Re: [lazarus] Compile fails on project with long pathname (MacOS X)

2006-05-22 Thread L505
Tom Verhoeff wrote: I recently upgraded to 0.9.14 and started a project, whose code is in a deeply nested directory tree with fairly long directory names, where one of the directory names contains a space. When compiling from the ide, this fails at the assembler. It seems to report

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
I'm a complete atheist and still share much of you POV because Brazil is largely (and my family is) Catholic (so I have some idea of what these people IMHO-stupid people think. Unfortunately, I don't know why, intelligent + phylosophical + logicist atheist...) Belief is a wise wager.

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
On Sat, 2006-05-20 at 14:37 +0300, Al Boldi wrote: Feel free to create OpenRAD based on FPC, gcc and lazarus ;) Lazarus isn't a language, it's a RAD. And a good one too! But it would be sad to see this effort being expended towards one language only. Lazarus is too good, not

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
On 5/20/06, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That programmers in other languages don't succeed in writing their own RAD, doesn't mean that we have to provide them with one, imho. But if someone else want to do that... be my guest. I'm not gonna do it. But then, people

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
Being atheist means you beleive that he does not exist. Certainly not. Not seeing something where there is nothing and where it is not necessary that there is something is not a belief, it is a knowledge. I don't not to believe that there is a Rammstein CD in orbit around Pluto, I do know

Re: [lazarus] contemplating future of Lazarus in context of Mono and dotGNU

2006-05-20 Thread L505
I come with a different point of view to Lazarus. I want to build projects that first feed my family and second please my sense of right. All of us who think this way should start a group/joint endeavor together because I am voting for the same thing, and I'm sick of all the folks out there

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
Thanks for enlightening us. But this whole discussion has really nothing to do with lazarus/fpc/programming in any sense. I brought in a quote from Blaise Pascal for the basis of my posts. And you should familiarize yourself with Blaise Pascal as some of his quotes are very related to

Re: [lazarus] OT - Request for PR noise !

2006-05-20 Thread L505
Upon your arrival for the final judgement you find yourself standing in front of Ra, the egiptian god. And he is pretty pissed that you were worshiping a false god. =) Wouldn´t that be funny?? Another quote from Blaise explains the answer to this.. I think Blaise says that no religions are

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-18 Thread L505
Can anybody explain, why googling with: site:lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net dynamicarray only gives two hits, but not http://lazarus-ccr.sourceforge.net/docs/lcl/dynamicarray/index.html It is a pity, that the most up to date docs are not completely indexed. I was just thinking

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-18 Thread L505
As for the Websnap thing, I did not tought about it; but I once imagined that as we have support for gtk / qt / win32... we could have a layer for 'psp' so as to generate forms in web format. (And push it a little bit more and you can have a full AJAX application compiled with lazarus. But

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-17 Thread L505
one. For the moment I'm sticking on my SQLite+html idea. The html format Ça va. What about a SQLLite database that stores the help info, and a php script that calls that database... No PHP required really. A CGI program written in Pascal that calls some sort of database, and a desktop

Re: [lazarus] Re: Lazarus File bigger then Delphi File?

2006-05-17 Thread L505
What would help is really powerful smartlinking (being able to rip unused methods inside a unit for example). Theres no such thing, that is what smartlinking is - KOL is designed around this but many people hate KOL because it uses old Objects and requires a bit of thinking - and most people

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-17 Thread L505
On 5/17/06, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason I currently use Google to search for freepascal documentation on the RTL instead of using my local copy of my help documents, is because Google itself is my database that powers the search of the freepascal documentation. Some

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-17 Thread L505
2006/5/17, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: one. For the moment I'm sticking on my SQLite+html idea. The html format Ça va. What about a SQLLite database that stores the help info, and a php script that calls that database... No PHP required really. A CGI program written in Pascal that calls

Re: [lazarus] Commande syntax error (makefile -- can't compile)

2006-05-15 Thread L505
When I try to compile either fpc or lazarus from svn, I always get errors on each line of makefile. I just can't compile. I do not understand why. Is it my make version? (MAKE Version 5.2 Copyright (c) 1987, 2000 Borland) rename Borland make to something else, gnu make and Borland make

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-14 Thread L505
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: If Lazarus puts pascal as a language on the map again, it's name is VERY well chosen indeed, as Lazarus rose again from the grave !! A RAD/IDE should not lock itself into one language only, but should rather strive to be compiler/language independent.

