A possible solution to Shane's desire to opt-out of
filtering:
From the new terms conditions at
http://www.paradise.net.nz/detect/frames/default/pages/main/terms.html
:
9. Virus and Spam Protection
9.1 Our virus and spam protection services are email
filtering
services and are only available
You didnt mention distribution, but on Debian, fwiw:
in the file /etc/default/rcS :
...
# Set UTC=yes if your system clock is set to UTC (GMT), and UTC=no if not.
UTC=no
Thanks Mike but it is redhat 7.3 Theonly rcs file is full of control
characters so I presume that is not it :-)
--
Yep ... Pacific Auckland ... see screen shot. It has been told I am not in GMT
time, that I am in thae pacific auckland time zone. I have it set to update
from a time server to correct any hardware slide.
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:12, you wrote:
Correct time zone
(Not an expert's answer)
PS
You might want to remove your Reply-to client email address setting, to
aid replies-to-list (post).
---BeginMessage---
Hi Shane,
I use RedHat too (9.0), but have struck no problem with time setting.
UTC must be off.
Sounds like the time server isn't helping. Better to correct manually
Zane Gilmore wrote:
Vik Olliver wrote:
Two things I can see coming of this:
1. Hardware that can be reprogrammed to run, amongst other things, Java
bytecode like the last 3 ARM CPUs.
2. The need for a Java bytecode Linux.
The what?
The *need*?
Why would someone put an Open and free operating
This was written for RH8 but I think it also works for RH9
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1890
-Original Message-
From: Michael Pearce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:20 a.m.
To: linux
Subject:Installing TT Fonts in RH9
Does
Oops, I forgot to say that I had it working in KDE and OO.org - But not in
the GIMP.
Any Ideas??
Mike.
--
Linux Rocks!!
Mike Beattie wrote:
Because the list is setting a Reply-To: address, but it will not overwrite a
Reply-To header written by a subscribed user. So, when you hit 'reply' on a
mail, and it goes to the user, it's because they've explicitly set a
Reply-To header.
Mike.
I have also been bitten by this
PITA - well spoken.
And I thought it was just me when I started this thread.
Robert
Never test the depth of the water with both feet.
-Original Message-
From: Zane Gilmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 1:02 p.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:36, you wrote:
PS
You might want to remove your Reply-to client email address setting, to
aid replies-to-list (post).
Ok ok ok :-)
Sigh ... I hate interacting with the outside world :-)
Here is an email that is hopefully in the correct time. after a bit of
Hi,
Shane Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 23:36, you wrote:
PS
You might want to remove your Reply-to client email address setting, to
aid replies-to-list (post).
Ok ok ok :-)
Sigh ... I hate interacting with the outside world :-)
Maybe but people can still reply to you AND the
You might want to remove your Reply-to client email address setting, to
aid replies-to-list (post).
Ok ok ok :-)
Sigh ... I hate interacting with the outside world :-)
Maybe but people can still reply to you AND the list, it is just a royal
PITA to do so with the reply to header
Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote:
PITA - well spoken.
While we are on the topic of reply-tos being a pain.
I find it annoying when someone starts a new topic
by replying to a completely unrelated message, and
then changing the subject line.
Why is this a pain, you may ask.
Any decent mail reader
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:51:43 +1200
Carl Cerecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No! If you start a new subject, compose a new message.
And no complaining about not remembering the clug list
email - that's what your address book is for.
good call
--
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:51, Carl Cerecke wrote:
No! If you start a new subject, compose a new message.
And no complaining about not remembering the clug list
email - that's what your address book is for.
True - but some topics simply evolve of their own nature... theres
nothing keeping a
took a look at your page. not sure that getting rid of parallel in
favour of usb is at all a bad thing! In my investgations recently both
scanners and printers seemed better supported in linux on usb than
parallel.
YMMV.
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:21:24 +1200
Rik Tindall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thx Nick,
Comment onboard.
Nick Rout wrote:
took a look at your page. not sure that getting rid of parallel in
favour of usb is at all a bad thing! In my investgations recently both
scanners and printers seemed better supported in linux on usb than
parallel.
YMMV.
Your Mileage May Vary
Does anyone know how to install True Type Fonts in RH9??? Easily!!
RH seems to have removed the KDE font installer, which made life easier.
I have followed the command line intructions as give by RH's documentation,
was not successful.
Any Ideas???
Mike.
--
Linux Rocks!!
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 12:44, Michael Pearce wrote:
Oops, I forgot to say that I had it working in KDE and OO.org - But not in
the GIMP.
