On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:00:07AM -0500, Jeremy Nelson wrote:
The new math parser was first written about 7 years ago and hasn't had
any significant changes for 2 years, despite rather signficant use by
several scripts. So it's stable.
It hasn't been turned on by default because it's not
I have had the new math parser enabled in two of my scripts for quite a while
now, and I have not had a single user complain about any sudden bugs. My vote
is to enable it by default.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 08:00:07AM -0500, Jeremy Nelson wrote:
The new math parser was first written about 7
Purely out of curiousity: is this new parser libgmp? If not, have you
considered using libgmp? Hell, I don't even know what libgmp really
does, other than act as some IEEE-oriented math library... ;-)
Food for thought. And I hate math, by the way.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 07:21 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Purely out of curiousity: is this new parser libgmp? If not, have you
considered using libgmp? Hell, I don't even know what libgmp really
does, other than act as some IEEE-oriented math library... ;-)
libgmp does math, not math