Re: [lazarus] Request for PR noise !

2006-05-14 Thread L505
On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:00:44 +0300 Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Calling it OpenRAD would probably be perfect, unless it's already taken. That's a description, not a name. Micha Call it DevCo IDE then ;-) Just admit it - the best name for the IDE is Lars.

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Help System Requirements

2006-05-12 Thread L505
Micha Nelissen wrote: Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: they use inside the *.jar files (html, straight xml or odt ...) and what viewer they use for the help. They do use the Berkeley Database for indexes, keywork search and extended tooltips. Berkeley DB ? Sorry, but that rings alarm bells

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-12 Thread L505
In your lazarus directory /components/chmhelp/packages/chm/ there is a unit called chmreader. It is simple to get a list of any of the files in the chm and extracting them: That's how easy it is to get all the files out of a chm :) Okay so its easy to get the HTML out of CHM (legally.. not

Re: [lazarus] Suggestions for Improvement

2006-05-11 Thread L505
2. Replace the delphi dfm with a real code init (java style). What are the advantages? Easier component creation control/management via ONE language. 1) Please do not forget, that then you will be able to Search / Replace on component properties if they are in code! Currently

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-11 Thread L505
Does Apache Server work on Windows CE? So I shouldn't use Apache for a webserver, just because it isn't truly cross-platform? Sometimes people get carried away with the whole cross platform advantage - when really there would be no advantage of having Dude, you are missing the

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-11 Thread L505
I think you are one of a selected few. CHM is basically compiled html files into one file. Why would I want to see the code of each help file I am viewing. All I want in the content. A single file is great for distribution (smaller and easier to copy) compared tho say a 1000 html pages

Re: [lazarus] Suggestions for Improvement

2006-05-11 Thread L505
Back when I started using delphi, I wondered what black magic was creating my forms for me? Why couldn't I see and tap in to the code that created my forms? I guess curiosity kills the cat. You can edit the .dfm. Just not the form and the dfm at the same time. The DFM never told me when

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-10 Thread L505
Even CHM format creates multiple files and depends on them. I actually meant HLP format on Win32 _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe as the Subject archives at

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-10 Thread L505
I don't see the big deal with external dependencies because almost all programs have one or more external dependencies: a system DLL/DSO, a config file, etc. I have. Lazarus works for Windows CE, does sqlite work on it? http://sqlite-wince.sourceforge.net/ But I wouldn't want to read or

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-09 Thread L505
On 09/05/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not very much in favour of creating yet another format. Standards exist, we should try to use them as much as possible. Linux - has no standard help! Man Pages! Indexing? use grep! (detect sarcasm here).

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-09 Thread L505
2006/5/9, A.J. Venter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:53, Alexandre Leclerc wrote: I'm sorry, I can't find the source code... :( The only code on sourceforge, well, I don't know if this is the compiler itself, but it does not look like. Any-way I've no time now to

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-09 Thread L505
sqlite is good candidate too (multiplatform,single file,fast, only one dll/so required) Sorry, but no: - No external dependencies, please. - Specifically: sqlite is a horrible database for use in Pascal. And very slow for complex queries, in general. What database is good for Pascal?

Re: [lazarus] New help doc format?

2006-05-09 Thread L505
There is at least TDBf component for DBase and some memory database components, but neither is suitable for a help system. Really.. and why? Too square? DBase creates too many files. How many for say a 100MB database or so ? 100's? Are they big files that take up lots of space?