Any Ideas??
I'm using RH9, gnome and gimp 1.3.18. I followed the instructions in the
link and the new fonts showed up straight away even without restarting
Hi there,
Anybody know of a utility which will help me to shrink a partition
with an xfs filesystem on it? There is a utility to make it bigger
but nothing to reduce the size.
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell
The problem is that the command histories are not
preserved. The .bash_history file contains the history
of whatever bash saved to it last before logout.
Yes, me too. :)
I use tcsh shell. The cwd is preserved, I expect this is done by konsole
as tcsh itself wouldn't have a clue about it
First less is rather clever at viewing (and saving) html files these days -
have you looked at or tried it for doing this?
Really? I don't use less, and a
less --help
Exit 1: No such file or directory
doesn't make it looke like I want to start either. The man page doesn't say
anything at
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 07:03:38PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
doesn't make it looke like I want to start either. The man page
doesn't say anything at all about rendering html. less 378+iso254.
That's because less doesn't render HTML.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
Hi there,
Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 16:45, you wrote:
Hi there,
I just did a samarital act by lending my Mandrake 9.1 install
disks to a guy who looks to install Linux onto his work system
to lower license costs to zero.
/. has the much same level of authority as talk-back
Hi there,
Joshua Collins wrote:
Chris Wilkinson wrote:
I run Alvaros MSN Messenger Client for Linux, so I can instant
message some friends around NZ and abroad. MS just emailed my
Hotmail address saying that I cannot use Messenger anymore until
I update it to a security fixed version!
I get the
Point taken (by me anyway)
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:51, Carl Cerecke wrote:
Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC) wrote:
PITA - well spoken.
While we are on the topic of reply-tos being a pain.
I find it annoying when someone starts a new topic
by replying to a completely unrelated message, and
Hehe! I tried to tell him that there will be little difference
between KDE on RH and KDE on MDK, but Windows-centric IT people
are a bit odd sometimes! RH on my laptop and MDK on my desktop
look fairly similar at a desktop level, but configuration apps
have different styles...other than that
I will always be a fan of trying to install the biggest, baddest, ugliest,
Jump-in-the-deep-end operating system. Hell, if I can get THAT (usually Debian for
it's complexity, or Slackware, for it's lack of anything helpful) to go, I can get any
damn thing to work...
After Debian 2.1 and 3,
I don't think there is any problem with continuing to use msn. I got a
mail to my hotmail account ages (in internet terms) ago from them saying
I had to upgrade. I still use amsn, gaim, kopete successfully. When I
logon I get a message from microsoft saying I nned an urgent security
update, if i
Just to leap into this discussion at an arbitrary point
Someone mentioned back in the thread about menu systems. I think that
one of the mostdifficult things for people in the windows mindset is the
very confusuing set of naming for *nix utlities, and the perpetuation of
those names in a
I couldn't agree more! I understand why people might like RH but I fail
to see what it has that Mandrake doesn't...OTOH, I can clearly see what
mandrake does that RH does not - namley GUI config tools that work well
- and intuitively.
Cheers
Jason
PS, most here know my RH sentiments already
I have been getting those warnings for yonks while using Gaim, it
hasn't prevented me connecting yet. I'd not bother worrying about it
until MS actually try and stop non MSN client connections.
My .0002c worth.
Cheers
J
Chris Wilkinson wrote:
Hi there,
Joshua Collins wrote:
Chris Wilkinson
Ken McAllister says: Mozilla and Konqueror at first sight I took to be
the addictive gorilla game and the
fire-rockets-off-the-top-of-the-screen-and-they-appear-at-the-bottom-of-the-screen
star wars game.
Programming and teaching in DOS, years ago, I tried to warn people
that silly names
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:03, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
This is impractical as it requires novices to configure Squid and run it
24/7.
Not really, The IPCop installs a Squid literally at the press of a key.
It would not be exactly intellectually taxing to alter the script so that the
Squid
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 10:57, Zane Gilmore wrote:
Vik Olliver wrote:
Two things I can see coming of this:
1. Hardware that can be reprogrammed to run, amongst other things, Java
bytecode like the last 3 ARM CPUs.
2. The need for a Java bytecode Linux.
The what?
Tha Jazelle module
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 23:39:30 +1200
Jason Greenwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been getting those warnings for yonks while using Gaim, it
hasn't prevented me connecting yet. I'd not bother worrying about it
until MS actually try and stop non MSN client connections.
My .0002c worth.
