Re: [leaf-devel] Wikipedia

2009-08-12 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:mhno...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:38 PM To: leaf-devel Subject: [leaf-devel] Wikipedia Everyone, We have a Wikipedia page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LEAF_Project -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes

Re: [leaf-devel] Project Admin

2009-08-04 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Erich. -Original Message- From: Erich Titl [mailto:erich.t...@think.ch] Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 11:13 PM Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Project Admin Hi KP KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: Am Montag, 3. August 2009 14:21:54 schrieb Mike Noyes:

Re: [leaf-devel] Domain

2009-03-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:mhno...@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 5:43 PM To: leaf-devel Subject: [leaf-devel] Domain Everyone, Interesting. Someone grabbed our old domain. http://www.leaf-project.org/ -- Mike Noyes mhnoyes at

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

2009-03-13 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi all, -Original Message- From: KP Kirchdoerfer [mailto:kap...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:58 PM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN? Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:09 schrieb Mike Noyes:

Re: [leaf-devel] Domain still desired?

2008-03-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Noyes Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:05 AM To: leaf-devel Subject: [leaf-devel] Domain still desired? Domain Name:LEAF-PROJECT.ORG Created On:21-Feb-2002 01:20:53 UTC Last Updated

Re: [leaf-devel] curl for Bering-uClibc

2007-06-29 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Burke Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 11:35 PM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [leaf-devel] curl for Bering-uClibc Anyone create or know of a package with curl for

Re: [leaf-devel] SF Project Wiki Beta (replacement for DocManager )

2007-03-19 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Greg, -Original Message- snip I am real short of time too. However, I look forward to revising some of documentation files for the LEAF wiki. So with a little vim regex tricks, this page http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/*checkout*/leaf/doc/howto/LRP-

Re: [leaf-devel] SCRUM

2006-11-02 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi there Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: terça-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2006 22:02 To: leaf-devel Subject: [leaf-devel] SCRUM Everyone, I just noticed the term SCRUM in a SF job opportunities post. It looks like it describes my poor

Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-18 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The exceptions are (IIRC) the kernel. That is a problem then, and we need to address it. I still say it is a non-existing problem, rather a stubborness. Do the guys at sourceforge.net really want to implode?

[leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant??

2006-07-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! WARNING - personal opinion inside! -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 4:39 PM To: leaf-devel Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] GNU Compliance (section 3) - are you compliant?? On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 07:41, Mike Noyes wrote:

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-05 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 9:48 PM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Docs On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 02:24, Eric Spakman wrote: I fully agree, but unfortuanatly I can't do anything

Re: [leaf-devel] Docs

2006-07-05 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PDF generation was part of our old documentation build process. It did work, but wasn't what I'd call acceptable. The wiki install was in my to-do list much longer than you realize (around three years).

RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Stick Image

2006-03-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 3:13 PM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Stick Image On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:25, Jorn Eriksen wrote: Here's the URL

RE: [leaf-devel] New LEAF branch?

2006-03-22 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi there! -Original Message- From: Natanael Copa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip I have been working on something that could turn into something that could satisfy this desire of playing with newer stuff. It has went under the codename Alpine and have been mentioned here in the

RE: [leaf-devel] lwp (webconf) packages

2006-03-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip IIRC, a USB keys can be formatted as a floppy type device (ie: one partition), or as a HDD (ie: 4 primary partitions). It should be possible to make an image that has an HDD partition table with

RE: [leaf-devel] lwp (webconf) packages

2006-03-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi forgot an important issue... The problem is normally related to CHS BIOS translation and I think it all depends on the USB stick size. Luis -Original Message- From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:00 AM To: leaf-devel

RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Drive

2006-03-15 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 4:21 PM To: leaf-devel Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Flash Drive Luis, I'm just one admin for this project. The other seven have the same permissions as I do. They can even

RE: [leaf-devel] NDISwrapper

2005-10-10 Thread Luis.F.Correia
-Original Message- From: Dmitry Lagush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 5:23 PM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [leaf-devel] NDISwrapper Hi ! Is anybody compiled NDISwrapper package for support WiFi card with Windows dirver model ? Can

RE: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-25 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 11:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you tell us what your intentions are? By reading your comments it seems like you are trying to force the creation of new branches. Eric,

RE: [leaf-devel] Re: Guides

2005-08-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:32 AM To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Re: Guides On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 15:00, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: I still don't see that bucu-upnpd.html is

RE: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support?