Re: [lazarus] Creating a GUI based DLL with FPC 2.0.2

2006-05-04 Thread L505
In january I was told by L505 that If you decide to use fpc 2.0.2 remember that when you build a normal lazarus GUI style application you may have to change back to your old compiler in the lazarus directory. -- Thread subject: Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.) date 2006/01/12 I think my

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus Foundation pros

2006-05-02 Thread L505
Hi. What they need is people. They (we?) don't need a foundation to make a better website, but we need someone to make a better website. Obviously the core developers don't care much about that. They have other interests. Your idea of, making some improvements to the community as an

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread L505
I can answer that. It isn't taught in school at all. If you go to any school and I mean any school that teaches CompSci in any way they will tell you that, Pascal is a dead and useless language. Nobody uses Pascal anymore. This was almost the exact quotation I heard from people on a local

Re: [lazarus] FPC/Lazarus Foundation would need people

2006-04-29 Thread L505
In all of this talk about the need for a foundation it has been said how we could have these people doing this job instead of the developers. We could have others doing other jobs, etc. etc. etc. Well as the statements point out this needs people. It needs people that are involved and

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus/FPC Foundation

2006-04-26 Thread L505
On 4/26/06, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only way a real free server could ever exist, is if we had free solar power/alcohol power and free hardware foundations Free as in Freedom. The patronization - I've read the differences between cost and speech for 5 years now. I'm no GNU

Re: [lazarus] Passing a procedure as a parameter

2006-04-25 Thread L505
Ian bell schreef Thanks for the detail. I find it really hard to get my head around OOP. It just seems to put barriers in the way of what I want to do. Can you think of any reason why it would want or need a procedure in this form? I guess the best advise we can give you is: Get a book

Re: [lazarus] Passing a procedure as a parameter

2006-04-24 Thread L505
@MyEventHandle Closer. Now I get this error: unit1.pas(200,69) Error: Incompatible type for arg no. 3: Got address of procedure(LongInt, LongWord);Register, expected procedure variable type of procedure(LongInt, LongWord) of object;Register It probably expects a method which must be

Re: [lazarus] Serial comms, events and other stuff

2006-04-22 Thread L505
Excellent - good to see a sense of humour here. Does this also prevent me programmaticaly writing to the TMemo? Presumably not else it would be nought but a BOG label. The read-only property is from a User perspective.. user clicks on the edit widget and can't do anythin'. But the programmer

Re: [lazarus] Serial comms, events and other stuff

2006-04-22 Thread L505
The read-only property is from a User perspective.. user clicks on the edit widget and can't do anythin'. Can't write anything, I meant.. still can copy/paste, select things. _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [lazarus] Serial comms, events and other stuff

2006-04-21 Thread L505
3. In Tcl/Tk I use a textarea widget with keyboard entry disabled to show progress and data. The nearest equivalent in LCL seems to be TMemo. How do I disable keyboard input to this and where can I find documentation on this and other) components - the wiki seems fairly silent on this or

Re: [lazarus] FPC question

2006-04-21 Thread L505
Any idea how to rename the title of a page? See the newly added tiOPF page. Currently the title is TiOPF and it should read tiOPF. Probably have to cut and paste, not sure if there is a rename function in wikis.. _ To

Re: [lazarus] Serial comms, events and other stuff

2006-04-21 Thread L505
Try the ReadOnly property, set it to false Er, it seems to default to false; did you mean set it true? that would make sense. Yes.. sorry. Do the opposite of what I say. var CorrectAnswer: boolean; begin if Lars.Responds then CorrectAnswer:= not Lars.Answer; end;

Re: [lazarus] x86_64-win46

2006-04-20 Thread L505
Another question: does the current win32 lazarus snapshot already contain the internal linker (compiling time 2.34 sec.)? Can't answer your question, but I noticed that the compilation time includes linking time so it should really be called compiled and linked in X.X seconds since we do

[lazarus] Refactoring Subfolders

2006-04-09 Thread L505
Hi, the current copies of Lazarus that another developer and I are using do not seem to have a subfolder or subdirectory checkbox for refactoring. Do any lazarus versions contain that feature. Sort of like the search/replace tool in lazarus where you can recursively search subfolders.

