[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 23 Mar 1998 21:05:20 EST DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-03-23 19:40:52 EST, you write:
Do you think there is a possibility of there being a genetic link
that
bonds
people like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
LOL...I don't know the question. Have you ever dreamed that you were
reading something but it was just gibberish and made no sense? That's
what this was like. And all the while I was trying to tell him that I
couldn't breathe. :)
Hmm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Jackie,
I'm sure Steve will elaborate on this, but the major cause of tides is
the gravitational pull of the moon as it orbits around the earth.
As for minerals, Calcium is essential for healthy bones and Iron is
essential for the hemoglobin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
There is also a type of dreaming (it has a name but I can't remember it
now) where the person dreaming can actually control the dream and what
happens. It's kind of like an internal virtual reality system. G Some
people can actually
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 21:14:16 EST DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-03-10 19:55:12 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, now that
time has passed and she has remained under the cloud
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Good points and I don't know the answer. :) I think that there are very
strict rules about when this type of evidence can be accepted by the
judge. But there has to be some situations where it should be accepted,
IMO. For example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
LOL...I think the point was that if there was this ball inside the back
of the pajama tops that it would be impossible for one to sleep on one's
back. :)
And my wife doesn't sew anything for me, so I probably won't ask her. G
She
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
And we still don't know the long term effects of the use of chlorinated
pesticides back in the 50's and 60's. Remember Love Canal? There were
hundreds of sites like it that never got the publicity that Love Canal
did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 16:51:34 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
Hi Jackie,
And certainly incidents like the Heaven's Gate suicide don't do much
to
change
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
What??? And deprive some people of the chance to be millionaires? And
deprive the Pentagon of procuring their latest toys?? Surely you jest.
Bill
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 17:03:49 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998 20:17:10 -0800 Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-=Today's Puzzle:
Homonyms are words that sound alike, though they are spelled
differently. (Example: to, two, too) One pair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
I'll have to ask my wife if she dreams in color. This is very
interesting. I wonder how much data has been collected on this one.
Bill
On Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:55:57 -0500 Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Jackief wrote:
No the reason I am questioning her statement is not because of your
statement about
Jones is trailer trash and he is President. That is not why I
question her
statement at all. I don't judge people for where they live.. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
I don't think it's political suicide to invoke EP per se. Certainly many
presidents in the past have invoked it, including George Washington.
The big problem here is that it is unclear why the specific conversations
with the president
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
43. Besides the personal rights mentioned or recognized in the
Government Code, every person has, subject to the qualifications and
restrictions provided by law, the right of protection from bodily
restraint or harm, from personal insult, from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998 07:27:11 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Terry:
Sounds like good old political talking to me. LOL
Seriously though there isn't any way to prove
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Linda,
It seems to be a type of Catch 22 situation. I have heard of cases (wish
I could remember the reference names) where the state has waited until
the birth of a baby to determine if damage had been done to the fetus
when the mother
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
One correction here. The Clintons lost money on their Whitewater
investments.
Bill
On Fri, 27 Mar 1998 09:55:47 -0800 Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Terry:
I have to admit I know
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
You're exactly right with respect to the rights of the woman and she
should be able to sue the person who killed her fetus for a large
judgment. But this does not relate to the rights of the fetus. It seems
that the law says the fetus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jamez,
Nice to see a new face.
I see two fallacies in your argument.
One, that everything the government does makes sense.
And two, if your argument is valid then alcohol and tobacco would also be
illegal.
Bill
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 20:36
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:26:38 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Creative statistics" is certainly nothing new, but is unquestionably
an
area in which Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
Crime went down in a lot of other areas that did not legalize guns. I
wonder how they explain that one. :) Let's face it. We have the highest
number of guns per capita than most any other country in the world. And
our crime rate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 30 Mar 1998 08:04:33 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
. I agree with Lott. This one is certainly
not like Anita Hill.
Bill: You really don't agree with Se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 31 Mar 1998 11:59:26 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Ron,
Are these unsolicited e-mail you're referring to? Or those stupid
ads
that pop up and you have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 31 Mar 1998 14:20:00 EST DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-03-31 11:25:29 EST, you write:
HI Doc,
Most of those shows are scripted and the roles played out by people
to
incite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
LOL...I used the example of statistics because YOU were accepting
statistics to support your point. Now you say we can play the little
game of statistics.