2005-08-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 4:25 PM To: Natanael Copa Cc: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] 2.6.x kernel support? Natanael Copa wrote: Erich Titl wrote: .. I dont have

RE: [leaf-devel] Extending LEAF

2005-05-23 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Koliwad, Ajay (GE Energy) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 12:45 PM To: 'leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: [leaf-devel] Extending LEAF Hello! In the course of product development in our organization, I am currently

RE: [leaf-devel] syslinux 3.x and APPEND lines

2005-02-25 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 4:54 PM To: leaf-devel Subject: [leaf-devel] syslinux 3.x and APPEND lines In syslinux 3.x, the APPEND line has a maximum of 255 characters. Is this going to have an

RE: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far.  There

RE: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - add 'pretty shorewall logs' You mean the table format (parsefw)? or is there more? Yes, it is the parsefw thinghy... - simplify log file viewing by not opening a separate window I was

RE: [leaf-devel] 2.4.26 kernel for wd1100.o

2004-10-31 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Victor McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 5:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] 2.4.26 kernel for wd1100.o According to Erich Titl's instructions on LEAF. Quote: The Bering

RE: [leaf-devel] ifupdown problem in Bering-uClibc V2.2.0

2004-10-08 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Jonathan Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 3:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] ifupdown problem in Bering-uClibc V2.2.0 Hi, list, To reproduce this problem: firewall# ifup lo RTNETLINK answers: File

[leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver [new driver location]

2004-10-06 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! I've managed to create a driver for accessing the 3 LED's and to read the button on a WRAP1C and compatible hardware. This is a kernel driver based on Martin Hejl's GPIO driver for Soekris. It was tested with a 2.4.26 kernel, the same as current Bering uClibc 2.2 version uses. It may or may

RE: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver

2004-10-05 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: K.-P. Kirchdörfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 23:13 schrieb Luis.F.Correia: Hi Mike

RE: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver

2004-10-05 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, Everyone, What about this? It's not perfect, and I think a better solution (Subversion or rewrite of FRS) by the SF staff will address this eventually. Proposal: * Create 'devel' package in our FRS. * Create 'name' release within that package. * Project

[leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver

2004-10-04 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! I've managed to create a driver for accessing the 3 LED's and to read the button on a WRAP1C and compatible hardware. This is a kernel driver based on Martin Hejl's GPIO driver for Soekris. It was tested with a 2.4.26 kernel, the same as current Bering uClibc 2.2 version uses. It may or

RE: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver

2004-10-04 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi Mike, -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] PcEngines WRAP1C LED Button driver On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 09:55, Luis.F.Correia wrote: For now, it can be reached from

RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF on Linksys Routers

2004-07-27 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Jørn Eriksen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] LEAF on Linksys Routers Eric, If you get a WiFi card to work for the PcEngines platform please share your experience as I

RE: [--ot] [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-07 Thread Luis.F.Correia
-Original Message- From: Lynn Avants [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 3:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [--ot] [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl) On Tuesday 06 July 2004 03:58 pm, Erich Titl wrote: [...] Some time ago I tried

RE: [leaf-devel] New Website

2004-05-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
[snip] Tom, Thanks for the feedback. :-) The readability of the nav bar may be related to the small caps, and fonts you have installed. Do you have the Bitstream Vera fonts installed? I agree with KP that the Releases/Branches menu should return. I'll give this serious consideration.