Re: [OT] Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-09 Thread L505
There is no excuse for Oil being a raw material needed to ship food No, there isn't. Which is why those who can are switching to gas (which, lo and behold, farmers can produce that themselves) and hydrogen and trains anyways. The only problem is the lag of the infrastructure, that is,

Re: [lazarus] Refactoring Subfolders

2006-04-09 Thread L505
Hi, the current copies of Lazarus that another developer and I are using do not seem to have a subfolder or subdirectory checkbox for refactoring. Do any lazarus versions contain that feature. Sort of like the search/replace tool in lazarus where you can recursively search subfolders.

Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-07 Thread L505
You could split the file into pieces and rejoin it together later. I'd do it in 100MB splits, or 50MB splits.

Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-07 Thread L505
You could split the file into pieces and rejoin it together later. I'd do it in 100MB splits, or 50MB splits. Or you could just pay $10 for avoiding the trouble ;-) In other news, Flavio bought a copy of delphi for $500 to avoid the trouble of freepascal. It's a common dilemma: 1. give

Re: [lazarus] Temperary FTP Speace

2006-04-07 Thread L505
Thank you, but I appreciate the freedom and the power of open source ;-) Also, I can't see anything wrong in spending US$10 on something minimally important, why is it? No problem at all - I would spend $10-$20 on a I Love Freepascal t-shirt, for example. Remember: free software is about

Re: [lazarus] Linking error

2006-04-04 Thread L505
I sometimes only get: error while linking Well I tried renaming as.exe to as.old and the IDE reported the correct error, and didn't just spit out error while linking - so can't really reproduce the issue yet. I recall using Build All to solve the problem, but can't remember what the

Re: [lazarus] Linking error

2006-04-03 Thread L505
Hi Could someone point me in the right direction please. I have added the unit pgcl (a postgres access unit) to a project which built and compiled perfectly without any problems. Now when I build the project , a message error while linking occurs and the project compilation does not

Re: [lazarus] Linking error

2006-04-03 Thread L505
Hi Could someone point me in the right direction please. I have added the unit pgcl (a postgres access unit) to a project which built and compiled perfectly without any problems. Now when I build the project , a message error while linking occurs and the project compilation

Re: [lazarus] SynEdit

2006-03-31 Thread L505
On 3/31/06, George Birbilis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the Lazarus SynEdit version available at synedit.sf.net or some private Lazarus modification of it? It is a private modification. So the one from sourceforge will not work. Sources for lazarus one are on your hard drive under

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-03-16 Thread L505
Unless you have in depth knowledge about how every bit of ansistring memory management works, using getmem and freemem and pchars are simpler, no? Because you are not battling the automatic memory management. Now, if you are an expert in battling the automatic memory management

Re: [lazarus] FPC 2.1.1 and spaces in output path

2006-03-12 Thread L505
i dont know if this is a known problem, and if its a lazarus problem or fpc i have setup an fpc 2.1.1 from yesterday and use the fpc.exe as compiler to use crosscompiling. works fine but when spaces are in the output path ppc386.exe has an problem example: Output Path : c:\fpc test\ ppc386

[lazarus] Sniffing Synedit Tokens

2006-03-11 Thread L505
Hi when a Var parameter is to be passed, holding a TPersistent object like below (tmpattr)... syn1.GetHighlighterAttriAtRowCol(syn1.CaretXY, tmpstring, tmpattr); ..is it wrong to create tmpattr first? Is it just a reference to an existing TSynHighlighterAttributes When I create and free a

Re: [lazarus] Sniffing Synedit Tokens

2006-03-11 Thread L505
Actually, the parameter coud/should be 'out' (but I guess FPC doesn't even implement the COM-ish things ;-) 'out' is implemented and used. Michael. I've used it before :) _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

[lazarus] Synedit patch

2006-03-11 Thread L505
Implemented GetHighlighterAttriAtRowColEx from looking at Delphi synedit. Better token sniffing available. See attached. synhighattrex.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [lazarus] Synedit patch

2006-03-11 Thread L505
Implemented GetHighlighterAttriAtRowColEx from looking at Delphi synedit. Better token sniffing available. See attached. also, we might want to make some of those OUT instead of VAR parameters if you think it is better. Did not do that in the patch, please implement that if you want.

