Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-06-07 Thread ne1uno
I feel bad cheating on eliza. it is what it is On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 5:08:39 PM UTC-4 Félix wrote: > I now use it somewhat daily to help translate little snippets and small > methods here and there to help finish leojs, i only used chatGpt which is > gpt3 under the hood. it often makes

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-27 Thread Robert-Felix
I now use it somewhat daily to help translate little snippets and small methods here and there to help finish leojs, i only used chatGpt which is gpt3 under the hood. it often makes mistakes and you've really got to be a programmer to revise the code it gives out before using it... but i've heard

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-26 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:11 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > This is an interesting account of someone doing real programming - > refactoring and simplifying version 1 - with the help of not one but two > LLM bots. He wanted to compare how the two differed and how useful each > would be - When the

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-24 Thread Thomas Passin
This is an interesting account of someone doing real programming - refactoring and simplifying version 1 - with the help of not one but two LLM bots. He wanted to compare how the two differed and how useful each would be - When the rubber duck talks back

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 1:38 PM Thomas Passin wrote: > And here is the earlier transcript, reformated - the chatbot's doing a lot > of hand-waving! Imo, the response is drivel. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
And here is the earlier transcript, reformated - the chatbot's doing a lot of hand-waving! write a short user's guide about how to manage a web site with the leo-editor, and do not explain what the leo-editor or a web site are ChatGPT Sure! Here's a short user's guide on managing a website

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
OK, this should be more readable: explain briefly what advantages the leo-editor has over vs-code ChatGPT The Leo editor and Visual Studio Code (VS Code) are both powerful text editors, but they have different features and advantages. Here are some advantages of the Leo editor over VS Code:

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
Rats! I'll try to reformat that one, too. On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 2:32:57 PM UTC-4 Thomas Passin wrote: > Hmm, that formatting came out weird. I'll see if I can reformat it better > - the above was directly copy-pasted from the browser. In the meantime, > here's another interesting

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
Hmm, that formatting came out weird. I'll see if I can reformat it better - the above was directly copy-pasted from the browser. In the meantime, here's another interesting one: explain briefly what advantages the leo-editor has over vs-code The Leo editor and Visual Studio Code (VS Code)

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
And here's one where it's clear the bot is just waving its hands rapidly: write a short user's guide about how to manage a web site with the leo-editor, and do not explain what the leo-editor or a web site are Sure! Here's a short user's guide on managing a website with the Leo editor: 1.

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-18 Thread Thomas Passin
I thought this might be a good test. ChatGPT came up with something I probably would not have thought of (don't know if it would actually work, though!): write a python script to copy the line containing the cursor in the Leo-editor, but do not explain what the leo-editor is ChatGPT

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-05-11 Thread Félix
Imagine for a second, if you will, being a teacher, and being able to transliterate the text of a lesson, or whole textbook into something written as if the author was some personal super-hero, or mythic legendary being, that the child is specifically currently obsessed with... Even more,

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-26 Thread Thomas Passin
An interesting post on the subject, including "alignment": Large language model alignment “bias” and cultural consensus theory . On Friday, April 21, 2023 at 12:57:32 PM UTC-4 Edward K. Ream wrote:

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-21 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:13 AM Thomas Passin wrote: > And now comes Google: Google's Bard AI Chatbot Can Now Help You Code and > Create Functions For Google Sheets >

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-21 Thread Thomas Passin
And now comes Google: Google's Bard AI Chatbot Can Now Help You Code and Create Functions For Google Sheets .

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-19 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 6:42 PM Thomas Passin wrote: ...I am not sure I am ever going to write code completely by hand again! > And I expect these tools to get better fast." Thanks for this quote. I wouldn't dispute it. My prediction: some time in the future AI's will program in their own

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-18 Thread Thomas Passin
And look at this (Stan is a very sophisticated system for doing Bayesian calculations by generating an sampling distributions - ChatGPT4 writes Stan code so I don’t have to. The author's

Re: Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-17 Thread Thomas Passin
And there's this slashdot report - https://slashdot.org/story/23/04/14/2152250/overemployed-hustlers-exploit-chatgpt-to-take-on-even-more-full-time-jobs?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon_medium=feed People are using ChatGPT to be able to take on additional side hustles. it does much of the extra

Impressive ChatGPT responses

2023-04-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
ChatGPT generates impressive answers for the following queries: "Disprove the assertion that the earth is flat." "Prove that the earth is flat." Imo, the responses to these queries are more compelling than any I have seen. Other example queries : "Disprove the theory of intelligent design."