I think your hypothetical fails in a big way because we are not talking
about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Linda,
Bascially the ruling allows the banning of lie detector evidence in
military, federal and state courts. The reason cited is because of the
unreliability of lie detector test results and interpretation.
You are correct
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 1 Apr 1998 16:11:54 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LOL...now I feel left out.
Bill
Bill, don't feel left out. These are mostly for get rich quick
schemes an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I thought your phrasing was impeccable, as usual, and you are 100%
correct in what you posted. :)
The more I read about that 13 year old the more bizarre that case gets.
Looks to me that not only the kid, but his father and step
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Terry,
As usual you are mis-stating the facts and trying to offer a flawed
argument to support YOUR bias against Clinton. Every lawyer that I've
seen quoted about this story agrees that Judge Wright followed the law in
rendering this decision
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Jackie,
The place where I used to work had a PA system. A co-worker pulled a
prank that he thought would simply be greeted with chuckles. (This was
not on April 1, however)
He dialed the PA system and announced:
"Attention all empl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Len,
Good point. Perhaps Bennett should put a lien on Jones' legal defense
fund before she tries to drown her sorrows in a face lift. G
I was reading an opinion this morning that this seriously undermines
Starr's efforts and that he'd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998 06:14:48 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Make sure the Judge is a former student of yours ;-).
Prior to committing acts appoint judges husband to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998 06:33:10 -0800 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
Too bad the Judge can't make Paula pay all Clintons legal bills.
What are
the right wing wacko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
What's that "attributed to Mary" crap? If she doesn't have the guts to
participate in THIS group, then I don't think we need any of her pithy
comments funneled over here by anyone.
It's obvious that no one really is making
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 08:22:12 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 09:21:28 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mac,
That says the judge had to base her decision on whatever was
presented by
Paula Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 16:59:59 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
You are wrong. As Justice Stevens noted in his lone dissent the
courts are
very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Steve,
I used to work in a laboratory and we'd all send the new kid out to a
store for some fire polish so we could repair the jagged edges of broken
glass containers. Of course, there was no such thing. Fire polishing
refers to a method
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 13:25:38 -0500 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
HI Mac,
Wow, that was sure a short decision that Terry posted. Surely Judge
Wright said more than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 18:12:08 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
Hi Jackie,
You are 100% correct. Even Judge Stevens in his dissenting opinion
did
not offer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! I believe that was the sound of
another slam dunk I just heard. :)
Bill
On Fri, 03 Apr 1998 04:23:24 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Poor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Another topic: Had to share this with you. Didn't get a chance to
post it
early this morning. It appears that we have a local controversy
regarding
whether the making public of preadjudication records of a juvenile are
against
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Wow, I bet that's a great story! You danced for your students? How did
that come about. Got any pictures?
Mathau and Lemon are a classic team. I thought Tony Randall and Jack
Klugman did a nice job with the TV version of The Odd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Bill:
The law here is that if you own a gun and a kid gets a hold of that
gun
and either hurts himself or someone else with it, you are held liable.
But if your gun is stolen, I don't think that they hold you liable for
any crimes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
I just realized that if you substitute Lewinsky for Fuhrman in your note
that the element of truth is not lost a bit. I agree with you.
Bill
On Sat, 04 Apr 1998 11:47:28 -0500 Kathy E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kathy E [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Jackie,
What a coincidence. I had Sisters of St. Joseph when I was in grade
school. In high school it was the Brothers of Mary. I almost went to a
Jesuit school but didn't make the final cut. Perhaps I was lucky,
although my nephew went
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
The biggest problem with the gun ownership is the large number of people
who are irresponsible and shouldn't even own an air rifle. If the laws
were strengthened to punish irresponsible gun owners and if these people
went to jail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie.
I only ran into a few nuns who were very strict, bordering on what we
kids labeled as mean and cruel. By eighth grade I ran into a few who
used physical punishment.
