RE: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-27 Thread Roger Jarrett
...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Kathy Shiell-Stokes Sent: Thursday, 12 November 2009 3:02 p.m. To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames ...or you could also put identifying information within privacy brackets[[]].This is VERY handy in preventing

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-26 Thread Brian/Support
...@madisontelco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:35 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames I use a different approach entirely because I like how it looks in the reports that I do for my clients and for myself. I use 10 underlines in a row for a name

RE: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Boyd Miller
Jennifer, I just leave the field blank. This doesn't cause any problems on screen or in reports, and in the normal Name List, all the people without surnames show at the top of the list. Boyd -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jennifer Dorner wrote: I cannot find on the Legacy site how they recommend dealing with individuals whose surnames are unknown. In a previous program, I would put two slashes (//) in the surname field, but when I do this in Legacy it warns me about adding symbols. What is advised: leave the

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Michele Lewis
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames Jennifer Dorner wrote: I cannot find on the Legacy site how they recommend dealing with individuals whose surnames are unknown. In a previous program, I would put two slashes (//) in the surname field, but when I do this in Legacy it warns me about adding

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Laura Johnson
I use a different approach entirely because I like how it looks in the reports that I do for my clients and for myself. I use 10 underlines in a row for a name. In using this to send reports to family members, I find they fill in the blanks easier and faster than seeing 'Unknown in the

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Laura, You make a very valid point for the purposes of your reports, which in this case are designed to elicit a response from the recipients. It also illustrates that the treatment of unknowns depends on the personal choice and end use, as I would not wish for underscores except for the

RE: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Brian L. Lightfoot
Johnson [mailto:rngad...@madisontelco.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 3:35 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames I use a different approach entirely because I like how it looks in the reports that I do for my clients and for myself. I use 10

Re: [LegacyUG] unknown surnames

2009-11-11 Thread Kathy Shiell-Stokes
...or you could also put identifying information within privacy brackets[[]].This is VERY handy in preventing the accidental merging of the 35,000 unknowns in your database. . By putting(for example)[[wife of Joe Blow]] into your database as a first or last name for an unknown female, the