
Evenin' Bill, A little leakage is nothing to worry about. My feet are dry and my
spirit
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very Funny Mac! LOL Y'all are giving TX a bad name, btw if you look
Florida is the one that has been "chair" happy lately, not TX.
Mornin' Kathy,
Yeah but Texas is darn right next door!
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
I was wondering that myself. If I read the story correctly they are
saying the kid never told anyone about this until after the murders.
Doesn't that seem a bit od
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
Hi Mac,
Perhaps we can convince him to join the law list so that you and Jackie
can tear HIM a new a**hole too. BG
Bill
Evenin' Bill,
I'm not done with this one. ; )
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Steve:
They still haven't said what he was doing, but they did say it was
definately lewd. And that he was alone. It was also a misdomenor and
all that he could get out
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mac,
You said, like others, you are "reserving judgment" and then you turn around
and say "there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations." You have
obviously bought the line about the f
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People do not hesitate in the slightest to trash those they dislike
repeating the grossest and flimsiest rumors as absolute truth
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rumor has it that Monica was sighted leaving the area, just before George
Michael was arrested :-) Ron
Mornin' Ron,
Naw that was Newt Gingrich in a wig and some sexy bla
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one doesn't know that this is purely political has their head up
the elephant's ass.
Hi Mac,
Of course it's political. I bet the Clinton bashers aren't going to
assume that Armey was guilty of anything just because he's being accused
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afternoon Ron, I don't think he has much choice. He's still down from
hurtin' jackie put
on him.
...Mac
Jackie said she didn't want to hear my opinion any more. I respected her
wishes. It's
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
It seems like there is more than meets the eye and when you look at as a
whole there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations. This makes me
suspicious of the accuser and of the story
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ridiculous! Any CEO who did not have complete control of the company would
be destroyed by doing what Clinton did. He would be out on his behind for
much less.
I didn't know that Clinton was found
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People do not hesitate in the slightest to trash those they dislike
repeating the grossest and flimsiest rumors as absolute truth while
complaining loudly that the most obvious flaws of their heros are just
unfounded rumors
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jackie Fellows wrote:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all
Just on the news this morning. Said he was abused repetitively by a
relative of the day care center he was in when 6 and/or 7. That's is
really all I heard--imagine
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' jackie, I'm surprised it took this long for the defense to
put this story out.
...Mac
Hi Mac,
I was wondering that myself
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
She said the actions by Clinton were "boorish and offensive" but not
"outrageous." I beg to differ. If you believe an employer does precisely
what Clinton was accused of is not outrageous why
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HI Mac,
LOL...I just downloaded my juno account and found 8 notes. 7 were from
Terry and Ron, 1 from you.
I think they are getting a bit frantic over this turn of events that
flies in the face of their opinions. The stretch is on to find some bias
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Terry:
You don't even have to go back that far. LBJ has a child out there who
also has LBJ's name on his birth certificate. But of course this wasn't
found out until long after he left
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Danny Ferguson is the trooper and he is a target of the lawsuit for lying
about the details. His story that he worked for Clinton in gathering phone
numbers
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
I deleted much. We can go on arguing over whether a propaganda machine
blackmailing reporters, making libelous charges in secret against
prosecutors and anyone regarded as hostile
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bennet's first spin was that the President didn't remember the meeting
with Kathleen, the president said the opposite, he said he had a very
clear memory of the meeting. I haven't read Ms. Steele's depo
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems your looking at the sexual aspect of the case, I'm looking into
the investigation and illegal acts that were done, if you read the plea
agreement that was just reached btwn Starr and Tucker
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No just as it doesn't mean that every person wether they be male or
female should not have to worry about their life being destroyed for
telling what happened to them by someone. That is what
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac:
Either way the office of the Presidency has been damaged IMO. There are
going to be a lot of people who are not going to run for the Presidency
now because they aren't going to want
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mac,
Don't you think that might depend partly on whether Starr's Republican
friends can be surgically removed? Starr has been very solicitous of such
concerns in the past.
Afternoon Terry,
From what I understand
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac:
I don't know why it surprised me, but it did. The other day I was in
the checkouts and there on the Star, Enquirer, and a few others were
pictures and stories of Clinton.
For some
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Wright wrote:
Steve Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But given the British handling of the IRA prisoners in the past I don't
think they have much room to criticize other judicial systems.
Bill
Sorry to get a bit touchy Bill
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evenin,
If Clinton's sexual past is fair game in showing a pattern of behavior in the case
of Jones v. Clinton and Jones claims she now has a "sexual aversion" despite having
sex anyway then why cannot her sexual history be used to refute
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mac,
In brief that Governor Clinton lured Jones to his hotel room and
propositioned her. The evidence is that it was in a most lewd manner.
A state tropper says
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Damn Mac! I'm glad you don't serve as judge for all otherwise hell when
I had a LCDR rub his groin against me and I told him if he did it again
I would put him on report in which I would have, the way
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' Kathy,
If Ms.Willey is so credible then why did she change her story for the
book deal? Her original proposal had nothing salacious or sexy about it.
When that version didn't sell her story took on another flavor. C'mon
now Kathy...you must admit
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E wrote:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac :)
You and I just have so much butting heads don't we :) :)
Afternoon Kathy,
As of today the publisher still says the story he heard on 60 mins. is
different than the one that was offered
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Kathy:
According to the lawyer who is handling the case for the clients her
husband stole the money from, Kathleen made a sworn statement which said
the on the day of her husband's death
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Mac,
I agree. It was HER attorney who approached the publisher about a book
deal that would be an autobiography and WOULD INCLUDE HER ACCOUNT OF
CLINTON'S SEXUAL
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' Kathy,
According to an avadavit signed by her friend Ms. Steele she did lie. So someone
is lying here. Ms. Willey, IMO, was following a script that apppears to be a little to
cozy with
the Paula Jones allegations. He distraught appearence
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afternoon,
According to sources, close to the investigation of Bill " The Swordsman" Clinton,
there is a possibility that he has had ongoing sexual relationship with a woman by the
name of "Hillary". There may be a child involved th
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evenin',
According to a an L.A. based publisher Ms. Willey's atty. has been discussing a book
deal with him over the past 8 weeks. The story that was told to him was quite differant
than the one Ms. Willey told on 60 mins. Their pitch to him was a story
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evenin',
It appears that with the publisher Michael Viner's relevation this evening about
Ms.Willey's book proposal that something very wrong and illegal has surfaced.
By all accounts Willey's, story according to her letters and the book proposal,
her
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Butler wrote:
"Alex Butler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Following a contribution I made several months ago, I continue to watch
MSNBC's InterNight and get ever increasingly annoyed with the performance
of Jerralyn Merritt.
Mornin' Alex,
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Mac,
Great post! I agree with you 100% I also wondered why, after being
dragged kicking and screaming into the Grand Jury, that Ms. Willey was so
willing to appear on 60
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff wrote:
"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac - concerning the underlying politics, do you or does anyone here
know anything about Web Hubbel (spelling?) being a common link between
Whitewater and these
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Evenin',
It didn't take long for Ms. Willey's credibility to get blown out of the water.
I think if Ken Starr did his homework she never would've appeared on 60 mis.
Sorry Ken, your little ruse to get this info out has backfired. If this was your
smoking
62 matches
Mail list logo
