Hello. In response to Nicko's reply to my first post on the log4net
list:
http://tinyurl.com/a24cc
http://www.mail-archive.com/log4net-user%40logging.apache.org/msg00886.html
I've written a collection of PatternConverter classes to make log4net
play nicely with Asp.Net. They allow for properties
If the connectionString property accepts a PatterString (do all
properties on all the built-in appenders accept PatternString?), you
could extend PatternConverter and expose all the values in AppSettings:
public class AppSettingsPatternConverter : PatternConverter
{
override protected void
I noticed this file has been coming soon for several months. I recall
seeing a road map when 1.2.0 beta 8 was on the website. Any word future
features or things that still need to be done?
I think the filter would be more useful if it dealt with the
LocationInfo object instead of just the ClassName:
filter type=LocationInfoStringMatchFilter
stringToMatch locationInfoProperty=ClassName value=Foo /
/filter
filter type=LocationInfoStringMatchFilter
stringToMatch
Have you seen this:
http://tinyurl.com/dedeu
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4net/extensions/net/1.0/log4net.Ext.EventID/cs/src/
You could use that or extend ILog and make your own interface.
--- Gargus, Javan (GE Infrastructure) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Currently, the
to the log4net core to
implement. We may also need to coordinate our implementation with
other
log4x projects.
Thoughts?
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 June 2005 18:02
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: http
: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 5:54 AM
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: RE: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/roadmap.html
According to the issue tracker:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET
there are about 24 open issues. You could take a look
I think more people could help you if you post questions like this to
the log4net-user list.
--- Piyush Arya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue: My log4net configuration needs to be specified in a config
other than my app.config. This, however is not happening.
LoggingEvent.cs contains this code:
public string RenderedMessage
{
get
{
if (m_data.Message == null)
{
if (m_message == null)
{
m_data.Message = ;
}
else if (m_message is string)
{
m_data.Message = (m_message as string);
}
else if (m_repository != null)
}
by the user.
However
the performance gain of doing the early test benefits about 99.999%
of
users.
If you want to use a renderer then you need to pass in a custom
object
to the ILog.Debug() methods rather than a string.
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto
I don't know why I didn't think of this sooner...if you have groups of
related converters that you'd like to register the amount of additional
xml nodes makes for some ugly xml:
layout type=log4net.Layout.PatternLayout
converter
name value=aspnet-response /
type
As you've probably come to realize, the Logging Services Project isn't
always the fastest moving group :-) Here's my thoughts on the matter...
Is it possible to create some sort of commons-logging plugin that uses
J#/log4net internally? I got bad vibes from seeing the log4j constants
redifined in
I live in the EST timezone (Eastern Standard Time, UTC - 4 hours). I'm
developing an application that is hosted by a 3rd party hosting company
in the MST timezone (Mountain Standard Time, UTC - 6 hours). I want the
timestamps in the log file to be in my timezone. I'm not a timezone
expert but
The ${foo} notation searches the environment for a key and uses its
value. I wonder if it would be useful to introduce the idea of a local
environment that would allow locally scoped temporary environment
variables:
log4net
localEnvironment name=LOG4NET_PATH value=c:\logs\staging /
Classes that extend PatternConverter expose the value passed into the
pattern:
%foo{valuePassedIntoThePattern}
as a property called Option. If someone wants to pass in more than one
value they are responsible for parsing the string using their own
delimiters:
I've heard people complain that log4net is too difficult to setup...
Perhaps we could add a new configurator that would setup a very basic
log4net environment that uses a single FileAppender and just the root
logger. The values would be settable via add nodes:
appSettings
add
true/false would be a good start but people would ask what failed:
// ???
if (log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator.Configure() == false)
{
processLog4netConfigError(log4net.Config.ConfigException);
}
What's the right thing to do with a log4net config error? Write the
message to
Have you tried %n and/or %newline ?
--- Secules, Christopher T [AMSRD-AAR-AEF-A]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know you can identify newlines in the header and footer of the
config file
by specifying \r\n. I'm trying to figure out how to specify
newlines in
the actual log statements. I can
:
log.Debug(%newline%newlineGun Level: Value %newline%newline)
Result:
2005-10-21 13:15:54,482 [DEBUG] COMPONENT v2.1 - %newline%newlineGun
Level:
32000%newline%newline
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 1:03 PM
I understand what you want to do now. I didn't look at this line
closley enough:
log.Debug(%newline%newlineGun Level: Value %newline%newline)
That's not how log4net works. Patterns are evaulated once at start up
and cannot be dynmically inserted into a message. What do you expect to
happen
At first glance I thought this was a typo. I wish there was a more
AppSettings-ish way to express these properties. The value value= /
node looks weird. I understand why it is the way it is.