RE: [leaf-devel] [Fwd: Re: Mike Noyes]

2004-04-15 Thread Luis.F.Correia
-Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] [Fwd: Re: Mike Noyes] On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 04:09, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Mike Noyes has been in a bicycle accident (see

RE: [leaf-devel] Bering on CD

2004-02-27 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 10:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] Bering on CD I'm getting new network service soon (hopefully more bandwidth!), and will be taking the opportunity

FW: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead

2003-06-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Sorry Lynn, this got to you but was intended for the list -Original Message- From: Luis.F.Correia Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:10 AM To: 'Lynn Avants' Subject: RE: [leaf-devel] Linux Router Project Dead Lynn and others: what a shitload of crap. I was also in the linuxrouter

RE: [leaf-devel] bering 1.2 kernel config file

2003-06-06 Thread Luis.F.Correia
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/latest/development/kernel/ -Original Message- From: Greg Cockburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 9:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] bering 1.2 kernel config file Can some one please supply the

RE: [leaf-devel] Command recall Oxygen(yes) Bering(no) DF(no)

2002-10-14 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Command recall that is used in all Leaf variants uses a patch made by someone from the LRP community to add 'command history' to the original ASH. It may be possible that this patch is not functional for long lines. Please note that ash has had no changes since 1999... -Original

RE: [leaf-devel] Command recall Oxygen(yes) Bering(no) DF(no)

2002-10-14 Thread Luis.F.Correia
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Command recall Oxygen(yes) Bering(no) DF(no) On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:36:35AM +0100, Luis.F.Correia wrote: Command recall that is used in all Leaf variants uses a patch made by someone from the LRP community to add 'command history' to the original ASH

RE: [leaf-devel] FAQs sec13: Developer Questions Answered

2002-10-01 Thread Luis.F.Correia
When you compile a C or C++ program, by default the compiler adds symbols and debugging information. This is good during development because you can debug a program going step by step, seeing the original lines of C code. After everyhing is OK, you either compile the program without debug info,

RE: [leaf-devel] Bering compiled with uClibc

2002-09-30 Thread Luis.F.Correia
why GNU sed? Because BusyBox sed is pretty broken when running complex scripts, sed is pretty small, and sed features are used almost as much as shell-script in LEAF/LRP systems, and once again, busybox sed wasn't around (at least in a usable form) when most of the current distributions were

[leaf-devel] Bering compiled with uClibc

2002-09-29 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Ok guys, here's a crazy thought: For a while it puzzled me why didn't LEAF evolve to a more recent and stable libc. Then I looked a bit into it and realised the obvious, to better support virtually everything, libc has bloated. Its fat, huge and ugly. So some time in the past two weeks, I

RE: [leaf-devel] Quick and Dirty LRP Package How-To

2002-09-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Did you create and populate the corresponding zebra.list, zebra.help, etc? -Original Message- From: Eric B Kiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 4:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] Quick and Dirty LRP Package How-To Hey everybody, I have

RE: [Leaf-devel] RE: [leaf-user] Webbased configuration

2002-08-30 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I also agree perl would be an overkill. What we need is to create a framework like we have for lrps for web based management. Every lrp must have a web based config template that will be used by a master web script. The template format and scripting needs to be developed and standardised. What

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hi there, and (bug?) report

2002-06-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
if you included your package name as the last one, did you produce an extra line at the end? Debian based systems like and extra line at the end. Or I might also be wrong :) -Original Message- From: Jon Clausen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:57 AM To:

RE: [Leaf-devel] improvement Mail Bering

2002-06-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Just a small suggestion, since we had a lot of issues in the past concering mail from the router: Why can't we forget about the POSIXness scripts for mail and create a (very) small package just for this function? Then we could use other methods for sending mail like something based on the

RE: [Leaf-devel] Re: [leaf-user] To Bering users: help us to release 1.0

2002-06-04 Thread Luis.F.Correia
And as a last point: The current CD building process with isolinux is technically the most advanced solution, anyway I can't boot with it. HP Anvin tells us in a few places, that a lot of older bios are buggy and will only boot with the ugly syslinux/bootdisk.img solution. In opposite to

RE: [Leaf-devel] RE: Booting Bering from /dev/hda2

2002-05-17 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Have you loaded the correct modules loaded? Have you read the documentation? -Original Message- From: Richard Herrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:00 PM To: Chad Carr; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] RE: Booting Bering from /dev/hda2 I'm

RE: [Leaf-devel] bering CD syslinux-style?