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
The problem is that the command histories are not
preserved. The .bash_history file contains the history
of whatever bash saved to it last before logout.
Yes, me too. :)
I use tcsh shell. The cwd is preserved, I expect this is done by konsole
as tcsh itself wouldn't have
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 08:41:16 +1200
Carl Cerecke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
I use tcsh shell.
No freaking way am I going back to tcsh :-)
Cheers,
Carl.
sick of distro wars, desktop wars, lets do shell wars :-)
--
Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Read more about this at
http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1061456252
Looks like non-msn users will be disconnected October15th.
Robert
Never test the depth of the water with both feet.
-Original Message-
From: Nick Rout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 2
Looks like the vote has been delayed.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/32614.html
--
I'm not worried about Artificial Intelligence, when they invent
Artificial Stupidiy, then I'll be scared.
I picked RedHat as my first distro simply because it was the first one to
come to my attention. I think that would be a symptom of the greater
penetration RedHat has/had.
Robert
Never test the depth of the water with both feet.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Greenwood [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:28:56AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
so long as the writers of the clone programs can still sniff network
packets between windows messenger and the server, it shouild be
possible to emulate the msn package.
Microsoft could require that certain small parts of the MSN
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 09:18:28 +1200
Matthew Gregan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:28:56AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
so long as the writers of the clone programs can still sniff network
packets between windows messenger and the server, it shouild be
possible to emulate
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:08:46AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
I use tcsh shell.
No freaking way am I going back to tcsh :-)
sick of distro wars, desktop wars, lets do shell wars :-)
ZSH!
(which was the first shell to have *native* extended completion (like
completing command options))
Mike.
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:29, Mike Beattie wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:08:46AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
I use tcsh shell.
No freaking way am I going back to tcsh :-)
sick of distro wars, desktop wars, lets do shell wars :-)
ZSH!
ssh - Super Shell, from Dublin in the mid 1980's ...
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Nick Rout wrote:
sick of distro wars, desktop wars, lets do shell wars :-)
Bash them.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818Fax +64 3 488 2875Mobile 025 267 9420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred.
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 05:51, you wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:03, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
This is impractical as it requires novices to configure Squid and run
it 24/7.
Not really, The IPCop installs a Squid literally at the press of a key.
It would not be exactly intellectually
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:53, Philip Charles wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Nick Rout wrote:
sick of distro wars, desktop wars, lets do shell wars :-)
Bash them.
Phil.
Phil... just sh!
Following on from the distro wars, anyone got any comments about the best
distro for a production server?
I'm soon going to be setting up a Linux server which marks the beginning of a
migration away from Win2K servers. The server will be used for file, print,
web, database, and groupware. I'm
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:52, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
covert
n 1: a flock of coots
-grin- describes the lot of us quite well I thought...
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:55, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Following on from the distro wars, anyone got any comments about the best
distro for a production server?
Anything that can automatically track at least security updates is
pretty much essential.
There's nothing worse than suddently waking
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 09:55, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 09:52, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
covert
n 1: a flock of coots
-grin- describes the lot of us quite well I thought...
:-)
Thanks for the laugh.
--
Sincerely etc.,
Christopher Sawtell
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 00:01, Ken McAllister wrote:
Ken McAllister says: Mozilla and Konqueror at first sight I took to be
the addictive gorilla game and the
fire-rockets-off-the-top-of-the-screen-and-they-appear-at-the-bottom-of-the
-screen star wars game.
LOL
That's exactly the reason why the
I was wondering about FreeBSD but have read about there being hardware
compatibility problems with some Dell machines ... not that I have to use
Dell. Perhaps my question should have been any hardware/distro combinations
recommended for a server?
Tom Munro Glass
Previously I've been happy
'urro..
If you want a 'low geek' server ie: easy(ish) install, hassle free(ish)
updates etc.. RedHat + RHN subscription is hard to beat.
If you don't mind a bit more fiddling Gentoo or Debian are good for
updates with Debian having a longer track record.
If this is for a medium to large
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:23, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Perhaps my question should have been any hardware/distro combinations
recommended for a server?
Well, generally you either go with whatever hardware is on hand, and
potentially adjust your OS choice to go with the hardware constraints,
or you
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:23, you wrote:
I was wondering about FreeBSD but have read about there being hardware
compatibility problems with some Dell machines ... not that I have to use
Dell. Perhaps my question should have been any hardware/distro
combinations recommended for a server?