--- Nicko Cadell (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
property
key value=PropertyName /
value
use an
appSetting,
say log4net.NullText.
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 November 2005 06:08
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: constant for (null)
Nicko, I think it would helpful to have a constant for when
calling
XmlConfigurator.Configure, but actually creating the Appenders and
Loggers programmatically). I will outline these ideas soon, I'm not
sure
how much pain this would cause our users.
Cheers,
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
the LOG4NET-XX are all hyperlinked to the appropriate bugs.
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 November 2005 03:33
To: Log4NET Dev
Subject: Re: svn commit: r331170 - in /logging/log4net: ./ trunk/
Neat! Did you use the -R (set
enough in the tree to get the trunk.
--
Cory J Trese
Development: http://polydevmono.blogspot.com/
Personal:http://digital2noise.blogspot.com/
On 11/6/05, Ron Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neat! Did you use the -R (set recursively
(I can take care of the bounce myself)
When I was writing this the 2005-08-24T12:00:00.000+01:00 format didn't
jump out to me as coming from XmlConvert.ToString. I kept looking for a {0:s}
related format. Maybe its a good idea to add a static XmlLayout.ToString to
allow outsiders (test
Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2005 19:46
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: PatternLayoutTest sometimes passes, sometimes fails
Is there any particular reason why we're still using the
depreciated Assertion class in the unit tests?
No good
on the nunit.framework.dll (still using
2.1.4.0) I will try upgrading to the latest version 2.2.3.0 and testing
again.
Do you want to go through the tests and update them to use the non
deprecated APIs, or do you want me to do that?
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL
I don't think HttpContext is always available...especially inside the
Global.asax.cs methods and/or inside CacheItemRemovedCallback methods.
According to this article:
http://www.odetocode.com/Articles/112.aspx
HttpContext is just a wrapper around
System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.CallContext.
If there's a global isWeb setting, you wouldn't be able to easily
tell certain loggers (i.e. a certain namespaces) to use CallContext.
What about setting the LogicalThreadContext's storage at the logger
level?
root
level value=ALL /
appender-ref ref=FileAppender /
Is NAnt 0.85rc3 the recommended NAnt version to build things? build.cmd
compiled everything ok but this failed:
C:\Projects\log4net\xdocsnant /f:build.xml
NAnt 0.85 (Build 0.85.1932.0; rc3; 4/16/2005)
Copyright (C) 2001-2005 Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sourceforge.net
Buildfile:
Log4net doesn't have its own run-time parsing engine for the *Format
methods; it just calls through to String.Format. If the format string
and parameters you're generating aren't compatible with String.Format
then you'll get unexpected results. For example, this will not include
Morten in the
--- Cliff Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By fail-stop, we mean that log4net will not throw unexpected
exceptions at run-time potentially causing your application to crash.
The documentation for String.Format says that if the format is invalid
or the number indicating an argument to format is
+1
--- Niall Daley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--
Niall Daley
Log4net Dev
I noticed this snippet of code:
log.DebugFormat(Hello {0}{1, World);
is correctly caught as containing an invalid format string. This is
part of the error message:
log4net.ErrorException during StringFormat: Input string was not in a
correct format. formatHello
}{1
args: World
But to do this in a valid way we would probably need to encode
newlines.
Users may be less confused by this non XML looking form.
What do you think?
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 April 2006 01:31
Is it just the FileAppender? What happens when you use a
ConsoleAppender? Have you tried setting the encoding property on the
FileAppender:
http://tinyurl.com/k8npm
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Appender.FileAppender.Encoding.html
appender name=FileAppender
Minor changes like this may help:
if (connectionTypeIsCloneable)
{
return (IDbConnection) ((ICloneable)connectionType).Clone();
}
else
{
return (IDbConnection) Activator.CreateInstance(connectionType);
}
but its difficult to know without profiling the code. Can you assemble
a few
I'm having a hard time following what's going on. Having you tried
turning on log4net's internal debugging to verify that the repository
is getting created correctly (i.e. log4net is isn't shutting down once
one of the other components is initializes)?