Re: Mozilla Plugin Panel component

2006-03-09 Thread L505
Just wondering how exactly you are doing it ? Are you linking to gecko or embedding the window itself ? If the latter, the way under the linux is to I embed the window itself. No reference to Gecko at all, though that was my first attempt at the component. I found an article on the

Re: [lazarus] Object pascal a Modern Language

2006-03-05 Thread L505
I guess it's not so hugely useful or else someone would have contributed it already. Mmm... if that was the case I wouldn't be programming because everyone has already implemented what I'm trying to program :-) Seriously though - it would mean less calls to SetLength when doing big

Re: [lazarus] Object pascal a Modern Language

2006-03-05 Thread L505
But I mean if you are doing things at different times in the program: for i := 1 to 1000 DoSomestuff s:= string + string; DoOtherStuff s:= string + string; in other words.. not one big concatenation at once such as: string.concatenate(string1, string2, string3,

Re: [lazarus] Object pascal a Modern Language

2006-03-05 Thread L505
Sl:=TStringList.Create; for i := 1 to 1000 do begin DoSomestuff; SL.Add(SomeString); DoOtherStuff; SL.Add(SomeOtherString); end; Result:=SL.Concatenate; // This can be optimized to 1 getmem call. Michael. I suppose this is sort of like SetTextBuff

Re: [lazarus] Object pascal a Modern Language

2006-03-04 Thread L505
No, if you need pointer _arithmetic_ you are doing it wrong or using a language that is assembly in disguise. Pointers itself are fine and dandy, but don't *(x + 3 * i + 2) = *(y - 3);. Would you talk like that to a human? No? Why talk like that to a computer then? It's just a sign that

Re: [lazarus] turboCASH on Lazarus proof of concept - grid

2006-03-01 Thread L505
A treeview is a totally different beast than a grid ? TVirtualTreeView can be a grid, a tree or a combination of both *looks out window* Pigs should not fly. I think this is taking object orientation too far. I could be dead wrong though. no, VT is mutch faster than all other

Re: [lazarus] OpenDelphi.org (off-topic?)

2006-03-01 Thread L505
Timothy Ha wrote: I would like to know your opinion about the new initiative called OpenDelphi.org That's plainly nonsense. As you can see, even the lazarus and free pascal contributors are little compared with other OSS projects. The OSS idea is very weak in the delphi/object pascal

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-03-01 Thread L505
Widestrings need to be like that for compatibility with c and c++ Not exactly, they need to be like this because the dang MS COM. However I can't see why is this different than the AnsiString vs Windows PChar-based API... I'm off topic here but: I think there should be a standard reference

Re: [lazarus] OpenDelphi.org (off-topic?)

2006-03-01 Thread L505
The compiler, probably the debugger also, is written in C++ and assembler. The IDE itself is written in Object Pascal. All packages are definitely in Object Pascal. Some of the Delphi 5 files check out as follows: dfwedit.dll is made with borland C++ imged32.dll is made with borland C++

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-03-01 Thread L505
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, L505 wrote: Widestrings need to be like that for compatibility with c and c++ Not exactly, they need to be like this because the dang MS COM. However I can't see why is this different than the AnsiString vs Windows PChar-based API... I'm off topic here

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-03-01 Thread L505
I'm off topic here but: I think there should be a standard reference counting mechanism (standards comittee?) between language. We have the standard ansi string header embedded in the ansistring but no standard reference counting mechanism. If this was the case we could share our ansi

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-02-27 Thread L505
is there some kind of official maintainer for the SynEdit component in Lazarus? I'd like to discuss some changes that were to the original SynEdit code and some new features (and refactors and restructuing ;-) I'd like to play with... Best regards, Flávio I'm not the maintainer and I

Re: [lazarus] Changing SynEdit

2006-02-27 Thread L505
Basically, yes. But as a matter of fact, what I was thinking about it to stop wasting my time developing for Delphi and finally shift my focus to Lazarus... How does M.H. and the rest of the Synedit developers feel? I have Delphi 5 too btw. Some of the ifdefs might even be able to be taken

Re: [lazarus] Program plugin

2006-02-24 Thread L505
If you choose for a dll system, I would choose Interfaces (and indeed, don't pass strings, dyn arrays or classes) Marc I don't have much experience with interfaces and would like to learn more about them. Can you import/export one to and from other languages? i.e. c++/c/etc.