2002-05-07 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I guess it is correct, although I will have to check it out :) -Original Message- From: K.-P. Kirchdörfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 4:50 PM To: LEAF-dev Subject: [Leaf-devel] bering CD syslinux-style? A question to the Bering crew about required files on

RE: [Leaf-devel] Small SMTP send-only MTA

2002-03-18 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hey! That's neat! I'll give it a go later on :) -Original Message- From: Serge Caron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 5:39 PM To: LEAF Subject: [Leaf-devel] Small SMTP send-only MTA Hello all, Here is a small (5277 bytes, 5.5kb on floppy) send only MTA

RE: [Leaf-devel] Re: Standards and due process :-)

2002-03-01 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Adding water to a boiling and already full kettle... Why can't we use a concept similar to this: assume vfat is used /assume Package name: pppd-2.1.4 Package files: pppd-2.1.4-bin.lrp, pppd-2.1.4-conf.lrp pppd-bin.lrp contains all necessary binaries and 'non-editable' scripts, pppd-conf.lrp

[Leaf-devel] Re: Standards and due process :-)

2002-03-01 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Correcting subject line. Done :) I honestly cannot express myself in very fluently in English. Therefore, you will have to bear with me for a while. Try to rearrange my sentences so that they make some sense. Comments below start with LC [snip] Adding water to a boiling and already

[Leaf-devel] Introducing myself

2002-03-01 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Well, I guess I never did properly introduce myself... I'm currently working as a developper for a Portuguese Institute, preparing a Windows NT 4 Unattended Installation that provides for a fully working workstation for front and backoffice users. I have been in contact on and off with Linux

RE: [Leaf-devel] SF changes TOS

2002-02-13 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Can you explain me in laymen terms what DCMA stands for? I know it means Digital Copyright Millenium Act but what is this exactly? I also know that, to the Portuguese law, software patents do not exist. -Original Message- From: Mike Noyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [Leaf-devel] Announcement: LEAF 2.4.16 + Shorewall 1.2.2

2002-01-22 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads glibc 2.0.7 for floppy releases and glibc whatever for CD, HD et al... I think supporting 3 different c-libraries at a time will cause lots of problems for users, and for the developers supporting them. I'd prefer to drop

RE: [Leaf-devel] Re: your PPPd analog modem image

2002-01-18 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I will test it also! Maybe I will now move away from EigerStein2B... :) -Original Message- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 7:37 PM To: Larry Platzek Cc: LEAF-dev Subject: [Leaf-devel] Re: your PPPd analog modem image - Original

RE: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] feature add

2002-01-15 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I can support that! In fact I was rather surprised that this question took all this time to come up. If we did branch away from LRP, we definitely should be named differently. In every possible way. But that is just my humble opinion. grin -Original Message- From: Matt Schalit

RE: [Leaf-devel] Oxygen Updates

2001-12-20 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Good point. It may be possible as cdrtools (mkisofs) compiles fine under cygwin. I haven't tried though. But I agree it will be harder for many end-users. Ewald, mkisofs / cdrecord work fine in a pure Windows config. I use them to produce almost all CD's here at work. I can make them

RE: [Leaf-devel] Oxygen Updates

2001-12-19 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Nathan, When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44 and 2.88. Check which format Oxygen-CD is using and correct your config file. -Original Message- From: Angelacos, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:33 PM To: LEAF Development

[Leaf-devel] My 'compile for LEAF' experience...