--- Secules, Christopher T [AMSRD-AAR-AEF-A]
The .snk file has been part the iBATIS for .NET distribution for a long
time. I don't think anyone commented when it was checked in. iBATIS
usually defers all of its Apache matters to Ted Husted :) I've included
him on this reply. Ted, this is the start of the thread:
http://tinyurl.com/kj2rd
Its my understanding that the .snk file for log4net 1.2.9 has been
misplaced and that's its not possible to get a build of 1.2.10 with the
1.2.9 key.
--- Cliff Burger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To solve my practical problem -- which I'm sure many other people
have:
Can someone make available
.
Cheers,
Nicko
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2006 19:40
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: AppenderSkeleton.DoAppender calls lock(this) while
some IAppender examples do not
Nicko, AppenderSkeleton's
I'll be there!
- Original Message
From: Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET Dev log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 2:49:05 PM
Subject: Fwd: ApacheCON US 2006
Sorry to leave you out of my once yearly cross-post.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Curt
It was my understanding that there was a requirement that there be at least 4
committers on an incubating project before it could graduate from the
incubator. I was the 4th committer.
I think most people would agree that log4net has been considered quite stable
for a number of years.
-
I was looking through some old files on my system (from 12/2005) and came
across a modified PatternConverter.cs on my local system were I had overloaded
the WriteDictionary method to accept an IDictionaryEnumerator. The IDictionary
overload forwarded to the IDictionaryEnumerator version:
For the console requirement a good starting point would be to use the
appender's threshold property to make it record warning level or higher
messages:
appender name=ConsoleAppender type=log4net.Appender.ConsoleAppender
threshold value=WARN/
!-- other properties --
/appender
One way to
with the
implementation of filters.
What is the best solution?
-Original Message-
From: Ron Grabowski (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 12/20/2006 11:15 PM
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (LOG4NET-108) [PATCH] add support for multiple
evaluators
();
timer.Interval = Interval;
timer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(timer_Elapsed);
timer.Start();
}
}
- Original Message
From: Ron Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2006 1:54:21 PM
Subject: Re
Have you looked at MessageObjectExpanderAppender?
http://tinyurl.com/3dnnf3
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/trunk/examples/net/1.0/Appenders/SampleAppendersApp/cs/src/Appender/MessageObjectExpanderAppender.cs?view=markup
Its a forwarding appender that extracts all the public
I sent the necessary information to Curt about my key. I saw him in person at
the last ApacheCon so he verified I'm who I say I am :-) What information about
my key do other people need? Is this good enough:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x74295265
- Original Message
Open up just one log file and inspect it or one log message and inspect that?
Could you write an Appender that keeps the last N messages in memory then
inspect those messages during testing?
- Original Message
From: Ayende Rahien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
I recall seeing some numbers from a long time ago showing that the async code
in NLog is faster than the AsyncAppender. You may want to investigate that. I
think there are test cases showing the speed of the log4net AsyncAppender vs.
the NLog appender in the NLog distribution. I haven't run
Have you looked at XmlLayoutSchemaLog4j? That defines a custom XML layout.
Perhaps you could use a similiar strategy for creating an RSS-friendly XML
layout.
- Original Message
From: raj1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 1:21:09 PM
On my machine the environment variable HOMEPATH seems to always point to my
home directory. Perhaps you could use that to create the path:
Dim location As String
= ${HOMEPATH}\APPLICATION\Log\log.txt
log4net will replace ${HOMEPATH} with the appropriate environment variable. You
can also
Only the mono compiler caught that warning. The nant builds for .NET 1.0 and
2.0 didn't report any warnings.
There's no particular reason why I marked it as virtual other than the other
implemented members of the class are virtual. I understand your point about the
virtual Format method
Those look like the only crypto usages.
I started hacking away at some long standing JIRA issues at the end of
December. The mailing lists seem to be slightly more active the past couple
months.
- Original Message
From: Curt Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET Dev
How do you fire using normal WMI code when the application is run in non-admin
mode?
- Original Message
From: Andreas Brauchli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:21:51 AM
Subject: WMI-Appender question
I am experimenting with the WMI
I think you have to use the supplied WmiInstaller class:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/05/09/WMI/
- Original Message
From: Ron Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4NET Dev log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:17:14 PM
Subject: Re: WMI-Appender
Set the level of the root logger to DEBUG then use LevelFilters to control the
level of messages that go into each of the FileAppenders.