As far
Hardware support is certainly a major consideration. I've had reasonable
support from Dell in the past, but I've heard that if you play around with
the operating system, their support suddenly vanishes. This is why I'm
thinking about buying Dell packaged with RH9, although I'm much more
This installation is for a very small network, but if it does everything
that's required I'm likely to get the job of introducing Linux servers into a
medium size company that currently has half a dozen NT4 servers and around 50
desktops.
Tom Munro Glass
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:28, Chris
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:13, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Hardware support is certainly a major consideration. I've had reasonable
support from Dell in the past, but I've heard that if you play around with
the operating system, their support suddenly vanishes. This is why I'm
thinking about
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:41:44 +1200
Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The differences between the
various distros are all in the installation method, and the methods used to set up,
stop
and start the daemons. There is also the aesthetic and cosmetic differences,
There is one
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:24, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
This installation is for a very small network, but if it does everything
that's required I'm likely to get the job of introducing Linux servers into a
medium size company that currently has half a dozen NT4 servers and around 50
desktops.
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/02/1237244.shtml?tid=123tid=99
nordi writes heise.de reports (in German) that SCO
Germany has to pay a fine of 10,000 Euros (~10,800
US$) because they kept on saying that Linux contains
stolen intellectual property of SCO. In May a German
court had decided that
Hi Chris,
I thought I might get a Gentoo vote from you ;-) Must admit that I'd probably
find Gentoo easiest to work with, but maybe it's time I was less one-eyed!
Thanks for the Scyld link - looks very useful.
Tom Munro Glass
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:41, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
Take care
We use RH here, but I'm not sure that I would recommend it unless you
are going to buy one of the Commercial versions.
RPM is OK at best and RH are quite slow at releasing version upgrades to
packages. They usually back-port security updates to an earlier version
of the application.
You can
YudA wrote:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/02/1237244.shtml?tid=123tid=99
nordi writes heise.de reports (in German) that SCO...
Grumble time...
Not only is it offtopic, but instead of composing a new message, you hit
reply to Jim's Re: Distro for a server email. So a threaded email
Trying to unsubscribe, I receive,
Error in the command: =unsubscribe%20linux-users
Command verb must be a symbol: =
Use the HELP command to get a list of legal MAILSERV commands.
Herb Petrie.
The other option is Mandrake ;) Updates are free and are kept up with
welleasy to update via urpmi too.
Cheers
Jason
John Blance wrote:
We use RH here, but I'm not sure that I would recommend it unless you
are going to buy one of the Commercial versions.
RPM is OK at best and RH are quite
mild rant..
RPM hell on a server? If you're running a business on a box you
shouldn't be installing any rpm's that didn't come from the distro
provider, and, ergo, rpm hell should not occur.
We have 8 RedHat servers at work with a corporate RHN subscription, they
operate as FilePrint, Firewall,
Yes, the larger installation will be very remote - in England!
Downloading updates won't be a problem, but rpm hell might be! I've only had a
few hours playing with RH9, so I've yet to encounter that particular torture.
I don't mind command-line admin providing I know how to drive the
Getting slightly OT, but could you suggest some reputable local hardware
suppliers? I've built my own PCs in the past but in recent years I've found
it hard to match the price of suppliers such as Dell, especially for servers.
Tom
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:29, Jim Cheetham wrote:
I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Good advice about the processor/disk speed Jim. I will definitely be using
SCSI and would like to use raid but it's too expensive.
If you want to do RAID on the cheap, get SCSI and use the Linux kernel's
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:13, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Yes, the larger installation will be very remote - in England!
That shouldn't put you off, I co-admin a bunch of FreeBSD machines in
the UK, only 300ms away over 23 hops ...
I use screen on the remote box, so I can ssh in and restore the
There is one other very big difference: update mechanisms. IMHO one of
the most important differences is the update (security or otherwise)
mechanism. (you did touch on this later in your email). rpm hell is to
be avoided.
Nonsense. I run SuSE server(s), the update mechanism is excellent and
bash is able to have a separate history file for each invocation.
Yuck, why would I want that for? Next time I might log in via VT100 and
ssh - oops, no history. Using any of the other gazillion X-terminals -
oops, no history. Doesn't cut it. The shell needs to be able to merge
the histories,
%20 is geek for a space, send the message with unsubscribe linux-users
in the body. not unsubscribe%20linux-users
its not always translated correctly when you just click on the mailto
link.
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 11:58:12 +1200
Herb Petrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to unsubscribe, I
Many thanks for the tip about screen. I'd never heard of it but it looks
incredibly useful. I've just emerged it on my Gentoo machine, and see it's
already available in RH9 I stuck on a test machine in England.