In high school they used more severe physical punishment. Much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I think the word is common throughout the US. But I laugh when I
remember the first time I heard it. I was about 19 years old and was in
a company bowling league where my boss was the chairman for the bowling
banquet. He told me we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Sat, 4 Apr 1998 18:27:38 EST DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-04 18:24:18 EST, you write:
I almost went to a
Jesuit school but didn't make the final cut. Perhaps I was lucky
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
The thing that will finally end Starr's witch hunt is the thing that
started it all, with respect to Starr being appointed. That is the
political machinations of the right wing conspiracy group. These are the
same people that jumped all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
At the risk of showing admiration I wanted to congratulate you on getting
this kind of first hand information for us. Even though you had
effectively blown the other side out of the water with your other
references, this really puts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I agree in principle, but when you have such a disparity between the US
and most other countries with respect to numbers of people who are
injured or killed via gun shots I think it is imperative to look for as
many ways as possible
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Clearly Starr has no case against Lewinsky unless he can get
corroborating evidence to show that she DID have sex with Clinton and
that Clinton told her to lie about it. Her affadavit given under oath
states that she did not have sex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I agree, a total ban on gun ownership would be unfeasible no matter what
anyone thinks about the issue. But I DO think that a gun owner who fails
to take ANY precautions against guns being stolen should be prosecuted
for a crime when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
The original meaning in the Bill of Rights was so that the states could
have their own militia, but your interpretation is correct. Since the
revolution was directed against the tyranny of a big government there was
a strong fear against
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I think the smarter students were the worst behaved because they got
bored. LOL..I say that because I was probably the worst of the lot. G
In 5th grade I had worked out a neat system of bouncing hunks of pencil
erasers (I chewed them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Sun, 5 Apr 1998 13:08:24 EDT DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-05 12:52:10 EDT, you write:
Even Gingrich is praising
Clinton for his courage. Guess his people are conducting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
This is an example of the kind of things I think need to be done. They
may seem small and inconsequential by themselves, but can add up to some
effectiveness in cutting down on the numbers and types of guns available
to criminals
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
And here I always thought you were a Joe Six Pack kind of guy. :)
I think I'd be more insulted if I was a surviving family member of one of
the lawyers who got killed in that plane crash and I read your subject
line of "A good
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
No, she would have no grounds for a lawsuit because her contempt of court
was well within the law. She was held in contempt for refusing to
testify before the Grand Jury after being given use immunity. In those
cases the person has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 6 Apr 1998 10:22:06 EDT DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-06 09:34:12 EDT, you write:
Sounds familiar, won't these teachers ever learn that you can't
touch a
Black child
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
I find your subject line incredibly insensitive and cruel. These are
real people and not some party joke.
Bill
On Mon, 6 Apr 1998 06:34:09 -0700 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
And that's the point I keep making here. Unless someone understand the
specificity of the law in Arkansas that covers these allegations it is
impossible to fault the judge for making a biased decision. I read today
that it was not what
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Jackie is correct in that Susan McDougal has nothing to do with the Paula
Jones case. Starr wanted her to corroborate testimony from her
ex-husband that Clinton was aware of the illegal loan and that he was
involved in illegal activities
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
They would probably charge a fee for it. :)
Bill
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 03:25:28 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
Now that is what I would call a "control freak.&quo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 03:54:22 -0600 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
Or is that something planned
by the aliens? G
Bill
Hi Bill
Perhaps, they are leaking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
You know what they say..If you can't fix it, duct it!
Bill
On Wed, 11 Mar 1998 20:27:05 -0800 Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie:
The ball is suppose to prevent a person from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Yeah, and that becomes a separate issue. Most of the laws regarding the
admissability of evidence are flexible enough so that it depends on the
judge's ruling. And it makes sense that a highly skilled attorney will
be able to make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I have a recurring dream where I'm reading a newspaper or a book and I
can't understand a word of what I'm reading. I think that in some dreams
we are using a part of the brain that does not have access to another
part needed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
There are those who claim that everyone can be taught to do this.
This sounds made up, but I swear it's true. I still have a vivid memory
of a dream I had when I was about 8 years old. I was dreaming I was a
cowboy with some famous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:24:32 EST DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-03-11 01:34:54 EST, you write:
Hmm, a ball in the back of my pajamas, eh? I'm in big trouble. I
don't
sleep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Boy the way we condition our children to develop the stereotypes of what
a girl should be like and what a boy should be like is amazing. I like
to observe people and their kids in areas like the park or a doctor's
office. I'm sure
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
LOL...you can wield that axe of cynicism pretty good. There was a great
political cartoon in the paper. It showed two teachers at an inner city
school expressing gratitude that they finally got computers so the
students could surf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I think the only effective legislation must come at the federal level,
for the simple reason that travel between the states is so easy and does
not require any checks as is required when travelling between countries.