- Original Message
From: Raghunandan S [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:30:16 AM
Subject:
, but these will only come in
when the log4net-app. Is run with administrative priviledges.
Thanks,
andreas
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Ron Grabowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008 02:17
An: Log4NET Dev
Betreff: Re: WMI-Appender question
How do you fire using normal
Configure your mail server such that log4net emails are not recognized as spam.
- Original Message
From: aus1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:43:47 AM
Subject: Preventing recognize log4net as spam
Hello everybody i have client
What do log4net's internal debug logs say?
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/faq.html
- Original Message
From: rockom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:44:31 AM
Subject: AdoAppender WIth Oracle
Hi,
i am trying to use this
elegant way to prevent it.
thanks alot
Ron Grabowski wrote:
Configure your mail server such that log4net emails are not recognized as
spam.
- Original Message
From: aus1977 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:43:47 AM
Subject
Is anyone facing this issue as well ? How come I was able to run smoothly
without any errors in VS2003 but not with VS2008 ?
Chee Hong
Ron Grabowski wrote:
If the exception message mentioned your app.config being malform perhaps
you should use a well formed app.config. This is incorrect
Log4net doesn't track that information. Can you store that information on your
own in a static variable?
- Original Message
From: lilalfyalien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 6:47:54 AM
Subject: How to find where log4net is
Thank you for looking into this. I'll review your comments. The best thing to
do would be to create and upload a patch on Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET
- Original Message
From: Iyer, Devan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Use a Timer?
// untested
public class AutoFlushSmtpAppender : SmtpAppender
{
private System.Timers.Timer timer;
private int interval;
/// summary
/// Flush interval in milliseconds.
/// /summary
public int Interval
{
get { return interval; }
set {
3.5 can run assemblies all the way back to 1.0. The most recent release run
fine under .NET 3.5.
- Original Message
From: dipankaronline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 9:46:39 AM
Subject: log4net support for .NET framework 3.5
I
You're using a RollingFileAppender but you're telling the root logger to use a
ConsoleAppender. Change the code to this:
appender-ref ref=RollingFileAppender /
From: Henry Padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 14,
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Layout.PatternLayout.html
From: Henry Padilla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 1:07:20 PM
Subject: conversionPattern parameters
Where can I find a list
You'd have to do something like include the process id (or other unique
identifier) in the file name for each instance.
- Original Message
From: Rob1234 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 8:54:40 AM
Subject: Create new log file each
You might be able to take some code from this example:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-user/200804.mbox/%3c658979.41804...@web80002.mail.sp1.yahoo.com%3e
- Original Message
From: herman404 herman@wachovia.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent:
;
}
public DateTime Now
{
get { return cachedDateTime; }
}
}
}
NLog uses this clever trick to optmize calls to DateTime.Now. I'm pretty sure
log4net uses a similiar trick with the %date formatter.
- Original Message
From: Ron Grabowski (JIRA) j
The static constructor on LogManager calls ShutDown in the AppDomain's
ProcessExit and DomainUnload:
// ProcessExit seems to be fired if we are part of the default domain
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.ProcessExit += new EventHandler(OnProcessExit);
// Otherwise DomainUnload is fired
The best place to put your code would be on a new JIRA ticket and make sure to
grant the ok to include into a ASF project.
I've been thinking about a feature like this but I wanted to get the remaining
tickets for the next version closed out (before 4.0 comes out!!!). My original
plan was to
When you run your program as a normal user can you write to the EventLog
without using log4net?
- Original Message
From: rodchar rodc...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:45:22 PM
Subject: log4net event logging appender
The simplest solution is to use a logger per class instead of one shared logger.
- Original Message
From: rodchar rodc...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:54:25 AM
Subject: log definition is in my pagebase
Hi all,
i have a pagebase
Log4net doesn't have anything built-in to support that. One strategy might be
to keep the logger / at DEBUG and set the appender /'s threshold to WARN.
If the number of warnings overflows some allowable level, you could change that
appender /'s threshold to INFO for a certain amount of time
The following examples are only available in the log4net release download, not
on-line. To obtain the examples download one of the log4net releases.
- Original Message
From: Johan Compen joh...@gmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:38:03 AM
This should be fixed. I forgot to commit the StackTracePatternConverter.cs file.
