Roberto Leiva M. wrote:
Breshears Doug P wrote:
No, you pretty much ignore LTSP when setting up LDAP logins.
You need to install an LDAP server (OpenLDAP) and the pam libraries to
talk to the LDAP backend.
You also need to set up nsswitch libs and in the end probably nscd(Name
Server Caching
On Monday 22 August 2005 18:37, Jim McQuillan wrote:
Michael,
We are indeed working on a much better solution to the whole issue of
local drives, including USB and built-in floppy and cdrom drives.
If you could take the time to update the LocalMedia wiki page with
information about your
On Saturday 20 of August 2005 21:43, Piotr Sobolewski wrote:
Hi,
I just install an X terminal at my home. The server is Debian, 1 GHz, 256
MB RAM. The terminal is 60 MHz, 32 MB RAM. After installation I had
problems with making X server (on terminal) work (you know, normal problems
with
Has anyone tried putting together a MueKow environment
for Redhat Enterprise Linux? I'm running LTSP 4.1.1 right now
and I'm working on moving the execution of at least Firefox
off of the server and onto our clients. We have about 30 terminals
that we bought from disklessworkstations.com
Hi all,
Another problem that I encounter is that dosemu takes 99% of cpu for each of
it's instances. This becomes a performance problem in my LTSP configuration,
where all the work is on the server. The dos program becomes very slow.
Is it normal that dosemu takes 99% of cpu? Anyone has
Fajar,
I have this problem in certain cases with the foxpro app that I run.
It is only in rare and temporary cases, so I have not tried to fix it.
However, there is a dosemu setting that you can change to control how
much cpu it uses. Look for $_hogthreshold in dosemurc.
bob
On 8/25/05, Fajar
On Friday 26 August 2005 05:29, bob greatguy wrote:
Fajar,
I have this problem in certain cases with the foxpro app that I run.
It is only in rare and temporary cases, so I have not tried to fix it.
However, there is a dosemu setting that you can change to control how
much cpu it uses. Look
Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Another problem that I encounter is that dosemu takes 99% of cpu for each of
it's instances. This becomes a performance problem in my LTSP configuration,
where all the work is on the server. The dos program becomes very slow.
Is it normal that dosemu takes 99%
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 26/08/2005 at 05:21 Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Hi all,
Another problem that I encounter is that dosemu takes 99% of cpu for each
of it's instances. This becomes a performance problem in my LTSP
configuration, where all the work is on the server. The dos
hi,
$_hogtreshold doesn't seem do much different, because default setting
already set to 0 (nicest).
i suppose dosemu should be run as local apps, but anyone had tried this?
thanks
kemas
- Original Message -
From: Harry Sufehmi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ltsp-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
On Friday 26 August 2005 11:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone tried putting together a MueKow environment
for Redhat Enterprise Linux? I'm running LTSP 4.1.1 right now
and I'm working on moving the execution of at least Firefox
off of the server and onto our clients. We have
11 matches
Mail list logo