2001-11-29 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Ok, let's start: I grabbed a RedHat 7.0 CD and installed a custom system with only the 'Kernel devel, Devel and Utilities' selected. After a sucessfull install, I booted and installed the extra 'compat' rpms. As a note, one should use the RPM's stated in

[Leaf-devel] Framebuffer vnc

2001-09-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! I read some time ago, that someone was triyng to make a Framebuffer vnc combination for remote administration. Is there something that I can test? The kernel, distro does not mind, I just want to see the results Thanks! Luis Correia ___

RE: [Leaf-devel] Framebuffer vnc

2001-09-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
? -Original Message- From: David Douthitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:55 PM To: LEAF Devel Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Framebuffer vnc Luis.F.Correia wrote: I read some time ago, that someone was triyng to make a Framebuffer vnc combination for remote

RE: [Leaf-devel] Framebuffer vnc

2001-09-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
it can be built? -Scott On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Jeff Newmiller wrote: On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote: Let me explain it better: A router/firewall LEAF box running a framebuffer-enabled kernel, has a vncserver that we as admins could connect to using a very normal vncviewer

[Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?

2001-09-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Last night, while browsing around I started to get entries like this on my logs. I'm using an ES2B modified version (PPP) Is this a CodeRed scan? Sorry that it is not properly formatted. Also I lost the link to that page on where we could put lines like this to get extra info. Could someone

RE: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?

2001-09-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
It's a request to my router/firewall which has nothing on it :) -Original Message- From: Pim van Riezen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:49 PM To: Luis.F.Correia Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan? Luis.F.Correia [EMAIL PROTECTED] tapped some

RE: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?

2001-09-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
To: Luis.F.Correia Cc: LEAF-DEVEL (E-mail) Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan? Luis: Heya. I think the page you're asking about is this one: www.echogent.com/cgi-bin/fwlog.pl I sent Mike the code to get that running on the LEAF site, I suspect he's been way

RE: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan?

2001-09-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:38 PM To: LEAF-DEVEL (E-mail) Subject: RE: [Leaf-devel] Is this a CodeRed scan? Thanks Scott! THAT was indeed the page I was looking for. And in the logs there are a big number of 3 in-a-row logs... I guess

[Leaf-devel] Have you guys seen this?

2001-08-24 Thread Luis.F.Correia
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/21253.html Luis Correia ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Leaf-devel] This could be useful, Ports used

2001-08-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
http://www.simovits.com/nyheter9902.html Luis Correia ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with CD1... It should boot, but I get nothing. Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt... I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will boot (target mode) while the latter will not. I have tried

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Mike, If you read the manual, HHL-JE-20.PDF, Chapter3 on page 19, Installing HHL 2.0 on an IA-32/x86 Target for a Source- base Installation Right on the Overview chapter you can read: The HHL 2.0 CDs for IA-32/x86 targets are bootable, and may be booted directly on a target whose BIOS provides

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
No. Don't bother Mike. Really, as I continue to read the pdf, I reckon that we should go in the cross-compiling direction. Why boot and install a target if you haven't decide what packages will ou put there? I will investigate further on. I have had little experience with a full-distro but

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-26 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Jeff, all of your comments check out with mine, except this one: In our case, the final product would probably be a generic 486, but I don't see support for that. 486 platforms are NOT supported. We have to evolve a little :( This reads on manual page 46: This LSP was built for 586 processors

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-25 Thread Luis.F.Correia
I'm sorry... (again) I should have RTFM'd The Journeyman is a development system as Jeff says. But, I should boot under a x86 system, maybe as hdc s Charles suggested. Anyway, after trying on several machines here @ work yesterday, I came to the conclusion that it should be installed on a

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi, I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong with CD1... It should boot, but I get nothing. Opening the same CD and extracting the bootflop.img which is under the bootimg directory, and put it on a floppy, still does not boot. Any pointers? Thanks -Original

RE: [Leaf-devel] Hard-Hat

2001-06-21 Thread Luis.F.Correia
One extra thought! MD5 checksums ARE OK!!! Bye! p.s. Charles, if you managed to boot it, can you privately send me the boot floppy? -Original Message- From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 5:55 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [Leaf

RE: [Leaf-devel] Suggestion for improvement

2001-06-15 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Take a look at Cisco I'd say. I never have to compile IOS from source, but they're pretty responsible in reporting security issues. Provided you'll pay for the fixes. They do NOT offer nothing for free... but they never said that either... ___