This gets my vote for Tip Of The Day!
Tom
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:35, Jim Cheetham
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:58, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Nonsense. I run SuSE server(s), the update mechanism is excellent and
free. rpm hell? You must have misunderstood something. It never
happened to me. On my desktop, I can tick automatic, and each time I
log in (or I click a little con in the
fair comment i didn't express myself well.
I have RH 7.3 with some non-redhat rpm's, because at the time I
installed them redhat did not have, for example, a properly working
cyrus-imap daemon, or a properly working spamassassin. Now I'm finding
that if I want to update either I will probably
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:58:09 +1200
Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is one other very big difference: update mechanisms. IMHO one of
the most important differences is the update (security or otherwise)
mechanism. (you did touch on this later in your email). rpm hell is to
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:22:42 +1200
Tom Munro Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for the tip about screen. I'd never heard of it but it looks
incredibly useful. I've just emerged it on my Gentoo machine, and see it's
already available in RH9 I stuck on a test machine in England.
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:22, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Many thanks for the tip about screen. I'd never heard of it but it looks
incredibly useful. I've just emerged it on my Gentoo machine, and see it's
already available in RH9 I stuck on a test machine in England.
This gets my vote for Tip
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:22, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:58, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Nonsense. I run SuSE server(s), the update mechanism is excellent and
free. rpm hell? You must have misunderstood something. It never
happened to me. On my desktop, I can tick automatic, and each time
Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
bash is able to have a separate history file for each invocation.
Yuck, why would I want that for? Next time I might log in via VT100 and
ssh - oops, no history. Using any of the other gazillion X-terminals -
oops, no history. Doesn't cut it. The shell needs to be able to
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:46:46 +1200
Jim Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before you get too used to screen, you may want to consider remapping
the default C-a command string with something else, if you're in the
habit of using C-a for emacs-binding beginning-of-line in either your
editors or
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:56:13PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
None the less, a Gentoo install would allow you to have the command:-
emerge --update world
Last time I ran that it hosed a box. Not very impressive.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 13:56, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:22, you wrote:
The server-relevant point here is that this update process must be
completely automatic - i.e. not waiting for a user to log on to a
graphical desktop.
You must be overflowing with trust in your
Thanks Nick. Yet more information to try and remember!
Tom
usefule article here on screen
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6340
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 14:35, you wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:56:13PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
None the less, a Gentoo install would allow you to have the command:-
emerge --update world
Last time I ran that it hosed a box. Not very impressive.
That's the knid of reason I'm not
Has anyone made procmail rules to catch all these annoying virus
notifcations? Can I have a copy please - faster than starting right from
scratch.
Thanks,
Volker
--
Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header
http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do
unsubscribe linux-users
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:17:02PM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
Has anyone made procmail rules to catch all these annoying virus
notifcations? Can I have a copy please - faster than starting right
from scratch.
I'm using:
:0
$MAILDIR/junk.virus/
But the false positive rate is fairly high...
just use linux!
most things that run on BSD are in linux-
or get both and thrash them, the one that survives is obviously the right choice.
--- Tom Munro Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering about FreeBSD but have read about there being hardware
compatibility problems with some Dell
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 15:17, you wrote:
Has anyone made procmail rules to catch all these annoying virus
notifcations? Can I have a copy please - faster than starting right from
scratch.
:0fw
| /usr/local/bin/spamoracle mark
:0
* ^X-Spam: yes;
spam
:0
*
Good question. Why is everyone using RH when you have a better distro
like SuSE.
RH is starting to smell like MS. The same technique/template as MS re:
Marketing, Certification etc. not to mention the costs. The
Certification costs are as bad as MCSE.
Besides, SuSE is the oldest, most stable
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 14:14, you wrote:
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 13:46:46 +1200
Jim Cheetham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before you get too used to screen, you may want to consider remapping
the default C-a command string with something else, if you're in the
habit of using C-a for emacs-binding
On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 16:11:21 +1200
Christopher Sawtell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dont' forget vigor
http://vigor.sourceforge.net/screenshots/
LMFAO, we've had tip of the day: vigor is laugh of the week!
Interesting concept - but does seem to aim at spam filtering, not virus
notification filtering. What I'm trying to get rid of are all these
emails of people telling me a msg someone else sent contained a virus,
plus associated rubbish like delivery failure notices because someone
else didn't
98 matches
Mail list logo