Re: [lazarus] FPC source directory

2006-02-23 Thread L505
Now, in Lazarus while trying to set FPC path I get error message: The FPC source directory usr/lib/fpc/2.0.2./units/i386-linux/ does not look correct. Normally it contains directories like rtl, fcl, packages, compiler, ... This folder include some of folders mentioned but not other such

Re: [lazarus] Program plugin

2006-02-23 Thread L505
Could someone give me an idea? I am writing an application to which I hope to add functionality later. One option would be to simple send out the new exe to all users. However, I would like to implement a plugin system. So a new feature could simply be added and totaly integrated to the

Re: [lazarus] Showing URL in default browser

2006-02-21 Thread L505
It would be nice, if someone would write a package with a component to start a browser. Preferably without opening a new page/tab on every call. I added examples/openbrowser/. Maybe you want to add the above command for windows. This problem is very hard to solve on Unix. I can´t

Re: [lazarus] Win32 Api Calls

2006-02-13 Thread L505
Can anyone please tell me how can I make calls to the Win32 Api ? Is there a unit I must include or something else I must do ? Windows.pas or Windows.pp unit from FPC is what you need. Check this out: http://z505.com/PWAPI1/windows2/index-5.html Haven't started documenting it yet, LOL

Re: [lazarus] Changes to file on disk warning annoying

2006-01-23 Thread L505
I assume everyone knows in samba the reason is line feeds, but just to make sure I will double verify.. Samba converts files line feeds and this causes the editor refresh issue _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [lazarus] Changes to file on disk warning annoying

2006-01-23 Thread L505
Mattias Gaertner wrote: The files didn't changed on disk, so an automatic refresh would undo your current changes. With samba this is not the case - the files are changed. The line feeds are converted. At the moment the IDE does this: On saving/opening a file it retrieves the

Re: [lazarus] Changes to file on disk warning annoying

2006-01-23 Thread L505
linefeeds in samba Right, but my point is under SMB it _worked_, but under NFS it doesn't... your description sounds like it should be the other way around? -Tony Ahh, I see. So we have two different problems here, but with the similar effects: the refresh dialog window popping up. I

Re: [lazarus] win32 program icon

2006-01-21 Thread L505
Recently, support for {R$ } directive on linux was added to the compiler. I don´t know how this helps, however. no idea what that's for in practise... Unix usually goes the other way, separating everything, not stuffing everything and their brother into one file. I guess the advantage

Re: [lazarus] bug 0001055 Form autoscroll and Control.Align=alTop

2006-01-17 Thread L505
Salvatore, So if I understand correctly, your panel is not put on the top of the form when you set the align property to alTop? It sure seems to be from your screenshot! AlTop should place the panel at the top maximized widthwise. It is not maximized widthwise in the picture.

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-15 Thread L505
What do PPU files contain? symbolic links or hard links? See below: - The .TPU format doesn't contain symbolic links to other units, it contains hard links to particular offsets in the interface part of other .TPU files. If those other units change their interface, the .TPU is made obsolete

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-15 Thread L505
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, L505 wrote: What do PPU files contain? symbolic links or hard links? They don't contain links at all. The accompagnying .o files contain symbolic links, as they are standard elf or pecode object files. Michael. Ahh I see.. does microsoft visual studio create

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-15 Thread L505
So in short: The only way to get a major speedup in linking is to have an internal linker so the .o is not needed anymore and can be stored in the ppu. But i don't have the time to code such an internal linker so don't expect anything before 2007. And I wonder about the Windows.a and

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-15 Thread L505
All those external references to DLLs are generated by the linker and don't need to be stored in the dcu. For FPC we can do the same since ld now also supports direct linking to DLL files. When the FPC port to win32 started that was not the case. I remember that was discussed in the article