So just because
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 15:43:40 -0500 Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jackie Fellows [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill
I don't think anyone was discounting the polygraph if used under
strict
procedures and with the knowledge that many
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Terry is wrong again. That guy who wrote the article for Spectator
magazine that first mentioned a woman named "Paula" gave a very sincere
apology to Clinton and to the public because he fell for the right wing
conspirators' li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 10:51:18 -0700 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ASSAULT? I didn't know you were a witness to any assault! Strong
words from
a weak mind.
Watch it Mac. Wher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 16:24:54 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ASSAULT? I didn't know you were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
LOL.I've never really known any guys hanging around public restrooms
masturbating together, if that is what you are referring to.
However, I HAVE heard a lot about homosexual men hanging around public
parks and rest rooms looking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
Do you or anyone know the details about this? From what I could see
based only on what's been reported, he was in a public rest room (in a
stall?) and he was alone. IMO, that's a big difference from what Pee Wee
Herman did since ol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Of course it's all speculation. All we know is the scant details
reported so far. He could have been performing a vasectomy on himself.
He could have been checking for melanoma. To read anything like him
being high on coke or heroin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Because the fruit fly or any other pest needs the fruit/vegetable/plant
in order to live and reproduce. If there are no target crops between
point A and point B then the pest will not make it to point B. BUT, if
someone has a target
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
LOL...not only do you drag me into a discussion where I'm not commenting
about anything you misstate the facts. I never said anything about
"that's still a lot of executions." You must be thinking of someone
else.
As I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 15:38:49 EDT DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 22:21:19 EDT, you write:
It takes all
kinds I guess.
I've heard that before, Bill. Has anyone ever explained
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 15:38:47 EDT DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DocCec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 22:06:49 EDT, you write:
I think it's a bit much myself. Who cares? It DOES seem strange
that
he'd be doing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
For one thing the USDA probably doesn't have any authority when it comes
to guns and/or narcotics. But more importantly I don't think the states
or the feds want to set up a precedent that could develop into something
that would be like
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 19:12:24 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Afternoon Ron, I don't think he has much choice. He's still down
from
hurtin' jackie put
on him
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 08 Apr 1998 18:22:35 -0400 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If one doesn't know that this is purely political has their head
up
the elephant's ass.
Hi Mac,
Of course it's political. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 15:22:03 -0700 "Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
"Ronald Helm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with both of you, I expect a conviction on this case.
moonshine wrote:
I predict a hu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
ROTFLMAO!! Obviously Terry is a legend in his own mind. VBG And we'd
never get tired or reading your rebuttals. Everyone loves a good slam
dunk. But I must say that Mac appears to be a tad ahead of you now.
Bill
On Wed, 08 Apr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Not only that, but this guy doesn't have one iota of evidence to support
the fact that this even happened. You would think he'd at least have the
decency to know beyond any doubt that this was true. I agree with you.
After all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
I don't think anyone can speak for the group, nor should anyone presume
to speak for the group. But I can speak for myself when I say you have
never annoyed me or bored me. I find your comments to be some of the
funniest I've ever read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Oh, I'm so relieved to hear that you were not emotionally damaged by that
nasty person questioning your faith. LMAOsome people certainly have
a high and delerious opinion of themselves, don't they? It takes all
kinds I guess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 15:19:03 -0400 moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
moonshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mornin' jackie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
You'd think they would have learned something when George Bush resigned
his membership several years ago. But the really big money still rests
in the hands of the big companies that manufacture guns, ammunition and
accessories and those
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I agree with the WH on this one. This woman is a liar, fraud and cheat.
I wouldn't believe anything she has to say. I bet this appearance was
well rehearsed and choreographed by a cast of hundreds.
Bill
On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 15:13:30
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Len,
I agree that they'll get all the mileage out of her that they can, but I
don't think Starr will go so far as to indict her. And even if Lewinsky
gets immunity and changes her story and claims that she DID have sex with
Clinton and he DID
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
This kind of gossip can do the country no good at any time it is bandied
about.
Bill
On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 21:14:44 -0700 Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sue Hartigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Bill:
I think that we have
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