- Original Message
From: carn...@apache.org carn...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 7:49:41 PM
Subject: [g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4net (in module
I replaced the string.IsNullOrEmpty call with Length != 0 in
StackTracePatternConverter.cs
- Original Message
From: carn...@apache.org carn...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 3:55:29 AM
Subject: [g...@vmgump]: Project logging-log4net (in module
,
Omer Mor (omer@gmail.com)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Omer Mor omer@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer debugging the situation live.
Is it so hard to re-compile 1.2.10 with pdb? It's just a matter of a slight
tweak in the project settings.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Ron Grabowski
Hi Eike, I received your email. The best thing to do is comment, vote, or write
patches for these items for the 1.2.11 release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=10690fixfor=12310980
If you think
You should be able to build both from their respective trunks then reference
your build where appropriate?
From: Preet Sangha preet.san...@aderant.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Sun, December 13, 2009 5:28:09 PM
I just read that nant has a new release candidate out that supports .NET 4.0.
Someone may want to try running that against the code base as that's how the
final releases are built.
- Original Message
From: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
To: Log4NET Dev
years ago...
before any major refactor is done to require .net 2.0 can a new
release be made, there is a lot of stuff in trunk that would heal some
pain.
cheers.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Ron Grabowski rongrabow...@yahoo.com wrote:
Its not dead. I read the mailing list every day
10 programs writing to the same file? That's a lot. RollingFileAppender isn't
process-safe.
From: kinnar (JIRA) j...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 9:45 AM
Subject: [jira] Created: (LOG4NET-285) Issue with rolling
https://github.com/lorenzomelato/rhino-commons/blob/master/Rhino.Commons/Logging/AsyncBulkInsertAppender.cs
- Original Message -
From: anjansingh mailan...@hotmail.com
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 5:09 AM
Subject: RE: Log4net Asynchronous Logging
Ummm, what does TabbedOutput look like?
From: mc_line mc_line_...@yahoo.com.mx
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 1:18 PM
Subject: System.FormatException: Index (zero based) must be greater than or
equal to zero
Hi I keep getting
I still use log4net every day across several large projects and check the
mailing lists several times a week. All my stuff is still on 3.5 still so I
haven't been hit by any of the 4.0 issues. I don't know how much a new release
targeting just 1.1, 2.0, and 3.5 would benefit people right
Is your .NET 4 support just in the NAnt scripts? It's probably safe to replace
the VS2008 solution file with a VS2010 version.
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:14 AM
Subject: State of
New key? I think I Nicko sent me the current assembly keya long time ago.
People always complain when keys change
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2011 12:26 AM
Subject: Distribution Formats
The signature changes from void to ICollection shouldn't break anything. Now
the configurators return a list of configuration messages. I suppose it should
return an array of a certain type instead of just ICollection. Maybe something
like ConfigurationMessage[] or LogLog[]. I lean more
I don't have any hard numbers but the last time I played around with
MinimalLock it was very very slow. I view InterProcessLock as an intermediary
between exclusive and minimal locking.
From: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
To: 'Log4NET Dev'
Can you share a config snippet showing how to use the RemotingAppender like
you've described?
What happens when one of the apps goes down? I envision the InterProcessLock as
a locking model used between two low/medium chatty apps that want to write to
the same file that may or may not be
+1
From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org; log4net-u...@logging.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:41 PM
Subject: Dropping Support for .NET CF 1.0 and SSCLI 1.0 in log4net 1.2.11
Hi all,
sorry for the cross-post
Project: Log4net
Issue Type: Wish
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 1.2.10
Reporter: Ron Grabowski
Assignee: Ron Grabowski
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.2.11
It would be nice if there were built-in Pattern Converters to support
Anyone know why there are extended chars in most of the log4net ndoc files? For
example this page has empty-blocks in IE9 and triangle-question-marks in
Firefox:
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Appender.BufferingAppenderSkeleton.Evaluator.html
Does anyone know who owns the log4net nuget package?
http://nuget.org/packages/log4net
http://blog.cincura.net/232619-log4net-back-alive-on-nuget/
We're the 6th most populate package on nuget! Can someone explain what it would
take to get the nuget package files into our svn repository?
The converter is trying to protect itself...the base class checks to make sure
HttpContext.Current is not null then a check against Request is made:
// AspNetRequestPatternConverter
protected override void Convert(TextWriter writer, LoggingEvent loggingEvent,
HttpContext httpContext)
{
if
1 - 100 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