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-15 Thread L505
You can expiriment yourself, use the 2.1.1 compiler from today and compile everything with option -WI-. Oh! Send -WI- to the compiler? or the linker with -k ? Lars _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-14 Thread L505
Yes, this is my favourite. As you can imagine, on embedded nano-computers every single byte has to be checked if it does something useful, the other ones have to go home. ;) Do you think the PStrList will be useful, and some other fake (byte friendly) classes (objects) in CompactUtils? I know

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-12 Thread L505
What does your DOS window say after you stripped the DLL? Nothing peculiar. As to the .dll.dll I just choosed not to fix it :) since this was just for a test any-way. Since Vincent has indicated lazarus ships with a non-smartlinked RTL, you may be pulling in a big sysutils in your case

Re: [lazarus] Compiler speed?

2006-01-12 Thread L505
Delphi was very quick. Is there something about the FPC that is fundamentally different from the Borland compiler that makes Lazarus 'seem' slower to compile? It's the linker and it is GNU's fault not FPC. If there is a custom linker built this may solve the problem, or maybe we could look

Re: [lazarus] dyn. linked lazarus

2006-01-12 Thread L505
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:01:21 +0100 Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was just able to link lazarus dynamically against the fpc rtl/packages: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fpc/lazarus$ ls -l lazarus.dynamic -rwxr-xr-x 1 florian florian 7381916 2006-01-12 21:51 lazarus.dynamic [EMAIL

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-12 Thread L505
Oh! It makes me think: are you compiling under linux to produce this Nope. dll? Else, is there a way to have the rtl smartlinked for windows? Well since I use fpc 2.0.2 the RTL is smartlinked. I think you are using the compiler that comes with lazarus. i.e. in environment options, I set

[lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-12 Thread L505
Maybe others have discussed the slowness of the GNU linker before (C programmers, for example).. and maybe the gnu/gcc team can offer some answers as to if the speed of the gnu linker is going to be improved or not. So far some simple searches don't reveal anything.

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-12 Thread L505
Marvelous! I'll try that and it will most probably work. I'll come If you decide to use fpc 2.0.2 remember that when you build a normal lazarus GUI style application you may have to change back to your old compiler in the lazarus directory. The lazarus packages and components I think need to be

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-12 Thread L505
. :) Thank you very much for your help, L505, on all this issue. Try also compactSysUtils if you want a 40KB dll It is a drop in replacement for this particular situation :) See all this fooling around with compilers is why people use scripting languages and just forget about size issues

Re: [lazarus] Who Discussed Linker Slowness?

2006-01-12 Thread L505
An extra handicap for the linker is the fact that the windows unit, which is rather large is always smartlinked, resulting in (I estimate) ten thouands of object files (archived in the .a file). You probably won't have this amount of .o files in c programs. Vincent. Windows.ppu is

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-12 Thread L505
later with results... I still don't know why your dll was working and not mine. If this is because of the smartlinking issue... well... hum... I don't know what to say. Me neither, what was the error? I was hoping it was simply because you forgot to rename mydll.dll.dll to mydll.dll

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-11 Thread L505
Maybe having the 'mydll.compiled' file could help (if there is any)... I think this is the file that has the compiler settings. The LPI file carries the settings _ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: [lazarus] Help with DLL (using pchar, etc.)

2006-01-11 Thread L505
As an experiment for CompactSysUtils project I started a while ago, I have used this opportunity to demonstrate why FPC should reorganize the FPC sysutils unit for better smartlinking (i.e. create just one more unit than just sysutils to take care of smartlinking). Many functions in the FPC

Re: [lazarus] Document (virus!!)

2006-01-09 Thread L505
And I couldn't resist knocking you off your unix high horse. This should have been posted to pascal-other, both your message and mine. Oh, but there is no lazarus-other so it had to be said right here and now. This was just a joke, don't need to be so anal retentive. Gee, even I knew

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus RB Edition w/Plugger

2006-01-04 Thread L505
Links: Download and Info http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Lazarus-RB-Edition Direct Download http://z505.com/download/lazrb/LazRB_0.9.7Alpha.zip Is this the newest version? Where is the lazarus stuff? Mattias The latest version is on SVN.. I'm actually way

  1   2   >